Do it yourself

In a keenly watched two-day meeting, the first after the inauguration of the new US President, the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) of the US Federal Reserve (Fed) decided to pause its kept federal fund rates in 4.25%-4.5% range, after cutting it overall by 1% over its three previous meetings. The decision to pause is governed by a strong and resilient labor market and persisting inflation.

In a post meeting press interaction, Fed Chairman Jerome Powell noted that “The unemployment rate has stabilized at a low level in recent months, labor market conditions remain solid, and Inflation remains somewhat elevated.” He further added that the Fed needs to see “real progress on inflation or some weakness in the labor market before we consider making adjustments.”

Most notably, he emphasized that we're meaningfully above the ‘neutral rate’. He said, “I have no illusion that anyone knows precisely how much that is and but having cut 100 basis points means that it's appropriate that we not be in a hurry to make further adjustments.” (‘Neutral rate’ is a fed rate that is considered neither stimulative nor restrictive of growth under the current circumstances.)

Higher for longer: The market participants have taken this to imply that the current rate cut cycle is certainly not over and may resume after a pause, as the Fed gathers more evidence on inflation. Nonetheless, analysts now appear less sanguine about the lower bound of the present rate cut cycle. The consensus amongst them is emerging that the long-term bottom rate may have risen to 3% from the earlier estimates 2.5%. The ‘Fed pause’ is also being influenced by uncertainties surrounding the new administration's direction - on fiscal, trade, and government spending matters. The Fed officials noted “they don't intend to react until policies reach the implementation stage and begin to impact incoming economic data”.

Markets: Post the Fed decision, stock prices ended lower (S&P500 -0.5%), USD marginally stronger (DXY +0.2%) and benchmark bonds stronger (US 10yr Yield -0.37%).

RBI: The ‘Fed pause’ has made the February 06^th rate cut by the Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), less certain. There are however more chances that RBI may change its stance to ‘accommodative’ from ‘withdrawal of accommodation’, signaling now growth is a priority over inflation.

The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) of the US federal Reserve (Fed) obliged the market consensus by cutting its overnight borrowing rate by 25bps to a target range of 4.25%-4.5%. One member of FOMC voted against the cut, preferring to maintain the status quo.

Noting the economic conditions, especially still elevated inflationary expectations and resilient growth, the Fed indicated that 2025 may see fewer cuts than the previously estimated number. “With today’s action, we have lowered our policy rate by a full percentage point from its peak, and our policy stance is now significantly less restrictive,” Chair Jerome Powell said at his post-meeting news conference. “We can therefore be more cautious as we consider further adjustments to our policy rate.”

The FOMC raised its projection for full-year 2024 GDP growth to 2.5%, from 2% in September. However, in the following years, the FOMC officials expect GDP to slow down to its long-term projection of 1.8%. The committee lowered its expected unemployment rate in 2024 to 4.2%, while headline and core inflation were pushed higher to 2.4% and 2.8% respectively, slightly higher than the September estimate and above the Fed’s 2% goal.

The resilient growth and elevated inflationary expectations would require the Fed to hike or hold rates in 2025. However, officials appear wary of keeping rates too high and risking an unnecessary slowdown in the economy.

Insofar as the Trump 2.0 policies and their impact on the growth are concerned, the Fed Chairman Jerome Powell prefers a wait and watch approach. IN the post FOMC meet press interaction he said, “We’re just not at that stage.” He further added, “We need to take our time, not rush and make a very careful assessment, but only when we’ve actually seen what the policies are and how they’ve been implemented.”

The financial markets reacted negatively to the FOMC decision. Dow Jones lost 1123 (2.58%). Falling for the tenth consecutive day, it has recorded its worst losing streak since an 11-day slide in 1974. The S&P500 (-2.95%) and Nasdaq Composite (-3.56%) fell even more. The benchmark 10-year treasury yields jumped 3.08% to 4.52%, the highest level since April 2024 and 90bps higher than their August 2024 lows. UST Index rose 1.2% to its highest level in almost three years. Gold prices fell 2.3%, taking the yellow metal below US$2600 level after 3 months.

Ending the weeks of intense speculation, anticipation and debate last night, the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) of the US Federal Reserve started the latest monetary easing cycle with a 50bps fund rate cut. The Fed fund rate range now stands at 4.75-5.00% This is the first Fed rate cut since March 2020 and has come after a fourteen months policy pause.

