Friday, June 17, 2022

A peek into India’s household assets and debt profile

 The latest issue of Sarvekshna (March 2022), the periodic journal of National Statistical Office (NSO), presents some important insights into assets and indebtedness of the Indian households. Some of the data is actually contrary to the popular perception. I find this data important since it defines the limits of potential domestic inflows into the financial markets; and the challenges the household face in a persisting negative interest rate environment.

The key highlights of the NSO presentation are as follows:

Asset ownership pattern

·         96.6% of Rural households own some financial asset. This percentage is lower (94.7%) in case of urban households.

·         Average value of financial assets held by a rural household in India is around INR73,000. For an urban household, this value is much higher at INR2,52,000.

·         About 91% of rural households asset value comprises of land and building (69% land and 22% building). For an urban households this proportion is not very different at 87% (49% land and 38% building).

·         Rural household have put 5% of their asset value in Deposits; whereas for urban household this percentage is much higher at 9%.

·         Other assets comprising livestock, vehicle, agriculture machinery/business equipment and shares comprise 4% of assets for both rural and urban households.

·         In rural areas, cultivator households’ average asset value is INR2.2million; while non cultivator households own much less at INR0.8million.

·         In urban areas, self-employed households own INR4.1million worth of assets; whereas for the other households this value is much lower at INR2.2million.

·         The average value of assets owned by the poorest 20% of urban (INR0.96million) and rural (INR0.76million) households is not much different. But for other quintiles the average value of assets owned by the urban households is almost twice as much as the rural households.

Indebtedness

·         35% of rural households have some cash loan outstanding; whereas only 22% of urban households have outstanding loans.

·         Average outstanding debt of a rural household is INR59748; whereas for an urban household the amount is twice as much at INR120,336.

·         More Cultivator households (40.3%) and self-employed households (27.5%) have some debt outstanding as compared to non-cultivator (28.2%) and other urban households (20.6%). Obviously, there is a strong correlation between asset ownership and indebtedness. It would be interesting to find the cause-effect relationship between debt and assets.

·         Andhra Pradesh and Kerala are the most indebted states. Delhi and Meghalaya the least.

·         The debt to asset ratio for rural households (3.8%) and urban households (4.4%) is extremely low by global standards.

 Inference

·         The preference for land and building ownership continues to be high across the country.

·         Financial assets (other than deposits) constitute miniscule part of total assets for both rural as well as urban households.

·         More rural households have debt outstanding. The households owning more assets have more debt outstanding.

·         Much more urban households prefer deposits to shares and mutual funds than rural households.

·         Theoretically the potential for growth of household credit and household investment in mutual funds and shares is immense. But over the past 32yrs of reforms, this potential has remained just that. Hardly any change is visible in the household preference for financial assets (non deposit) over physical assets.

·         Gold does not figure separately in the asset ownership pattern. It is part of the 4% “Other Asset” bucket that includes personal vehicle, shares & MFs, business/agriculture machinery etc.



Thursday, June 16, 2022

It’s upto Lord Indra and Lord Ganpati now

The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) of the US Federal Reserve decided to hike the benchmark bank rate by 75bps to 1.5% - 1.75% on Wednesday. The Committee also reiterated that the Fed will continue to shrink its balance sheet by US$47.5bn till August 2022 and from September the unwinding will be stepped up by US$95bn/month. The FOMC noted that there is no sign of broader slowdown in the economy, while lowering its GDP growth forecast for 2022 to 1.7% from 2.8% earlier. The FOMC statement reiterated the strong commitment to achieve the 2% inflation target. The Fed Officials projected raising it to 3.4% by year-end, implying another 175 basis points of tightening this year. The projection shows a rate cut in 2024.

In the post meeting press meet, Chairman Powell commented that “Either a 50 basis point or a 75 basis-point increase seems most likely at our next meeting. We will, however, make our decisions meeting by meeting.” The Chairman added that ““It does appear that the US economy is in a strong position, and well positioned to deal with higher interest rates.”

The US markets reacted favorably to the FOMC decision. The benchmark S&P500 ended 1.46% higher and 10yr benchmark yields fell 3% to 3.29%. 

Lately, I have been reading a lot of views and opinions about the likely outcome. There are strong arguments for a long corrective phase in the US Economy, just like Japan witnessed post the fiscal and monetary profligation of the 1970s. This Volckerish view anticipates a hard landing for the US economy; tremors across the world and gradual decoupling of global markets from the US markets. The other, equally stronger view is aggressive Fed hikes and tightening taming inflation but not without material demand destruction (recession) followed by a deflationary cycle. This Greenspanish view implies a soft landing for the US economy, premature end to Fed tightening and restoration of “Fed Put” for quick market revival.

Besides, there are multiple views that completely deny the independence of the US Fed from domestic politics and geopolitics. One view, though not convincing enough, portends that the US Fed will be forced to abandon its tightening stance before the mid-term polls begin in the US. The other view is that the inevitable end of current hostilities between Russia and Ukraine would mark the end of the global supply chain woes, resulting in reversal of cost pushed inflation; and the global central bankers’ focus will return to financial stability and growth.

Honestly, with each page of additional reading my confusion has compounded exponentially. In fact, I am confused, like never before, about the basic economic concepts like interest rates, inflation, free markets etc.

What I studied in school was that “inflation” is the rate of rise in prices of goods and services over a defined period. For example, if I could buy a basket of groceries for Rs1000 in June 2021; and I have to pay Rs1100 for the same basket in June 2022; the rate of annual inflation for June 2022 is 10%. If the same rate of inflation persists, the price I would need to pay for the same basket in June 2023 would be Rs1210.

