Do it yourself

After several years of corporate & bank balance sheet repair and fiscal correction, the contours of India's next economic growth cycle are beginning to emerge. With the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) maintaining a growth-supportive stance; union government showing strong commitment to fiscal consolidation, easing financing pressures for the private sector; and global markets showing signs of stabilization as geopolitical confrontations ease and trade disputes settled; the stage is set for a potential economic upswing.

The spotlight is now on three competing themes — corporate consolidation, private capex, and household consumption — each pulling investor attention in different directions.

Corporate begin to re-leverage

After many years of deleveraging, corporate debt in India appears to have bottomed out and is now beginning to rise. This shift in trajectory marks a significant departure from the post-2016 era, where Indian companies focused on strengthening balance sheets following a wave of over-leveraged investments. According to recent analyses, corporate borrowing is rising as businesses seek to capitalize on emerging opportunities.

This shift is supported by a monetary environment that remains broadly pro-growth. The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has maintained a balancing act between containing inflation and supporting economic momentum. Rates have been cut aggressively and RBI is pushing for a quick transmission.

Fiscal consolidation by the union government is also helping to ease crowding-out pressures in the credit markets. With the Centre projecting a glide path toward more sustainable fiscal deficits, room is being created for the private sector to tap into financial resources more freely.

RBI’s Growth-Supportive Stance and Fiscal Consolidation

The Reserve Bank of India has definitely turned growth supportive in the past one year, after maintaining a delicate balance between inflation growth. The rates have been cut aggressively and liquidity conditions have been made favorable. Targeted interventions to support small and medium enterprises (SMEs) and infrastructure projects, have bolstered private sector confidence.

Simultaneously, the Indian government’s commitment to fiscal consolidation has eased pressure on private financing. By reducing the fiscal deficit—projected to decline to 4.4% of GDP in FY26 from 5.6% in FY24—the government is crowding in private investment. Lower government borrowing means more capital is available for private enterprises, reducing competition for funds and potentially lowering borrowing costs. This synergy between monetary and fiscal policy is creating a fertile ground for private capex to flourish.

Global context changing quickly

Globally, financial markets have been navigating turbulent waters for the past some time. Monetary policies remained tight in major economies like the United States and the European Union. Geopolitical concerns were elevated as multiple war fronts were opened. The political regime changes in the US early this year, also triggered an intense trade war.

However, recent developments suggest a quick shift. There are conspicuous signs of geopolitical stability, particularly with noteworthy steps toward peace in conflict zones. The US administration is showing significant flexibility in negotiating trade deals, raising hopes for an early and durable end to tariff related conflicts. Inflationary pressures are also easing, especially with stable energy prices. These all factors combined raise hopes for a global monetary easing cycle. The US Federal Reserve and the European Central Bank have hinted at potential rate cuts in 2025, which could lower global borrowing costs and improve capital flows to emerging markets like India.

For India, this presents an opportunity to attract foreign portfolio investments (FPIs) to boost market sentiments, as well as foreign direct investment (FDI) for long-term projects, especially in manufacturing and green energy. The government’s Production-Linked Incentive (PLI) schemes and “Make in India” initiatives are well-positioned to capitalize on this opportunity, but execution will be key.

Investors’ dilemma

Amidst corporate optimism, supportive policy environment, positively turning global context, investors and traders are facing a dilemma – whether to stay bullish on the capex theme or turn focus towards the consumption theme that has been lagging behind for the past couple of years.

In my view, investors need to examine two things—

1.    What is driving this resurgence in corporate debt?” Is it being used to fund acquisitions of operating or stressed assets, or is it fueling fresh capacity creation?”

2.    Whether easing inflation, lower interest rates, good monsoon, and improved employment prospects due to capex translating to on-ground activity, will accelerate private consumption growth, or households will focus on repairing their balance sheets and increase savings?

What is driving this resurgence in corporate debt – Consolidation or capacity addition?