No panic in the boardroom

Unlike the previous two rate cycles that started with a rather aggressive 50bps rate cut – first October 2008 post the Lehman collapse and second March 2020 post Covid-19 break out – this cut is apparently not a panic cut.

The Fed chairman sounded confident about growth and employment level. He emphasized that the central bank is not in a hurry to ease policy, as he sees no likelihood of an elevated downturn in the economy. He mentioned, “There’s nothing in the SEP (Summary of Economic Projections) that suggests the committee is in a rush to get this done.”

The Chairman categorically advised the markets to not take this 50bps cut as “new pace”. He said, “we’re going to go carefully meeting by meeting, and make our decisions as we go”.

The decision to cut was however not unanimous. In a rare dissent, one member (Michelle Bowman) voted for a 25bps. This could be seen as yet another sign of “no panic” in the Fed board room.

Committed to price stability without pain in labor market

Announcing a victory over inflation, Mr. Powell announced, “The U.S. economy is in good shape. It is growing at a solid pace. Inflation is coming down.”

As per the latest economic data release, the US GDP expanded at 3% annual rate in 2Q2024 with 4.2% unemployment rate (considered near full employment), and inflation at 2.2% in August 2024.

Outlining the latest policy objectives, he commented, “We’re trying to achieve a situation where we restore price stability without the kind of painful increase in unemployment that has come sometimes with disinflation”. Guiding the markets, he emphasized that investors should take the Fed’s 50bps rate cut as a sign of its “strong commitment” toward achieving that goal.

Neutral rate seen close to 3%

The FOMC members see cuts of 25bps each in November and December FOMC meetings; 100bps cut in 2025 and 25bps cut in 2026 – implying that the latest easing cycle may end with the Fed rate range of 2.75-3.00%.

The Fed Chairman also mentioned in the post FOMC press meet that the neutral rate is likely significantly higher than it was on the previous occasions.

Markets ended lower

Markets – equity, bonds and commodities – ended the day with marginal cuts post the Fed announcement; while the USD was marginally stronger. This could be an outcome of either (i) sell on news; or (ii) traders’ disbelief in what Fed says about the strength of the economy.

What now

In my view, this aggressive 50bps cut is more of a correction than an aberration. Perhaps the Fed realized that they are running slightly behind the curve and hence tried to catch up. I do not see it as a panic move and would not like to indulge in “there is more to it than what meets the eye” debate.

Unlike 2008, there is no corporate balance sheet crisis, no risk of global markets freezing, and unlike 2020 there is no shutdown necessitating fiscal and monetary profligacy. It is a normal rate cycle change in response to a normalizing economic cycle. Therefore, expecting a market reaction like 2008 (sharply down) or 2020 (sharply higher) may not be appropriate.

I feel the US markets will adjust to the new policy trajectory in a couple of weeks and move accordingly. The lower rates shall help arrest the decline in the US housing markets and consumer spending. The bond yields may come down and the hedge trade in gold may begin to unwind. The corporate discretionary spend may also normalize as the cost of borrowing eases. This could be a relief for the Indian IT services companies.

For India, I am not sure if the RBI will rush to cut in October meeting, but would not rule it out completely. Financials and commodities are two sectors that need to be watched closely, in my view.

In the next couple of months, the markets in India will be driven by the 2QFY25 earnings. Any disappointment could lead to a decent correction in the markets. For now, I do not see a need to make any change in my investment strategy. (More on this next week)

The major risk to the markets comes from geopolitics now. The situation in the Middle East is worsening by the hour. NATO and CRIK (China, Russia, Iran and North Korea) alliances are hardening their positions, both on trade and war, making the situation explosive. (More on this next week)

The US Federal Reserve (Fed) Chairman Jerome Powell has provided the much-anticipated fuel to the US markets, which appeared running out of fuel after a shocking job revision. Speaking at the annual Jackson Hole symposium, he unambiguously hinted that “The time has come for policy to adjust” as “inflation has declined significantly. The labor market is no longer overheated, and conditions are now less tight than those that prevailed before the pandemic”. Though he qualified his remarks by adding, “the timing and pace of rate cuts will depend on incoming data, the evolving outlook and the balance of risks”.