If my income grows at the same rate during this period, I will continue to buy the same basket and there would be no change in my lifestyle (just for example). If my income does not grow by 10%, I will have to cut my consumption or borrow money to maintain my lifestyle. In the first case, the demand for groceries would fall and the seller will be forced to cut prices and the inflation will come down and I will be able to afford the same basket of groceries after some time. In the second case, the inflation for groceries will not come down as the demand sustains; but the demand for money (credit) will rise resulting in higher price for money (interest rates). This means in a simple environment higher interest rates and higher inflation could have positive correlation and move in tandem.

However, the inflation-interest rate correlation will turn negative if (in the above example) I borrowed money in the year 2021 itself and I cannot make additional borrowing to meet higher cost of groceries. In this case, even if my income grows to match the grocery inflation, I will have to cut my consumption to meet the rise in my interest expense.

This implies that other things remaining the same, and it being a free market economy, the correlation of inflation and interest rates would depend on the extent of extant leverage in the economy.

The situation however gets complicated when the largest consumer and borrower (the government) is in a position to control the price of money (interest rates) and/or goods & services. For example, if the government (or central bank) increases money supplies and also cuts the price of money (interest rate) the consumption demand could become artificially high, resulting in higher consumer price inflation. The problem gets further complicated if the government is able to manipulate the purchasing power of the currency (exchange rate) and thus also artificially contain the consumer inflation.

The present situation in the US, as per my understanding, is like this:

The US Fed has increased the money supply (M2) by more than ~3x in the past 13years; while maintaining the price of money (interest rates) close to zero. The exchange rate of USD (DXY Index) has appreciated by about 25% during this period. The inflation was therefore artificially suppressed for over a decade.

The “shutdown” of the global economy in the wake of the pandemic breakout, made the cheaper money and expensive currency irrelevant as the real goods and services were in short supply. The war in Europe further complicated the situation of goods and services supply.

Now, the US central bank is trying to find a lower demand-supply (price) equilibrium by (a) reducing the money supply; (b) increasing the price of money (to contain the consumption demand) while (c) maintaining the currency exchange rate at high level (to ensure cheaper imports).

The debate now is about the trajectory of (i) consumption demand destruction; and (b) improvement in supply of goods and services. A steep fall in demand and steep improvement in supply chains could normalize the situation without much damage to the basic fabric of the economy. However, if the trajectory is flatter, the pain may linger on for years or may be decades.

The other solution could be to control the consumption and prices of goods and services also (Marxist model). This will obviously destroy the basic fabric of the US economy as it stands today.

Insofar as India is concerned, our situation is fairly simple. We have limited leverage and the government intermittently controls the prices of money as well as goods & services, especially during the period of crisis. We just need to pray to Lord Indra for good rains and pray to Lord Ganpati for giving some sanity to Mr. Putin and Mr. Zelenskyy. If these two prayers are answered favorably, we shall be in a position to decouple from US markets and charter our own course (or find a more favorable benchmark to follow). Rest all is ok.

Wednesday, June 15, 2022

Guide for portfolio review

As I suggested yesterday (see A perfect storm), “the best strategy under the present circumstances would be to (a) hold nerves and not panic; (b) review the portfolio for any corrective action that may be needed once the storm passes and the sea becomes calmer.”

To add further to that, I may suggest that the following points may be pertinent to note while reviewing the portfolios:

1.    The higher cost of capital (interest rates) would result in lower fair valuation for equities in general. The growth companies that have debt on balance sheet or need to borrow for capex; and/or where the free cash flows are mostly back ended may see much sharper cut in their target multiples. In fact we have already seen 20% derating in Nifty PE Ratio over the past eight months.

2.    The market consensus was working around 18% CAGR for Nifty earnings over FY23-FY24. The realized earnings growth may be much lower than this. My personal assessment is that we may end up with ~10% CAGR over FY23-FY24.

3.    The popular trades of the previous market cycle (2018-2021) may continue to see sharper valuation rationalization over the next couple of years. Many of these stocks may therefore not participate in the next market cycle.

4.    Monetary tightening, growth slowdown and consumption demand destruction shall essentially result in deflationary conditions in 2023-24. The strong earnings cycle for most non-food commodities may therefore not last much longer. The metal and energy stocks may therefore see sharper correction in multiples and fair value targets.

5.    A new market cycle is mostly led by the market leaders, till a new theme(s) emerges and the stocks from that theme(s) catch the fancy of the market participants. It is therefore always better to be positioned in a large cap basket during the twilights of a market cycle.

In my base case assessment, the risk reward in Nifty from one year perspective is positive at the current levels.





Tuesday, June 14, 2022

A perfect storm

The benchmark Nifty is down about 15% from its October 2021 closing high of 18477. A broader gauge of the market performance Nifty500 is also down by a similar proportion. However, anecdotally I find that damage to the investors’ sentiments is much worse than what this extent of correction in these indices might be suggesting. There could be multiple reasons for the investors’ despondency. For example—

·         Most of the popular trades of 2020-21 that have attracted a whole lot of new investors/traders to the equity markets have lost materially. The Covid trade (Pharma, healthcare); New listed IT enabled businesses like ecommerce platforms and Fintech; popular disinvestment candidates; PLI beneficiaries; self-reliance and import substitution (Specialty chemicals, electronics) have sharply underperformed the markets. A large number of these stocks have corrected 25-75%.

The non-institutional investors have a tendency to chase popular trades. The beta (correlation with the benchmark index) of their portfolios is therefore much higher than a well-diversified portfolio. Obviously, the losses to their portfolio may be much higher than the extent of fall in the benchmark indices. To make the matter worse, the visibility of recovery of their losses is much lower, as the rationalization of the valuations in the popular trades may be more permanent in nature. We might not see loss making new age businesses; commodity chemicals; generic pharma and API makers; and electrical appliance assembly units etc. trading at crazy multiples in the next few years at least.

