Do it yourself: China

Showing posts with label China. Show all posts

Tuesday, April 8, 2025

Tariff Tantrums

Last week, President Trump announced a hike/imposition of tariffs on most of the USA's imports. As per the proposed tariffs that are presently scheduled to come fully into effect from 9^th April 2025, the Trump administration has proposed a 10% base tariff on all imports into the US. Over and above the base tariff, higher rates of tariff are applicable on several countries based on the trade deficit of the US with each such country.

The global reaction to the tariff announcement has been varied. Some trade partners like China have responded aggressively by announcing matching higher tariffs; whereas the others, like India, have adopted a wait and watch approach, hoping to find a middle path.

Apparently, the calculation of the proposed indiscriminate tariffs has been done through mindless spreadsheet application, using the recent US trade data. Though President Trump had made tariffs a key issue in his poll campaign, the administration appears mostly unprepared for this. The explanation offered by the US administration for taking steps is not convincing. For example, the arguments presented in an interview of treasury secretary Scott Bessant, remind of an old folklore that goes like this:

“Once a little lamb walked to the river to quench his thirst. At that time the king of the jungle, a Lion, was also drinking water from the river a few meters upstream of the lamb. The smell of this small soft lamb whetted lion’s appetite. He wanted to eat the lamb immediately, but the farce of being a just and kind king, he has perseveringly created over years, prompted him to look for a valid excuse to kill this small creature.

After thinking for a moment, he roared "How dare you make me drink dirty water?”. Not sensing the trouble, the lamb politely replied, my Lord, I am downstream, while you are drinking water upstream. It is me who is drinking your dirty water!”

Determined to kill the lamb, the lion retorted, “but why did you laugh at me last summer when I passed by your abode?". Now sensing some trouble, the lamb meekly replied, "My lord, it could not be me, because I was only born just a couple of months ago”. Unable to control his urge, the lion lamented, “If it was not you, it must be your mother. You must pay for her sins.” Saying this he jumped on the lamb and killed him.”

A career hedge fund manager, who has been feasting on the miseries of others all through his adult life, suddenly speaking the language of Karl Marx, and rooting for the hungry and homeless, would make sense only if he wears the rob of a monk and speaks from a monastery. It sounds even more unconvincing when seen in tandem with the DOGE’s move to end humanitarian aid, in some cases a couple of million dollars, to the world’s most poor and disease prone people.

Listening to President Trump and his team members, I get a vivid impression that Tariff tantrums they are throwing are just an ill-thought excuse being used for a bigger design. This is clearly a fight to stay relevant in the emerging world order. The US economics and demographics do not support its pole position in global geopolitics – a position they have enjoyed and greatly benefitted from for over 80 years now.

The US gained its pole position by dropping “Fat Man” (Nagasaki) and “Little Boy” (Hiroshima), eighty years ago, and has been repeatedly shocking the global community through economic, financial and geopolitical shocks to retain this position. The latest tariff tantrums may just be part of that series.

I do not subscribe to the conspiracy theory doing rounds on social media that this may just be a ploy to push the US yields down, to ease the fiscal pressure and facilitate smooth refinancing of the debt maturing in the next couple of years, for three simple reasons:

(i) The US mostly borrows in its own currency. A simple quantitative easing (USD printing) would be sufficient to refinance debt.

(ii) Bond yields are mostly a function of demand and supply for the underlying bonds. Tariff war would certainly weaken the US economy - at least in the short term (2-3years), if not structurally. Besides, it will also trade linkages of the US. Weaker growth (weaker USD) and declining external linkages would invariably result in poor demand for bonds, hence higher yields. To the contrary, a strong economy with contained inflation (cheaper imports) and stronger external linkages is more likely to stimulate higher demand for the US bond and hence lower yields.

(iii) Approximately, one third of the US public debt (US$8-9 trillion) is owned by the foreign entities. Out of this, Japan (US$1.1 trillion) China (US$800bn) and the UK (US$700bn) are major holders of the US debt (US Treasuries). A full-fledged trade war could result in these holders optimizing their UST holdings and might further reduce demand for the US debt.

There is also a serious disconnect between the immigration policies and the objective to make the US a manufacturing power again. The US wage structure, average US citizen skill levels, the cost of imported raw material and capital goods post tariffs, and a weaker USD may not be conducive for an efficient manufacturing ecosystem. The US would need cheap foreign labor, strong USD, strong trade linkages with suppliers of raw material and engineering goods for at least one decade to relocate manufacturing back to the US.

Notwithstanding the brouhaha over the US$5mn gold card, in the absence of an assurance of a free, liberal, diversified, inclusive and equitable society and stable policy environment, not many investors and highly talented workers may find the US a suitable investment/career/study destination. The European competitors may be happy to host these investors/workers.

In my view, Trump’s tariff tantrums are part of the traditional US ‘shock and awe’ tactics. They will test waters with this sometimes and stage a strategic retreat, if it does not show the desired effects, viz., reinforce the US position as undisputed superpower; achieve fiscal correction without triggering a deeper demand recession, and probability of putting Trump’s face on the Mount Rushmore. However, if it does show the desired results, no one should have any strong reasons for worrying.