These comments read with the minutes of the last meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) provide adequate ground to believe that—

(i)      The current rate cycle has peaked out; and the next policy move will be a rate cut.

(ii)     The policymakers are confident the spike in inflation that occurred in the aftermath of Covid-19 pandemic (massive cash stimulus fueling demand and logistic challenges causing break in global supply chains) has been successfully tamed.

(iii)   The economy is no longer overheated as the pandemic stimuli have been gradually withdrawn, the job market has cooled down, and commodity prices are behaving normally.

Though Mr. Powell did not make it clear that the FOMC will cut rate in the next meeting scheduled to be held on 17-18^h September 2024; the market consensus is assuming it to be a certainty. The debate is now circling around how aggressive the Fed could be in their pursuit of policy easing. Though, Mr. Powell emphasized that the rate cut will be data driven, a majority of market participants are expecting a 25bps cut each on 18^th September, 7^th November and 18 December. Some aggressive estimates are building 50bps cut each in September and December.

I am not competent to comment on the dynamics of the US monetary policy and its implications for the global economy and markets. My concern at this time is limited to how does the likely change in the Fed’s policy stance affects my tine portfolio of investments, if at all.

In this context I note that—

·            In its last meeting, the Monetary Policy Committee of the RBI retained its policy stance of withdrawal of accommodation and maintained the status quo on policy rates by a four to two majority vote.

One of the dissenting members, emphasized that “Global uncertainties continue. The Fed, in indicating a cut in its September meeting, pointed out that since monetary policy acts with a lag they can't afford to wait until they reach their inflation target before cutting. That lag may be responsible for the sharply adverse August jobs report that has stoked recession fears and created market volatility. That a series of small signals were ignored, may have led to a critical large one. Monetary policy needs to act well in time. Spillovers led the global manufacturing PMI into contraction zone in July at 49.7.” (See here)

The other dissenting member was even forceful in his dissent, stressing, “For the last several meetings, I have been expressing concerns about the unacceptable growth sacrifice induced by a monetary policy that is excessively restrictive. The majority of the MPC however do not share this concern, perhaps because they think that the Indian economy is already growing at close to its potential growth rate. I think that such a view reflects (a) an unwarranted pessimism about the growth potential of the economy and (b) an overly sanguine expectation about growth in ensuing quarters. I disagree with both prongs of this assessment.” (See here)

This clearly highlights that despite being warned of the perils of running behind the curve and impairing the growth potential, the MPC decided to retain its stance. Maybe the RBI is not as sanguine about the price stability and growth potential as some of the members of the MPC.

·            The fourteen-month gap (July 2023 to September 2024) between the Fed pause and the first cut would be the second longest in the past five decades. The markets have been anticipating a Fed rate cut for almost a year now.

In this period, the stock markets, both the US and the Indian, have not witnessed any meaningful correction and are already at an all time high level. The question is whether the anticipated rate cut would provide immediate impetus to the markets; or the markets will be worried about further deterioration in economic growth.

It is pertinent to note that empirical evidence suggests that in the past three rate cycles, the US market has fallen 12 to 50% during the Fed rate cuts.

·         The governments in the US and India are not in a position to back up the monetary policy easing with fiscal stimuli.

Under the circumstances, for now I am more inclined to assume that:

·         It is not certain that the RBI will immediately follow the US Fed in cutting rates, unless strong evidence of growth collapsing emerges. Rise in the yield differential may attract stronger flows and support USDINR and markets.

·         A weaker USD may support commodity prices

·         A panic cut by RBI on the other hand may adversely affect the margins of banks (loans get repriced immediately while deposits take longer; CD ratio faces further pressure); and also affect the overall sentiments.

·         The earnings momentum appears to have slowed down in 1QFY25. A sharp cut by RBI might arrest the slowdown in earnings momentum; and also help higher equity valuations to sustain.

·         Negative real rates may adversely affect savers (consumption) and support capex.

I will review my portfolio in accordance with these assumptions in the next review. For now, I am just staying put.

The minutes of the last meeting (30 April 2024 – 1 May 2024) of the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) of the US were released last week. The discussion provides a decent insight into the policymakers’ thought process about the near-term economic outlook and the likely policy direction.

