Showing posts with label Indian Economy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Indian Economy. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 11, 2025

The Indian economy – disconnect in growth statistics

 While the 7.4% GDP growth number for 4QFY25, and claims of continuing strong growth momentum in April 2025 are encouraging, the RBI assessment of FY26 growth and aggressive policy stance raise some doubts. A careful analysis of the GDP data released by the NSO also leaves some doubts about the consistency and sustainability of the 4QFY25 growth numbers.

Many economists have noted discrepancies and incongruencies in the data, as well as comparisons with other economic indicators and external analyses.

For example, I found the following noteworthy.

Discrepancy Between GDP and GVA Growth Rates

In Q4 FY25, GDP growth is 7.4%, while GVA growth is 6.8%. The divergence between GDP and GVA growth rates is notable, as GDP includes net taxes (taxes minus subsidies), which can distort the picture of underlying economic activity captured by GVA.

The gap suggests that tax revenues or subsidy adjustments may have inflated GDP growth relative to GVA. For instance, higher GST collections or reduced subsidies might have boosted GDP figures without reflecting proportional growth in actual economic output. This discrepancy raises questions about the sustainability of growth driven by fiscal adjustments rather than core sectoral performance.

As per Systematix research, “Recent robust GST collections have been interpreted as evidence of strong economic growth, supporting the 4QFY25 real GDP growth of 7.4%. However, this narrative contrasts with on-ground economic indicators suggesting a demand slowdown. Our analysis reveals that rising GST collections stem not from stronger economic growth but from increased indirect tax incidence in a slowing economy. This trend aligns with the government’s pro-cyclical fiscal tightening framework over recent years. We estimate an excess tax collection of INR 2.9 trillion over the past two years (2QFY24–1QFY26E), which has elevated the net indirect tax burden on Indian households to a historical peak. This has suppressed household spending power, exacerbating the lack of real income growth.”

Q2 FY25 Growth Slowdown vs. Q4 Recovery

2QFY25 reported a seven-quarter low GDP growth of 5.4%. 1QFY25 growth slowdown could be explained by the spending restrictions due to the imposition of the model code of conduct during the general elections (March-June 2025). Logically, 2QFY25 should have witnessed excessive government spending due to spillover effects from the previous quarter.

The rapid recovery from 5.4% in Q2 to 7.4% in Q4 appears inconsistent with the broader FY25 growth of 6.5%, suggesting uneven economic momentum. The low Q2 growth was attributed to reduced government spending and weak private investment, but the factors driving the Q4 rebound (e.g., manufacturing and construction) are not fully explained in the press release.

Sectoral Growth Inconsistencies

Agriculture (3.8% in FY25)

The agriculture sector’s growth improved significantly from 1.4% in FY24 to 3.8% in FY25, attributed to a good monsoon. However, this contrasts with reports of uneven monsoon distribution and challenges like low reservoir levels in some regions, which could have limited agricultural output in certain areas.

The uniform 3.8% growth figure may mask regional variations or overstate the sector’s recovery, especially since agricultural income growth (e.g., farm wages) has not kept pace, as noted in some external analyses.

Manufacturing (5.0% in FY25)

Manufacturing growth slowed sharply from 9.9% in FY24 to 5.0% in FY25, yet Q4 FY25 GDP growth (7.4%) suggests a manufacturing rebound. This is inconsistent with high-frequency indicators like the Index of Industrial Production (IIP), which showed subdued industrial activity in most parts of FY25.

The slowdown aligns with high input costs and weak export demand, but the Q4 recovery lacks detailed sectoral data to confirm whether manufacturing truly drove the uptick or if other factors (e.g., statistical adjustments) played a role.

Construction (9.4% in FY25)

Construction grew at 9.4%, down slightly from 10.4% in FY24, yet government capital expenditure reportedly slowed in FY25. This raises questions about the source of growth, as public infrastructure spending is a key driver of construction.

Private sector construction (e.g., real estate) may have contributed, but the press release does not disaggregate public vs. private contributions, creating ambiguity.

Expenditure-Side Discrepancies

Private Final Consumption Expenditure (PFCE) grew at 7.2% in FY25 (up from 5.6% in FY24), indicating strong household spending. However, this contrasts with external reports of weak rural demand and urban consumption slowdowns, particularly in discretionary goods (e.g., automobiles, FMCG).

The robust PFCE growth may be driven by urban or high-income consumption, but the lack of granular data obscures whether this reflects broad-based demand or is skewed by specific segments.

Government Final Consumption Expenditure (GFCE) growth slowed to 2.3% in FY25 from 8.1% in FY24, reflecting fiscal consolidation. However, the strong Q4 GDP growth (7.4%) and high growth in public administration (7.8%) suggest continued government spending in certain areas, creating a potential mismatch.

The low GFCE growth may understate government contributions in Q4, or the sectoral growth in public administration may reflect non-expenditure factors (e.g., statistical adjustments).

