Vijay Kumar Gaba

 The benchmark Nifty50 has oscillated in a tight range in the past eight weeks. On a point-to-point basis, it’s hardly changed - remaining mostly in the 19500-19700 range. More importantly, it has weathered a barrage of bad news in this period and stayed calm as reflected in the low volatility index.

 It was spring of the year 2022. The news flow was worsening every day. The Russia-Ukraine conflict was dominating the global media headlines. NATO-Russia acrimony was at its worst since the cold war era. China committed to a zero Covid policy and implemented strict mobility restrictions, further impacting the global supply chains. Inflation was beginning to spike and most central bankers were ready to embark on an accelerated tightening cycle.

Back home, the enthusiasm created by a path breaking budget had not survived even for a whole week. Issues like macroeconomics (growth, inflation, current account, yields, INR), geopolitics (Russia-Ukraine), politics (state elections) and persistent selling by foreign portfolio investors (FPIs) was dominating the market narrative. The trends in corporate earnings also were not helpful to the cause of market participants.

By early March 2022, the benchmark indices had fallen substantially from their highest levels recorded till then, between October 2021 and January 2022. The Nifty50 was down ~11%; the second most popular benchmark Nifty Bank was down ~16%, the Nifty Midcap 100 was down ~14% and the Nifty Smallcap 100 was down ~17%. Though technically, the market was still in ‘correction’ mode, sentimentally it did feel like a ‘bear’ market.

Amidst all the gloomy headlines and bearish forecasts, I felt that we are most likely to witness a boring market rather than a bear market in India during 2022 with breadth narrowing. (see here). Since then benchmark Nifty is higher; but it has mostly moved in a range occasionally violating the range on both the sides.

Since the beginning of 2022, Nifty50 (+1%) is almost unchanged and midcap (-3%) have performed mostly in line. Nifty Bank (+10%) has been major outperformers; while Smallcap (-20%) have underperformed massively. The market breadth has accordingly been mostly negative.

If we cut the noise and overcome our recency bias, Indian stocks have given a decent return over the past five years; though this period had been particularly eventful. We witnessed the worst pandemic in over a century crippling the world. A variety of economic and geo-political conflicts impeded the global economy. The financial markets witnessed unprecedented liquidity deluge that led to over US$20trn bonds trading at a negative yield; followed by sharp monetary tightening. The world moved from severe deflationary conditions to sharp inflationary spikes. Central banks cut the policy rates close to zero (even below zero in some cases) and then hiked the rates at the fastest speed in five decades.

In the domestic economy, we saw macro parameters like inflation, fiscal deficit, current account deficit etc. worsening sharply. We witnessed a monetary easing and tightening cycle. Banks went through a massive credit cycle.

The benchmark Nifty50 has yielded an 11.4% CAGR over the past five year (January 2018- December 2022). IT Services (19.6% CAGR) is the only sector that has meaningfully outperformed Nifty50 over the past five years. The sectors that should have theoretically benefitted from abundant liquidity and low rates like Auto (1% CAGR) and Realty (4.5% CAGR) were actually amongst the worst performers, failing even to match bank deposit returns.

The market breadth has not been great. The broader indices like Nifty 500 (10.2% CAGR) actually underperformed the benchmark Nifty50 (11.4% CAGR). In fact Nifty Next 50, that represents the set of 50 largest stocks next to Nifty50, underperformed massively with just 6.4% CAGR. Banks (11% CAGR) and Metals (11.3% CAGR), that many might think to be massive outperformers have performed just in line with the benchmark Nifty50. 

If we observe only the benchmark indices, the situation appears calm and simple. However, the story beyond benchmark indices is quite revealing. For example, consider the following facts:

• Only 384 stocks (out of 1428 actively traded stocks on NSE), have outperformed the benchmark Nifty50 over the past five years.
• 54% stocks (770 out 1428) gave a positive return during the past five years, while 46% (658 out of 1428) yielded a negative return over the period of five years.
• The top 100 stocks gained 267% to 6299% during the past 5 years. These include a variety of stocks, largecap, microcap, midcap, chemicals, textile, infra builders, power, metals, FMCG, ERD services, entertainment, NBFCs, pipes, cables, industrials, pharma, etc. The list however excludes banks, top IT services, and PSUs.
• Over 270 stocks lost more than 50% of their value during these five years.