In the worst case, if the US stays committed to tariffs and its trade partners prefer to contest rather than yield, we must be prepared for the end of the rule-based global order that has prevailed since the end of WWII. The age of Vikings returns. All powerful nations begin campaigns to acquire territories and resources. The weak nations get subjugated. Poor and starving people are made slaves. Indentured laborers would rebuild empires, before the disease and death destroys it all.

In this context, it is important to listen to the warning of the Prime Minister of Singapore.

Thursday, March 20, 2025

View from the Mars - 4

Continuing from yesterday (View from the Mars – 3)

In my view, the following issues may, inter alia, play an important role in shaping the contours of the new world order that may evolve in the next decade or so.

· China presently is finding it hard to gain acceptance as a major global leader. One of the reasons is lack of democracy, which is still a major consideration for the western developed world. Besides, it is also regarded as an irresponsible power by the extant major global powers. Recently, the spread of Covid-19 virus from Wuhan laboratory, causing a global pandemic, has materially tarnished the image of China. In particular, the mistrust between the US and China have increased manifolds after the outbreak of pandemic, resulting in a Sino-US cold war. This cold war that may last for many years, or may be decades, may be a key determinant of the new world order. Important to note that Russia, which was a key WWII opponent of China, and key OPEC members – Iran & Saudi Arabia, and erstwhile strategic partner of the US – Pakistan, are overtly standing on the Chinese side in this cold war.

· The vulnerabilities of the US and Europe have been exposed by the coronavirus. Post 9/11 incident, we saw dramatic changes in the concept of internal security in the US and many other countries. The suspects were shot dead without much provocation, disregarding all concerns for human rights and liberties. The culprits were chased and killed in foreign jurisdictions often disregarding sovereignty of these foreign lands. The diplomats, politicians and prominent personalities arriving in the US and the UK were strip searched and denied entry with impunity.

We may see further rise in xenophobic tendencies of the developed western countries. Another major impact could be a concerted effort to reverse the course of demography, especially in European countries that are turning old at an alarming rate. This could be achieved by substantial incentives for procreating aggressively or changes in the immigration policies to encourage young professionals from developing countries to settle there.

· The global supply chain presently relies heavily on China for components as well as manufacturing services. Many developed countries get their fiscal gaps filled by China in lieu of using Chinese manufacturing services and allowing China access to their markets. The new world order may see a massive shift in this trend. Countries may seek to limit their fiscal deficits and seek diversification of their supply chains. This could present many opportunities & threats to the emerging economies like India.

· The dominance of USD as the world's only reserve currency could face serious challenges from more neutral digital currencies, especially as a medium of exchange.

· The ideas like free trade, personal liberties, etc. may face serious challenges from the rising tendencies of governments world over, which are eager to exercise enhanced surveillance and control over personal conduct and data.

· The business models, valuation models, risk assessment techniques, commercial contracts etc. may need to be redefined to build in probability of frequent disruptions and conflicts.

· The business and official ‘foreign travel’ may become ‘avoidable unless necessary’, due to rising scrutiny and excessive VISA restrictions.

· The business continuity planning may become a mainstream subject for all businesses, not just for the mission critical processes and financial services.

· A strong wave of debt defaults/waiver may hit the global financial system. Handling of this tsunami and subsequent recapitalization of the lenders will be a key challenge for the governments and central banks. Inappropriate handling of this challenge may eventually lead to shortage of growth capital and thus rise in cost of capital.

Where does India stand in this transition and what are the opportunities and threats?

I shall share my thoughts on this next week.

Wednesday, March 19, 2025

View from the Mars - 3

About 17 years ago, a global financial crisis (GFC) engulfed the global markets. The impact of the crisis on financial markets was mitigated in a couple of years by collective efforts of the governments and central bankers. However, the social, geo political and economic impacts of the crisis largely remain unmitigated even today.

The "Reset" button pressed by the crisis resulted in widening of socio-economic divide across the world. The geopolitical tensions have intensified materially with rise in nationalism, protectionism and parochialism. This has not adversely impacted global trade. The rising unemployment in Europe and most commodity dependent economies in Asia, Africa and Latin America, declining growth in China, substantial cut in developmental aid to least developed nations due to fiscal pressures, has caused widespread rise in human suffering.

The COVID-19 pandemic further accelerated the "Reset" process, paving the way for the emergence of a new global order.

To put things in a right perspective, it is pertinent to note the changes in world order that have taken place since the advent of the 20th century.

In 1917, the Russian revolution successfully dismantled the Tsarist autocracy and laid the foundation of the USSR. In the following decades, many smaller independent European states became subservient to a mighty Russian socialist army, and together formed one pole in the emerging bi-polar world, forever shrouded by the specter of cold war.