·         Most equity and debt mutual funds have yielded negative or nil returns in the past 6 months. The real return on bank fixed deposits has also been negative for the past six months. The global and domestic markets are indicating that the probability of any reversal in this trend is very low for the next few months at least. The New investors, who have not experienced a genuine bear market (e.g., 1990s) may be feeling nervous about losing their hard earned wealth.

·         Nifty Smallcap 100 has lost close to 28% from its January 2022 high; almost twice the losses in benchmark Nifty50 or Nifty500. The actively managed portfolios that have more smallcap stocks (high growth at reasonable valuation) may therefore be suffering more damage than what the benchmark Nifty is indicating.

·         The macro environment (both domestic and global) has deteriorated in recent months, especially after the war broke out between Russia and Ukraine. It appears that the measures adopted to arrest the macroeconomic deterioration may be friendly to the equity valuations. The rate hikes, liquidity withdrawal, fiscal tightening etc. have diminished the visibility of growth capex. There are early signs of consumer demand destruction in discretionary spending due to inflation and higher rates. The investors may be fearing even deeper correction in sectors like cement, metals, consumer electronics etc.

It is important to understand that the markets are caught in a perfect storm – (i) Liquidity is shrinking; (ii) cost of capital is rising which requires target valuations to moderate; and (iii) growth environment is clouded which requires earnings forecast to be downgraded.

The best strategy therefore would be to (a) hold nerves and not panic; (b) review the portfolio for any corrective action that may be needed once the storm passes and the sea becomes calmer. It may not be a good idea to go out on the deck and try catching some fish.

Friday, June 10, 2022

Endure the grind, do nothing

What would be the first thought that crosses your mind, when you hear a veteran fund manager betting his shirt on Nifty falling 30-40% in the next 6months! Yes, you heard it right. Last week, a former CEO/CIO of a large AMC, confidently told an audience composed of top bankers and HNIs that Nifty is bound to come to sub 10000 levels in next 6months and gold is the only safe haven under the present circumstances.

I am not sure about how many amongst the audience actually concurred with his view, but the first thought that came to my mind was “how would this old man look without a shirt!”

In a recent visit to the financial capital Mumbai, I also had the opportunity to meet some senior market participants (bankers and investors). None of them sounded enthusiastic about the markets. The consensus appears to be strongly favoring a slow grind over the next 6-9months.

Incidentally, the reference point for most of the senior participants is 2008 market crash, in the wake of the global financial crisis (GFC). The fear is that rising cost of funds and fast drying liquidity could trigger some major defaults that could trigger a global contagion like what happened post Lehman collapse in 2008.

Obviously, the senior bankers and fund managers have much wider vision and knowledge base to form their opinion; and therefore are certainly in a better place to foresee what direction the markets are taking. Nonetheless, I am not inclined to agree with their assessment. I strongly, believe that a repeat of 2008 like condition is unlikely, for the following simple reasons:

1.    Contrary to popular perception, the abundant liquidity infused in the global financial system post the GFC, has not resulted in excess return on assets. In the past 15yrs - European Equities (Stoxx600) has returned a mere 0.7% CAGR; Chinese equities have yielded negative return; Japanese equities continue to be lower than their 1990 level; Brazilian equities have yielded about 3.5% CAGR despite very high inflation; US and Indian equities have yielded less than 7% CAGR.

In comparison, during 2005-2007 – the Chinese equities had surged at 131% CAGR; European equities prices gained at 25% CAGR; US equity prices gained at 14% CAGR and Indian equity prices gained 58% CAGR.

Gold, aluminum, copper, crude oil prices (in USD terms) are at 2011 levels, while silver and steel prices are much lower as compared to 2011 levels.

Apparently, there is no bigger bubble to burst this time. There were localized bubble in sectors like US Tech, India internet; Taiwan semiconductor; China real estate etc. which have been punctured in past 9 months and the gas is releasing mostly in an orderly fashion, so far. It is also important to note that unlike numerous infra builders commanding crazy valuation in 2007-2008 (e.g., JPA, Suzlon, GVK, GMR, Lanco, Reliance Infra, KSK et. al.), and totally dominating market activity, the share of crazily valued new age businesses in the overall market is much less this time.

Another bubble was inflated in cryptocurrencies, which has already burst.

2.    The subprime crisis came to light in July 2007 when Bear Sterns announced the implosion of two of its hedge funds due to credit defaults. The market fell 20-25% and rose again to record higher highs in the next 6months. The governments and central bankers were mostly complacent in this period. They kept sitting on fringes waiting for the crisis to blow out in due course.

The global financial markets started to freeze due to threats of sovereign default crisis and sudden surge in energy prices. But it still took months for the governments and central banks to come out with a concrete plan for handling the crisis. The collapse of Countrywide Financials, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mae and Lehman Brothers (September 2008) actually catalyzed the globally coordinated response to the crisis. The markets made a strong bottom in the next six months (March 2009) and have not looked back since then.

While it took more than a year (July 2007 to September 2008) to devise a rescue and revival plan during GFC, the template is now available readily. The template has been tested extensively during the 2020 pandemic induced global lockdown. Despite a worldwide lockdown, no market froze and the panic fall in the markets was corrected in 3-4 months.

Besides, the global markets have handled Brexit; defaults by countries like Argentina, Sri Lanka etc.; China Evergrande crisis; collapse of some large funds and decimation of some cryptocurrencies (and tokens) etc. rather well in the past one decade.

Hence, it is safe to assume that the chances of a global market freeze like 2008 are significantly less.

