Wednesday, April 20, 2016

States of the Union - 2

Never be afraid to trust an unknown future to a known God.
—Corrie Ten Boom (Dutch, 1892-1983)
Word for the day
Fuliginous (adj)
Sooty; smoky, e.g., the fuliginous air hanging over an industrial city.
(Source: Dictionary.com)
Malice towards none
Shahrukh Khan claims to be the greatest patriot in the country!
Any higher bids?
First random thought this morning
Now a days it is common to watch, hear and read stories narrating how a child born in a very poor family landed a good job or succeeded in competitive examinations, etc.
Ostensibly, the objective is to highlight the social awakening and to motivate millions others who are facing similar types of socio-economic challenges. Unintended consequences are rise in fear psychosis in a section of the society that is unnecessarily feeling threatened by rise of the downtrodden.
This reminds me the most overrated Hindi movie of recent times - 3 Idiots. Whatever was the objective of that movie, it might have motivated many stressed students to commit suicide!

States of the Union - 2

Confronted with chronic and unsustainable levels of fiscal deficits and public debt regional governments have embarked upon corrective strategies to attain a certain degree of fiscal consolidation. The primary objective is to align the key macroeconomic parameters with the broader socio-economic context of respective states.
These efforts are typically driven by a rule based framework through the enactment of fiscal responsibility and budget management (FRBM) legislations. The legislations at state level are designed, keeping in view specific requirements and characteristics of the respective  states.
While the fiscal rectitude shown by the states is welcome, a careful impact assessment of the mechanism employed for expenditure management is imperative.
For seizing the full impact of the fiscal consolidation, it must be made sure that it does not result in sacrificing the expenditure considered necessary for stimulating growth, and promoting larger objectives of inclusion, equality and integration of socio-economically backward population.
The study of FY15 state finances relates that there is significant variation in expenditure on social and physical infrastructure among states in terms of both composition and the level of spending. Expenditure on physical infrastructure shows greater variability, with energy being the most volatile component. By contrast, states’ spending on the social sector exhibits stability and is dominated by outlays on education.
Majority of the Non Special Category (NSC) states incurred expenditure on social and physical infrastructure (as proportion to aggregate expenditure) below the group average; indicative of the presence of sharp outliers.
Two features are noteworthy: (a) states’ spending on medical and public health has tended to exhibit a central tendency, with a greater degree of cluster around the average (NSC states) relative to expenditure on energy which is at the other end of the spectrum in terms of dispersion from the average.
At a disaggregated level, average social sector expenditure on education and health is higher among top 5 states than the other states, indicative of the impact of income levels on the quality of expenditure. In respect of physical infrastructure, expenditure on roads and bridges is highest for the bottom 7 states.
It is clear that the states in lower income brackets need to improve social sector spending, given the correlation of around 0.5 between expenditure on health and education and the human development index (HDI) of NSC states. These adjustments would enhance labour productivity and enable states to reap the benefits of the “demographic dividend”
 
 
(Source: RBI)
 
(Based on April 2016 report of RBI on "State Finances - A Study of Budgets of 2015-16")
 

No comments:

Post a Comment