Thursday, July 28, 2016

"EASE" vs. "ease" of doing business

"Birds sing after a storm; why shouldn't people feel as free to delight in whatever sunlight remains to them?."
—Rose Kennedy (American, 1890-1995)
Word for the day
Arrears (Plural noun)
The state of being behind or late, especially in the fulfillment of a duty, promise, obligation, or the like, e.g., Many homeowners have fallen into arrears.
Malice towards none
16years and two bypass surgeries later Bill Clinton may again get a chance to enter the White House. But this time nothing else to do!
First random thought this morning
Yesterday evening got an opportunity to attend a meeting of traders' body as special invitee. The topic of discussion was the evolving policy framework under the incumbent government. Everyone appeared perturbed. Everyone appeared antagonized. No one is liking the change.
The participants wondered why the government is prejudicial to the interests of  - Businessmen, Government Employees, Muslims, Dalits, and Real Estate Developers & Agents!
I guess PM needs to urgently rework the rules of engagement and communication with people.

"EASE" vs. "ease" of doing business

The reaction of many global corporations (MNCs) to the attempts by Indian authorities to implement good business practices, global compliance standards, and globally accepted sustainability framework raises doubt over feasibility and desirability of programs and policies like Make in India, liberal FDI regime, fiscal incentives etc.
From the reactions of auto majors towards the ban on diesel vehicles; reaction of foreign investors and businesses to implementation of GAAR and revision of DTAA with tax havens like Mauritius; conditions of local sourcing and employment generation; etc., prima facie it appears that the real pull factor for investing in India may be the "EASE" of doing business in India rather than the "ease of doing business".
There can be no denying the fact that an overwhelming majority of Indian companies have been direct or indirect beneficiary of (a) the inefficiencies of the administration; (b) lack of transparency; (c) incongruent policy framework; (d) unduly supportive politicians; (e) government largesse in form of misdirected subsidies; and (f) protection from fair competition at the expense of consumers, etc. This "EASE" of doing business in India is diminishing under the current regime.
There could be little argument on the fact that the changing structure of India’s socio-economic milieu require tremendous amount of capital investment.
The demand for civil and industrial amenities like power, transportation infrastructure (e.g., roads, airports, railways, ports, waterways etc.), sanitation, water, education and health etc. is rising with conspicuous rise in affordability. The demand for food, especially protein rich food, is also rising in non-linear trend since past decade or so.
However, the supply has not matched the demand in most of these areas leading to serious productivity constraints and persistently high inflation. This trend highlights the urgent need to invest huge amount of capital in building basic infrastructure and improving agro productivity. Unfortunately, all the required capital is not available within the country and we have to rely on the foreign capital for this.
This is as simple as it sounds and we need not complicate the matter. If we need foreign capital, which we do desperately, we need to be consistent in our approach towards investors.
In my view, in the interest of transparency and predictability, the government needs to issue a conceptual framework for the global investors and businesses investing or willing to invest in India.
It would be a good idea to clarify in the preamble of the said framework itself that "India is a well regulated market and it has earnestly embraced the generally accepted global practices & standards for compliance & disclosures. India whole heartedly supports the global sustainability framework and committed to the Paris Agreement on Climate signed in December 2015. India is committed to prevent money laundering and tax evasion." ....to continue

No comments:

Post a Comment