The latest GDP data released by the government has evoked mixed reactions. While less than contraction (-7.3% yoy) in overall FY21 real GDP is a matter of comfort, sharp contraction in private consumption and continued weakness in manufacturing (-6%) is a subject to be worried about. The better than expected economic performance has mostly been outcome of strong government consumption expenditure and large subsidies extended as part of various tranches of stimulus.
In the last quarter of FY21, India’s real GDP witnessed a growth
of 1.6%. This is in spite of a poor base of mere 3% growth in 4QFY20
(disruption started in the base quarter) and significant relaxations in
lockdown restrictions. This clearly indicate that normalization of economic
activities might take much longer than earlier estimated.
I have always stated that quarterly growth data has little
relevance for investors. It may hold some relevance for the policymakers to
assess if any course correction is needed, but for a common investor it
virtually has no meaning.
I also believe that extrapolation of annual real GDP growth data
to immediate future years may also produce misleading results. The large
projects that started in a year contribute to GDP through Gross Fixed Capital
Formation (GFCF) head. However, the second and third round impact of these
projects takes years to reflect in GDP growth; whereas the second round impact
of consumption expenditure are usually visible relatively in lesser time. It
would therefore be appropriate to judge the longer term trend in GDP growth to
assess the likely growth trajectory in short term, (1-2years). I usually use 5year
rolling CAGR in GDP to assess the likely growth trajectory of GDP in next
couple of years.
This trend forewarned of a prolonged economic slowdown as early
as FY11-FY12 (see chart). The long term (5yr CAGR) growth trajectory slipped
below 6% in FY20, even before the pandemic induced slowdown was triggered. If
we adjust the growth for FY21 and FY22 for sharp fall in FY21, and assume a 9%
real GDP growth for FY22, we may end up with almost no growth during two period
of FY21 and FY22. Assuming a further 8% growth for FY23 and 7% thereafter, we
shall be able to attain the long term 6% growth trajectory only in FY27. A
higher trajectory would be possible only post FY27. This essentially implies
the following, in my view—
1. The fiscal
leverage with the government will become incrementally lesser. So unless the
government decides to shed its inhibition and increase the capacity of its
printing press, sustaining higher government consumption expenditure will
become increasingly challenging.
2. The private
consumption demand might not improve materially in next couple of years as real
household income remains stagnant. Discretionary consumption growth will
particularly be impacted.
3. The manufacturing
growth will largely depend on exports and capacity building for import
substitution. Technology leadership would be more important than the
capacities.
4. Construction and
construction material sectors will overwhelming depend on government
expenditure on capacity building.
5. For next couple
of years agriculture would remain mainstay of economic growth.
No comments:
Post a Comment