In the same year, USA decided to shed its long-held policy of isolationism, and joined the War as an associate of the Allies - a development that tilted the scale in favor of the Allies, bringing the War to an end in 1918. In the following decades, the USA evolved into a formidable military and economic power that led the NATO allies to become the second pole in the emerging bi-polar world.

It took three decades for the new order to consolidate. The imperialist global order that existed in preceding centuries began to dismantle. Many colonies of European empires gained freedom. The British Empire that was built in three centuries and covered almost one fourth of the world population and area before the War, was completely dismantled in the following three decades.

The new order was characterized by the UN, NATO, WARSAW, Mao, Israel, NAM, Bretton Woods, World Bank, Cold War, energy cartel (OPEC), WEF, et. al. The globalization that was a norm prior to the first War was completely overpowered by the forces of nationalism and protectionism. This world order lasted till the German Wall fell and the USSR disintegrated in early 1990s; unleashing a new wave of globalization. In this world order, ‘market’ and ‘multilateralism’ was the dominant theme.

For two decades, since early 1990s, the global narrative was driven by global trade (WTO), Internet, digitalization, dematerialization, Europe integration into a single market, China's entry into mainstream global trade (through WTO), free flow of capital, G-20, BRICS, numerous FTAs, global war on Islamic fundamentalism, energy security, climate control, until the global financial crisis pressed the reset button and Covid-19 pandemic added further impetus to the process and brough us on the threshold of a yet new global order.

The imperatives of the new world include—

· Necessity to exit the accommodative monetary and fiscal policies originally adopted to mitigate the impact of GFC, which have become completely unsustainable after further loosening to mitigate the impact of Covid-19 pandemic.

· Need to find an alternative to the USD, which continues to be the only global currency despite material weakness in the underlying fundamentals.

· An urgent need to correct the imbalances that have creeped into global trade in the past three decades, due to aggressive growth agenda pursued by China & OPEC, technology developments in the US, persistent low yields in EU and Japan, and economic sanction on Russia, etc.

· Weakening of old trade and geopolitical blocks weakening and emergence of new trade and geopolitical alliances, especially Russia, China and Iran nexus.

· China is accelerating the drive to assume global leadership through mega initiatives like One Belt One Road (OBOR) and China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) and enlarging BRICS.

· Weakening of the European Union due to the exit of the UK.

· The US withdrawing from conflict zones like Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya refusing to engage in Syria, and ignoring genocide in Palestine, signaling a paradigm shift in its policy towards globalization and, free trade.

· Worsening of the refugee crisis in the western Europe.

· India’s effort to emerge as an alternative manufacturing hub to China, for the developed countries seeking to derisk their supply chains.

· Growing irrelevance of the multilateral institutions like the UN, OECD, IMF etc.

It may be little early to speculate on the likely contours of the emerging new world order. However, I do believe that the new world may not be excessively localized, nationalist and/or protectionist. Nonetheless, it is entirely possible that several new trade and geopolitical blocks get form, and define the contours of the new world order.

….more on this tomorrow.

Wednesday, February 5, 2025

3D view of market – Deleveraging, Demographics and Deflation

“There are events in the womb of time, which shall be delivered in time”. (Othello, William Shakespeare)

Beginning of the current year, I commented that “the trend seen in the past few months is indicating that the conditions might change materially in the next 12-24 months. The macro trends may become ambivalent and unpredictable. Investors may need to make choices; and the return they would earn on their investment portfolios would largely depend on the choices they would make. Making right choices, in my view, would be the central investment challenge for the year 2025.”

Barely one month into the year and it appears that earth already witnessed many seasons. The conditions are becoming more uncertain with each passing day. The 47^th President of the United States (P47), appears in a tremendous hurry to deliver on his promise to Make America Great Again (MAGA). He is using all his negotiating skills to secure good deals for his country. How much success will he achieve with his aggressive approach, we would only know with passage of time. Nonetheless, with his initial actions he has created a fair degree of uncertainty in the minds of his political opponents, trade partners, strategic partners, competitors and markets.

While I continue to maintain that investors would be better off avoiding a macro trade and focusing on individual business stories in the next 12-24 months, the three macro trends worth including in the matrix for identifying and evaluating individual business stories are Deleveraging, Demographics and Deflation.

Deleveraging: The US Fed has contracted its balance sheet by US$2.1trn since the beginning of its monetary tightening (QT) program in April 2022. The total assets held by the US Fed are now lowest since May 2020. It would need to unwind another US$2.7trn to completely undo the Covid related monetary expansion. Besides the US Fed, most other central bankers have shown a tendency to tighten the money supply by reducing their asset holdings. The Bank of England balance sheet is following the same trajectory as the US Fed. BoJ has not expanded its balance sheet in the past couple of years and cut the size of its asset holdings in recent months. Even RBI’s balance sheet has contracted in the past few months.

If we take the plan of P47 at par value, we are staring at one of the biggest fiscal corrections in modern history. Most other major developed and developing countries are also progressing on the path of sustainable fiscal corrections.

This macro deleveraging at the global level might reflect in the corporate and household balance sheets sooner than later. But for a major natural or manmade disaster, we should be factoring in sustainable governments, lower rates and adequate household savings in our investment strategies.