The distinction is crucial. While the former drives job creation, productivity, and long-term growth, the latter may only temporarily improve capital utilization rates and return metrics. Acquiring distressed assets or merging with competitors may lead to short-term efficiency gains but could delay the broader economic benefits of new capacity creation. Whereas, investments in fresh capacities could signal a long-term commitment to growth, aligning with India’s aspirations to become a global manufacturing hub.

While mergers and acquisitions (M&A) activity has been robust in the past few years, particularly in sectors like infrastructure and manufacturing, greenfield investments have seen limited areas like renewable energy (driven mostly by government incentives) and steel.

Equity markets are evidently betting on a capital investment Supercycle. Stocks of capital goods makers, construction contractors, and building material firms have seen sharp re-rating over the past year. Order books are swelling, and forward guidance from several listed players suggests growing optimism.

Consumption paradox

While the equity markets are bullish on capex-driven sectors, investor enthusiasm for household consumption remains subdued. This is puzzling, given the macroeconomic tailwinds that should theoretically support private consumption. Easing inflation, which dropped to 4.7% in mid-2025, coupled with the prospect of lower interest rates and improving employment prospects due to rising capex, should create a virtuous cycle of demand. Yet, private consumption, which accounts for nearly 60% of India’s GDP, has been lackluster over the past two years.

Several factors may explain this paradox. First, uneven income distribution means that the benefits of economic growth are not reaching all segments of the population equally. Rural consumption, in particular, has been hampered by volatile agricultural incomes and inadequate infrastructure. Second, high inflation in essential goods like food and fuel, despite overall moderation, continues to erode purchasing power for lower- and middle-income households. Third, policy support in the form of subsidies and cash transfers is being gradually unwound as fiscal discipline returns. Finally, the stress in the household balance sheet, especially in the wake of the Covid-19 pandemic may have also hampered consumption growth.

The equity market’s lack of enthusiasm for consumption-driven sectors like FMCG (fast-moving consumer goods) and retail reflects these concerns. Investors appear to be betting on a capex-led recovery rather than a consumption-driven one, prioritizing sectors poised to benefit from infrastructure spending and industrial growth. However, sustained economic growth will require a revival in household consumption, as capex alone cannot drive inclusive prosperity.

What to do?

The question is what investors should do under the present circumstances? Should they continue to back the obvious beneficiaries of capex — engineering firms, infra developers, lenders to industry? Or should they begin building positions in consumption plays, in anticipation of a cyclical rebound?

In my view, both themes may ultimately play out — but on different timelines. Capex is here and now, led by policy push and balance sheet strength. Consumption is the laggard, but if the macro indicators hold, its turn could come with a lag of a few quarters.

Recently the Ministry of Statistics and Program Implementation, Government of India, released the results of the Forward-Looking Survey on Private Sector CAPEX Investment Intentions, providing valuable insights into 3 year trends and future outlook private corporate sector capital expenditure plans.

The good

·        The average Gross Fixed Assets (GFA) per enterprise in the private corporate sector increased from Rs. 3,151.9 crore in 2021–22 to Rs. 4,183.3 crore in 2023–24, reflecting a healthy growth of 32.7% over the two years. This implies an average capital expenditure of Rs 366cr per corporate during FY22 to FY24. The estimated provisional capital expenditure per enterprise for purchasing new assets in the year 2024–25 is Rs. 172.2 crore.

·         Overall aggregate capital expenditure of the private corporate sector increased 66.3% over the four-year period from 2021-22 to 2024-25.

The bad

·         Out of the total capital expenditure provisionally incurred in the year 2024-25, only 53.1% were utilized for purchasing machinery & equipment.

·         The strategy of investing in distressed assets and non-performing loans was adopted by less than 0.5% of enterprises. 

·         Only about half of the capex in FY25 is for capacity addition. Over 30% capex is for maintenance, upgrade etc.

The ugly

·         Intended capex for FY26 is about 25% lower as compared to FY25.