 Sitharaman, Powell toss the ball in Das’s court

Wednesday night, the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) decided to maintain the status quo on policy rates for the fourth successive review. The Committee reiterated that it “does not expect it will be appropriate to reduce the target range until it has gained greater confidence that inflation is moving sustainably toward two percent.” The Committee however made it quite clear that any rate hike from the present level is no longer on the table.

In the post-meeting press meeting, Fed Chairman Jerome Powell indicated that FOMC may not consider rate cuts in its next meeting in March 2024. The market is thus expecting a rate cut in May 2024.

In another development, the Union Finance Minister, Ms. Nirmala Sitharaman, presented an interim budget for the fiscal year 2024-25. Two notable features of the interim budget were (i) Nominal GDP growth projection for FY25 at 10.5%, implying a well-controlled inflation environment; and (ii) Fiscal deficit of 5.1% of GDP for FY25BE, implying a strong commitment to fiscal discipline.

In line with the lower fiscal deficit projection, the borrowing program of the government has also been moderated. The finance minister has proposed Rs11.75trn of net borrowing from the market by way of fresh government securities in FY25BE against Rs11.80 borrowed in FY24RE. This shall leave decent scope for private investment.

In her speech, the finance minister also emphasized the supportive environment her government is building for acceleration in private capex to achieve the high growth targets. The minister has provided higher allocation for production-linked incentives (PLI).

With the global rate and monetary policy environment set to become benign in 2H2024; domestic macro (fiscal deficit, inflation, external conditions, etc.) improving and the government holding its side of promise to maintain fiscal discipline despite forthcoming general elections, the ball is now in the court of the Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) to provide impetus to the economic growth.

The risks to inflation now mostly stem from food (inclement weather) and energy (geopolitical disruptions) which may not have a significant correlation with the policy rates. It would therefore be in order for RBI to guide a lower rate path and increase system liquidity.

The MPC meeting next week therefore will be watched with keen interest. I would not expect any immediate rate cut (though it will be welcome if happens), a clear guidance for lower rates going forward and enhanced system liquidity is what I do expect from MPC. If RBI delivers on these expectations, markets could rally to new highs led by financials and rate-sensitive sectors like auto and real estate.

As widely expected, the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) of the US Federal Reserve, unanimously decided to keep the key fund rates at 5.00% - 5.25% for the second consecutive time. The FOMC had last increased the rates in July 2023.

The Committee noted, "Economic activity expanded at a strong pace in the third quarter". It also acknowledged “the tighter financial conditions faced by businesses and households”. Upgrading its outlook for the US economy, Fed Chairman Jerome Powell remarked, “The process of getting inflation sustainably down to 2% has a long way to go”.

After the last meeting in September 2023, the monetary policy statement issued by the FOMC had noted that “credit conditions have tightened” consequent to the eleven consecutive hikes delivered by the Fed. This time, the Committee added “financial” to the credit conditions, noting the rising stress in the financial system as a consequence of rising bond yields.

Caught between the resilient economy and building stress in the financial system, the Federal Reserve seems to have decided to stay on the fringe and let the markets find their equilibrium.

Though, the post-meeting FOMC statement reads, “committee is still determining the extent of additional policy firming” and “The Committee will continue to assess additional information and its implications for monetary policy,” the consensus in the market is leaning towards “a long pause” followed by a series of cuts; assuming the Fed is done with hiking and it will now wait for the market forces to find an equilibrium on prices and growth.

Whitney Watson, co-CIO of fixed income and liquidity solutions at Goldman Sachs Asset Management, reportedly commented it’s likely the Fed will keep its policy unchanged into next year. “There are risks in both directions,” Watson said. “The rise in inflation expectations, owing to higher gas prices, combined with strong economic activity, preserves the prospect of another rate hike. Conversely, a more pronounced economic slowdown caused by the growing impact of higher interest rates might accelerate the timeline for transitioning to rate cuts.”

Post the release of the FOMC statement, the yield on the two-year Treasury, which is more sensitive to Fed policy, fell 12.5 basis points to 4.93%, the lowest level since September 2023. Stocks also rallied with S&P500 and NASDAQ ending the day with over one percent gains.