Demographics: One of the most critical trends in a large part of the developed world is deteriorating demographics. Most European and LatAm countries, the US, Canada, Japan, China, South Korea, Thailand, etc. have their total fertility rates fallen below the replacement ratio (implying their population is now on a declining path). The proportion of the working age population in these countries is decreasing fast. The population in China has already peaked and the population in India is expected to peak much ahead of the previous estimates of 2050.

This demographic trend appears structural and irreversible. With deeper and wider integration of technological advancement in social and personal life, the need & space for human interaction is on the decline. Financial and professional constraints are adversely impacting the capability and willingness to commit to personal relationships. Stressed and hectic lifestyles are adversely impacting the fertility of humans. There is nothing to suggest that these trends could change in the foreseeable future.

Obviously, the demographic trends will reflect on the aggregate demand as well as the demand mix.

Deflation: The mix of deleveraging, ageing demographics and superior productivity gains through technological advancements may lead to resumption of the pre-Covid deflationary trend. The supply lines disrupted due to Covid related restrictions and geopolitical developments post 2021 have mostly been restored. Save for a totally unexpected development, the current trend appears that a workable global trade balance may be achieved within the next 12-24 months.

With almost all major global market forces (the US, China, Germany, Japan, South Korea, France and the UK account for ~40% of the global trade) focused on repairing and strengthening their domestic economies, it is more likely a mutually beneficial global trade framework will emerge after the initial aggression of the P47 brings all trade partners to the negotiating table. This framework would, among other things, will certainly dampen the inflationary expectations.

Tuesday, December 10, 2024

Do we need to worry about the external situation?

Notwithstanding a marked slowdown in the past few quarters, the Indian economy has managed to grow at a decent pace in the current global context. Though India may have lost the crown of the fastest growing global economy to Vietnam, it still remains the fastest growing amongst the top 10 global economies.

The Reserve Bank of India is holding US$658bn in forex reserves, which is considered adequate in normal circumstances or even in a usual cyclical slowdown. Despite accelerated selling in equity markets by the foreign portfolio investors (FPIs), the current account deficit of ~1.5% of GDP, is conveniently manageable. INR has been one of the most stable emerging market currencies. On the real effective exchange rate (REER) basis INR is presently ruling at a five-year high level.

In their recent policy review, the Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) of the Reserve Bank of India has cut growth estimates for FY25 by 60bps to 6.6% and 1QFY26 by 40bps to 6.9%. The MPC has also hiked their inflation forecast for 2HFY25 and 1QFY26. The RBI estimates are still few basis points higher than the average estimates of professional forecasters, as per the RBI’s recent survey. It is therefore likely that growth slowdown extends well into 1HFY26.

RBI has once again made it clear that it is not comfortable about the inflation trajectory and would prefer to outweigh price stability against growth in its policy dynamics. In the recent meeting, the two external members of the MPC voted in favor of a 25bps repo rate cut, but the RBI’s official nominees voted to maintain a status quo, despite loud growth concerns and political rhetoric for monetary easing.

The market consensus seems overwhelmingly in favor of a February 2025 repo rate cut. This assumes growth staying in the slow lane; lower food and energy inflation; and fiscal improvement as promised in the union budget for FY25. We need to watch for development of La Nina, adversely impacting the Rabi crop; slowdown in tax collection and rise in cash subsidies due to election promises adversely impacting the fiscal disincline. Compensating higher subsidies with a cut in capital expenditure (as has been the case in 1HFY25) would further slowdown the potential growth, making any monetary easing more inflationary.

At the surface level there is nothing that would ring alarm bells for domestic investors. However, some of the recent actions of the RBI are reminiscent of the 2013 crisis period. The monetary policy is increasingly sounding like a plan to secure the stability of USDINR.

I wonder if RBI is really worried or it is just cautious and taking preemptive steps to mitigate any chance of a balance of payment crisis and/or currency volatility.

I have taken note of the following data points; and at the risk of being labeled unnecessarily paranoid, I would keep a close watch on these for the next few months to assess any vulnerability in India’s external sector.

· There has been a marked slowdown in foreign flows -both portfolio flow and FDI flows in the past one year. The political changes in the US and Europe may further impact the flows in 2025. RBI may not want to further discourage flows by offering lower bond yields. For record, the India10y-US10y yield spread has already fallen from a high of 350bps in January 2024 to ~250bps.

· RBI has created a record short position in USD (over US$49bn in forward market) in the past couple of months to protect USDINR; besides running down Fx reserves by ~US$47bn in just one month (from US$705bn in October 2024 to US$658bn in November 2024)). It has taken almost US$96bn to keep USDINR stable in the 83-50-84.50 range.

It is critical to watch this because:

The global trade war could escalate, before it settles after the inauguration of President Trump. This could slowdown global trade; lead to China dumping on non-US trade partners; slowdown in remittances and services exports to some extent.