Gross Fixed Capital Formation (GFCF) growth slowed to 7.1% in FY25 from 8.8% in FY24, indicating weaker investment. This aligns with reports of sluggish private investment but contrasts with the strong construction sector growth (9.4%), which typically relies on capital investment.

The disconnect suggests that construction growth may be driven by specific sub-sectors (e.g., real estate) rather than broad investment, but the press release lacks clarity on this.

Mismatch with High-Frequency Indicators

The GDP growth of 6.5% for FY25 and 7.4% for Q4 FY25 appears optimistic compared to high-frequency indicators like-

Index of Industrial Production (IIP): Showed weaker industrial growth, particularly in manufacturing, contradicting the Q4 rebound.

Purchasing Managers’ Index (PMI): Indicated slower manufacturing and services activity in parts of FY25.

Core Sector Output: The eight core industries (e.g., coal, steel, cement) showed subdued growth in some quarters, inconsistent with the strong construction and manufacturing contributions in Q4.

These indicators suggest a more sluggish economy than the NSO’s GDP figures imply, raising concerns about potential overestimation or statistical discrepancies in the GDP calculations.

 

Comparison with External Forecasts

The NSO’s FY25 GDP growth estimate of 6.5% is lower than the Reserve Bank of India’s (RBI) revised forecast of 6.6% (down from 7.2%) but higher than some private forecasts (e.g., 6.0–6.3% by agencies like ICRA or SBI). The Q4 growth of 7.4% also exceeds many analysts’ expectations (e.g., 6.8% median estimate).

The higher-than-expected Q4 growth and the annual estimate suggest either a stronger-than-anticipated recovery or potential overestimation in the NSO’s provisional data. The reliance on provisional estimates, which are subject to revision, adds uncertainty.

Other disconnects

There are some other disconnects in the GDP data. For example, the nominal growth in 4QFY25 at 10.8%, much ahead of money supply growth of 9.6% is fully explained. A growing economy would usually need higher money supply due to higher transaction demand. This mismatch can probably be explained by the use of an erroneous deflator. Besides, external trade data, sharp contraction in subsidy payments etc. also raise some doubts.

Also read

The state of the Indian economy

The Indian economy – glass half full

The Indian economy – glass half empty

RBI makes a bold bet

Tuesday, June 3, 2025

The state of the Indian economy

The National Statistical Office (NSO) released provisional estimates (PE) of the annual growth statistics for the Indian economy, last Friday. The data indicates that the Indian economy grew at a rate of 7.4% (real GDP) in 4QFY25 and at a rate of 6.5% for the full year FY25.

The key highlights of the growth data could be listed as follows:

FY25 Growth

Real GDP: Estimated at 187.97 lakh crore at constant (2011-12) prices.

Growth rate: 6.5% compared to 176.51 lakh crore in FY 2023-24 (8.2% growth in FY24).

Nominal GDP: Estimated at 330.68 lakh crore.

Growth rate: 9.8% compared to 301.23 lakh crore in FY 2023-24.

Real Gross Value Added (GVA): Estimated at 171.87 lakh crore at constant prices.

Growth rate: 6.4% compared to 7.2% in FY 2023-24.

Nominal GVA: Growth rate: 9.5% compared to 8.5% in FY 2023-24.

Quarterly GDP Estimates for Q4 FY 2024-25 (January-March 2025)

Real GDP: Estimated at 51.35 lakh crore at constant prices.

Growth rate: 7.4% compared to 47.82 lakh crore in Q4 FY 2023-24.

Real GVA: Estimated at 45.76 lakh crore at constant prices.

Growth rate: 6.8% compared to Q4 FY 2023-24.

Observations

The 6.5% real GDP growth in FY25 is lower than the 8.2% recorded in FY24, reflecting a slowdown attributed to factors like reduced government capital expenditure and sluggish private investment.

The Q4 FY25 growth of 7.4% indicates a rebound from the 5.4% growth in Q2 FY25, driven by strong performances in manufacturing, construction, financial services, and agriculture, supported by a good monsoon and easing inflation.

The agriculture sector’s improved performance (3.8% growth) is a notable positive, while manufacturing and mining sectors saw slower growth compared to FY24.

The estimates are provisional and subject to revision as more data becomes available, with the next update (Second Advance Estimates and Q3 FY25 data) scheduled for February 28, 2025.

Sectoral trends

In FY25, most sectors experienced slower growth in FY25 compared to FY24, contributing to the overall real GVA growth of 6.4% (down from 7.2%). The slowdown is attributed to a high base effect from FY24, reduced government capital expenditure, high interest rates, and global economic challenges.

Agriculture’s recovery (3.8%) and construction’s robust growth (9.4%) were key positives, supported by favorable monsoons and infrastructure investments, respectively. Q4 FY25 showed a rebound (6.8% GVA growth), indicating improving economic momentum.