The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) of the US Federal Reserve (the Fed) decided unanimously to keep the benchmark fund rate in the range of 5.25% - 5.5%; pausing one of the sharpest hike cycles in the past four decades. Beginning in March 2022, the Fed has hiked the benchmark rate 11 times to the highest since 2001.

The latest FOMC decision may be influenced by the recent evidence showing that the hikes already implemented are beginning to impact inflation, despite strong economic outcomes. Notwithstanding, its latest decision to pause, 12 out of 19 FOMC members felt that one more rate hike would be needed in 2023 before the current rate hike cycle ends, as inflation is still running above the Fed’s 2% target. The persistent strength in the economy requires caution as inflation might bounce back again.

In particular, FOMC members sounded cautious about the tight labor market, as wage growth has so far accounted for the bulk of price pressures in the service sector,

Higher for longer

Speaking at the post-meeting press conference, Fed Chairman Jerome Powell, cautioned that "Holding the rate doesn't mean we have reached the stance we seek”. The committee projects the median Federal Funds rate at 5.1% in 2024, higher than its June estimate of 4.6%, suggesting that rates will remain higher for longer than earlier projections.

The FOMC members now see a couple of rate cuts in 2024, against four rate cuts projected previously. For 2025, interest rates are expected to drop to 3.9%, well above the 3.4% previously projected, and fall further to 2.9% in 2026.

Economic growth forecast upgrade

Taking cognizance of the persistent strength in the economy, FOMC upgraded its economic growth forecast for 2023 to 2.1% from the previous 1% rate projected in the June 2023 meeting. The growth forecast for 2024 was also raised to 1.5% from the previous 2.1%.

Yields spike, curve inverted

Post the announcement of the FOMC decision, the US bond yields rose to cycle highs. The benchmark 10-year G-Sec yields ended at 4.395%, while the more sensitive 2yr yields were at 5.17%. The US treasury bond yield curve is now sharply inverted, indicating market expectations of much slower growth, if not full-blown recession in the offing.

Equities correct led by big Tech

The US Equities corrected over 1% from their intraday highs, post the FOMC decision. The fall was led by the growth sectors, especially the big technology companies like Alphabet (-3%), and Meta Platforms (-1%) and Apple (-1%).

 I have often seen that when we fail to find solutions to our problems with the help of science and economics, we tend to look towards the heavens and seek to find answers in philosophy. It is not uncommon for businesses, administrators, and policymakers to seek divine intervention when science and economics are not helping to resolve a problem. The global policymakers and administrators seem to have reached such a crossroads one more time, where the conventional practices, accumulated knowledge, and past experiences do not appear to be of much help. Their actions appear driven more by hope than conviction.

The war in Ukraine; the economic slowdown in China; and the monetary policy dilemma in the US and India are some examples of problems where the administrators and policymakers seem to be hoping for divine intervention. I see the recent speech of the US Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell at the Jackson Hole symposium and the minutes of the last meeting of the monetary policy committee of the Reserve Bank of India in this light.

After 16 months of aggressive monetary tightening, the Fed is not confident whether they have done enough; or they have overdone with tightening or they are lagging behind. He reiterated that the policy is restrictive enough to anchor inflationary expectations, but still expressed fears that the high inflation might get entrenched in the economy and may require treatment at the expense of higher unemployment. Chairman Powell indeed sounded more like a sailor trapped in a storm, when he said, “We are navigating by the stars under cloudy skies”.

The situation in the US, as I see it from thirty-five thousand feet above sea level, is as follows:

·         The US Federal Reserve has hiked the key policy rates from near zero (0.25%) in March 2022 to 5.5% in August 2023. This is one of the steepest hikes in the past four decades.

·         The US financial system faces a serious challenge as MTM losses on the bond portfolios are accelerating; retail delinquencies have started to build up;

·         The positive real rates in the US are now 2% or higher. Despite these restrictive rates, the economy is not showing much sign of cooling down. The probability of growth acceleration in the US economy in the next couple of years is therefore remote.

·         Inflation continues to persist above 4% against a committed target of 2%. The household savings may therefore continue to shrink at an accelerated pace.

·         The mortgage rates are well above 7%, the highest in two decades. Housing affordability is at its worst in history.

·         The US government is paying close to US$1trn/year (about 20% of revenue) in interest on its borrowing, which is an unsustainable level.