3.    During the 2003-2007 market rally, the subprime credit was a primary supporting factor. This time it is materially different. This time subprime debt is mostly a tertiary factor. The debt is mostly sitting in the books of the financiers who have funded the investors in private equity funds. These private equity funds have invested in the equity of all these fancy startups. An implosion in the astronomical valuations of these startups would be the ultimate lenders with a significant time lag. Thus the grind could be slower and protracted this time.

4.    The regulatory changes since GFC have materially strengthened the global financial system. The risk management systems and processes are much superior now as compared to pre GFC period. Besides, the global agreements on information sharing systems have reduced the probability of unexpected global contagion.

5.    Leverage in Indian markets is significantly lower as compared to 2008. In 2008, over 55% NSE derivative volume was single stock futures and less than 10% was in Index options. Now 98% of derivative volumes are in Index options and less than 0.5% volume is single stock futures. Besides, cash margins are much higher. Hence, the chances of markets falling 10-15% in a day are much less.

I therefore believe that the probability of markets falling like 2008 due to inflation, slower growth, debt defaults, any other well-known factor or a combination of all these is insignificant. Of course, the markets can crash 30-40% due to some extraordinary ordinary, which is totally unexpected and cannot be foreseen.

In my view, as I said three months ago (see here), we are more likely to witness a “boring” market rather than a “bear” market in India. The indices may get confined in a narrow range and market breadth also narrow down materially. The market activity that got spread out to 1200-1300 stocks in the past couple of years may constrict to 200-250 stocks.

It will be a test of patience as well as endurance of the investors. Not doing much in the next few months would be the best course of action, in my view.


Thursday, June 9, 2022

RBI takes the path most travelled

In its latest meeting (6-8 June’22) the Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) of RBI unanimously decided to hike the policy rates by another 50bps. Last month, the MPC had announced an unscheduled 40bps hike in rates. With this hike, the policy Repo Rate (rate at which RBI lends short term money to banks) is 4.90%; Standing Deposit Rate (rate at which banks can park their surplus funds with RBI) is 4.65%.

It is relevant to note that in the last rate cycle RBI had cut repo rates from 8% (January 2014) to 6% (February 2018) and then increased it to 6.5% (August 2018). In the current rate cycle, RBI cut the repo rate from 6.5% (August 2018) to 4% (May 2020) and has now started to hike it from May 2022. The consensus market view is that RBI will make another 3 hikes of total 85-110bps till December 2022 to take the rates closer to 6%.

The latest statements of the MPC and RBI governor are significant in more than one way. These statements mark a clear shift in the RBI’s monetary policy stance and highlight the current policy challenges.

In a marked shift to its reluctant stance of “calibrated tightening”, the latest resolution states, unambiguously, “The MPC also decided to remain focused on withdrawal of accommodation (emphasis supplied) to ensure that inflation remains within the target going forward, while supporting growth. However, the pretense of “growth supportive tightening” still continues.

From the statement of the governor it appears that the MPC is confident that the objective of 4% inflation could be achieved just by withdrawing accommodation and taking the rates and liquidity to the neutral level; and a need for “tightening” monetary policy stance may not arise. It implies that the RBI is presently not aiming for positive real rates. For record, the surplus liquidity with the scheduled commercial banks presently stands at Rs5.5trn; down from over Rs7.4trn in early May and Rs12trn last year. Post the CRR hike in May 2022, liquidity surplus in the banking system has thus contracted by Rs2.1trn surplus.

Till now, the RBI had been either avoiding any mention of stagflation or denying any possibility of the emergence of stagflationary conditions. However, this time in his statement, the governor admitted, “Globally, stagflation concerns are growing and are amplifying the volatility in global financial markets. This is feeding back into the real economy and further clouding the outlook.” Obviously, this admission complicates the policy framework.

The MPC has revised its FY23 average consumer price inflation target to 6.7%. It expects the inflation to peak at 7.5% in 1QFY23 and then gradually taper to 5.8% in 4QFY23. It is important to note that this 6.7% inflation target is after accounting for the impact of a series of rate hikes, fiscal measures (e.g., duty cut), and good monsoon. This target factors in the crude prices (Indian Basket) of US$105/bbl, which is marginally lower than the current price.

This implies that the RBI is fully cognizant of the fact that the current episode of high inflation is mostly supply driven and rate hikes may have limited impact on the inflation itself. The rate hikes are therefore aimed more at (i) maintain and enhancing the credibility of RBI’s policy framework; (ii) anchoring the inflationary expectations running wild and unduly disrupting the bonds and currency prices; and (iii) making a stronger case for more fiscal measures to help the growth and contain the inflation.

Clearly, the RBI is playing a multidimensional game. It has played its shot and the ball is now in the courts of Lord Indra, Mr. Vladimir Putin and Ms. Nirmala Sitharaman. A good monsoon; easing of hostilities between Russia & Ukraine; and more fiscal concessions could tame the inflation by improving domestic food supply; easing the global supply chains & restoring normalcy in the global energy markets; and easing the cost pressures on the economy.

Besides, the rates and inflation, the RBI made two more significant announcements.

Firstly, the limits of loans that the cooperative banks may extend for the personal housing has been doubled from Rs30lacs/70lacs to Rs60lacs/140lacs for TierI and Tier II cooperative banks respectively. Besides, Rural Cooperative Banks have been permitted to lend the developers of affordable housing. This shall materially improve the credit available to the real estate sector. Though, for the existing lenders, the scheduled commercial banks and housing finance companies, it may mean increased competition.

