Vijay Kumar Gaba

Last month, in one of my posts (read here), I mentioned that “From the events of the past few years, it is evident that the era of peace and global cooperation, which started in the aftermath of two devastating wars in the first half of the twentieth century and flourished after the end of the Cold War in the late 1980s, may be coming to an end. In my view, the year 2024 will see a new paradigm unfolding in global economic, political, and geopolitical spheres. The new paradigm which would take a couple of decades to manifest fully, may inter alia see multiple axes and alliances emerging in the global order, competing with each other for supremacy. Consequently, global trade may get fragmented into multiple trade blocs.”

I also expressed a view that “The trend in the financialization of economies may reverse. Physical resource ownership and localized manufacturing may become the primary focus again.”

A team of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) analyzed the economic impact of the fragmentation of commodity trade, in a working paper titled Geoeconomic Fragmentation and Commodity Markets (Jorge Alvarez, et. al., October 2023). The conclusions of the research are pretty scary. The following are some excerpts from the IMF paper.

Concentration of Production

Unlike manufactured goods, the first stage of production of commodities depends on natural endowments that can be concentrated geographically. As a result of natural endowments’ concentration, there is a significant concentration of production at the country level, with the top three producers accounting on average for about 65 percent of the global output of agriculture, about 50 percent of energy, and about 75 percent of minerals commodities.

For minerals, production is concentrated both at the mining stage due to the geographic concentration of deposits, but often also at the processing stage, with a few countries (most notably China), having developed a strong comparative advantage through the deployment of capital intensive facilities, efficient technological solutions, lighter environmental regulations, and relatively cheaper labor.

Low Elasticities of Supply and Demand

Commodities exhibit low elasticities of supply and demand, particularly in the short run.

On the supply side, scaling up production often requires large investments and long permitting processes that can delay a supply response to price changes. For example, it takes on average 16 years from exploration to the opening of copper mines. Discovering new deposits is also costly and takes time.

On the demand side, many commodities are inputs for key technologies and products or are essential to household consumption, making them hard to substitute, and attenuating the demand response to price changes.

Trade Dependence

With production highly concentrated and demand often spread across many countries, commodities are heavily traded. Their homogeneity and fungibility also contribute to market integration. As a consequence, the share of production that is traded internationally across commodity types is consistently higher than the ratio of world trade to gross output. Across agricultural commodities, around 40 percent of output is exported, around 30 percent for energy and almost 50 percent for mineral commodities are exported. more than 80 percent of lithium, or potash produced cross borders, with the share increasing over time for most raw commodities.

Fragmentation and Commodity Prices

Events of the past few years suggest that the Western Economies and Russia/China led (or controlled) economies are drifting apart, getting divided into separate trade blocks. The Covid-19 pandemic exposed the fault lines of global manufacturing. If commodities cannot be transported between China, the West, and Africa, much of the modern manufacturing may halt. For example, Congo supplies two-thirds of the global Cobalt requirement. Disruption in supply chain could halt production in various manufacturing units that use cobalt as a raw material.

A model examines how much prices of 48 key commodities would change in the Western bloc and the Russia/China bloc if trading between the two blocks stopped altogether. In such an eventuality, the Western bloc would end up with a surplus of some commodities like iron ore or copper where there is more production than is needed in the region. Hence, steel prices would drop a lot in the West and rise dramatically in China, which undoubtedly would put an end to a lot of the growth in infrastructure and real estate in that country. Prices for magnesium and graphite, used extensively in the production of batteries and other renewable energy equipment as well as platinum, group metals, and rare earth metals would skyrocket in the West since we would be cut off from supply from China.

Prices of various commodities could move dramatically in the event of geopolitical decoupling of the West from China and Russia.

Obviously, the current geopolitical standoff is an invitation to mutually assured economic destruction for both blocs. The whole rhetoric of China+1; the isolation of Russia and China and the emergence of India at the expense of China appears fraught with danger.

Investors who are positioning for a secular growth of India’s economy over the next decade and the success of China+1 strategy may want to review their strategy in my view.

What is most wonderful?

Yaksha asked Yudhishthira “what is most wonderful?”

Yudhishthira answered – “Every day numerous living entities are dying and going to the abode of Yama. Yet one thinks/believes one will live forever (Immortal). What can be more wonderful than this?”