As the denominator (nominal GDP) goes down and exports also slow down, the current account deficit may show a tendency to rise, pressuring INR. The RBI cannot afford to spend another US$100bn on defending USDINR.

RBI has hiked the ceiling on interest rates offered by scheduled commercial banks on foreign currency deposits of NRIs. This is an early sign of the RBI worrying about Fx reserves. Any measure to limit foreign spending, investments (outward FDI) and LRS remittances will confirm these fears.

Presently, FPIs own about US$650bn worth of Indian equities, which is equal to official fx reserves of India. A US$12bn (appx 1.75% of total holding) sale in the past couple of months has caused some damage to the market sentiments. A 5% selling (US$35bn) could seriously damage equity markets, currency markets and RBI’s gameplan. Remember, on an average, we are running a ~US$20bn/month trade deficit; and a net external debt of over US$682bn. In a crisis situation, US$658bn reserves might not prove to be adequate.

· President-Elect Trump and some of his designated team members have explicitly termed India a “currency manipulator” and demanded RBI to strengthen USDINR. If RBI is forced to meet these demands, it may need to unwind its short USD position, conduct aggressive OMO to buy USD from the market, and engineer higher yields (bond and/or deposits) to attract more USD flows into India. This could make maintaining current account balance a challenging task. Especially in an environment, where China could be dumping everything in the global markets, and competitors like Vietnam, Indonesia, Philippines, Turkey are becoming very aggressive.

If you find it confusing, impertinent, misplaced, let me sum this up in short for you. I would prefer to totally avoid macro trades in 2025, and stay committed to individual business stories that I like.

Tuesday, November 26, 2024

Speculating Trump’s second term

President elect of the US, Donald Trump has already designated key members of his team. Based on his election agenda, speeches and rhetoric and personal views of his designated team members, market participants are speculating about the likely policy framework of Trump 2.0 administration, and its implications for the global trade and markets.

My personal view is that the actual agenda of governance might have some shades of the election rhetoric but its actual path may not materially deviate from the trend seen in the post GFC (2009) period. At this point in time, I do not expect to sight any black swan in global economics and/or markets. With this caveat, let me summarize the current market speculations and its likely impact on India.

Trade tariffs

Trump has been speaking about imposing high tariffs on the US merchandise imports to promote local manufacturing, cut US trade deficit and strengthen USD. He has been suggesting 20% universal tariff on all imports, 60% tariff on imports from China and restrictions on the trade partners that he believes have artificially undervalued their currencies to gain trade surplus with the US. India is seen as one of these currency manipulating countries.

The administration will have to assess the impact of higher tariffs on businesses that are heavily reliant on imported inputs. Besides, the present US infrastructure and worker pool may not be adequate to onshore much of manufacturing activities. The impact of higher tariffs on the monetary policy objectives will also need to be calibrated.

Trump 1.0 started a manufacturing renaissance of sorts in the US, through tax incentives, tariffs and favorable skilled worker immigration policies. The Biden administration has carried forward the Trump 1.0 agenda and provided added further impetus though It would be reasonable to assume that trend will continue. There may be some random measures taken to address the political constituency, but a universal restrictive tariff policy (if at all implemented) will take much longer, maybe a couple of years, to evolve. A trade taken on the likely contours of the tariff policy may be frustrating.

In this context, it would be pertinent to note the comments of Michael Feroli, chief US economist at JPMorgan. Feroli said, “One path sees tax cuts and deregulation unleashing animal spirits, thereby boosting productivity growth and GDP outcomes while keeping inflation well-contained. The other path foresees policy uncertainty hindering growth, while trade and immigration restrictions impart a stagflationary bias.”

Collateral

Presuming Trump carries out his threat of a 60% tariff on Chinese imports – it may have consequences for most of the trade partners of the US and China. Some of the tariff hikes may be absorbed through CNY devaluation like China did in 2018; but some of it will have to be shared by the US consumers and producers. This essentially means higher US inflation and lower corporate profitability. China may dump the surplus production on Non-US importers, impacting local producers in those markets – thus exporting deflation throughout the world.

The Indian chemical sector, for example, which has already been suffering from Chinese price cuts may suffer further damage. Considering the massive capacity addition in the past 5-6 years and leveraged balance sheets, some of these companies might not be able to survive.

Energy policy

Trump has designated Chris Wright to head the energy department. Wright has been a known supporter of fossil fuels, disregarding the threat of climate change. He believes that the oil and gas industry has brought security and power and development to the United States, and global emissions aren't going down with greater focus on clean energy. He famously rejected carbon dioxide as a pollutant, claiming “carbon is essential for life”.

In the words of Wright, “Climate change is a real and global challenge that we should and can address. However, representing it as the most urgent threat to humanity today displaces concerns about more pressing threats of malnutrition, access to clean water, air pollution, endemic diseases, and human rights, among others.” He therefore advocates a need to bring down the price of energy and secure energy independence for the US.

Anticipating higher US oil production and return of thermal power in favor, the traders are placing a trade on fossil fuel – buying coal miners, fracking companies and drilling equipment manufacturers.

