Friday, February 5, 2016

Governance by ambivalence - II

"Reason has always existed, but not always in a reasonable form."
—Karl Marx (German 1818-1883)
Word for the day
Kerflooey (adv)
To cease functioning, especially suddenly and completely. E.g., As soon as the storm hit, every light in town went kerflooey.
(Source: Dictionary.com)
Malice towards none
What should the government aim for - "gender equality" or gender neutrality"?
First random thought this morning
Last week I received more than 20 "Forwards" of a Whatsapp message celebrating announcement of our National Anthem as "the best anthem" in the world by UN!
I was not surprised by this ridiculous claim or the celebrations over it. I have been witnessing this hubris since my childhood. What bothered me was the people who were spreading this message. These were CAs, IIM graduates, senior bankers, principal of a prestigious private school, et. al.
On the positive side, I can now explain many election results better and can forecast many more even better!

Governance by ambivalence - II

Last month, a village panchayat in Aligarh (UP) decided that farmers already staggering under the burden of a bad crop and loans should not be expected to continue the tradition of Mrityubhoj, the ritual feeding of people on the 13th day of death. (see here)
The Panchayat said that only 10% of farmers and villagers have 20 bighas (~1 hectare) and above of land, the rest have only 10 bighas (~0.5 hectare) or less. They should, therefore, be freed "from expectations of feeding people, a ritual that often involves huge expenses.
The event, though not reported prominently in media, is very significant in the overall socio-economic context of the country.
It is common knowledge that death, birth and marriages are three most important reasons for household indebtedness in India. This is more true in case of Indians living in rural areas, but also applies to the city dwellers.
Many of these traditions and rituals have perhaps outlived their relevance and have serious economic and social consequences.
For example on economic side, these practices have been seen leading, inter alia, to (a) wasteful expenditure by way of elaborate and unaffordable ceremonies and feasts; (b) misallocation of capital, e.g., by way of buying gold and avoidable (often prohibitively expensive) debt; (c) misallocation of labor, e.g., by way of bonded labor and unnecessary migration.
On the social side, malice like female infanticide, dowry deaths, exploitation by money lenders and bonded labor, mindless migration to cities, oppression of poor and lower caste people, human trafficking, could trace their genesis in these practices and rituals.
I have no qualms in saying that any economic reform program cannot be effective if it does not deal with these aspects of socio-economic milieu.
Unfortunately, so far political expediency and shortsightedness has constricted our political establishment from addressing these issues. On the contrary, we have seen many instances of elected leaders encouraging and promoting such practices.
Another social issue that has serious economic consequences is the issue of women rights. The recent agitations over women's right to enter places of worship.
What I understood from my discussion with some administrators, law enforcers and politicians is that (a) everyone is approaching the issue from the three angles of religious sanctity, gender equality and social acceptance. Whereas, in my view, given the modern context, the government should be working towards achieving the goal of "gender neutrality".
So rather than providing for gender based reservation and concessions, the ultimate goal should be to eliminate the Gender column from all forms & documents; and obliterate all gender based references from the statute books. In the interim a firm stand should be taken towards anything that is found discriminating on the basis of gender (of course including the 3rd gender).

No comments:

Post a Comment