The primary idea of this analysis however is to assess two things:

1.    Do we have a secular trend in the Indian equities?

2.    Do we have significant pockets of froth in the markets?

The answer is:

We may have a secular trend in the Indian equities. The trend is deepening and widening of growth. A large number of sub sectors from the economy – Materials (metals, chemicals, building material, energy, textile, paper, sugar etc.); industrials; utilities (power, telecom); infra builders and owners; consumer (discretionary, durable, staples and internet); healthcare; financials (lenders, non-lenders and service providers); IT services (engineering, digital, cloud, conventional software, BPO) etc. are now participating in growth together. The market is neither sector specific nor segment (large cap, midcap etc.) This had happened briefly in the early 1990s only. This trend could actually be reflective of some structural changes in the economy per se. Of course an intensive research would be required to confirm this.

There does not appear to be froth in any pocket of the market. Though there may be cases of some individual stocks that are still in the process of normalization post the bubble burst.

The latest correction therefore could be a good opportunity to increase exposure to the Indian equities.

 Strategy review

1HFY23 Market performance

For the Indian markets, the first half of the current financial year (1HFY23) has been noteworthy in many respects. While the benchmark indices have remained boringly range bound (not unexpectedly see here), the shift in sector preferences has been material. Also as expected volatility has remained low to moderate and market breadth has narrowed down.

Some key highlights of the market performance in 1HFY23 could be listed as below:

Equity Markets

·         Benchmark Nifty lost 2.1%, sharply outperforming the peers from emerging as well as developed markets. For example, S&P500 (US) lost ~20% in this period; while STOXX600 (Euro Area) was down over 15%.

·         The foreign flows were majorly negative in 5 out of 6 months. Overall foreign portfolio investors sold ~US$20bn worth of Indian equities. Most of this selling was absorbed by domestic institutions. However, on a net basis, institutions were sellers worth Rs100bn.

·         There was a clear shift in sector preference of investors, in accordance with the institutional flows. The momentum massively shifted to domestic consumer demand from global growth. The IT sector was a major loser with NIFTY IT losing over 25% in 1HFY23; whereas FMCG (+22%) and Auto (20%) were major gainers.

·         Commodities (-7%) also lost in line with the global trend; with metals losing over 10%.

·         Banks also sharply outperformed with the benchmark Bank Nifty gaining over 6%. PSBs (+10%) did better than their private sector peers (+8%).

·         The domestic growth trade did get massive support from investors with Nifty Gowth Sector 15 index gaining over 18%; however, Realty (-8.5%) and Infra (-1.2%) sectors ended lower as rate hikes accelerated.

·         Conventional investment style outperformed with Nifty100 Quality (+1.6%) gaining and Nifty Alpha 50 (-16.6%) losing. Small caps lost close to 10% while midcap gained over 3%. Overall market breadth was neutral.

Currency & Debt Markets

·         Bond yields in India rose sharply in line with the global trend. The benchmark 10yr Treasury bond yields rose 50bps from 6.9% at the end of March 2022 to over 7.4%.

·         The yield curve flattened materially, with the short term yields lifting more than 50% from below 4% to over 6%.

·         RBI has so far hiked the policy repo rates by 190bps in FY23.

·         USDINR depreciated over 8% from 75.95 at the end of FY22 to 82.35 presently.

Outlook and Strategy

As I stated in my last strategy review (see here), the investment environment continues to be very uncertain and complex. The geopolitical uncertainties, fiscal policy fatigue and monetary policy dilemma makes short term forecasts very complex. These factors further support the idea of keeping the investment strategy simple and giving preference to capital preservation over higher returns.

Market outlook

The market movement in the 1HFY23 has been mostly on the expected lines. Despite the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine, and elevated energy prices, I do not see any reason to change my market outlook for the rest of FY23. I expect-

(a)   NIfty50 may move in a much larger range of 16200-18745 during 2HFY23.

(b)   I shall remain positive on IT Services, Financial Services, select capital goods, healthcare and consumer staples, and negative for commodities, chemicals, energy and discretionary consumption. For most other sectors the outlook is neutral.

(c)    Benchmark bond yields may average 7.25%+30bps for the year.

(d)   USDINR may average close to INR78.5-79/USD in 2H2023. Better growth and stable markets may attract decent flows to support INR.

(e)    Residential real estate prices may show a divergent trend in various geographies, but may generally remain stable. Commercial real estate may continue to remain strong.

