Vijay Kumar Gaba

The National Statistical Office (NSO) released the estimates of National Income for the first quarter (April-June) of the current fiscal year (2022-2023) on Wednesday evening. A lot has already been written, said and debated about the reported GDP/GVA numbers. Apparently, the reported yoy GDP growth of 13.5% for 1QFY23 is slightly short of what the market consensus was expecting.

In my view, the economic growth of India has been grossly inadequate and unbalanced, especially in the past 5yrs. The worst part is that the manufacturing and construction sectors that are traditionally considered having material employment generation potential are growing the least. It is primarily the exports that have helped the Indian economy to grow at the rate of 1.4% CAGR in the past 3years. Given that the global economy has perhaps entered a phase of protracted slowdown or sub-optimal growth, the exports may not sustain the Indian economy for too long.

The markets must take cognizance of this. Especially the excitement in construction and capex space is not getting much support from the economic data sustain. Moreover, the piling inventories across supply chains globally and in India at a time when demand is getting crushed and inventory carrying costs are rising, also call for additional caution.

Technically markets are showing some strength and may move a little higher from the current levels. However, this would be a rally to sell into rather than getting infected with FOMO.

Notwithstanding the official position about the state of economy in the US, the market is building an elevated probability of a recession (or a recession like, if I may say so) situation in 2023. The short term (1-2yr) bond yields are now higher than the benchmark 10yr yields in a number of developed economies, including US, UK, Canada, Sweden, and emerging economies like Brazil, Mexico, Hong Kong, Turkey, Pakistan etc.

Historically, the yield curve inversion has been a harbinger of recession in the majority of instances. For example, in the case of the US, the yield curve inversion has been followed by a recession in all of the past seven instances.

In this context, it is important to note that the US Federal Reserve (Fed) and European Central Bank (ECB) have unambiguously stated that they are willing to accept a measured slowdown in the economy to achieve the goal of price control. The Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) also stated categorically that for now price control is the primary objective and not economic growth. This implies that RBI is also willing to accept a calibrated slowdown in the economy to meet the end of price stability.

As it appears from the commentary of global central bankers, renowned economists and widely acclaimed market experts, the process of monetary correction may be a protracted one; and hence the global economy may not return to the desired trajectory of growth anytime soon. The situation for the stronger emerging markets like India may however be different. These economies could find their own course and avoid recession. Nonetheless, the impact of the slower (or negative) global growth would be felt and remain a key obstacle to high growth.

In particular, if our growth plans have accorded high priority to (a) exports to developed countries and (b) reliance on manufacturing growth due to global businesses preferring Indian facilities over China or Germany (China+1 or Europe+1); then probably we our policy makers would need to rework the strategy for the interim period.

So far, we have not heard any credible plan from our policy makers to mitigate the impact of impending recession-like slowdown in our major trade partner economies. In such an environment, RBI’s 4.5% real GDP growth projection for 2HFY23 might prove to be marginally optimistic and growing 7% in FY24 would be a big challenge. The markets need to take cognizance of this, in my view.

The National Statistical Office (NSO) recently released national income estimates for 3QFY22 and advance estimates for the entire year FY22. The key highlights of the GDP data are as follows:

 State of the economy

The National Statistical Office (NSO) recently issued the first advance estimates (FAE) of GDP for FY22. This event is considered important, because these estimates are essentially used as input for preparing budget estimates for the next year (in this case FY23). The estimates are derived by extrapolating the previous year (in this case FY21) final estimates using the performance of sector indices in the first 7 to 9 months of the current financial year. These estimates may be subject to substantial revision in case of a material event that may impact the economic performance during the fourth quarter of the current financial year, e.g., lockdown during March of FY20.

FY22e Real GDP to grow 9.2%

NSO has estimated FY22 GDP to grow at 9.2% (-7.3% in FY21), lower than the recent estimates of RBI (9.5%).