As the spring was paving way for summers in 2020, the entire country was locked down to prevent the spread of Covid-19 pandemic. A few weeks into the lockdown, the skies became blue; peacocks started dancing on city roads; mountains were visible from long distances; roads were empty; air was serene; a pleasant quietness had replaced the annoying cacophony; many misogynists and patriarchs were helping their wives in household chores; many tech illiterates were quickly leaning to use smart devices for communication, shopping & entertainment; the sentiments of frugality, minimalism, spirituality, & patriotism, etc. overpowered vanity, presumptuousness, pretense, selfishness etc.; and new births and deaths were accepted with equanimity.

As the autumn approached, some relaxations were allowed but austere weddings (50 guests) replaced big fat weddings (1000-3000 guests). Professionals continued to work from remote locations. Many of whom had moved back to their peaceful home towns, far away from bustling metros.

Two years later, the skies are no longer blue; peacocks have retreated to their hideouts; roads are as choked as before March 2020; air quality is severely poor; misogynists are no longer helping their wives; big fat weddings are back; spirituality and frugality have been overwhelmed by vanity, revenge tourism, revenge shopping etc.; professionals have left their old parents behind for a miserable life in metros; births are being celebrated and deaths are being mourned.

Everyone had seen the advantages of driving less, loving more, being spiritual & frugal, and being equanimous; but still no citizen are seen vowing – no driving personal vehicle for at least two days a week; no big fat wedding; less vanity, presumptuousness, pretense; respect for women etc.

The worst part is that no politician, policymaker, judge or administrator has advocated enforcement of these “virtues” for the sake of future generations.

What could be more wonderful than this?

Accountability

A household hired a new domestic worker. The worker promised to work hard and more efficiently than all the previous workers that had worked for the household. Few months later his neighbors pointed out to the household that the new worker is not true to his promise and may be indulging in some acts of corruption also. But instead of seeking accountability from his worker to whom he was paying a decent salary, the household started quarreling with the neighbor. The neighbors failed to appreciate how could this household pay the worker decently; tolerate all his inefficiencies, mistakes, laxity and insolence; and also aggressively attack the neighbors who dared point out the worker’s mistakes to the household.

Nothing could be more unfortunate for a democracy, if the people who enthusiastically and hopefully supported a particular party and/or a leader, stop seeking accountability from them; and to make the matter worse begin to violently put down anyone else who dares to ask questions from such a party and/or leader.

(This narration mostly explains the present mood of a majority of the voters in Gujarat, besides some other states.)

In the context of India stock markets, I found the following two things worth noting on Tuesday:

(i)    A number of brokerages wrote strategy notes urging the clients to use the recent “lockdown fear” led correction in stock prices as a good opportunity to buy stocks. Apparently, the strategy appeared to be driven by (a) deep fall followed by a sharp recovery in 2020; and (b) belief that the abundant global and local liquidity and low interest artes will continue to support equity markets for couple of more years at least.

(ii)   The IT sector stocks corrected rather sharply after the bellwether TCS announced a decent set of number for 4QFY21 and encouraging commentary for FY22. This highlights, in my view, that markets expectations may be running rather high in terms of corporate performance and payouts. There is virtually no margin for any disappointment on earnings or payout front.

Some research reports have taken note of the intensifying second wave of Covid-19 infection cases, and cautioned against the likely adverse impact of the incremental restrictions on mobility due to this. For example-

“The Economic data released yesterday showed that the restrictions & sporadic lockdowns in response to the fresh wave of coronavirus infections started impacting the overall demand & growth. The IIP contracted 3.6% for February 2021, mainly on account of a steep contraction in the manufacturing output. Meanwhile, India's retail inflation rose to a 4 month high of 5.52% in Mar (5.03% in Feb & 5.91% in Mar 2020) as food prices soared.” (Aditya Birla Capital)

“The sporadic lockdowns/mobility curbs & night curfews put in place across key economic hubs in India in the past few days are likely to cost the nation $1.25 bn/wk. Taking into account rolling COVID curbs, if the current restrictions remain in place until the end of May, estimate is that the cumulative loss of activity could amount to around $10.5 bn, or ~0.34% of annual nominal GDP. However, the impact on the Q1FY22 nominal GDP is likely to be higher, shaving ~1.4% from the same.” (Barclays Bank)