If Trump-Wright energy doctrine is actually implemented it would mean – collapse of United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP), sharp rise in the US oil production and exports resulting in lower global crude prices, decline in clean energy subsidies resulting in poor demand growth for solar energy and EVs.

In the past one-decade massive investment has been made in the production and adoption of clean energy solutions for electricity and mobility needs. The viability of these investments, especially in emerging economies where viability gap is already funded through fiscal support, would need to be reassessed.

Collateral

A 20% duty hike on the Indian exports may hurt some of the Indian exporters, as they may not be able to pass on the whole of the duty hike to the importers.

Cheaper oil may hurt the economies of OPEC countries, which are major trade partners, investors and employment providers for India.

Cheaper oil may help current account, inflation and INR.

Immigration policy

Immigration was a core issue in the entire campaign of Trump. He promised strict action against all illegal immigrants and several restrictive actions against the legal immigrants. We have heard similar rhetoric during the election campaign of Geroge Bush jr, Hillary Clinton, and Trump 1.0 etc.

It is widely accepted that ~47 million immigrants form a critical element of the US economy. They support the US businesses by providing a highly skilled workforce; boost federal revenue by paying taxes and contribution to social security; support the economy through high rates of savings and investments; and are an important consumer group.

President-elect Trump has indicated that his administration plans to carry out mass detentions and deportations of millions of immigrants, including long-term residents, by declaring national emergency and deploying armed forces to carry out deportation exercises. This could lead to family separations and negative mental and physical health consequences. This could potentially create widespread civil unrest, affecting the mental and social health of millions and the health of several small businesses who employ these immigrants. It is also feared that there could also be higher taxes on legal foreign workers.

Collateral

Uncertainty about jobs and residential status and higher taxes could result in lower job opportunities for the Indian workers employed in the US, negatively impacting remittances. Tougher VISA norms and immigration policies may also have some negative impact on the margins of the Indian IT services companies.

Geopolitics

George Washington implemented a policy of isolationism and neutrality with regards to the internal affairs of other nations. The successive US presidents followed this policy till the president Wilson was forced to change it in the wake of threats to the American interests that emerged from the first World War. In April 1917, the US entered the war with Germany “to make the world safe for democracy”. In the past 107 years, the US has followed this doctrine in its foreign policy.

Trump has now vowed to revert to the policy of isolationism and neutrality. Many geopolitical experts fear that this will end a major deterrent to the global expansionist forces like China and Russia, and could potentially unleash some major wars.

In my view, Trump may not hurry to a policy of isolationism and neutrality. I believe the US derives most of its power from the bombs they dropped in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. This nuclear deterrent has kept most expansionist ambitions at pay in the post WWII era.

The promise of liberty, fairness and equal opportunity has tremendously enhanced the US’s power. It has enabled it to attract and retain top talent from their adversaries like Vietnam, Japan, China, Russia, East Europe, Iran, Cuba, etc. and even talent starved countries like India, Pakistan, Bangladesh etc. The US will be able to retain its supremacy only as long as these immigrants are loyal to the US and the US administration is ready to bomb any country to protect the world order.

(PS: A large number of people believe that “the save democracy” democracy doctrine of the US is a façade to camouflage its own expansionist agenda. There are strong arguments on both sides of this belief. I would not like to get into that debate here.)

Collateral

If the US does revert to the policy of isolationism and neutrality by cutting aid to the countries like Ukraine and Israel, we may witness widespread unrest globally. This will unfold the worst human tragedy since WWII.

Besides the above mentioned factors, there are speculations about the trajectory of USD, Rates, Crypto, Gold during the second term of Trump. I believe that these all are derivative factors which would depend on the macro policies of the new US administration. It may be too early to call a good trade on these.

Tuesday, November 19, 2024

Ambivalent

In the past four days, my e-mailbox, WhatsApp message box and social media timelines have been inundated with copies of an Asia Pacific strategy report of a global brokerage. So far, I have received 127 digital copies of the 21 pages (5MB) report, with a rather Tharoorish title – “Pouncing Tiger, prevaricating Dragon”. (I needed to use a dictionary to find out the meaning of prevaricating). I am not sure how many of those sharing the report have actually read it. Most of them appear to have just forwarded it in the spirit of Diwali – just like Soan Papdi boxes exchanged on Diwali, which are never opened and tasted by intended recipients.

The strategy report makes two points that may be of any interest to the Indian investors – (i) Initiation of “Overweight China” trade in the month of September 2024 by some global brokerages was an error of judgement and needs correction; and (ii) the cut in India overweight from 20% to 10% was not warranted and is being restored.

It is important to note that brokerages remained overweight or equal weight on India, while leaning a bit towards China. This report is more about correction in China strategy and less about India. As of this morning no data is available as to how much selling the clients of this particular brokerage actually did in India since September 2024, and how much they would be buying in next few weeks to adhere to the brokerage’s strategy.