Secondly, the RBI has permitted the UPI to be linked with the RuPay Network. This means that the holders of RuPay credit cards can now make credit purchases using the UPI network. Subsequently, this facility may be extended to the other credit card networks also. This may materially enhance the access to short term credit for lower income group credit card holders; beside providing more avenues and convenience to the customers in making payments through UPI platform. 

Wednesday, June 8, 2022

ASHA – A ray of hope

A recent media report highlighted remarkable reduction in the infant mortality rate (IMR) of India. India’s IMR improved from 47 in2010 to just 28 in 2022, bringing it closer to the global average of 27. (see here)

Much contrary to the popular perception, India achieved one of the best Covid vaccination rates in the world. As per the latest available data close to two billion doses of Covid vaccines have been administered, defying all the logistic challenges.

These are just two success stories from India’s public health sector. Recognizing these remarkable achievements, the World Health Organization (WHO) recently honored more than a million Asha Workers of India for their commendable public service, especially during the pandemic.

It is rather unfortunate that not much of the urban population is even aware of the existence of Asha (the frontline health workers). Many mistake Asha workers for Aanganwadi workers. Even though millions have “liked” the pictures of Asha workers administering Covid vaccines to people in remote places, sometimes walking for many kilometers, not many seem to have bothered to learn more about them.

ASHA stands for “Accredited Social Health Activists” – “community volunteers” engaged under the National Rural Health Mission (NRHM). The designated Asha worker is the first port of call for any health related demands of deprived sections of the rural population, especially women and children, who find it difficult to access health services. These workers create awareness on health and its social determinants; mobilize the community towards local health planning; promote good health practices; and provide a minimum package of curative care. (learn more)

‘Stories of Change”, a report published by the NITI Aayog, in collaboration with Center for Social Behaviour Change (Ashoka University), highlighted some of the brilliant stories of changes that are happening in the hinterlands, away from media headlines and social media gossips.

These are the real stories that reinforce faith in the bright future of India; much more than a startup with virtually no business model (or even any real revenue) raising a few million dollars at a billion dollar valuation to get “unicorn” status. These stories explain what a small but brilliant innovation could bring meaningful change to many lives.

In my numerous travels across the length and breadth of the country, I can certainly vouch that these true stories are not only inspirational, but also deeply insightful. These stories highlight an original Indian model of frugal innovation and entrepreneurship – the Gandhian model of Swaraj (self-reliance with dignity).

The following is a gist of three simple stories from hinterlands, reproduced from the cited report “Story of Change”, highlighting how small simple solutions can handle complex problems.

PARI – (A pilot program for Diarrhea management in Bihar

Pari (fairy), a plastic inflatable doll with two openings, one at the top and the other at the bottom, is used to educate villagers about diarrhea that kills many children every year. A frontline health worker (FLW) pours water into the top inlet to inflate the doll to show what a healthy baby looks like. Then she releases the water by opening the outlet at the bottom, which deflates the doll to demonstrate what diarrhea does to the body: causes dehydration. When the FLW plugs the second opening and pours ORS into the doll, the water does not leak out. She explains that in order to solve the problem, it needs to be ensured that the outlet at the bottom has been plugged. When the child is administered ORS and zinc supplements, it acts as a plug to the bottom outlet thereby retaining vital fluids that can be absorbed by the body.

Pari has been used in Bihar for over two years across eight districts. In 2018, the Government of Bihar committed funds to scale up Pari to all 38 districts of Bihar. Results showed that among women exposed to Pari, appropriate knowledge of diarrhea management was three times higher and the use of ORS and zinc was almost two times higher than women not exposed.

Mobile Kunji (Guide) – Aid for awareness on family planning, pregnancy and child care

Mobile Kunji is a multi-media job aid (Kunji means key or guide in Hindi) designed for use by FLWs when they counsel families. It has two components: a deck of colour-coded cards with illustrations and related key messages for each stage of pregnancy or post­ natal care, and an audio component accessed via mobile phone. Each card carries a unique, seven-digit number or mobile short code that the FLW dials from her mobile phone, playing a piece of pre-recorded audio content for the family she is visiting. The audio content is delivered in the voice of a fictional doctor character, Dr. Anita, who brings credibility along with her great and very localised bedside manner. Moblle Kunji helps standardise the FLWs' dellvery or the key messages, reducing inconsistency and significantly improving interpersonal communication.

Evidence shows that conversations between FLWs and families last twice as long when Mobile Kunji is used,and families trust FLWs who use Mobile Kunji more than those who do not.

Kilkari – Mobile health update for mother and the child

Kilkari (Hindi for  a baby's gurgle) delivers  weekly, time-sensitive audio information about reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health (RMNCH) directly to families’ mobile phones, from the fourth month of pregnancy until a child is a year old.It aims to improve families' knowledge and uptake of life-saving preventative health practices. Kilkari supplements the counselling visits that FLWs make, by providing a regular and more consistent source of timely, relevant information for families, reaching families that are otherwise left out, and addressing issues that FLWs hesitate to discuss. As of March 2019, Kilkari had reached almost 10 million users across 13 states in the country. Subscribers cited Kilkari as a private, comprehensive, credible source of information on family planning and the service contributed to building health equity by conveying information to women in marginalised communities, whom ASHAs may not visit.

 

Tuesday, June 7, 2022

Need for redefining ‘rural sector’

A lot of the recent macro research effort of stock market participants has been devoted to the state of rural demand in the country. In their latest commentary, most consumer goods companies have reported continued pressure on rural demand. Even though many market economists and analysts have forecasted imminent recovery in rural demand, the corporate commentary did not sound that much sanguine. Nonetheless, higher food prices and expected good monsoon are expected to help the rural economy to some extent.