Although the FAE accounts for slower growth (~5.6%) in 2HFY22 against 13.7% in 1HFY22, these estimates may not have fully factored in the impact of recent surge in cases of Covid and consequent mobility restrictions. Thus, there is a risk that the actual GDP might be slightly lower than FAE.

The GVA (GDP + subsidies on products – taxes) growth is expected to be 8.6%. This implies that NSO has factored in continuing buoyancy in tax collections in 4QFY22 also.

Most of the higher growth rate in FY22 could be attributed to the low base. As per the FAE, the real GDP for FY22 could be just 1.3% higher than the real GDP for FY20, implying less than 0.7% CAGR for 2years (FY21 and FY22).

Elevated inflation to reflect in higher nominal GDP growth

Elevated price pressures are expected to reflect in higher nominal GDP growth, which is expected to be 17.6% in FY22 (-3% in FY21). It is noteworthy that price pressure has remained elevated in FY22 across goods (food, fuel and others) and services.

 Private consumption continue to be sluggish

NSO has estimated private consumption expenditure to grow at a sluggish rate of 6.9% in FY22. This implies that the private consumption in FY22 will remain ~3% below the pre pandemic level (FY20). At 54.8% of GDP, the share of private consumption in real GDP is expected to be lowest in 8 years.

Besides, the key GDP component of Trade, Hotels, Transport and Communication is also expected to remain ~9% below the pre pandemic level (FY20).

It is pertinent to note that higher inflation of FY22 has so far not resulted in significant monetary tightening. Though the benchmark yields have seen significant rise in FY22 (from 6.05% in March 2021 to 6.6% presently), it has so far not reflected in lending rates. For example, SBI MCLR has remained unchanged during FY22 for most tenure.

Government consumption also to slow down

The consumption demand in the economy has been mostly driven by government consumption in crisis time. In FY22 government consumption expense is expected to slow down to 11.6% of real GDP from 11.7% in FY21; though it shall remain higher than 10.6% seen in FY20.

In absolute terms, government consumption is expected to grow 7.5% (at fixed prices) over FY21 and 15% in nominal terms.

Investment growth healthy

Investments are projected to grow at a healthy pace in FY22. NSO expects investments to be 29.6% of FY22 estimated nominal GDP, which is the highest level since FY15. In FY22, investment (Gross Fixed Capital Formation or GFCF) is seen growing 29%. It is also expected to be 18% more than in FY20

Economy expected to grow faster in 2HFY22

NSO expects over half of the projected growth in agriculture, industry and services to come through in 2HFY22. Considering the current state of pandemic led mobility restrictions, these estimates may have some downside risk.

For example, NSO estimates factor in 60% of the projected annual growth in the hospitality sector to materialize in 2HFY22. Clearly this forecast is at risk.

Similarly, 58% of the over agriculture output is expected to materialize in 2HFY22. Considering the inclement weather conditions across North and East India, this estimate may be at some risk.

External risk could rise

Though the balance of payment remained in surplus during 2QFY22, the external risks could rise if exports fail to pick up materially in FY23.

In FY22, BoP has been supported by a capital account surplus of US$40bn (5.3% of GDP) led by higher SDR allocation by the IMF; increased FPI debt inflows; FDI inflows, external borrowings and NRI deposits. However both FDI and FPI inflows have slowed down in recent months.

As per various estimates, a wider trade deficit ($190bn FY22e and $200bn FY23e) is expected to lead the current account deficit to 1.7% in FY22. Kotak Equity Research expects CAD to be 1.7% of GDP, and cautions that for every US$10/bbl increase in average crude price, CAD may increase by US$17 bn (0.5% of GDP). These estimates also assume inclusion of India in global bond indices and consequent $25bn debt inflows. Failing which, the pressure on INR may increase forcing RBI to intervene more aggressively.

Fiscal deficit contained

The government has been to contain the fiscal deficit in April-November 2021 period with the help of lower revenue expenditure, higher tax collections and dividends, and spectrum receipts. However, the disinvestment receipts are significantly lower than the budget estimates.