The reason cited for the change in strategy are:

a) Trump will herald Sino-US trade war escalation. Chinese NPC stimulus is not reflationary. Elevated US yields and inflationary expectations would prevent the Fed from cutting further, thus limiting the scope for further stimulus by PBoC.

b) India is amongst the least exposed regional markets to Trump’s adverse trade policy. FPIs are underexposed to the Indian equities and looking for buying opportunities. Valuations are now more palatable.

In my view, the brokerage might have committed another mistake to correct an earlier error. We still have two months before Trump’s inauguration and perhaps a few more months to see what his trade policies are going to look like, regardless of the election rhetoric. Six weeks may be too early to assess the impact of the Chinese stimulus. The latest earnings estimates used to derive the valuations of Indian equities might change in the next couple of quarters, if inflation does not ease and growth estimates are downgraded. There is no evidence that FPIs have remitted the dollars out of India in the past few months. The net FPIs flows have been positive (see here). FPIs may not rush to India with fresh bags full of dollars in the next few months. They may want to see how EM debt and currencies behave in 1H2025 in the wake of Trump and Fed policies.

In this context, I note the following, which makes me ambivalent about the impact of the change in heart of few global brokerages.

· Trump has spoken extensively about onshoring manufacturing to the US. This forms the fulcrum of his trade policies towards China and other countries that run trade surplus with the US.

In this context, it is pertinent to note that the US is home to countless unskilled, obese, and unwilling workers asking for a raise in US$18-20/day minimum wage. Trump’s choice for health secretary, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., is exactly not promising a program to make this workforce fit enough to work 50hrs/week. It is not clear how President Trump would propose to compete with US$350/month wage Chinese workers who are regimented, skilled and healthy enough to work 70hr/week.

· In the year 2018, Trump imposed restrictions on export of high-end semiconductors to China. The Chinese government responded to this by investing massively in the high-end technology sector. Massive flows of capital were directed towards the industrial sector from real estate. Consequently, China is now close to attaining self-sufficiency in semiconductors. China has leapfrogged the US in several areas requiring high-end technology.

The point is that protectionist trade policies of the US may now help some of American businesses; but these policies may not hurt China in any significant way. China is even more geared now to export deflation to the western world, than before. The protectionist policies may impede India's interests noticeably.

· Naseem Nicholas Taleb, regarded as a visionary by many market participants, has recently warned Elon Musk in no uncertain words. He wrote on X (formerly Twitter) “Business people want to make things function; bureaucrats like to perpetuate dysfunction. I fear for @Elon as he is stepping harder and harder on the interests of the Deep State. I will light a candle for him at the Monastery of Hamatoura.”

Obviously, there are reasonable doubts about the success of Team Trump in implementing their election promises, especially those concerning the bureaucratic reforms in the US.

· The latest portfolio disclosures of Michael Burry, the legendary US trader/investor, suggest that recently he has been loading up on Chinese equities.

Tuesday, September 24, 2024

Are you feeling chill in the air

The Fed, BoE, and BoJ rate decisions are out of the way now. The S&P500, bond yields, USD, JPY, Gold, and Bitcoin, etc. have already made their initial move. The market participants may now begin to focus on elections – state assembly elections in India and the US Presidential elections. Regardless of overwhelming evidence to suggest that these elections may not impact the markets beyond a few days, the narrative might keep the market participants busy and distracted in the next few weeks.

I find many events, besides rate cuts and elections, that are occurring on the sidelines that need to be noted by the investors. Considered individually, these events may not look like triggering a meaningful move in global markets. However, if we take a collective cognizance of these events, the probability of global market shock would certainly rise by a few points.

The following events, for example, have drawn my attention in the recent months.

Central banks loading on gold

Post the global financial crisis 2008-2009, the central banks have significantly increased their gold accumulation. In 2023, central banks added 1,037 tonnes of gold – the second highest annual purchase in history – following a record high of 1,082 tonnes in 2022. The trend is continuing in 2024 also. (see here)

The notable thing in this trend is the sharp rise in gold accumulation by the Russian and Chinese central banks. President Xi and President Putin, along with Iran and North Korea (CRIK) are seen as an informal anti-NATO alliance. (see here)

Biden provides fresh impetus to the Sino-US tariff war

The Biden administration has provided significant impetus to the Sino-US tariff war started by the Trump administration. Despite strong objections from the domestic industry, the US has not only retained the tariffs imposed on the Chinese imports by the Trump administration in 2018, but made some material additions to the list. The new tariff list includes a 100% duty on Chinese EVs, 50% on solar cells and 25% on steel, aluminum, EV batteries and key minerals.

Besides, the Biden administration announced new measures aimed at Chinese e-commerce platforms to minimize the low-value imports eligible for duty and tax exemptions. (See here)

Putin mediating thaw between India and China

The rhetorical aggression between China and India has decelerated materially in the recent weeks. It is reported that China is retracing from its advanced positions in the Indian territories and willing to disengage completely. Apparently, it has occurred after the recent visit of PM Modi to Russia and Ukraine. (see here) This is obviously an important geopolitical development after the coup in Bangladesh, allegedly with support of the US. (see here)

Hedge Fund piling on short positions

In the past few weeks hedge funds have been piling on their short positions. They have now been net sellers for the five consecutive weeks, not a normal situation when the benchmark indices are making all-time highs.