Manufacturing (5.0%) and mining (4.2%) remained the key areas of concerns, reflecting industrial and external demand weaknesses. Trade and hospitality also saw moderated growth due to cautious consumer behavior.

Agriculture, Livestock, Forestry, and Fishing

Growth Rate: 3.8% in FY25 (up from 1.4% in FY24).

Farm sector recorded a significant recovery compared to the previous year’s low growth. The improvement is primarily driven by favorable monsoon conditions, which boosted agricultural output. Enhanced livestock and fishery activities also contributed. The sector’s resilience is notable, as it supports rural economies and overall food security, despite challenges like fluctuating global commodity prices.

The growth trend also indicates better crop yields and government support through schemes like minimum support prices (MSP) and rural infrastructure investments.

Mining and Quarrying

Growth Rate: 4.2% in FY25 (down from 7.1% in FY24).

Mining sector experienced a notable slowdown, reflecting reduced demand for minerals and challenges in global commodity markets. Domestic factors like regulatory constraints and environmental clearances may have also impacted mining activities.

The decline suggests a moderation in industrial demand for raw materials, potentially linked to slower manufacturing growth and global economic uncertainties.

Manufacturing

Growth Rate: 5.0% in FY25 (down from 9.9% in FY24).

Manufacturing growth decelerated significantly, driven by weaker domestic and export demand, high input costs, and supply chain disruptions. The sector faced challenges from elevated interest rates and stricter lending norms, which constrained industrial expansion.

However, despite the slowdown, manufacturing showed some recovery in Q4 FY25, contributing to the overall GDP growth of 7.4% for that quarter. Government initiatives like "Make in India" and production-linked incentives (PLI) continue to support the sector, but external pressures limited growth.

Electricity, Gas, Water Supply, and Other Utility Services

Growth Rate: 7.5% in FY25 (down from 7.8% in FY24).

The utilities sector maintained relatively strong growth, though slightly lower than the previous year. Steady demand for electricity, driven by industrial and domestic consumption, and investments in renewable energy supported this performance. Water supply and utility services also contributed positively.

The marginal decline reflects stable but not exceptional growth, with ongoing infrastructure investments in clean energy and utilities providing a foundation for resilience.

Construction

Growth Rate: 9.4% in FY25 (down from 10.4% in FY24).

Construction remained a robust performer, driven by government-led infrastructure projects, urban development, and real estate demand. The slight slowdown from FY24 is attributed to reduced government capital expenditure compared to the previous year’s high base.

The sector’s strong growth underscores its role as a key driver of economic activity, supported by initiatives like the National Infrastructure Pipeline and housing schemes.

Trade, Hotels, Transport, Communication, and Broadcasting

Growth Rate: 6.1% in FY25 (down from 7.5% in FY24).

This sector saw a moderation in growth due to weaker performance in trade and hospitality, impacted by reduced consumer spending in certain segments and global trade slowdowns. Transport and communication services, however, benefited from digital infrastructure investments and logistics improvements.

The decline reflects challenges in discretionary spending, though digital services and logistics provided some cushion.

Financial, Real Estate, and Professional Services

Growth Rate: 7.3% in FY25 (down from 8.4% in FY24).

This part of the services sector maintained solid growth, driven by financial services (banking, insurance) and real estate, supported by urban demand and digital financial inclusion. Professional services, including IT and consulting, continued to perform well, though export-oriented IT services faced global headwinds.

The slight decline from 8.4% to 7.3% reflects global economic uncertainties affecting IT exports, but domestic financial services remained a strong contributor.

Public Administration, Defense, and Other Services

Growth Rate: 7.8% in FY25 (down from 7.9% in FY24).

This public services sector showed steady growth, driven by government spending on public administration, defense, and social services. The marginal decline reflects a normalization from FY24’s high growth, with fiscal constraints limiting expenditure growth.

The sector’s consistent performance (7.8%) highlights the prominent role of government spending in stabilizing economic growth, particularly in Q4 FY25.

 

More on Growth trends tomorrow.

Wednesday, March 5, 2025

Growth normalizing in a lower orbit

As per the latest national accounts data released last week, the economic growth of India appears to be normalizing in 6.5% +/- 0.3% band. Optically, this growth rate may appear decent; but is insufficient for achieving the target of catapulting the Indian economy into a higher orbit and sustaining the status of a middle-income economy.

After recording a higher growth rate of 8.8% CAGR for three years (FY22 to FY24) on a low base of Covid affected FY20 and FY21, the FY25 growth is estimated to be 6.5%. The consensus estimates for FY26e growth are also hovering around 6.5%.

From the internals of the economic data, it appears that growth trajectory of the Indian economy is settling in the current band, just like we spent decades in the 3-4% growth band in the pre-reform (1990s) era. Any effort to accelerate the economic growth would require transformative socio-economic reforms in the next five years.