·         Capex in the manufacturing sector is ~44% of the total capex committed in FY25. Services (telecom, IT Services, transportation, storage etc.) account for the rest 56% of the capex. Consequently, the employment intensity of the capex remains poor.

As highlighted in the latest Annual Survey of Industries, total employment in the manufacturing sector grew just at a CAGR of 3.2% during the five-year period from FY19-FY23 (see here). Lower capex and even lower manufacturing capex does not augur well for the growth of employment opportunities.

India’s real GDP grew by 5.4% yoy during 2QFY25 (July-Sep); the slowest growth rate recorded since 3QFY23. The Reserve Bank of India had forecasted a growth of 7%, just a month ago, while the market consensus was less sanguine at ~6.5%.

For the argument’s sake, some of the slowdown in 2QFY25 could be attributed to a high base (2QFY24 GDP grew at 8.1%). However, it is tough to deny that the Indian economy has been growing below potential in most of the post global financial crisis (GFC-2009) period. In fact, it will not be totally perverse to argue that in the past one decade or so, the potential growth curve itself has moved lower.

For record, the Indian economy has grown at an average rate of 5.8% during the past decade (FY15-FY24). Even normalizing for the Covid-19 lockdown impact, the Indian economy has grown at an average rate of 6.0%, much below the estimated potential growth rate of over 8%. The real GDP had grown at an average rate of 7.8% during the preceding decade (FY05-FY14).

The slowdown in 2QFY25 has been led by the industrial sector, especially, manufacturing and core sector (e.g., mining and electricity) – a sector that has been the highest priority area for the incumbent government in the past decade. Agriculture (3.5% growth) sector did well on the back of a bountiful monsoon; and services also grew at a decent 7.1% led by public administration. On demand side, investments contracted for the fourth consecutive quarter, belying the promise of a massive jump in allocation for capex in the union budgets for FY24 and FY25. Private consumption grew 6% yoy on a low base of 2.6%, but declined qoq, despite the higher DBT.

The fiscal data for April-October 2024 period shows that contrary to its commitment in the union budget, the government has sacrificed capital expenditure in favor of direct cash transfer (DBT) to households. Ahead of key state elections, the government transferred an advance installment of tax devolution to states to meet revenue expense obligations. The central government capex (including on defense) was much lower than the budget targets. The disbursement of the promised capex loans to the states was also lower. Revenue expenditure on education, drinking water and sanitation were restrained to increase DBT allocation.

The popular narrative after the announcement of 2QFY25 GDP data appears to be that high effective rate of taxes and higher interest rates are hurting the growth and fiscal and monetary stimulus may lead to a course correction. I sincerely beg to differ from this hypothesis.

I have often highlighted that the obstacles to the acceleration in India’s growth rate are structural and not cyclical. Inability to adequately exploit our most valuable resources – the human capital and the largest pool of arable land in the world – is the principal reason for below potential growth. Consistent misallocation of capital, adhocism in policy making, lack of a conceptual growth framework, a distorted federal political structure, blatant pursuit of crony socialism, and lack of a long-term socio-economic growth plan.

In this context, it might be pertinent to note the OECD has projected a gradual deceleration in the potential growth rate of the Indian economy in the next four decades, as the marginal productivity of capital declines and contribution from technological progresses diminishes. (Table 1). The potential rate declines, even if in a blue-sky scenario, where India is able to take fuller advantage of its demography and is able to achieve a much higher rate of capital accumulation and employment (Table 2). (see full report here)

 For me, Diwali this year was certainly not as it ought to be. Untimely demise of many close friends and relatives in the past few months; incessant horrific news flow from the active war zones; conspicuous signs of extreme socio-economic stress in a majority of the population; and apathy of the administration towards common man’s plight and worsening law & order situation dampened my spirit of festival.