·         The cost of borrowing (and interest burden) for the US government shall continue to rise for a few years at least as the Fed reduces its balance sheet, foreign governments cut on their demand for the US treasuries, and the rating of the US government’s debt face further downgrades. The fiscal pressures thus remain elevated.

·         The money supply (M1) in the US at US$19trn is about 4.5x of the pre-Covid levels. It may take years to normalize at the current speed of quantitative tightening (QT) by the Federal Reserve.

·        
The “Lower for Longer” narrative has metamorphosed quickly into “Higher for Longer”. However, analysts, economists, and strategists who are in their 30s may have never witnessed a major rate or inflation cycle in their professional careers. Their assessment of peak rates and peak inflation may be suffering from some limitations.

….to continue tomorrow

 The Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) is currently holding its bi-monthly meeting. This particular MPC meeting is perhaps one of the least discussed by the market participants. There is not much anticipation about the outcome that will be known tomorrow morning. The consensus overwhelmingly believes that RBI will maintain the status quo on rates and monetary policy stance.

A quick reference to a note prepared by the research team of the State Bank of India would be apt to highlight the extent of the lack of excitement amongst market participants over this MPC meet. The SBI team devoted three full pages to verify a humorous US study that correlates the height of Fed chairman to the rate hikes and discovered that incidentally it is true in the case of India also.

Though the market is divided in its expectation about the course of action the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) of the Federal Reserve of the US would take in their meeting scheduled on 13-14 June 2023; few expect a 25bps hike by the Fed would have any bearing on the RBI decision making. To that extent RBI policy making effort may have already diverged from the developed market central bankers, particularly the US Federal Reserve.

The reasons for this divergence in the direction of monetary policy are obvious – strong growth data; inflation within tolerance range; stable bonds and currency markets; comfortable liquidity; positive foreign flows; much improved current account; and better than expected corporate performance. Specter of an erratic monsoon is definitely a red flag; but it may influence the timing to begin easing the monetary policy rather than the decision to maintain the status quo. 

I find it interesting to note that economists are not bothered to mention the probability of the MPC to consider accelerated tightening due to heating of economy, especially given the GDP growth has outpaced RBI’s own much above consensus forecast; spike in unsecured personal loans; and sharp rise in real estate prices in most urban and semi urban pockets.

Like market participants, I am not eagerly waiting to hear what the governor Das has to say on the MPC decision tomorrow morning. Nonetheless, I would be keenly watching if the RBI takes some precautionary steps to check unsecured personal loans and credit to the real estate market. I am also not keen to look for a hint of rate cut in the August meeting, though the real rates are now in the territory where these could constrict growth.

 The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) of the Federal Reserve of the US announced another 25bps hike, taking its key fed fund rate toa target range of 5.00 to 5.25%. This unanimous decision of the FOMC is the 10^th straight hike in the past twelve months. With this hike, the effective fed fund rate is now highest since the global financial crisis. Besides the hike, the Fed also maintains the plan to shrink the balance sheet each month by $60 billion for Treasuries and $35 billion for mortgage-backed securities.

…claims banking system “strong and resilient”

Noting the concerns in the financial markets, especially those arising from the failure of Signature Bank, Silicon Valley Bank and First Republic Bank, the FOMC emphasized that "The U.S. banking system is sound and resilient. Tighter credit conditions for households and businesses are likely to weigh on economic activity, hiring, and inflation. The extent of these effects remains uncertain. The Committee remains highly attentive to inflation risks."

…reiterates “growth modest”, “job gains robust” and “inflation elevated”

The FOMC noted that recent data suggest that growth has been modest while “job gains have been robust” and inflation is “elevated.” Reiterating its commitment to the 2% inflation target, the Committee cautioned about the further slowdown in economic growth due to tighter credit. FOMC post policy meeting statement read, “tighter credit conditions for households and businesses are likely to weigh on economic activity, hiring, and inflation. The extent of these effects remains uncertain. The Committee remains highly attentive to inflation risks.” This is very similar to what the FOMC had stated in previous policy statement in March 2023, which had come just after the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank.

…stops short of saying “pause”

The latest FOMC statement omitted the previous wording ““some additional policy firming” and instead said it “will take into account various factors “in determining the extent to which additional policy firming may be appropriate”. Analysts largely interpreted this change as a signal for pause from the next meeting in June 2023; though no one suggested that any policy easing may be imminent.

