Why to emulate Chinese investors?
Gold prices hit an all-time level in April and have corrected marginally since then. Again, this is the time when self-proclaimed investment gurus commemorate Indian households, especially the women, who have traditionally parked their savings in gold ornaments. They highlight how the uneducated and unaware “mothers” have managed to earn more return than savvy investors who invested in index funds etc. In my view, this narrative is completely flawed and does not merit any comment.
The all-time high gold prices in international markets have also triggered a deluge of reports forecasting a strong performance of gold in the coming years. The key arguments in favor of a strong rally in gold prices are (i) technical breakout; (ii) central banks amassing gold reserves in anticipation of the diminishing role of USD in the global economy; and (iii) the Dilemma of the Bank of Japan whether to protect bond yields or Yen. The traders have however pointed out that the higher gold prices are currently supported by the strong investor demand from China. The gold imports, other than the central bank buying, into China, have surged sharply in recent months and so have the trading volumes of gold in China.
In my view, gold is a declining asset and as such should offer sub-optimal returns in the decades to come. Particularly, for investors in a fast-growing economy like India, investment in gold makes little sense for household investors. It may be a bad idea for Indian investors to emulate their Chinese peers and invest in gold. Those advising Indian investors to invest a material part of their wealth (10% or more) in gold, because gold prices are likely to move higher due to buying by central banks and Chinese consumers/investors must consider the following:
· Chinese households are much richer and more protected as compared to Indian households. China’s per capita GDP (US$13136) is almost 5x of India’s per capita GDP (US$2731). Chinese households enjoy much more social security and a higher standard of basic amenities like education and health.
· The Chinese economy (US$18trn) is 5.3x in size as compared to the Indian economy (US$3.4trn). It is expected to remain much larger than India for the next 50 years at least, despite slower growth.
· China has forex reserves of US$3.23 trn as compared to India’s US$640bn. Though both countries have reserves close to 18% of their respective GDP, India runs a current account deficit of appx. US$100bn as compared to current account surplus of US$253bn for China. China needs to diversify from US and European treasuries and USD assets to protect its reserves from depreciating. For now gold is one of the popular option for it. India on the other hand does not have similar needs, given our current account deficit.
· The per capita income in China has grown at a CAGR of 6.1% over the last decade. In this decade, Chinese equities have provided a CAGR of 3.5% and real residential prices have barely risen. Whereas Gold in CNY terms has yielded a CAGR of 7.75%. However, for Indian investors, per capita income has grown at a CAGR of 5.3%, real property prices have grown 1.1% and equities have yielded a return of 11.4 CAGR. Chinese investors therefore have reasons to buy a hedge against inflation and negative real rates. The Indian investors on the other hand have little reason to diversify from high-yielding equities and positive real rate offering debt. Besides, they need to invest heavily in their education and health, unlike their Chinese peers.