The Nomura India Business Resumption Index (NIBRI) dropped sharply to 90.7 for the week ending 4 April from 94.6 the prior week, ~9.3pp below the pre-pandemic normal. This is its steepest weekly decline since mid-April last year. Accordingly, Nomura has cut the 2021 GDP forecast for India to 11.5% from the earlier 12.4%.” (Nomura Securities)

It is pertinent to note that currently, Nifty valuations (one year forward PER) are at 15% premium to the long term (10yr) average; and the market consensus is expecting ~32% earnings growth in FY22 followed by ~18% growth in FY23. Obviously, the expectations are running high, leaving little room for any disappointment.

Even after the recent episodes of sporadic mobility restrictions impacting the business and consumer sentiments, and downgrade of overall GDP growth for FY22, the consensus earnings estimates have been cut by less than 2% for FY22.

In my view, we may see further downgrades in both macroeconomic growth and earnings growth estimates for FY22. I am not sure if market may be forced to de-rate the equities’ valuation by these downgrades, but any rerating would certainly be difficult.

Currently, market consensus appears to be working with Nifty EPS of Rs640-650 for FY22 and Rs750-770 for FY23. I would prefer to be somewhat conservative and work with Rs590-610 for FY22 and 680-700 for FY23.

This means, I may be mostly ignoring the benchmark indices and focusing on businesses which I found (i) reasonably valued; and/or (ii) having very high visibility of growth, in spite of Covid-19 related obstructions. Because the Lord has commanded that “Blessed are the meek: for they shall inherit the earth” (Bible, Mathew 5:5)

After some exciting action post presentation of Union Budget for FY22, the benchmark indices have moved sideways with heightened intraday volatility. The broader markets have definitely outperformed suggesting some superlative returns for the investors. However, when assessed from the rout of small and midcaps in 2018 and 2019, it is clear that broader markets may not have actually yielded much return, even to the investors who have stayed put for 3year. For example, Nifty Smallcap100 index has not yielded any return for past 3years; and Nifty Midcap100 return is only slightly better than the bank deposit return since March 2018.

Notwithstanding the massive visual gains recorded by equity prices in past 12 months, the portfolio returns for most investors may have been below par.

The returns on debt part of the portfolio have been poor, with real returns being negative in many cases. For a large proportion of investors, debt part is usually equal to or more than the equity part.

Since global financial crisis (2008-09), gold has also found prominent place in asset allocation of numerous investors. The efforts of government to popularize financialization of gold through gold bonds etc., have also motivated household investors to invest in gold. For past one year, the return of gold funds is close to zero. The three year return of gold funds is less than savings bank accounts.

Regardless of the outperformance of small and midcap stocks, it is important to assimilate that usually these stocks are much smaller part of an average portfolio. Any superlative return on this part of the portfolio, may not necessarily translate in outperformance of overall portfolio.

A simplified analysis of sectoral performance of Indian equities highlights the following:

(a)   The euphoria created by the brave and revolutionary budget has not lasted much. Nifty is almost unchanged for past five weeks.

(b)   Optically, it appears that budget ignited risk appetite for growth trade. It is believed that big money rotated towards cyclical sectors like commodities, infrastructure, automobile, etc. post budget. The aggressive disinvestment agenda underlined in the budget also attracted huge interest in public sector stocks. Consequently, metals, energy, infra, PSEs, and Realty sectors have outperformed since presentation of budget. Whereas, the favorites of post lock down period, i.e., consumers, pharma and media have yielded negative return since then. IT has also underperformed YTD.

The fact is that metals are participating in a global rally (reflation trade) and may not have much correlation to budget proposals. Energy sector performance is highly skewed due to Reliance Industries performance, which is popular due to its retail and telecom ventures rather than its energy business. Infra outperformance has actually diminished post budget, as compared to past 12months performance.

Auto sector has yielded no return since budget; and financial services have actually underperformed Nifty.

(c)    Assuming that most household investors and fund managers believed in this Cyclical growth trade story and have started to rotate from the defensive and secular businesses like IT, Pharma and Consumers in post budget period and the rotation may be completed in next couple of months. I would like to wager that it will be time for outperformance of IT, Pharma and Consumers by the time monsoon hits the Mumbai coast.