 


Some critical points that need to be watched closely from the perspective of growth sustainability and acceleration could be listed as follows:

·         The share of primary sector that employs the largest share of workers has deteriorated from 22.1% in FY21 to 19.8% in FY25AE. The share of the secondary sector has also declined from 25.6% in FY21 to 25.2% in FY25AE. Especially, the share of manufacturing in the GDP is low at 14%, and has not recorded any material improvement despite the material incentives like PLI, etc. FY25AE growth of manufacturing is estimated to a dismal 3.5%.

·         The gross savings rate of the economy has fallen to 30.2% of GDP in FY25AE, materially lower than 33.8 in FY12, when the new GDP series started. The investment rate has also fallen in this period from 39% in FY12 to 31.4% in FY25AE. The household & corporate savings and investments have seen decline in FY25E. The government investment and consumption has been supporting the investment rate to stay above 30% of GDP. The fiscal constraints are indicating that this support may weaken in the coming years.

·         Early reports are indicating that Rabi crop in many states has been materially damaged by unusually dry and warm winters. Sugar production for SS25 is expected to be ~14% lower; while wheat crop may be 25-35% lower. Oilseed and pulse crops have also suffered damage. This data will reflect in 4QFY25 and 1QFY26 agriculture GVA and private consumption numbers.

It is important to note that MFI sector is already burdened by a material deterioration in the asset quality. Poor Rabi crop may add to the rural stress and adversely impact the overall consumption demand, given that urban demand is not showing signs of improvement.

It is therefore very much possible that the actual FY25E growth comes lower than the second advance (AE) estimates.



·         The global trade uncertainties are rising with the passage of every hour. A situation of material trade logjam, supply chain disruption, accelerated tariff war and/or high volatility in currency markets is not completely improbable. If any such situation does materialize, it may materially hurt the growth prospects and external vulnerability of India. 

Tuesday, December 3, 2024

Growth slowdown may be structural

India’s real GDP grew by 5.4% yoy during 2QFY25 (July-Sep); the slowest growth rate recorded since 3QFY23. The Reserve Bank of India had forecasted a growth of 7%, just a month ago, while the market consensus was less sanguine at ~6.5%.

For the argument’s sake, some of the slowdown in 2QFY25 could be attributed to a high base (2QFY24 GDP grew at 8.1%). However, it is tough to deny that the Indian economy has been growing below potential in most of the post global financial crisis (GFC-2009) period. In fact, it will not be totally perverse to argue that in the past one decade or so, the potential growth curve itself has moved lower.

For record, the Indian economy has grown at an average rate of 5.8% during the past decade (FY15-FY24). Even normalizing for the Covid-19 lockdown impact, the Indian economy has grown at an average rate of 6.0%, much below the estimated potential growth rate of over 8%. The real GDP had grown at an average rate of 7.8% during the preceding decade (FY05-FY14).



The slowdown in 2QFY25 has been led by the industrial sector, especially, manufacturing and core sector (e.g., mining and electricity) – a sector that has been the highest priority area for the incumbent government in the past decade. Agriculture (3.5% growth) sector did well on the back of a bountiful monsoon; and services also grew at a decent 7.1% led by public administration. On demand side, investments contracted for the fourth consecutive quarter, belying the promise of a massive jump in allocation for capex in the union budgets for FY24 and FY25. Private consumption grew 6% yoy on a low base of 2.6%, but declined qoq, despite the higher DBT.

The fiscal data for April-October 2024 period shows that contrary to its commitment in the union budget, the government has sacrificed capital expenditure in favor of direct cash transfer (DBT) to households. Ahead of key state elections, the government transferred an advance installment of tax devolution to states to meet revenue expense obligations. The central government capex (including on defense) was much lower than the budget targets. The disbursement of the promised capex loans to the states was also lower. Revenue expenditure on education, drinking water and sanitation were restrained to increase DBT allocation.

The popular narrative after the announcement of 2QFY25 GDP data appears to be that high effective rate of taxes and higher interest rates are hurting the growth and fiscal and monetary stimulus may lead to a course correction. I sincerely beg to differ from this hypothesis.

I have often highlighted that the obstacles to the acceleration in India’s growth rate are structural and not cyclical. Inability to adequately exploit our most valuable resources – the human capital and the largest pool of arable land in the world – is the principal reason for below potential growth. Consistent misallocation of capital, adhocism in policy making, lack of a conceptual growth framework, a distorted federal political structure, blatant pursuit of crony socialism, and lack of a long-term socio-economic growth plan.