The US Federal Reserve Open Market Committee (FOMC) decided to hike the key federal fund rate by 25bps to 4.75% - 5% range. This is the eighth straight hike decision by the FOMC since the Fed started its fight against inflation in March 2022; bringing the rates to highest since September 2007.

Speaking to the press post FOMC meeting, the Fed chairman Jerome Powell, dismissed the speculation about any imminent rate cuts, stating “FOMC participants don't see rate cuts this year, it is not our baseline expectations”.

The post meeting statement of FOMC indicated that the policy may remain sufficiently restrictive though future hikes shall be data dependent. The statement read “The Committee anticipates that some additional policy firming may be appropriate in order to attain a stance of monetary policy that is sufficiently restrictive to return inflation to 2 percent over time” and “The Committee will closely monitor incoming information and assess the implications for monetary policy”.

The market participants interpreted the statement to imply that at least one more rate hike of 25bps will be done this year, before the Fed hits a pause button.

Powell emphasized that the Fed is “committed to restoring price stability, and all of the evidence says that the public has confidence that we will do so.” Speaking about the recent banking sector crisis, the chairman assured that “US banking system is sound and resilient” and the Fed is “prepared to use all of its tools to maintain stability.” He however admitted that recent banking turmoil is “likely to result in tighter credit conditions for households and businesses, which would in turn affect economic outcomes.”

The Fed maintained that the current pace of quantitative tightening (QT) shall continue, though recent emergency measures to mitigate the impact of the banking crisis have resulted in expansion of its balance sheet.

The US equities ended the session with a cut of 1.6%; while US dollar index 9DXY) lost 0.7%.

The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) of the US Federal Reserve (Fed) unanimously decided to hike the key bank rate by 50bps to 4.25%-4.5% target range, the highest since 2007. From near zero in the beginning of the year, this is perhaps the sharpest rise in rates in one calendar year.

In the customary post meeting press conference, the Fed chairman Jerome Powell emphasized on the commitment to rein inflation. He said, “we still have some ways to go” and “I wouldn’t see us considering rate cuts until the committee is confident that inflation is moving down to 2% in a sustained way,” indicating that rates will rise in 2023, though not at the same speed as 2022. The Fed chairman reiterated, “It is our judgment today that we are not at a sufficiently restrictive policy stance yet,” adding “We will stay the course until the job is done.”

The Fed Chairman had stated after the November FOMC meeting that the pace of tightening is less significant than the peak and the duration of rates at a high level. The Fed’s latest stance also emphasizes that the markets should brace for “higher for longer”.

The FOMC statement clearly indicated that they are aware that higher rates will impact the economy adversely. The projected unemployment rate for 2023 has been hiked to 4.6% from 3.7% in November 2022, as the economy is forecasted to grow at just 0.5% in 2023, at the same pace as 2022. The Chairman noted, “I wish there were completely painless way to restore price stability. There isn't, and this is the best we can do.”

It would be interesting to see if the Fed can actually deliver a soft landing of the economy as promised, without triggering a deeper recession, while attaining a milder inflation as per the target.

The Fed Chairman welcomed the recent lower inflation prints, but wants more substantial evidence to believe that the inflation is on a sustained downward path. He said, “the inflation data received so far in October and November show a welcome reduction in the pace of price increases, but it will take substantially more evidence to give confidence inflation is on a sustained downward path.” The Fed now expects the personal consumption expenditures price index, currently running at 6% - to cool to 3.1% in the final quarter of next year and to 2.5% by the end of 2024.

Belying the market expectations, the Fed Chairman clearly hinted that the rate hikes will continue in 2023 and the policymakers projected rates now indicate that we may end the next year around 5.1%, slightly higher than the previous projections. The dot plot now indicates a cut of 100bps from 5.1% in 2024.

 The latest policy statement and the aggressive stance of the Fed, is likely to anchor the inflationary expectations while resting the frequent speculations of an imminent “peak” followed by immediate easing of rates.

The equity markets were disappointed as most participants were expecting a “peak” below5% and a cut in 2023 itself. The stock ended lower after a volatile session. The bond markets were however not too bothered and yields ended marginally lower after the Fed statement.