Investment strategy

I shall continue to maintain my standard allocation in 2HFY23 and avoid active trading in my equity portfolio. I am keeping my target return for the overall financial asset portfolio for FY23 to 7%.

After almost a decade the Indian financial sector seems to be out of troubled waters. Almost all significant banks are beyond solvency concerns and set to progress in the path of growth. The asset quality has shown steady improvement for most banks despite Covid disruptions. The loan growth has improved from historic lows seen in the past few years. Earning growth is strongly aided by healthy recovery from the bad accounts.

Moreover, the loan books of most tier 1 and Tier 2 banks are tested for stress and provisions are adequate to meet most foreseen adversities. These institutions have come a long way from the first announcement of Dirty Dozen (the largest 12 non performing accounts) in the summer of 2017. Eight of the notified 12 accounts have been resolved with more than 50% recovery. Resolution is under progress for two accounts and the other two are under liquidation. As of the end of FY22, no major potential stressed account has been reported that can materially alter the current status of any bank. The credit cost from hereon will mostly be under control with some defaults in the normal course of business.

The best part is that the rather stringent provisioning and disclosure norms have significantly enhanced the credibility of the books of banks. The capital adequacy is positive for aggressive lending. Obviously the outlook for Indian banks is bright and buoyant.

Most of the non-bank lenders (NBFCs) are also back on the path of steady growth. The asset liability mismatch (ALM) and asset quality concerns have been mostly addressed by almost all meaningful NBFCs. Many weaker players have been eliminated from the market. For the survivors, the business is brisk and profitable.

Obviously, for the investors in the financial sector better times lie ahead, even if the consensus overweight on the financial sector might slow down the trajectory of gains a little.

Notwithstanding the air of optimism all around, the sky may not be all blue and bright. There are scattered clouds that do not look menacing as of this morning; but certainly warrant a watch.

I shall be in particular watching some conglomerates that are growing too fast (both organically and inorganically) and are considerably leveraged. In some cases the leverage appears supported by the balance sheet that might have been engineered to look healthy but not necessarily backed by tangible assets. The cash generation is poor; thus the servicing capability could be severely impaired if the things do not go as per the plan, raising the spectre of dirty dozen all over again.

The number of systemically important (too big to fail) financial institutions is also growing steadily. The regulator (RBI) is keeping a closer vigil on these institutions. Additional regulatory provisions have also been prescribed for these. Nonetheless, in case of a global contagion like dotcom (2001-2001) or global financial crisis (2008-2009) the probability of a “big tree collapsing” in India is now certainly not zero.

From the business viewpoint, I hope that while aiming to achieve global size and economies of scale, the Indian managements would have learned key lessons from the decline of global conglomerates like General Electric and General Motors and demise of Lehman and Merrill Lynch etc.

The debate over whether “equity investing” is an art or science is never ending. There are arguments on both sides, but none of these appear strong enough to settle the debate. Almost all episodes of this debate usually end with the compromising statement - “Equity investment is both an art and a science.”

The application of quantitative research and financial models does give it a scientific color. But use of quantitative methods and financial models is highly influenced by the personal preferences, experience, estimates and prejudices of the user. Invariably, the forecasts of fundamental analysts vary based on what parameters they have used in forming their respective opinions. For example, a 50bps difference in weighted average cost of capital (WACC) used by two analysts could give dramatically different assessments for the fair value of a stock. As someone pointed out, fundamental analysis of equity stocks is like navigating a car. While all the cars are designed scientifically, the drivers have distinct styles of driving and the results – time to travel a defined distance, safety of the passengers and vehicle, fuel mileage obtained from the vehicle etc. – largely depend on the style and experience of the driver.

The “art” side of equity investing is even more complicated. Most investors view a particular stock from the vista point they are standing at that particular point in time. Their decision to buy or sell stock depends on their financial, psychological, and social condition at that particular point in time. The decision (and therefore view on a stock) can change dramatically if they move to a different vista point, i.e., their financial, psychological and/or social change.

For example, an investor who invested in a portfolio of stocks 10yrs ago for children's college fees, he/she will sell the portfolio as soon as the children get admission in college, irrespective of the future outlook of these stocks.