In this context, it might be pertinent to note the OECD has projected a gradual deceleration in the potential growth rate of the Indian economy in the next four decades, as the marginal productivity of capital declines and contribution from technological progresses diminishes. (Table 1). The potential rate declines, even if in a blue-sky scenario, where India is able to take fuller advantage of its demography and is able to achieve a much higher rate of capital accumulation and employment (Table 2). (see full report here)




Wednesday, September 25, 2024

State of the economy

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has issued its latest assessment of the state of the economy. The paper notes the marked slowdown in the global economy; it exudes confidence in the sustainability of 6.7%-7% GDP growth in India. In particular, the assessment sounds buoyant on manufacturing, and household consumption, while taking cognizance of resilience in the services sector. The inflation is forecasted to stay close to the lower bound of the RBI tolerance limit (4-6%).

Tuesday, January 9, 2024

USD five trillion in 2029

Last week the National Statistical Office (NSO) released its first advance estimates (FAE) of the national income for the current financial year 2023-24. The growth in real GDP during 2023-24 is estimated at 7.3% as compared to 7.2% in 2022-23. This projection of growth is higher than the latest forecast of the Reserve Bank of India (7%) and professional forecasters (6.0 to 6.9%). Given the economic momentum, it is likely that growth for the next financial year FY25, currently pegged ~6.5%, may also get revised upwards.

Friday, October 20, 2023

Some notable research snippets of the week

WPI in Contraction for the Sixth Month; core inflation higher (Centrum)

WPI inflation witnessed a yet another contraction in the month of September and registered a deflation of 0.26% YoY, down from -0.52% in August. The print came in slightly lower than the estimates as the general consensus was around -0.5%. This was the 6th month where we have seen a contraction. All the segments witnessed a deflation in prices, except for the Primary Articles. However, on a monthly basis primary articles contracted while Fuel & Power and Manufactured products saw rise in prices.

Core inflation rose in September

India’s WPI based inflation witnessed a further contraction in August. The persistent moderation in WPI since May-22 has been mainly because of constant decline in mostly all the major sub-indices. Although at a slower pace than previous month, this month’s fall in the wholesale prices can be mainly attributed to all the sub-indices except for the primary articles, as food prices (although slowing down) remains in the positive. The deflation in Fuel prices have slowed down as international crude prices have again started to pick up. We expect food prices to cool down in the coming months, all while fuel prices may turn out to put pressure on the headline WPI figures. The core prices remained in deflation for the 7th consecutive month as it fell by 1.4% compared to 2.2% in the month of August.

September’s report clearly shows that the inflationary pressure caused by high food prices have eased down considerably - which clearly indicates a good sign for the market. However, production cut done by Saudi Arabia and Russia could hurt the prices further on the upside. Clearly, the tightness forced by the RBI has started to show, as both core CPI and WPI are on a downtrend, which eliminates the volatile fluctuations of food and energy prices. This report came after the CPI recorded a print of 5.02% for the month of September, which took a detour from the 7.44% it had hit in the month of July.

Narrowed trade deficit a transient respite (Systematix)

India’s trade deficit narrowed in Jul’23 on the back of a sharper decline in imports than exports. But it reflects slowing demand and global trade. As trade was the biggest driver for post-pandemic recovery, the receding global bounties are having a wider impact on the domestic economy, particularly the employment-intensive services sector. While RBI has the buffer in the form of forex assets, the spillovers of external sector vulnerabilities can manifest into volatile currency and rate markets.

Overall trade reflective of slowing global and domestic demand: At the segregated level, the oil trade has been contracting since Mar’23 by 20% (YoY) on average. Non-oil & and non-gold/silver trade has also contracted by 5.9% (YoY) on average since Dec’23. This is reflective of simultaneously slowing global trade and domestic demand.

Contracting services trade has a larger bearing: With the current declining trend of the overall trade since its peak in early 2022, it is going to have a multi-layer cascading impact on the formal sector. Overall services trade and its components, which remain a significant source of formal and informal employment, have started exhibiting signs of moderation or contraction.


 

India strategy: Global headwinds to test domestic resilience (AXIS Capital)

Indian equities should be able to offset some of the downward pressure emerging from the downward adjustment in valuation of global financial assets due to the sharp rise in risk-free rates (UST yields). Not only are inflows into domestic MFs likely to be resilient, EPS growth and revisions are both supportive of time correction. With a cyclical upturn in capital formation supporting the structural improvements in labour and productivity growth, the domestic economy should also be able to offset some of the headwinds from the ongoing global slowdown. A sharp US recession, though, can drive a spike in risk premia and also intensify growth headwinds for the economy.

Structural drivers likely to drive 7% growth annually

We believe India can grow at ~7% annually, with 1% growth in labor input supplementing 2%-plus growth in total factor productivity. We expect strong TFP growth to continue (2.4% CAGR in the five years pre-Covid), on (1) the state continuing to cede space to the private sector (the latter generally uses labour and capital better); (2) improving macro (roads, highways, airports, ports) and micro (last-mile access to energy, piped water, internet and financial services) infrastructure; (3) formalization of retail and construction; (4) net services exports; and (5) state capacity improving.