I spent the week wandering the streets, slums and villages of Delhi NCR region and adjoining districts. What I witnessed and experienced, makes me believe that blaming selling by the foreign investors for the extant pain in the stock markets is like treating “the effect” as “the cause” – which is not only inappropriate but borders foolishness.

Household inflation, unemployment (including underemployment, disguised unemployment and most importantly unemployability), lack of basic civic infrastructure (drinking water, sanitation, primary health, decent primary education, etc.), are serious challenges for even the citizens living in the national capital or in its vicinity.

It is clearly evident that household savings and consumption may continue to face strong headwinds in the short term (4-6 quarters) at least. It shall reflect on the asset quality of the lenders, fiscal balance (rising reliance on the fiscal support for food, healthcare, education, and constricted ability for revenue mobilization) and eventually slow down the capex growth. 2QFY25 results declared so far are indicative of some of these trends.

I also find the stress in household finance management manifesting in the elevated anger and anxiety in the personal behavior of citizens. A sharp rise in the instances of domestic violence; social aggression; racial & religious intolerance; addiction to drugs, alcohol, & pornography; and insolent disregard for compliance, are some of the conspicuous effects, especially in the lower strata of the population. Rise in corruption and ostentatious consumption (as an act of denial of the actual state or to deceive others) are only a couple of economic consequences.

I also gathered some pearls of wisdom during the Diwali week, which I would like to share with the readers.

End of home cooking approaching?

A reputable entrepreneur shared his thoughts on the likely future trend in the food industry. In a tweet on Diwali day, he wrote, “In my view in 2040: For every 1L population at least one “Food Factory” will operate. From it, for 5 KM radius food will be delivered at home in 10 mins by a drone or a driverless EV. 50% of the population will not use the kitchen even once a week. 80% of hotels will not exist.” Many comments to this tweet mentioned that 16 years is too long a period. This trend may emerge in the next 5-7 years. The necessity of two incomes to run a kitchen may be one of the major factors in forcing the ‘homemaker’ out of home for work.

It is pertinent to note that as per the latest Annual Survey of Industries (ASI) Factories producing food products, 16% of the total number of factories, are now the largest category of industrial units in the country. These factories employ 21,16,000 or 11.4% of the total industrial workers, more than any other industry. The traditional largest employer, textile industry, comes a distant second employing 17,23,000 workers. (see here)

It would be interesting to see what changes the kitchen appliances industry would face due to this emerging trend.

Gulab Jamun is real villain not Soan Papdi

In the past decade or so, the Soan Papdi memes have become an essential part of the Diwali festivities. Once a cherished delicacy, a traditional sweet Soan Papdi has become a joke for everyone, as the modern health-conscious find this particularly sweet very unhealthy and prefer to pass it to others instead of consuming it themselves.

A sweet-maker (Halwai) in Hathras town in Uttar Pradesh educated me on this. As per him, if properly made, Soan Papdi is actually not unhealthy. It is made of besan (gram flour) which is protein rich and not deep fried. On the other hand, the worst sweet is Gulab Jamun – Maida (refined flour), deep fried (mostly in extremely unhealthy reused palm oil), and soaked in sugar syrup for days. It has no nutritional value and tons of ill effects. So, the next time you gulp a savory Gulab Jamun, please be mindful.

Kiwis whitewash the men in blue

The Indian men’s cricket team lost their first test series in India after 2012, after 18 consecutive series victories. The New Zealand team defeated India 3-0 in a three-test series. The worst part is that all three tests were lost very badly. For example, on the third day of the third test, India needed just 146 runs to win the test. On home ground, for a team that bats right till number nine, it should not have been very hard. If only the coach had told all the eight batsmen that “they need to score 19 runs each, and they have 25 overs each to achieve this task. There is no rush and no need to hit boundaries.”

I think all the young investors, who have started their investment journey in the past four years, could draw an important lesson from this. They need not chase the stocks that hit daily limits frequently. They just need to find 10 companies that are most likely to grow their earnings @15% CAGR for the next five years. Investing in these companies may double their capital in the next five years. It is as simple as that.