A good performance of the rural sector is important for investors. Almost two third of the Indian consumers derive their livelihood directly from the rural economy, including farming, horticulture, animal husbandry, cottage industry, forestry, etc. The rural economy directly supports a large number of industrial enterprises, like crop protection, farm equipment, transportation, food processing, etc.; besides providing material indirect support to industries like textile, consumer staples, durable, and services such as financial services, trade and communication etc.

From my discussions with fellow investors, I understand that there exists a great deal of divergence, insofar as the understanding of rural demand is concerned. In my view, the phrase ‘rural demand’ may not be the same for everyone. For example—

·         For farm input companies, the rural demand may denote the demand for their products by the farmers.

·         For the consumer product companies, the rural demand may include demand for their products by the household engaged in farming, animal husbandry, other allied services; industrial labourers living in rural areas and working in nearby industries; public servants; households in semi-rural areas etc.

·         For financiers, rural demand includes demand for farm inputs, farm equipment, household appliances, automobile, personal loans (health, auto, housing, marriage, etc.), rural supply chain (auto dealers, farm input dealers, farm output traders and stockists, etc.)

·         For government schemes, a rural household is defined by the population (as per census definition); while for the taxation purposes it is the geographical area based on distance from municipal limits of a census town.

There are many large towns whose economy is largely built around agriculture & allied activities; SMEs based on these activities and services catering to the households engaged in these activities. Some examples include Shahjahanpur, Hapur, Erode, Guntur, Solan, Jhansi, Jammu, Darbhanga, Rajkot, Sri Ganganagar, Moga, Gurdaspur, Nashik, etc.

However, there are many villages, which are in the vicinity of a large industry or cluster of industries. The economy of these villages may largely depend on the performance of these industries. The economy of hundreds of villages in the vicinity of Jamnagar, Dahej, Barmer, Mathura, Panipat, Bhilai, Jamshedpur, etc. depends on the large industrial units set up near these towns.

With this view in the background, I would like to share some observations made during my recent travels regarding the rural demand.

1.    Despite the extraordinary support from the government during the pandemic, the household finances in rural areas still seem stressed.

2.    The input cost inflation may have matched the rise in farm produce prices. Besides, the adverse weather conditions and fertilizer shortages (unaffordability) may have impacted the yields for crops, resulting in lower margins for farmers.

3.    The finance cost for rural households seems to have increased materially.

4.    The pressure on income is leading most households to down trade for their staple requirements. The local brands have mushroomed all over. The local vendors have learned all the tricks of the trade from their larger peers. They are selling products in hygienic and attractive packaging at much lower prices. Some part of this transition to “local” from “branded” may be long lasting.

5.    The spending on health and education has seen material rise in the past 2yrs. This has obviously come at the expense of some discretionary spending.

6.    Assurance of food supply by the government at minimum cost has impacted the spending and savings patterns of rural households. Focus on aspirational spending (travel, telecom, home improvement etc.) and savings may be increasing. Data will reflect this trend in due course.

7.    The remittances to villages have reduced; whereas many displaced laborers are yet to return to their pre pandemic employment locations. This may also be resulting in further division of already unviable farm holdings.

8.    Many young entrepreneurs, in some cases not belonging to traditional farming households, are engaging in agriculture and related activities. They are using advanced technologies, equipment and methods for farming and related activities like animal husbandry, and marketing of their products. The investment in the farm sector and agri supply chain is definitely increasing. While this may show up in aggregate rural income, the dispersion of rural income may become highly skewed in favor of “new” players over next one decade.

In my view, the rural demand, as traditionally seen by the market participants, might need to be redefined. Investors might have to factor in the changing rural landscapes – more educated, more industrialized and more mechanized farm sector, with widening income inequalities. The dependence of traditional farmers on fiscal support may continue to rise.

 

Friday, June 3, 2022

2022 - Fear trumping the greed

The prices of publicly traded financial assets like equity shares and bonds etc., is materially influenced by the sentiments of fear and greed amongst the market participants, at least in the near term. The sentiment of greed drives the participants to bid higher prices for a security, even though the economic fundamentals underlying that security may not fully justify such price. Similarly, the sentiment of fear prompts the market participants to offer the securities held by them at relatively cheaper rates. The equilibrium of sentiments of greed and fear keeps the markets stable & healthy; whereas dominance of either sentiment induces excessive volatility and irrational pricing in the markets. Extreme dominance of either sentiment usually marks the peak or bottom (as the case may be) of a market cycle.

If we examine the current equity market behaviour, it appears that the sentiment of fear is gradually becoming dominant amongst the market participants. The following five signs, for example, indicate that relatively weaker participants might be moving to sidelines or even withdrawing from the markets. This is usually indicative of the beginning of the process of a market cycle completing its downward journey. The actual bottoming though may take some time and further downward move.

Market activity shrinking

In the past six months, the market activity has cooled down conspicuously. The volumes in INR terms as well as in terms of shares traded and number of trades executed have remained on the lower side, indicating shrinking participation in the market.


At peak of the market in October 2021, the average traded volume in Oct’21 was over INR4000bn; however in May’22 it contracted to was below INR2800bn. Similarly, the number of trades in Oct’21 was over 130bn; whereas in May’22 only 108bn trades were executed on NSE. In terms of number of shares traded – in Oct '21 83.58bn shares were traded on NSE. In May’21 the number had contracted to 43.91bn, almost half of Oct’21.


 

Volatility persisting at higher levels


Since the benchmark Nifty recorded its all-time high level in October 2021, the implied volatility (popularly called the fear index) has persisted at higher levels; even though it has eased in the past 10 days.