 The minutes of the last meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) of the US Federal Reserve System (Fed), held in November 2022, were released a couple of days ago. The meeting was a joint meeting of the FOMC and the Board of Governors of the Fed, hence the number of participants were much larger than a usual FOMC meeting.

After the release of the minutes, the popular media narrative has been that the Fed officials and most participants are concerned about the likely adverse impact rate increases could have on financial stability and the economy; hence, we could “soon” see the Fed scaling down the pace of rate increases. The markets have obviously drawn a sense of comfort from this narrative and decided to move higher.

The minutes make some points that I found worth noting. From a plain reading of the minutes, I find that the participants were generally—

(a)   Surprised by the resilience of the job market;

(b)   Concerned about the persistence of the inflation and assessed the risk on the upside;

(c)    Comfortable with the broad economic conditions which are presently indicating slower growth but no risk of recession;

(d)   Comfortable with the anchored inflationary expectations;

(e)    Confident that the monetary tightening will reflect on inflation and other economic conditions with a time lag;

(f)    Inclined to keep the monetary policy “restrictive” for long;

(g)    Focused on the final Fed rate that would be adequately restrictive, rather than the rate hiked per meeting; and

(h)   Mindful of the market expectations and behaviour about the monetary policy direction and trajectory.

The media narrative of a slower pace of hikes (50bps in December meeting), seems to be driven by the following five mentions in the FOMC minutes:

1.    The minutes noted that “Most respondents to the Open Market Desk’s surveys viewed a 50 basis point increase in the target range for the federal funds rate at the December meeting as the most likely outcome.”

2.    “A number of participants observed that, as monetary policy approached a stance that was sufficiently restrictive to achieve the Committee’s goals, it would become appropriate to slow the pace of increase in the target range for the federal funds rate. In addition, a substantial majority of participants judged that a slowing in the pace of increase would likely soon be appropriate. A slower pace in these circumstances would better allow the Committee to assess progress toward its goals of maximum employment and price stability. The uncertain lags and magnitudes associated with the effects of monetary policy actions on economic activity and inflation were among the reasons cited regarding why such an assessment was important.”

3.    “A few participants commented that slowing the pace of increase could reduce the risk of instability in the financial system.”

4.    “Some participants observed that there had been an increase in the risk that the cumulative policy restraint would exceed what was required to bring inflation back to 2 percent. Several participants commented that continued rapid policy tightening increased the risk of instability or dislocations in the financial system.”

5.    “There was wide agreement that heightened uncertainty regarding the outlooks for both inflation and real activity underscored the importance of taking into account the cumulative tightening of monetary policy, the lags with which monetary policy affected economic activity and inflation, and economic and financial developments.”

Interestingly, the media narrative generally ignored the following noting, that indicate lack of consensus on slowing the pace of hikes:

A.    “A few other participants noted that, before slowing the pace of policy rate increases, it could be advantageous to wait until the stance of policy was more clearly in restrictive territory and there were more concrete signs that inflation pressures were receding significantly.”

B.    “With monetary policy approaching a sufficiently restrictive stance, participants emphasized that the level to which the Committee ultimately raised the target range for the federal funds rate, and the evolution of the policy stance thereafter, had become more important considerations for achieving the Committee’s goals than the pace of further increases in the target range. Participants agreed that communicating this distinction to the public was important in order to reinforce the Committee’s strong commitment to returning inflation to the 2 percent objective.”

C.    “Members agreed that, in assessing the appropriate stance of monetary policy, they would continue to monitor the implications of incoming information for the economic outlook. They would be prepared to adjust the stance of monetary policy as appropriate if risks emerged that could impede the attainment of the Committee’s goals. Members agreed that their assessments will take into account a wide range of information, including readings on public health, labor market conditions, inflation pressures and inflation expectations, and financial and international developments.”

D.    “Russia’s war against Ukraine is causing tremendous human and economic hardship. The war and related events are creating additional upward pressure on inflation and are weighing on global economic activity. The Committee is highly attentive to inflation risks.”

In my view, the chances are high that the Fed may slow the pace of hikes from the December meeting; but the end rate may be higher than previously estimated. We may have decisively shifted to “higher for longer” from “lower for longer” rate scenario.

More on FOMC minutes next week.