Improving capital formation to provide cyclical boost, offset headwinds

The pre-Covid growth slowdown was due to a fall in growth of capital formation (bad-loan clean-up and a real-estate downcycle). This is now changing: dwelling construction is picking up, and leverage on corporate balance sheets and lenders has likely bottomed out. These should offset the several cyclical headwinds faced by the economy.

The first is limited fiscal space and a falling fiscal deficit ratio. Second, even with a pause on repo rate hikes, financial conditions can continue to tighten as loans roll over. Third, as the global economic slowdown is already hurting growth in goods and services, a likely US recession next year can intensify pressure in some of the export-driven sectors.

Real-estate cycle turning after a decade-long downturn: No sub-continental sized economy like India can grow rapidly without strength in dwelling construction. Despite 2.4% annual growth in household formation (Exhibit 28:), a houses-to-households ratio of 0.97 in 2019, 4% annual growth in the size of houses (the floor space per person in India is ~100 sq ft, vs 550 in China and 700 in the US, Exhibit 29:), and rising quality of construction, the value of dwelling construction in India barely grew over 2012-21.

Time correction for now: lower global P/Es, and steady EPS growth

The US Treasury (UST) yields have risen 2 pp, and are likely to remain elevated, in our view. With Nifty earnings yield spread over UST yields at record lows, P/E can remain under pressure despite the USD 30-35bn of unintended flows into domestic equity MFs.

P/E premium to world is already elevated at 30%. Markets may time-correct as Nifty earnings are in much better shape than in the past decade: (1) for-the-year EPS seeing upgrades vs sharp 10-25% cuts in the prior decade; and (2) double-digit growth FY24-26E vs 4% CAGR 2011-20. In our 30-stock model portfolio, we are overweight financials, autos, utilities, cement, and real-estate, and underweight IT, industrials, and metals.

US bond yields may remain elevated (MOFSL)

During the past three months, the benchmark 10-year US treasury yield has surged toward 4.75%, about 100bp higher than the mid-Jul’23 level. Notably, the rise in the yield is not limited only to the longer end, but it is seen across the curve and more at the shorter end, as the spread between the 3-month yield and the 10-year yield has actually narrowed from -1.5pp in mid-Jul’23 (and 4-decade low of -1.89pp in early Jun’23) to -0.9pp in Oct’23, last seen in early 2023. (All data used here is as of 16th Oct’23).

If the cost of funds increases sharply and continuously, it is usually believed to hurt borrowers. Nevertheless, since a bulk (~90%) of household loans are fixed-term, higher rates have not pinched customers in the US. Because of this, the burden of higher interest rates will be borne by the lenders, due to the higher cost of roll-over and/or refinancing the loans. On top of this, the financial institutions also see a drop in the value of their securities portfolios due to higher interest rates.

Moreover, although higher rates may not affect existing customers, they are likely to affect new demand badly, hurting home prices. This, if happens, will have the potential to broaden and sharpen the economic slowdown. However, mortgage/non-mortgage loans continue to grow decently, which shows that consumers are not worried so far.

None of these troublesome implications, thus, have played out so far. Our expectation of a serious US slowdown by mid-2023 did not materialize, and even the soft landing theory has been elusive. The US economy remains strong, supported by the drawdown in savings by US consumers, which is in contrast to most other rich nations.

However, this is unlikely to continue for a long period, especially if bond yields stay so elevated. Only ~8% of the market participants expect a rate hike on 1st Nov’23, down from 33% a month ago, and 29% expect it in Dec’23 (up from 2.3% a month ago). It means that the majority of participants would be surprised if the US Federal Reserve delivers another rate hike, like they projected in their Sep’23 policy meeting.

We believe that even if the Fed does not hike rates in the next meeting, it cannot afford to loosen its stance. If so, bond yields will remain elevated, and the longer they stay high, the higher the risk of an economic slowdown is. Accordingly, we push our expectation of a US economic slowdown into 1HCY24.

Unrealized losses of the financial institutions have surged

If the cost of funds increases sharply and continuously, it is usually believed to hurt borrowers. Nevertheless, since a bulk (~90%) of household loans are fixed-term, higher rates have not pinched customers. Because of this, the burden of higher interest rates will be borne by lenders, due to the higher cost of roll-over and/or refinancing the loans. On top of this, financial institutions also see a drop in the value of their securities portfolios due to higher interest rates.

According to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), the unrealized losses on investment securities of all the FDIC-insured institutions in the US have amounted to close to or more than USD500b during the past five quarters. Since the Fed started hiking interest rates in Mar’22, unrealized gains have disappeared (from USD29.4b in 3QCY21) and large losses (totaling USD558b in 2QCY23) have emerged. The unrealized losses are divided in the ratio of 45:55 between available-for-sale (AFS) and held-to-maturity (HTM) securities portfolios.