Broader markets underperforming

The market breadth has remained negative in eight out of the past twelve months. The market breadth on NSE was worst in at least the past twelve months. In fact the market highs in October 2021 were recorded with a negative market breadth and high volumes; indicating a distribution pattern in the technical analysis parlance. Nifty50 has corrected ~10% from its latest closing highs; whereas Nifty Smallcap 100 index is down ~23% from its latest high levels; even though the smallcap high (January 2022) was recorded 3months later than Nifty (October 2021).


Sector wise also YTD 2022 only Financials (1%), FMCG (1.5%), Auto (5%) and Energy (14%) sectors have yielded positive returns. IT Services (-22%), Realty (-15%), and Pharma (-12%) have been the worst performing sectors.



 

Valuations are now more reasonable

As the sentiment of fear has started to dominate the markets, the valuation excesses are now correcting. The 12month forward PE Ratio of the benchmark Nifty Index is now closer to 5yr average level. The price to book (P/B) ratio for Nifty has also corrected sharply from the higher levels seen in October 2021.


The valuations are now closer to “fair value” zone, a pre-condition for completion of the down leg of a market cycle (bottoming). It is however important to note that in many cases it has been seen that the earnings estimates are materially revised lower. In that case the “fair value” curve may shift sharply downward. 


Global markets – sentiments most bearish since March 2020


As per the Bank of America’s (BofA) proprietary Bulls and Bears Indicator, the global fund managers were most bearish in May 2022, since the Pandemic outbreak (March 2021).





Thursday, June 2, 2022

State of economy – no scope for complacency

 The latest data published by the National Statistical Office (NSO confirms that India’s economic activity in FY22 has reached the pre pandemic levels of FY20. The Real Gross Domestic Product (GDP at FY12 prices), private consumption, government consumption, and gross investments in FY22 were at a marginally higher level than FY20. The exports and Imports in FY22 were more than 10% higher than FY20.

The Real GDP in FY22 grew 8.7% vs a contraction of 6.6% in FY21, and a growth of 4% in FY20. The growth in Real GDP in 4QFY22 was much slower at 4.1%.

Media and government officials have reported the growth numbers in a context of their own liking. Some have taken pride in India achieving the fastest growth rate amongst the larger global economies. Some have expressed relief that the Indian economy has recovered fully from the pandemic impact and attained the pre pandemic level of economic activity. Some celebrated this as a “V” shape recovery of the economy. Some expressed concern over slower growth in 4QFY22 and poor growth outlook for FY23. Many global agencies have downgraded their estimates of FY23 growth for India.

In my view, comparing India’s growth trajectory to global peers is meaningless, as the socio-economic profile of India (particularly demography and people living below poverty line) may be very different from the developed or even developing economies like China. A fair comparison, if at all needed, would be to compare with the growth rate of those economies when they had similar demographics and poverty levels; adjusted for the available resources (financial, human, and other natural resources) for future growth.

Our competition is with ourselves only

Also, it is important to note that this 8.7% number is a purely statistical phenomenon that is impacted by the base effect. Since the growth in FY21 was a negative number (-6.6%), the FY22 growth is statistically looking stronger. There is no denying that the Indian economy has shown resilience. The government has been able to limit the impact of the pandemic to a material extent. But a better way to look at growth would be to compare it with the “Required growth Rate” (RGR) to achieve full employment and eliminate poverty in, say, the next two decades. The RGR must also account for the costs to be incurred over the next couple of decades for improving the sustainable quotient of the economy, and achieving the sustainable development goals (SDGs).

Urgent need to exploit the demographic dividend

The demographic profile of India warrants extreme urgency in accelerating the growth rate to RGR. As per the latest available Periodic Labour Force Survey (PLFS 2018), almost one third of skilled youth in the country are unemployed. The rate of unemployment amongst skilled female workers is even higher. The situation is widely believed to have worsened in the past three years due to the pandemic.

My experience indicates that if a college graduate does not get employed in accordance with his/her skill level within 2yrs of graduating, the probability of his remaining underemployed for life increases manifold. It is therefore important that India achieves RGR urgently so that 8 to 12 million youth who are joining the workforce every year get employed appropriately. Else, we will continue to lose the benefits of demographic dividend, which has been one of the primary factors in many countries graduating to the middle class of wealthy economic status.

Focus on long term growth trajectory

Rather than focusing on quarterly numbers that may be materially impacted by some non-recurring factors (Drought, flood, lockdown, monetary or fiscal action etc.) it is important that we focus on the long term growth trajectory of the economy. For example, a 5yr CAGR of real GDP may be a better indicator of sustainable growth potential of the economy. This long term growth rate may adequately account for the sustainable level of economic activity and capacity building for the future growth.

The long term growth (LTG) trajectory (5yr GDP CAGR) has been declining since the global financial crisis (GFC 2008). It had shown some signs of improving in FY15-FY19, but the pandemic has pushed it down again. The economy had a LTG of 9% in FY08, which declined to 7% - 7.5% during FY13-FY19. The present LTG is less than 4%; and the Indian economy is expected to regain even the 6% LTG trajectory not before FY27.

For record, the LTG during the past 8yrs (FY15-FY22) is 5.2%.



Obviously, the economy has some serious challenges to surmount, and there is no scope for any complacency.

Wednesday, June 1, 2022

Harbingers of Amrut Kaal

The country is celebrating Amrut Kaal - the 75th year of independence. The government has committed to make this year a watershed year in the history of independent India. The occasion is inevitably marked by the usual political bickering between the ruling party at the center and the principal national opposition party.

The incumbent BJP is projecting that the Indian National Congress, which has been at the helm for a substantial part of these 75years, is primarily responsible for slower, unequal and misdirected growth and development of the country. It is also assuring the country that the incumbent government is not only undoing the mistakes of commission and omissions committed by the earlier governments and taking impactful corrective action; but also laying the foundation for a stronger, faster, equitable and well directed growth & development of the country.