The lower fiscal deficit allows some leverage to the government to increase investment and consumption expenditure in the last quarter to support demand during the current phase of pandemic restrictions. If this is the case, the yields may continue to stay elevated and pressure on INR will sustain.

Conclusion

Though the Indian economy has recovered well from the shock of pandemic, the recovery is not broad based and continues to be fragile. On the supply side, the two key drivers of growth, i.e., manufacturing and exports continue to lag; whereas on the demand side private consumption continues to be vulnerable. This makes the policy making function rather challenging. Continued supply side constraints may keep the pressure on prices high; tightening the hands of RBI. A rate hike on the other side may hit the already sluggish demand even harder.

FY23 could be a struggle to attain balance between these counter pressures. Obviously the government will have a larger role to play in this and fiscal policy will become more relevant than monetary policy.

 Historic performance of a banker

In the summer of 2007, at the peak of sub-prime bubble, a top executive at a global bank presented to the Board that the bank has expanded its footprints to 11 new frontier markets and materially augmented the operations in the 13 emerging markets by enhancing the workforce by 19% in the past one year, a record in the 90year history of the bank. The board applauded the presentation and approved the 100% hike in the annual bonus for the top executive.

In the spring of 2009, the same manager made another enthusiastic presentation to the management. He said, “the management has been able to cut the cost by a whopping 28% to meet the challenges of global financial crisis. We have optimized our operations by exiting the non-profitable operations in 17 frontier market and 2 merging markets, and materially curtailing the operations in 9 emerging markets, to achieve 20% cut in the total workforce in the past one year; a record in the 92years history of the bank. The board applauded the gigantic effort of the management and approved a modest 35% increase in the bonus of the top executive.

Super Heroes and the Super power

The President of the United States, Joseph Robinette Biden Jr., defended the decision to withdraw forces from Afghanistan after 20 years of conflict. He described the decision as “the best and the right decision for America which ended an era of major military deployments to rebuild other countries.” In his address to the nation on Tuesday, Biden said, “there was no reason to continue in a war that was no longer in the service of the vital national interest of the American people.” He further assured is people by saying, “I give you my word: With all of my heart, I believe this is the right decision, a wise decision, and the best decision for America, he said.”

When the US decided to send the troops on ground in Afghanistan in the wake of the attack on World trade Center in New York (9 September 2011), the then president George Bush has commented, "The attack took place on American soil, but it was an attack on the heart and soul of the civilized world. And the world has come together to fight a new and different war, the first, and we hope the only one, of the 21st century. A war against all those who seek to export terror, and a war against those governments that support or shelter them."

After 20years, the US government has ended the war by handing over the power to the same people who it was supposedly fighting for 20years.

However, both the decision to invade and quit have been described as historic and in the best interest of the people of United States.

Art of managing the denominators

“This is massive! India records a GDP growth of 21.1% in Q1 o FY21-22”, exclaimed a leader of the ruling party.

One of the key economic advisors of the government emphasized that “the GDP data for the first quarter reaffirms the government's prediction of an imminent V-shaped recovery made last year.”

“It's a big economic comeback. Q1 GDP of 2021-22 grows by a phenomenal 20.1% as per provisional estimates”, a senior union cabinet minister exuded ebullience.

Similar sentiments were expressed by most office bearers and prominent supporters of the ruling party, advisors to the government and members of the union cabinet.

On the other hand, the members of opposition parties, their supporters and some outside experts were not too impressed with the apparently high growth number.

A prominent left party leader rejected the claims of the government by highlighting that “Compared to 2 years ago, India’s GDP shrinks -9.2%.”

A Congress spokesman clarified that “India's GDP for April to June 2021-22 (Rs32.38trn) is lower than India's GDP for April to June 2019-20 (Rs35.85trn) and very close to India's GDP for April to June 2017-18.”