We are not suggesting that all these losses will be realized. However, it is probable that some institutions may be forced to unwind their positions unwillingly, making it economically very difficult for them to survive. Overall, it may not bring down the entire financial sector, but it definitely holds the potential to send chills. Of course, timely intervention by an extremely active US Fed could change the course.

Steel demand to grow slower than expected (Centrum)

World steel association in its October 2023 outlook revised steel demand growth estimate to 1.8% in 2023 and reach 1,814.5mt downgrading from 2.3% YoY earlier. As steel using key sectors like infrastructure and construction witnessing impact of high inflation and high interest rate leading to slowdown in both investment as well as consumption. However, recovery in auto production continued in 2023, helped by order backlog and easing of bottlenecks resulting high growth for most regions. For CY24, world steel demand is expected to show 1.9% YoY growth led by demand improvement in World ex China.

China - The real estate sector have shown state of weakness as key indicators like land sales, housing sales and new construction starts continued to fall in 2023. However, government infrastructure spending stood as major driver for steel demand. As a result, steel demand is expected to rebound by 2% YoY at 939mt in CY23 after fall of 3.5% in CY22. The various measures undertaken by the government should lead to stabilisation in property sector. Hence, under this assumption, the steel demand for CY24 is expected to sustain at CY23 level.

India - India remains bright spot in the global steel industry benefiting from surge in construction and infrastructure sector driven by government spending as well as recovery in private investment. After growing by 9% in CY22, demand is expected to show healthy growth of 8.6% in CY23 and 7.7% in CY24.

US - Despite the resilience of the US economy to steep interest hikes, steel using sectors are feeling demand slowing down. Particularly, residential construction is affected, which is expected to contract in 2023 and 2024. Manufacturing has been also slowing, but the automotive sector is expected to continue its post-pandemic recovery. The lagged effect of tight monetary policy points to downside risk for 2024. After a fall of 2.6% in 2022, steel demand is expected to decline by 1.1% in 2023 and then grow by 1.6% in 2024.

European Union and UK - In CY23, EU economy stood stronger than expected to able to manage energy crisis arising from the Russia-Ukraine war. The high interest rates and energy costs had heavy effect on manufacturing activities. Though, recovery in automotive sector continued. The steel demand after a fall of 7.8% in 2022, is expected to fall by 5.1% in 2023. Although in CY24, demand is expected to see rebound as impact of current adversaries likely to cool off.

View & Outlook: Developing nations to spearhead global steel demand

Overall, worsening economic outlook due to influence of monetary tightening that hurt consumption and investment alike. The construction sector has been negatively affected by the high interest rates and high-cost environment, especially the residential sector. Falling housing sales have led to financial troubles for major Chinese real estate developers, generating concerns about the health of the economy. For CY2024, auto sector growth likely to decelerate, China to remain uncertain depending on the policy direction to tackle economic difficulties, regional conflicts such as Russia-Ukraine, Israel-Palestine and elsewhere further add to downside risk. Steel demand dynamics in emerging and developing economies continue to diverge, with developing nations excluding China remaining resilient to global headwinds. After falling by 0.6% in 2022, steel demand in emerging and developing economies excluding China will show growth of 4.1% in 2023 and 4.8% in 2024.

India metals - Earnings to be a mixed bag (Systematix)

India’s steel production and demand remained strong for a seasonally slow quarter. Domestic crude steel production increased by 15% YoY during July-August 2023 while other major economies witnessed a decline over the same period. Various economic indicators also signal strong demand from the infrastructure, building and construction, and automotive sectors, a trend likely to gain momentum in 2HFY24. Prices of major base metals fell during 2QFY24, with zinc/aluminium recording a decline of 25.7%/8.6% YoY and 4.5%/5.2% QoQ. Lead and copper prices were relatively resilient at USD 2,170/t (+9.8%/+2.5% YoY/QoQ) and USD 8,356/t (+7.9%/-1.5% YoY/QoQ), respectively. Silver/gold prices slid lower by 2.5%/2.7% QoQ but remained higher by 22.6%/13.3% on a YoY basis, respectively.

Primary steel producers under our coverage (JSW Steel, SAIL, and Tata Steel) are estimated to report a 3%/1% YoY/QoQ drop in 2QFY24 revenue due to lower steel prices and seasonal factors. However, despite seasonality, the EBITDA margin is likely to remain stable driven by higher volumes and lower raw material costs.

Strong domestic demand is likely to keep the earnings buoyant for JSW Steel and Tata Steel, partially offsetting the impact of lower sales volume estimated at their respective international operations. We estimate strong sales and EBITDA recovery for SAIL driven by 13%/5% YoY/QoQ growth in 2QFY24 reported production.