The party in opposition, Indian National Congress (INC), on the other hand is refuting these claims. INC is insisting that it was their leadership that built a strong institutional framework that laid the foundation for a stronger, egalitarian and harmonious India.

I am sure both the parties would have strong arguments to support their respective contentions and this game of political grandstanding may continue forever. Nonetheless, I find it pertinent to take note of the present strengths of Indian economy and society that could really lead the transformation of Indian economy into a middle class economy over the course of next couple of decades; and also the weaknesses that could thwart the process of process of faster and sustainable growth and development of the country.

In particular, I would like to highlight the following five factors that now form the core of India’s strategy to achieve the ambitious growth and development goals.

Digital identity for all the citizens (Aadhar enabled by UIDAI)

UIDAI (Aadhar) is widely acknowledged as one of the most sophisticated and pervasive digital identification programs in the world. The program provided a digital identity to more than 1.31 billion citizens of India. This identity now forms the core of the financial inclusion and social security system in India, eliminating the leakages, middlemen and inefficiencies of the system. Aadhar also forms the core of the financial services, telecom and social sector services like health  and education.

The UIDAI model has also been adopted to provide digital identity to all corporate entities, corporate directors, taxable properties, to facilitate faster identification & transactions; and minimize the probability of frauds.

The services like DigiLocker - a free digital storage space for documents available to all citizens – are also primarily based on Aadhar authentication services.

UIDAI was conceived and set up in 2009 by the then UPA government under the ages of the Planning Commission. It was given a statutory status by the incumbent NDA government in 2016.

Digital payment ecosystem (UPI enabled by NPCI)

The RBI founded the National Payments Corporation of India (as a not for profit company) in 2008 to operate retail payments and settlement systems in India. The NPCI developed a Unified Payments Interface (UPI) to facilitate instant digital settlement of interbank peer to peer (P2P) and Person to Merchant (P2M) payments. UPI is an Aadhar enabled mobile based interface, available for free to all the citizens and merchants in India. NPCI also developed the BHIM mobile App and Bharat Bill payment system.

This makes the Indian digital payment infrastructure, one of the best in the world. Millions of small and marginal merchants make billions of UPI transactions, to transform the Indian economy from a cash driven economy to a digital banking society.

NPCI established the National Automated Clearing House (NACH) to integrate all regional electronic clearing services into one national payment system.

NPCI has also enabled a national electronic toll collection through FASTag; National Financial Switch (Network of shared ATMs); RuPay Card, IMPS and Bharat QR etc.,

NPCI was conceived and established in 2008 during the UPA government. However it has taken a lot of new initiatives under the incumbent NDA government.

Expansion and modernization of highways

The Congress government led by P. V. Narasimha Rao, operationalized National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) as an autonomous agency in 1995 to build and manage the network of national highways in India.

The NDA-1 government led by A. B. Vajpayee assigned the task of implementing the National Highways Development Project (NHDP) to NHAI in 2000. NHAI has undertaken and executed several key projects to remarkably improve the interstate surface transport ecosystem in the country. Golden Quadrilateral (20012012), an ambitious project of NHAI under NHDP has become the backbone of national trade & commerce. Besides, NHAI has commissioned North South and East West corridor projects to connect major Indian cities.

NHAI model has inspired most state governments to undertake major highway and express projects in public and private sector to improve road infrastructure and intra state and interstate connectivity.

Best standards in defense and space technology

Indian Space Research Organization (ISRO, established 1969) and Defense Research and Development Organization (DRDO, established 1958) have been two core institutions to make India a major player in the global space and defense technology arena.

ISRO has placed India in the top 5 countries in terms of space capabilities. The commercial satellite launch capabilities of ISRO are now recognized world over. The indigenous GPS tracking system GAGAN, developed by ISRO, has put India in the global elite club.

DRDO has developed a potent nuclear deterrent to safeguard geopolitical interests of India, which is surrounded by rather hostile neighbors. DRDO is a key functionary in the plan to make India self-reliant in defense production and technology. DRDO has also done remarkable development work in the field of chemical engineering and medical science.

BrahMos, developed jointly by DRDO and Mashinostroyeniya of Russia, is the fastest supersonic cruise missile in the world. A hypersonic version of the missile is also under development.

BrahMos Aerospace, the JV between DRDO and Mashinostroyeniya, was formed in 1998. It tested an Air-launched variant of BrahMos in 2012; which was inducted in service in 2019. In 2016 India became a member of the Missile Technology Control Regime(MTCR), enabling India to develop missiles jointly with other members.

We may see India becoming a notable exporter of missiles and missile technology in future.

Democratization of digital commerce (ONDC)

The Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (DPIIT), of Government of India has recently formed a Not for Profit company named Open Network for Digital Commerce (ONDC).

ONDC shall be developing an open network for e-commerce in India. It is expected to be an UPI equivalent for digital commerce. The idea is to end the monopoly and manipulative practices of some large ecommerce players and democratize the ecommerce market by providing an equal access to all the participants. Like what UPI did with the payments, ONDC could revolutionize the digital commerce market in India, providing huge impetus to growth.

ONDC shall lead to democratization, decentralization, digitalization and standardization of the entire digital commerce value chain, increasing the efficiency and access manifold.

MNREGA (started in 2009) also deserves special mention in this context. The rural employment scheme has provided one of the best templates for implementing social security and uniform basic income (UBI) in the country. It is widely recognized that this program has saved millions of families in distress, especially during the periods of crisis such as drought, pandemic, cyclone etc. In the past one decade, the program has been admirably used to build rural assets like roads, water bodies, schools, health centers, etc.

About the constraints, I shall discuss in a later post.