A former senior economic advisor to the government who is presently a senior official with IMF, rejected the GDP as a shocking bad news. He commented, “It needs just a little arithmetic to see that India's Apr-Jun 2021 growth of 20.1% is shocking bad news. The 20.1% is in comparison to Apr-Jun 2020 when India's GDP had fallen by 24.4%. This means compared to GDP in Apr-Jun 2019 (i.e. 2 years ago) India has had a negative growth of -9.2%.”

The politicians these days have mastered the art of managing the denominator. They set a weak denominator to exaggerate your status and performance. Most governments have, for example, moved the denominator to “pre Covid” levels to make exaggerated claims of their status and performances. Not many people are bothering to note that “pre Covid” conditions were pretty bad in itself and reaching there by making a V shaped recovery may not be a great feat in itself. Though it certainly provides comfort that we did not deteriorate much due to covid.

Insofar as the common people are concerned, they would be better off ignoring these manipulated narratives and focusing on the per capita real growth in GDP and change in the Gini coefficient that measures the scale of economic inequality in the country.

The real GDP growth in percentage terms will have little meaning if the base or the denominator is very low (which is the case at present) or it is not adjusted for the population growth or the real household inflation. A 5% real GDP growth with 2% population growth would mean just 2.9% growth in per capita income. This is not likely to cause any material improvement in their lifestyle; especially when it is deflated by the headline inflation which may be very different that their actual household inflation. Also if the income inequality rises more with rise in GDP, it would mean that their income may not rise in tandem with the rise in average per capita income of the country.

The latest GDP data released by the government has evoked mixed reactions. While less than contraction (-7.3% yoy) in overall FY21 real GDP is a matter of comfort, sharp contraction in private consumption and continued weakness in manufacturing (-6%) is a subject to be worried about. The better than expected economic performance has mostly been outcome of strong government consumption expenditure and large subsidies extended as part of various tranches of stimulus.

In the last quarter of FY21, India’s real GDP witnessed a growth of 1.6%. This is in spite of a poor base of mere 3% growth in 4QFY20 (disruption started in the base quarter) and significant relaxations in lockdown restrictions. This clearly indicate that normalization of economic activities might take much longer than earlier estimated.

I have always stated that quarterly growth data has little relevance for investors. It may hold some relevance for the policymakers to assess if any course correction is needed, but for a common investor it virtually has no meaning.

I also believe that extrapolation of annual real GDP growth data to immediate future years may also produce misleading results. The large projects that started in a year contribute to GDP through Gross Fixed Capital Formation (GFCF) head. However, the second and third round impact of these projects takes years to reflect in GDP growth; whereas the second round impact of consumption expenditure are usually visible relatively in lesser time. It would therefore be appropriate to judge the longer term trend in GDP growth to assess the likely growth trajectory in short term, (1-2years). I usually use 5year rolling CAGR in GDP to assess the likely growth trajectory of GDP in next couple of years.

This trend forewarned of a prolonged economic slowdown as early as FY11-FY12 (see chart). The long term (5yr CAGR) growth trajectory slipped below 6% in FY20, even before the pandemic induced slowdown was triggered. If we adjust the growth for FY21 and FY22 for sharp fall in FY21, and assume a 9% real GDP growth for FY22, we may end up with almost no growth during two period of FY21 and FY22. Assuming a further 8% growth for FY23 and 7% thereafter, we shall be able to attain the long term 6% growth trajectory only in FY27. A higher trajectory would be possible only post FY27. This essentially implies the following, in my view—

1.    The fiscal leverage with the government will become incrementally lesser. So unless the government decides to shed its inhibition and increase the capacity of its printing press, sustaining higher government consumption expenditure will become increasingly challenging.

2.    The private consumption demand might not improve materially in next couple of years as real household income remains stagnant. Discretionary consumption growth will particularly be impacted.

3.    The manufacturing growth will largely depend on exports and capacity building for import substitution. Technology leadership would be more important than the capacities.

4.    Construction and construction material sectors will overwhelming depend on government expenditure on capacity building.