Internecine celebrations

The residents of the national capital blew up billions in burning firecrackers on Diwali night, despite the dangerous level of air quality, sick children and old parents in their homes, a government order prohibiting non-green crackers, and stretched finances. They offered the most ridiculous of the arguments to justify this act of assured mutual destruction.

In all their sincerity, they believed that by doing so they are (a) protecting their religion; (b) telling other religious communities their true place in the society, and (c) rebelling against the government’s minority appeasement policies.

Little did they realize that (i) they have burned their hard-earned money; (ii) added more poison to the already poisonous air; (iii) poisonous air does not discriminate between Hindu and Muslim lungs & brains, and it would kill both equally; and (iv) the people who claim to be more fierce religious warriors come mostly from lower middle and poor classes, spend most money on firecrackers are the worst affected by the poor air quality. Their children and old parents will suffer the most and they would spend the most on their healthcare.

The administration and law enforcement agencies bother little about their welfare. Like the colonial British government, they are happy seeing the society divided and killing each other. The educated and rich are getting disenchanted from festival celebrations, slowly dissipating the Indian culture and traditions. This is what the colonial rulers always strived for – destroy their culture and traditions, and the people will love to be slaves.

One thing that the prime minister Narendra Modi is well known for is his business friendliness. At the core of the famous Gujarat Model, that shot Mr. Modi to the national and international scene, was his claim of making Gujarat the most business-friendly state in India. He is also often accused by the opposition parties for unduly favoring the large corporate at the expense of micro and small enterprises and middle-class households.

ले दे के अपने पास फ़क़त इक नज़र तो है, क्यूँ देखें ज़िंदगी को किसी की नज़र से हम —साहिर लुधियानवी

Last Thursday, the finance minister presented an interim budget for the fiscal year 2024-25. The budget presentation had two part – (i) rhetorical and (ii) substantive.

The first part included a speech about the performance of the governments led by Prime Minister Narendra Modi for the past 10 years and promises for the next 23 years. The finance minister spoke about how in 2014 their government inherited an economy that was in shambles; and how they have pulled it out from a total mess and put it on the fast track to achieve the status of a developed nation by the year 2047; when we would celebrate 100 years of our independence from the colonial British rule. The finance minister also promised to implement a slew of development schemes over the next five years. She however refrained from listing any specifics or financial details.

The second part included (i) the accounts of the government for FY24; (ii) fiscal proposals for FY25, and (iii) a vote on account to meet the government’s expenses till a new government is formed and a full budget is approved by the parliament. This is the part that needs to be discussed and analyzed.

Fiscal prudence – achievement vs desirability

The finance minister presented that the fiscal deficit target for FY24 has been revised downward to 5.8% (Budget estimates (BE) 5.9%) and budgeted a fiscal deficit for FY25BE at 5.1% of GDP. She emphasized that the government is well on course to achieve the FRBMA target of a 4.5% fiscal deficit by FY26. The sharp improvement in the fiscal deficit has been received well by most. A tight balance is particularly commendable given the impending general elections. In my view, we need to ponder deeply over the following five points:

1.    At this stage of economic development, whether this degree of fiscal tightening is desirable? FY24RE shows that to meet the fiscal targets, the government has cut capex spending also. Is it appropriate to save on capital expenditure to meet fiscal targets? FY25BE growth in capex spend on key sectors is very moderate.

2.    FY25BE further confirms the trend of the past three years that the government is systematically cutting its consumption expenditure, subsidies, and social sector spending while allocating more for manufacturing and export incentives. Should investors assume that our economy is taking a left turn toward the Chinese model of growth (primarily manufacturing and infrastructure capacity building) from a largely consumption and social sector capacity building led growth?

3.    The budget does not explain why Rs one trillion, 50-year interest-free loan to states shall not be considered part of the fiscal deficit. For all practical purposes, it’s a drain on the center’s finances that will likely never be returned.