Mining companies MOIL, NMDC, and Coal India are likely to report a YoY EBITDA growth of 28% driven by strong operational performance. APL Apollo Tubes (APAT) and Surya Roshni (SYR) are estimated to report EBITDA growth of 29% and 19% YoY, respectively, driven by high-margin value-added product portfolio and higher volumes partially offsetting lower steel prices. For our non-ferrous coverage (Hindustan Zinc, Vedanta, and NALCO), we estimate a YoY/QoQ drop of 21%/3% in EBITDA reflecting the movement in base metal prices. Overall, we estimate 2QFY24 EBITDA of our metals and mining universe to increase by 13% YoY but decline by 5% QoQ. We currently have BUY on SAIL, TATA, JSTL, MOIL, NALCO, SYR, NMDC, COAL, and VEDL, and HOLD on APAT, and HZL.

Strong domestic demand: India reported a 17% YoY growth in monthly crude steel production in August 2023, and remains one of the few countries globally to consistently record growth in steel production. India’s September 2023 manufacturing PMI came in at 57.5, above the neutral level of 50 for the 27th consecutive month, indicating strong order intake and sustaining demand.

The latest Index of Industrial Production (IIP) data for manufacturing activity in basic metals also indicated a strong demand scenario, as it increased to 215 in August 2023 vs 207.7 in July 2023 (2011 as the base year). Strong demand, increasing volumes, and lower raw material costs are likely to outweigh the impact of lower steel prices and help key ferrous companies maintain EBITDA margins during the quarter. We believe, earnings have already witnessed a significant pullback in 1QFY24 as key metal prices normalised from the record levels breached during the same period last year and, going forward, higher volume-enabled operating leverage will ensure margin sustenance while higher demand keeps prices in check.

Rising exports disaffirm overcapacity risk in China; will likely keep steel prices

rangebound

Steel demand from the property sector in China, largest steel producing country, remained subdued during the quarter slashing hopes of a faster economic recovery. However, expected steel production cuts have not materialized as well due to an offsetting demand from the infrastructure and manufacturing sectors. China’s PMI data showed expansion in September 2023, after recording a contraction in manufacturing activity for two consecutive months. Lack of domestic demand from the property sector has also led to a rise in steel exports from China. During April-July 2023, China produced 364.6mt of crude steel, a marginal increase of 0.36% from last year. Over the same period, exports of finished steel to India increased by 27% and 58% YoY in value and volume terms, respectively. We believe, China is likely to take milder production cuts for the rest of the year due to concerns over economic growth that would keep exports high and inventories at a comfortable level thus providing downside support to steel prices.


Thursday, August 24, 2023

State of Affairs – Macroeconomic conditions

 Recently, the Reserve Bank of India published the results of the 83rd round of the Survey of Professional Forecasters. In the latest Survey, professional forecasters have mostly reiterated their previous estimates. The forecasters have assigned the highest probability of the real GDP growth remaining between 6.0% and 6.4% during FY24 and FY25. No significant acceleration is expected in the growth in FY25.

The FY24 growth is seen to be mostly front-ended, with the real GDP expected to grow (y-o-y) by 7.5% in Q1FY24 and thereafter moderate to 6.2% in Q2, 5.9% Q3, and further to 5.5% in Q4. The participants were quite sanguine about the price condition remaining under control with CPI inflation averaging 4.7% in FY25. The trade situation is expected to deteriorate further in FY24, before recovering in FY25. The trade deficit is likely to be close to 1.5% in FY24 as well as FY25. No significant improvement is expected in investment and savings rates.

The key highlights of the latest survey of professional forecasters are as follows:

Growth

The real GDP may grow by 6.1% in FY24 and 6.5% in FY25. The growth in FY24 would be mostly front-ended with 1QFY24 expected to record a growth of 7.5%.

Private Consumption is expected to grow 6.1% in FY24 and 6.4% in FY25.

Investment may grow at 7.1% in FY24 and 7.4% in FY25. The investment rate maybe 31.1% of GDP in FY24 and 31.5% in FY25

Gross Savings Rate is expected to be 29.8% of National Disposable Income in FY24 and 29.9% in FY25.

Fiscal Situation

The fiscal deficit of the central government is projected to be 5.9% for FY24 and 5.4% for FY25. Total gross fiscal deficit (center + states) is expected to be 8.7% and 8.2% for FY24 and FY25 respectively.

Benchmark 10-year bond yields are projected to average 7% in FY24 and 6.6% in FY25.

Trade and balance of payment

The current account balance is forecast to be negative US$52.6bn (1.4% of GDP) in FY24 and US$61.7bn (1.5% of GDP) in FY25.

Imports may contract by 5% in FY24 and grow by 7.8% in FY25.

Exports may Contract by 5.5% in FY24 and grow by 7% in FY25.

Overall balance of payment surplus is expected to be US$24.1 in FY24 and US$16bn in FY24

Inflation

The headline CPI inflation is likely to average 5.2% in FY24 and 4.7% in FY25.

The WPI inflation may average 0% in FY24 and 4% in FY25.