5.    For next couple of years agriculture would remain mainstay of economic growth.

 The localized lockdown and mobility restrictions in past 6weeks have led to scaling down of FY22 GDP growth estimates. The new estimates mostly imply that Indian economy may record marginally negative growth during two period from April 2020 to March 2022. These estimates though assume (i) No community transmission of infections; (ii) no nationwide lockdown; (iii) no wider shutdown of industries and construction work; and (iv) normalization of mobility restriction in 2HFY22. Any further worsening of pandemic situation may lead to further downgrade of growth estimates resulting in spillover impact over FY23 as well.

The global rating agency S&P, recently published a note saying, “The possibility the government will impose more local lockdowns may thwart what was looking like a robust rebound in corporate profits, liquidity, funding access, government revenues, and banking system profitability.” The note further stated that agency is “looking at two scenarios, both entailing a cut in its GDP growth forecast for India:

·         In a moderate scenario, new infections peak in May 2021. If that happens, the hit to India’s GDP growth is estimated at 1.2 percentage points, indicating that India’s GDP is likely to grow 9.8% in FY22 compared with 11% growth estimated previously.

·         In a more severe scenario, new infections peak in late June 2021. In this case, the hit is estimated at 2.8 percentage points, with growth of 8.2%.”

As reported by Bloomberg, the scenario projections by S&P assume that initial shocks to private consumption and investment filter through to the rest of the economy. For instance, lower consumption will mean less hiring, lower wages, and a second hit to consumption, the note said. The severe scenario, which assumes hits to economic growth and infrastructure sector cash flows, presents more downside risks. Leverage remains elevate.

Incidentally, the current estimates appear to assuming a fast normalizing developed world, and hence buoyant export sector and capital flows.

IMF has projected US and China economies to move beyond their pre-Covid levels in 2021 itself, led by sharp rise in both consumption and investment. Even EU that bore the brunt of pandemic in 2020, is expected to reach near pre-covid level in 2021. This essentially implies rising global inflationary pressures creating possibilities for an earlier than currently forecasted monetary tightening. The capital flows to emerging market may there get impacted, if these forecast come true.

What no one is forecasting is a re-lapse of pandemic in the developed world. Rationally, it does not look likely, given the speed of vaccination, development of preventive ecosystem and treatment protocols. However given that the virus is mutating itself fast, assigning zero probability to this occurrence in economic forecasts may not be fully appropriate. God forbid, if this happens, Indian economy may decline rather precipitously.

The government had surprised the markets by maintaining strict fiscal discipline in Union Budget for FY22. So far we have not heard any relaxation in budget estimates of fiscal deficit. However, any worsening of conditions from here may require another dose of fiscal stimulus. It is pertinent to note that the fiscal stimulus last year was mostly focused on capacity building and easing liquidity. The present conditions require strong social sector spending program, which primarily aims at cash handouts. The recent setback to the ruling BJP in UP local body elections and West Bengal assembly elections; and continuing farmers’ agitation may motivate the government to consider material cash subsidies to poor and farmer ahead of critical state assembly elections in UP, Punjab, Odisha, Goa and Uttrkhand. All these elections are due in February/March 2022.

Insofar as stock market is concerned, the consensus appears to be leaning towards the strategy that the localized lockdowns may not hamper the industrial and construction sector like 2020, as the government has spared the manufacturing and infrastructure activities from lockdown restrictions. The consumption may however get impacted materially. Cyclical over Consumers appears the preferred trade as of now.

More on this next week.

The GDP data for 3QFY21 and second advance estimates for FY21, released by CSO last Friday has evoked mixed response from economists. While the positive growth number (0.4%) for 3QFY21 has been received with a sigh of relief (as it ends the technical recession), the downgrade of full year FY21 estimates from -7.5% to -8%, implies a negative growth print for 4QFY21. Presently, growth estimates for 4QFY21 range between -0.8% to -1.5%.