4.    Interest expense now constitutes 25% of the total government spending. There is no indication that this proportion will come down any time soon. On the contrary, with fiscal deficit staying at 4% of GDP or above for at least three more years, and greater reliance on high-cost small savings funding of deficit, it is likely that the proportion of interest in total expenditure may rise further. Under these circumstances, the sovereign rating of India may not see any upgrade anytime soon.

5.   With the current valuations of PSEs, disinvestment looks increasingly improbable. The government has not presented an alternative plan for fundraising so far.

 

…

After US electing a “leftist” Biden to occupy the White House; Germany elected social democrat Olaf Scholz to the office of Chancellor, France reelected left of center Emmanuel Macron (first reelection of a president since 2002); Italy reelected Christian leftist Sergio Mattarella; and now Australia has elected a leftist Anthony Albanese as the prime minister. The ruling right of the center New Democracy party in Greece has been consistently losing support in opinion polls for the elections scheduled to be held in October later this year.

A number of Latin American countries like Chile, Mexico, Argentina, Bolivia, Peru, and Honduras have elected leftist leaders to lead their respective countries. The opinion polls are indicating that Columbia and Brazil are also most likely to elect leftist leaders in the elections to be held in May and October respectively. In Asia, the Chinese communist regime under President Xi Jinping has strengthened its position.

Moreover, to counter the egalitarian agenda of left of center parties, even the right of center parties like conservatives in UK, BJP in India, LDP in Japan and Yemina in Israel are increasingly resorting to socialist agenda to retain power.

The emerging trends clearly indicate that the rising income and wealth inequalities are driving the political narratives globally. Obviously, this narrative will gain further momentum as the monetary corridor tightens further and fiscal constraints begin more pronounced.

The recent cuts in excise duty on transportation fuel announced by the government of India must be viewed from this angle also.

Over the weekend, the finance minister announced a cut of excise duty on petrol (Rs8/ltr ) and diesel (Rs6/ltr) to cool down the inflation and provide relief to the stressed consumers. The finance minister stated that this cut will have a Rs one trillion impact on the central government budget. She also mentioned that the entire Rs one trillion will be met through reduction in Road and Infrastructure Cess (a part of Central excise on transportation fuel). It is pertinent to mention that the cut of Rs5/ltr in petrol and Rs10/ltr in diesel made in November 2021 was also met entirely through reduction in RIC. The November 2021 cut had an infra budget implication of rs1.2trn.

The union government has levied a Road Cess on sale of petrol and diesel in the union budget for FY99 to create a dedicated fund for construction of roads. The fund was later adopted under a law named Central Road Fund (CRF) Act, 2000. In the Finance Act 2018, the cess was rechristened as The Road and Infrastructure Cess (RIC) as the scope of the fund was widened to include infrastructure.

The Road and Infrastructure Cess (RIC) is collected and levied on specified imported goods and on excisable goods as specified in the Sixth schedule of the said Act. The said goods are motor spirit commonly known as petrol and high-speed diesel oil. The objective of RIC is to provide dedicated funds for development and maintenance of National Highways, railway projects, improvement of safety in railways, State and rural roads and other infrastructure.

The reduction in RIC means almost 10% cut in Rs.11.06trn provided for capital expenditure in FY23BE. This is equal to 75% of the allocation made for NHAI in FY23BE.

Obviously, the immediate relief to the poor from inflation is a higher priority than growth. As things stand today, the tighter monetary and fiscal conditions will continue to challenge the growth ecosystem in near future. This implies that supply side challenges that are threatening the global economy may continue to persist till a new growth paradigm emerges. In the meantime, the economic policy will continue to be a constant struggle to avoid stagflation.

 In the latest union budget presentation, the finance minister placed special emphasis on the need to encourage private sector investment. The finance minister highlighted that catalyzing (crowding-in) private sector investments through public capital expenditure is one of the key goals of the government in its endeavor to attain its long term vision “India at 100”.