Do it yourself

As per the latest national accounts data released last week, the economic growth of India appears to be normalizing in 6.5% +/- 0.3% band. Optically, this growth rate may appear decent; but is insufficient for achieving the target of catapulting the Indian economy into a higher orbit and sustaining the status of a middle-income economy.

After recording a higher growth rate of 8.8% CAGR for three years (FY22 to FY24) on a low base of Covid affected FY20 and FY21, the FY25 growth is estimated to be 6.5%. The consensus estimates for FY26e growth are also hovering around 6.5%.

From the internals of the economic data, it appears that growth trajectory of the Indian economy is settling in the current band, just like we spent decades in the 3-4% growth band in the pre-reform (1990s) era. Any effort to accelerate the economic growth would require transformative socio-economic reforms in the next five years.

Some critical points that need to be watched closely from the perspective of growth sustainability and acceleration could be listed as follows:

·         The share of primary sector that employs the largest share of workers has deteriorated from 22.1% in FY21 to 19.8% in FY25AE. The share of the secondary sector has also declined from 25.6% in FY21 to 25.2% in FY25AE. Especially, the share of manufacturing in the GDP is low at 14%, and has not recorded any material improvement despite the material incentives like PLI, etc. FY25AE growth of manufacturing is estimated to a dismal 3.5%.

·         The gross savings rate of the economy has fallen to 30.2% of GDP in FY25AE, materially lower than 33.8 in FY12, when the new GDP series started. The investment rate has also fallen in this period from 39% in FY12 to 31.4% in FY25AE. The household & corporate savings and investments have seen decline in FY25E. The government investment and consumption has been supporting the investment rate to stay above 30% of GDP. The fiscal constraints are indicating that this support may weaken in the coming years.

·         Early reports are indicating that Rabi crop in many states has been materially damaged by unusually dry and warm winters. Sugar production for SS25 is expected to be ~14% lower; while wheat crop may be 25-35% lower. Oilseed and pulse crops have also suffered damage. This data will reflect in 4QFY25 and 1QFY26 agriculture GVA and private consumption numbers.

It is important to note that MFI sector is already burdened by a material deterioration in the asset quality. Poor Rabi crop may add to the rural stress and adversely impact the overall consumption demand, given that urban demand is not showing signs of improvement.

It is therefore very much possible that the actual FY25E growth comes lower than the second advance (AE) estimates.

·         The global trade uncertainties are rising with the passage of every hour. A situation of material trade logjam, supply chain disruption, accelerated tariff war and/or high volatility in currency markets is not completely improbable. If any such situation does materialize, it may materially hurt the growth prospects and external vulnerability of India. 

 Do you remember Tulsi Bhabhi, the protagonist in one of the most popular TV soaps on Indian television? The character was adored by all as it was widely considered to be an epitome of quintessential Indian – caring, selfless, affectionate, tolerant, accommodating, and family person. Even though there are plenty of Indians who may not exactly match this description, but a vast majority does find these characteristics desirable to have.

In our cinema and literature, protagonists are not only expected to possess these characteristics; but they are also supposed to demonstrate these in a rather non- subtle manner. Most of the successful and admired product promotion campaigns also target this emotional aspect of Indian populace. The sellers of Insurance, Chocolates, clothes, jewellery, steel, cement, adhesives, real estate, trucks, motor cycles, cars, etc., all try hard to touch the emotional cord of consumer.

I am sure all politicians and bureaucrats are cognizant of this phenomenon. I would therefore expect that the promotion campaign for government schemes and programs must address to this core of the target audience.

This understanding was however not visible in the campaign against the spread Covid19 pandemic. The citizens were told to “protect themselves” by “maintaining distance” and “wearing masks”. The policy makers ought to understand that a quintessential Indian would not work hard to protect himself. They would not wear mask or maintain distance to protect themselves, simply for the reason that the other family members might feel offended and find them “selfish” or overzealous”. The campaign would have been much more successful if it asked citizens to protect their loved ones by wearing masks and keeping distance. Most people would have obliged - if not voluntarily, then just to demonstrate how much they care.

Another policy incongruence that attracted my attention recently, related to the record production of food grain in the country. The agriculture minister recently told media that due to the efforts of the farmers & scientists; and policies of the central government India shall achieve a record production of food grain for the fifth consecutive year.

As per the latest data, rice production is pegged at a record 121.46 million tonne in the 2020-21 crop year as against 118.87 million tonne in the previous year. Wheat production is estimated to increase to a record 108.75 million tonnes in 2020-21 from 107.86 million tonnes in the previous year. In 2020-2021, our domestic wheat and rice consumption are expected to be ~105 million tonne and 107 million tonne respectively.

It is widely accepted that—

(a)   Wheat is not a native crop to India and may not be most suitable source of nutrition for Indian DNA. Most nutritionists attribute the sharp rise in cases of diabetes and obesity to over consumption of wheat. They advise more consumption of native grains like millets and sorghum to stay healthy.

(b)   Over cultivation of rice has depleted the ground water in many states. Most geologists and agriculturists are advising against the rice cultivation in states like Punjab, Western UP, Haryana, MP etc.

Given these circumstances, the government policy should be to —

(i)    discourage the wheat plantation;

(ii)        encourage plantation of native grains like millets and sorghum;

(iii)  run an extensive campaign to promote consumption of native grains due to their health benefits; and

(iv)   Supplement the promotion campaign with adequate incentive schemes to encourage wider cultivation and consumption of native grains.

It is pertinent to note that once considered food of poor people, Bajra (pearl millet), Ragi (finger millet), Jhangora or Kavadapullu (Barnyard millet) Kuttu (Kodo millet) etc. are selling in the market at 2x to 4x of wheat and rice prices. Their availability is also an issue in many parts of the country.

The function of policy must be to—

(a)        promote and propagate what is right for the common people;

(b)        correct the past inconsistencies, anomalies  and mistakes; and

(c)        drive the economy on a faster and sustainable growth path.

Celebrating higher wheat production; higher tax collection driven by fossil fuel, cigarettes etc. may not be the best thing to do for a progressive government.