The slowing momentum in 4QFY21 has also resulted in changes in FY22 growth estimates; which now mostly range between 10-11%. This implies a normalized growth of about 1% CAGR over FY21-FY22.

I have highlighted this issue earlier also. For common man nominal GDP is more important because lot of variables like effective taxation, budgetary allocations for development and social welfare, subsidies, salaries of public servants, etc. are calculated as a factor of the nominal GDP. Lower nominal GDP essentially means lower income for people and lower tax revenue for the government.

For example, the sharper fall in nominal GDP has resulted in sharper rise in effective rate of indirect taxes; which impacts the common people more, resulting in increase in income inequality and social injustice

In my view, the fall in nominal GDP over past 7-8years has been more worrisome than the real GDP. The nominal GDP growth rate has almost halved during FYFY13 and FY20. One of the better part of FY21 GDP estimates is that the decline in nominal GDP seems to have been arrested. With larger inflation tolerance range of RBI, hopefully this trend might get reversed in due course.

Insofar as the enthusiasm over positive GDP growth print is concerned, I would like to highlight the concerns raised by Dr. Pranab Sen, former Chairman of Indian Statistical Commission. As per Dr. Sen-

·         Recent GDP data is indicative of the slowing growth momentum and suggests that Q4 is not going to be great.

·         Investments (Gross capital Formation) is worrying for FY22 also.

·         Negative growth in 3QFY21 in Public Services is a source of worry, as it highlights resource constraints for the government.

·         The government expenditure that contributed significantly to the GDP growth numbers, includes significant amount of repayments of past dues. The growth in actual expenditure on real goods and services or creation of demand is not significant.

On the positive side, the growth in construction and manufacturing sector is encouraging; while agriculture growth stays strong. Given the expected record Rabi crop this season, the agriculture growth is expected to stay strong in 4QFY21 also. This gives hope that the normalized GDP growth may return to pre Covid level (FY19) in FY23-FY24.

It is however pertinent to note that pre Covid growth rate was quite dismal, in all respects. Moreover, we may not achieve the 6% long term growth (5yr CAGR) trajectory for till FY25 at least.

Global economy

The year 2020 witnessed the global economy contracting by 3.5%, the worst peacetime performance after the great depression. IMF has recently forecasted a “strong” (5.5%) revival in 2021 and “normalization” (4.2%) in 2022. Which essentially means the global economy would be growing at less than 1% CAGR over two years (2020-2021). This rather long pause in global growth means serious setback to the development goals of poverty elimination, climate change and inclusion. The fact that this “pause” in growth could only be achieved with trillions of dollars in fiscal and monetary stimulus, highlights that the legacy of global financial crisis (GFC) and subsequent quantitative easing might have materially weakened the growth drivers of the global economy in past few decades, e.g., development of human capital, globalization of trade and commerce, poverty alleviation, productivity growth, etc.

The new global survey of 295 economists from 79 countries, commissioned by Oxfam, reveals that 87 per cent of respondents, including Jeffrey Sachs, Jayati Ghosh and Gabriel Zucman, expect an "increase" or a "major increase" in income inequality in their country as a result of the pandemic. (see here)

In Indian context, IMF is now forecasting a contraction of 8.5% for FY21 and a growth of 11.5% for FY22. This implies, like global economy, Indian economy would also be growing at less than 1% CAGR over two years (2020-2021). This “pause” in growth over two years comes at the expense significant fiscal leverage (rs30trn stimulus), and massive liquidity infusion.

The latest Oxfam report highlights that the pandemic induced lockdown may resulted in massive rise in socio-economic inequality. While the formal sector workers mostly escaped unscathed or with small salary cuts; the job losses in informal sector were massive. “Out of a total 122million people who lost their jobs, 75%, which accounts for 92million jobs, were lost in the informal sector. The disruption in school schedules may result in massive rise in school dropout young population, further widening the socio-economic abyss.

As per Oxfam, "Only 4% of rural households had a computer and less than 15% rural households had an internet connection. Only 6% of the poorest 20% has access to non-shared sources of improved sanitation, compared to 93.4% of the top 20%.