Parallel to the debate of ‘science” vs ‘arts”, a lot of mythical investment strategies are also commonly discussed and marketed. The investors, analysts and money managers use terms like “value vs growth”; “cyclical vs defensive”; “large cap vs midcap”; “financials vs technology”, which are mostly mythical and have no scientific basis.

·         Most large IT Services companies count BFSI as their primary customer segment. Most large financial firms are reporting spend on technology as their primary capex. How could possibly the investment in these two sectors be alternative.

·         Auto, Energy, and Banks sector equities have given positive returns over the past 3yr, 1yr and YTD2022 horizon. This period saw one of the most pervasive socio-economic disruption globally and triggered a global recession. Whereas, media, pharma and IT services are the sector that are down on 1yr and YTD2022 basis, though IT and Pharma sectors have given strong returns over the past 3yrs. The question is how would define what is cyclical and what is secular or defensive in this scenario.

·         Midcaps have outperformed Nifty over past 1yr and 3yr timeframe. So what is the relevance of largecap vs midcap debate?

The point I am trying to make is that the investors must avoid these mostly redundant and mythological distinctions and debates and focus on their investment objectives and strategy to achieve those objectives.

What would be the first thought that crosses your mind, when you hear a veteran fund manager betting his shirt on Nifty falling 30-40% in the next 6months! Yes, you heard it right. Last week, a former CEO/CIO of a large AMC, confidently told an audience composed of top bankers and HNIs that Nifty is bound to come to sub 10000 levels in next 6months and gold is the only safe haven under the present circumstances.

 The strong rally in global metal prices, and consequently metal producers, appear to be faltering. Chinese authorities have taken a number of measures to calm down the steel and iron ore market. Iron futures have fallen sharply in past couple of weeks. Besides, steel and base metals like copper and aluminium have also corrected sharply from their recent high levels.

A few brokerages who were extremely bullish on metals from midterm viewpoint have also turned little cautious. For example, in a recent research note JM Financial stated that

“The recent spike in the headline inflation in several countries, including in the US, has been led by steep rise in global commodity prices, including metals, soft commodities and crude oil prices….”.

“For us the rally over the past 12 months was fairly predictable. But things are not as clear looking forward. We believe that market indicators have run far ahead given the context of the underlying strength of the economic recovery that is still nascent and significant supply side factors including production cuts by China in case of steel, by OPEC in case of crude oil production, and bottlenecks across various input items. Given our assessment of still weak pricing power in the manufacturing sector despite the recovery, the rising cost and inflation pressures can slow growth and consumption. There can also be supply responses to steep rise in commodity or input prices. Both these will cool off the commodity rally. Indeed the recent news indicates that the supply-demand equation for Chinese steel is now weighing on the other side.”

The note concludes that the historic low pricing power of manufacturers is incongruent with the high commodity inflation and therefore unsustainable. It is felt that “The probability of pick up in output prices in response to rising cost is lower than decline in commodity prices.”

But there are other brokerages like (Kotak on Aluminium and Nomura & CLAS on Steel) which have not yet considered revising their outlook.

A recent note by Kotak Research emphasized that “Chinese aluminum smelters are facing environment-led production restrictions whereas capacity cap is limiting future additions. With strong sequential demand recovery, global utilization has reached a decade high, has limited spare capacity and thin pipeline of fresh additions.” The brokerage accordingly forecasts “a deficit market from CY2022E to keep aluminum prices elevated and upgraded our price assumptions by 30%/19% for FY2022/23E.”

The rating agency CARE, expressed a balanced view in a recent note. It highlighted that “The demand for base metals looks strong as more countries emerge from the pandemic with strong recovery anticipated in the global economy. Economic data from US and European market have improved since April and the US dollar trended lower which is also giving supporting metal prices. The current demand fundamentals for copper, aluminium and tin are robust and future supply will need to respond to increased demand.” The bullish view was however qualified by risk from Chinese action. It read, “, on the downside risk Chinese authorities have announced that they will track commodities prices more closely, and are prepared to take measures to steady raw materials prices. High commodity prices will also increase the project cost of infrastructure development activities announced by the major economies to tide over the pandemic driven slowdown. High commodity prices of copper and aluminium will also increase the cost of transitioning to green energy and may lengthen the time taken to reach the climate goals.”

The market however seems to be embracing the idea of peak commodity inflation with Nifty Bank outperforming Nifty Metal by 7-8% in past 3days. It is to seen whether this divergence is beginning of a new trend or just a minor correction in a midterm trend.