Chinese economy imploding, govt puts a tight leash on investment professionals

All the recent data about the Chinese economy indicates that the Chinese economy is slowing much faster than previously estimated. As per the current estimates, China is most likely to miss even a modest 5% growth target. (see here) By all indications the Japanification of the Chinese economy is happening against the wishes of all. The Chinese economy has been the engine pulling the global economy in the past two decades. If this engine falters, it cannot be good news for the global economy and therefore markets.

The Chinese authorities have been taking action against the entrepreneurs, like Jack Ma of Alibaba, failing to adhere to the strict regulatory norms. Recently, the authorities cracked down on financiers – impounding passports of 8700 investment bankers and restricting their overseas travel. (see here)

This could be seen by some as a precursor to a massive shift in the economic development followed in the past two decades. (see here)

Traders incurring losses despite market rally

On 12^th September 2024 (weekly F&O expiry day), many option traders in India experienced exceptional losses due to sharp surge in the benchmark indices in the last hour of trading. It happened again last Friday. This has happened when sharp underperformance of the broader markets and popular stocks is already bothering the non-institutional (retail) investors. In the technical analysis parlance, these are conspicuous signs of a large-scale distribution taking place. Empirical evidence suggests that this phase of the market is usually followed by a dull period in the market, marked by poor returns.

It's still the month of September and on my morning walks, I can feel the chill in the air. This is not usual weather in Delhi NCR. I am getting the same sense in markets. If you are also feeling this chilling sensation, please do share your views.

Tuesday, July 9, 2024

1H2024 – Buoyancy all around

The first half of the year 2024 has been good for global markets. Despite disappointment on rate cuts, geopolitical concerns, sticky inflation, and political changes in many countries, stocks, precious metals, industrial commodities and crypto made a steady move up with very relatively low volatility.

A notable feature of the global market movement in 1H2024 was the stark underperformance of Asia ex Japan, even though the Japanese equities being the best equity markets amongst the major global markets. Brazil also underperformed despite a decent rally in commodities.

Another notable feature of global markets was the narrow market breadth of US markets. Though the benchmark indices scaled new highs, it was mostly due to parabolic rise in a handful of technology stocks.

At present equity markets appear strong on the back of a resilient demand environment, well anchored inflationary expectations and peak interest rates. Fears of earnings failing to match the stock price rise, escalation in geopolitical tensions, spike in energy prices, uncertainties about the policy direction post the US presidential elections, and erratic weather conditions are some points of concern.

India performance – 1H2024

Indian markets performed very well in the first half of the year 2024. Though Indian equities underperformed the developed markets in line with the global trend, it did very well within the emerging market universe. The key highlights of the India market performance could be listed as follows:

· The benchmark Nifty50 gained ~10.5% during 1H2024; while the Midcap (+20.7%) and Small Cap (+21%) did much better. Consequently, overall market breadth has been strong.

· Two third of the market gains came in the month of June 2024, post the elections. This was contrary to the pre-election consensus that BJP failing to secure a majority on its own may result in sharp decline in market.

· The total market capitalization of NSE is higher by ~21%; more than gains in the benchmark indices – implying that stronger gains have occurred in the section of the market beyond indices.

· The number sector outperforming the benchmark indices far outnumbers the sector underperforming. The rally was led by Realty, PSUs (mostly power, defense, and railway), Auto, infra and energy. The Capital Goods and Heavy Engineering sector have been the flavor for the period. Particularly, the businesses catering to sectors like defense, railways, and road construction did extremely well. Banks, IT Services and FMCG were notable underperformers.

· Ship builders were the notable outperformers amongst the individual stocks. No conspicuous sectoral trend was seen for the losers.

· Institutional flows to the secondary equity markets were positive for five out of the six months. 1H2024 witnessed a total flow of ~INR3559bn, despite FPIs outflows of Rs320bn. The correlation of institutional flows with Nifty returns remained poor (~48%).

· The rates, currency and yields were stable in 1H2024. Policy rates were unchanged; while money market rates were marginally higher by 15bps. Deposit rates did not see much change while lending rates were higher by 10-15bps.

· The overall Indian yield curve shifted lower and flattened completely, as the RBI maintained the status quo on policy stance.

· The economic growth surprised on the higher side with the Indian economy recording a growth of 8.2% for FY24, beating all forecasts materially. Fiscal balance also improved with FY24RE fiscal deficit coming at 5.8% and FY25BE of fiscal deficit at 5.1%.

· CPI inflation has inched closer to the lower bound of the RBI’s tolerance band of 4%-6% with May’24 CPI inflation number coming at 4.75%.

Corporate performance has shown resilience in recent quarters, with sales growth recovering, margins improving and RoE rising. Banks reported consistent improvement in the asset quality and profitability.