Global Trade

IMF sees global trade rising by 8.1% in 2021, after an estimated 9.6% decline in 2020. The rebound is much weaker, as compared to post global financial crisis (GFC) rebound in 2010-2011. The recovery would look even insipid if we factor in poor trade growth during 8yrs preceding the pandemic (2012-2019).

In a recent update, ING Bank highlighted—

“With freight rates signaling capacity constraints in world trade, it’s likely that trade volumes won’t be able to rise much further – even to serve catch-up demand – when countries emerge from the second wave of lockdowns. Capacity may only come back on stream slowly as shipping liners wait until the global recovery is more firmly underway before bringing back inactive ships. Even then, containers being unavailable where they are needed will drag on volumes for some time. Capacity constraints mean that trade volumes won’t be able to rise much further even when countries come out of lockdowns

In the near term, limits to global trade growth are likely to be a modest headwind for GDP compared to the far more disruptive domestic lockdowns. More important will be higher freight rates and import prices building inflationary pressures over the course of the year.”

The present state of global economy and trade is therefore far from Blue Sky; even though the dark clouds may have dispersed for now. A bullish bet on sustainable global recovery to beyond “Pre Covid sub optimal levels” might be premature as of this morning, in my view.

A sharp rise in inflation, as presently anticipated by a section of global economists and investors, forcing monetary tightening; could however lead even the recovery to Pre Covid level, halting in its strides.

 A literal interpretation of the latest statistics would indicate that Indian economy is passing through a recession and faces a specter of stagflation. A young demography like India can certainly not afford this condition.

The government officials have termed the recession as a “technical” one, induced temporarily by the total lockdown imposed in the wake of the outbreak of Covid-19 pandemic. The economic managers of the government have also vehemently denied any possibility of Indian economy slipping into a stagflationary trap.

In my view, however, this entire discussion based on official statistics might be “technical” in nature. Wandering through the streets of large cities and fields in the hinterlands over past few months, and interacting with people from various strata of the society, I am convinced that more than two third of Indian population may already be trapped in the stagflationary conditions, with their real income stagnant or declining over past few years and essential expenses rising. The economic and health shock of pandemic may have only accelerated the trend of deterioration.

Another noteworthy thing in the official narrative is that an attempt is being made to establish as desirable base for the future growth paradigm. This sounds unfortunate, as the pre March 2020 situation was worrisome and far from desirable state of economic growth. Therefore, in my view this “V shape recovery to pre March 2020 level” narrative is also ironical and redundant.

Nonetheless, as we approach end of calendar year 2020, it is useful to look at the latest economic trends; draw estimates for the next year and see if any changes are required in the investment strategy and investment portfolio.

I find the following economic trend worth noting. I shall continue to keep a close watch on these trends for my investment strategy purposes.

1.    The long term growth trend (5yr CAGR of Real GDP) of India’s GDP peaked in FY08 and has been declining since then. Even normalized for the sharp deceleration in pandemic affected FY21, the long term growth shall remain below 6% for next 3years at least. Success of recent stimulus program for promoting manufacturing and agriculture growth may add 50 to 75bps to India GDP by FY23. Even then the long term growth trajectory shall remain below the 9% rate desired to create enough employment for the fast increasing workforce of India.

2.    India’s savings rate, especially household savings rate, has been declining consistently for past 10years. On the other hand, the household indebtedness is on the rise. Historically, the domestic savings have supported both the public finances and private investments. Lower savings is making the growth and social sector spending more dependent on foreign capital. Nothing inherently wrong in borrowing from overseas; but it increases the external vulnerability, especially in the periods of crisis. The global monetary conditions indicate that the crisis may be more “norm” than “exceptions” in next decade. Obviously, a further deterioration in domestic savings will make us more vulnerable to global volatility.

3.    The export growth of India has been dismal in past decade. The stagnating exports in fact have been one of the primary factor behind declining growth trend in India. The government has apparently taken cognizance of this fact and taken a slew of measures to promote exports. I shall be keenly watching if these measures result in meaningful and sustainable acceleration in exports, especially manufactured exports, from India.

4.    After peaking in 2018, the non-performing assets in the Indian financial systems had shown encouraging trend in past two years. I shall be keenly watching the trend in NPA, once the relaxations given as part of support to businesses in post lockdown period end next year. A sharp rise in NPA level again would seriously impact the mid term growth prospects of the economy.

5.    The household and corporate investment in fixed assets has deteriorated in past decade. If the prevalent low interest rates fail to revive the investments in next couple of years, the mid-term growth potential of Indian economy could be seriously impacted. I shall be watching the revival of investment, which most analysts are expecting to happen in 2021.

6.    The real rates have remained negative for past many months now. It is estimated that the policy rates may have bottomed, and remain at present levels for most of 2021. This shall keep the real rates negative for 2021 also. I shall watch for any violation of this premise. The real rates turning positive may trigger a rise in short term rate and reallocation of assets.

7.    The tax collections have seen sharp decline in FY21. If the normalcy in tax collections is not restored in 2021, we shall see (i) material decline in government expenditure 9which has supported the growth revival so far); (ii) rise in effective tax rate; or (iii) both.

8.    Excess liquidity in the financial system has made the policy rates redundant in the near term. This situation cannot last for longer. Unless we see sharp acceleration in credit demand, RBI may be forced to change its “accommodative” policy stance. This may be negative for equities in the short term.

 The statistics for economic growth during 2QFY21; consumption, investment, exports and financial indicators etc. for the month of October were announced last week. The data has been received very enthusiastically. The general commentary is that the growth is “surprising”, and the recovery is much quicker and superior that previously estimated. The “buoyant” data and further encouraging news on vaccine development & launch kept the momentum in the stock market busy yesterday.

Since, most of the “surprised” reports are basing their arguments on the “Pre-Covid” and “Consensus Estimate” benchmarks; I find it pertinent to note the data with the usual year on year comparison.

1.    The production in eight core industries has contracted for eight consecutive months. In October 2020, the index of core industries fell by 2.5% compared to October 2020. It is important to note that in the base month October 2019, index had also contracted 5.5%.

While coal, fertiliser, cement and electricity recorded positive growth, crude oil, natural gas, refinery products and steel registered negative growth in the month of October 2020.

During April-October 2020, the index of core industries has now declined 13% as compared to a growth of 0.3% in the same period of the previous year.

2.    After witnessing an uptick in the overall export segment in the month of September, India's exports faltered back into the negative territory, contracting by 5.12% YoY in October.

The worrisome part however is that India has lagged its peers materially in exports growth in past many months. Comparative data of export growth on a three-month moving average basis showed that Vietnam, China and Taiwan have seen the strongest revival, followed by Bangladesh. India and Indonesia have lagged.

3.    India’s GDP contracted for second consecutive quarter on year on year basis. In 2QFY21 India’s GDP contracted 7.5% as compared to the same period in previous year. It is relevant to note that NSO has admitted data availability limitation and recognized a possibility of downward revisions to the GDP data for 2QFY21.

Nominal GDP contracted 4% on account of higher inflation in the quarter. Overall, H1FY21 GDP stands at -15.7%, worse than most of our peers.

I find the standalone growth statistics, independent of “pre-covid” and “consensus estimate” benchmarks, not very encouraging. Though one can certainly draw comfort from the fact that we may not deteriorate materially from the current level of economic activity. But we must recognize that the latest statistics implies two things:

 

2.    The potential growth rate for India’s economy which was bordering 9.5-10% a decade ago, may itself have fallen to 7-8% in these two years. Remember, even this “less contraction: is happening on the back of massively negative interest rates.

 

The increase in value of equity portfolio in recent days is causing more discomfort to me rather than giving any satisfaction. For all practical purposes I am discounting my portfolio by 20%.