(d)   Private sector banks have underperformed their public sector peers over past one year period. Much of this outperformance of PSBs has occurred post budget. Valuation gap, promise of reforms and recapitalization, improving balance sheets are some of the primary reasons for this outperformance. Watch out for any disappointment on these parameters.

Bond market is obviously not happy with the state of fiscal and macroeconomic factors. Recent sharp rise in Covid cases has also raised the specter of “relock”. Year end “adjustments” may also play some part in markets in next couple of weeks. In my view, it’s time for some extra caution rather than exuberance. Preserving wealth should be a priority at this point in time over maximizing profit.

The pace of vaccination across the globe is accelerating with each passing day. It is hopes that in next 6 months, we may have a reasonable number of people inoculated against Covid-19 infection; and the life may begin to normalize (even if it is new normal!) and become more predictable as compared to the life in 2020.

However, from investors’ perspective a rather strange thing seems to be happening. Many investors had bought shares of leading vaccine manufacturers in the hope of extraordinary gains. To their disappointment, many of them are suffering losses.

Pfizer Inc. (-8.1% in one year) and AstraZeneca (-4.75% in one year) are two examples; though Moderna Inc (up 740% in one year) has done well.

In Indian context, AstraZeneca (-20% YTD 2021); Pfizer (-13% YTD 2021) Dr Reddy’s Lab (-8% YTD 2020) have all performed poorly on stock exchanges. The other listed vaccine prospect Cadila Healthcare (-2% YTD 2021) is also doing poorly.

Obviously, it is a case of the excessive exuberance cooling off. The stock prices may revert in due course. But this has five important lessons for small investors to learn.

1.    The stock prices movement is usually akin to the movement of a pendulum. The far it moves on right (up) side, it usually covers the same distance on the left (down) side also.

2.    Buying something in exuberance, based on some popular news or widely prevalent expectation, is seldom a good idea. One usually ends up buying closer to the peak.

3.    A good stock bought at an elevated level may not eventually give you losses. In due course of time the stock will give decent gains.

But remember, a stock that has fallen 25% from your purchase price (100 to 75), would need to rise 33% (75 to 100) from low for you to breakeven. This journey (100-75-100) could be exhausting sometime and result in significant opportunity loss.

4.    More business may always not mean more profit and higher stock price.

Investors, who did invest in L&T based on the growth in its order book over past 5years, have not been rewarded much. The order book, revenue and profit of the company have almost doubled in past 6years; but the stock price is up less than 25%.

Same thing could be true with profit from the increased revenue from vaccination for these pharma giants.

5.    Environmental, Social and Corporate (ESG) consideration in investing is not only a fad. It is increasingly becoming a norm. A vaccine for pandemic that caused extreme social distress may not be acceptable as a medium to make extraordinary profit. The authorities (mostly socialist governments these days) accelerated approval process may essentially accompany limit on profiteering.

This is an important lesson that needs to be remembered before a hasty decision is taken on the news of some company winning a coal mine bid etc.

 The two thousand twentieth year of Christ is coming to an end. This year has been totally forgettable and remarkably transforming at the same time. It reminds me of the title of the autobiography of legendry poet Dr. Harivansh Rai Bachachan – “क्या भूलूँ, क्या याद करूँ”.

Notwithstanding the all-time high levels of stock market indices in most countries; the global financial system inundated with trillions of dollars in free liquidity; over US$20trn worth of bonds yielding negative return globally; the massive economic and social shock of Covid-19 pandemic has left billions of people in distress. The inequalities of income, wealth and opportunities have risen to new highs.

Significant developments have been reported on the front of vaccine development to check the spread of Covid-19 virus. Many countries have already authorized emergency use of some vaccines; and people are being administered such authorized vaccines. Nonetheless, recently a fresh wave of mutated version of Covid-19 virus has been reported from some places in Europe (especially UK), resulting in fresh set of mobility restrictions. This indicates towards the possibility that the world may not return to total normalcy in many months to come. As per various estimates, it will take 15-18months to inoculate a sizeable population to reach a stage of herd immunity against the Covid-19 virus.

On the positive side, the pandemic has accelerated many trends that may help the cause of sustainable faster development in the medium to long term.

There have been many events in 2020 that must be taken note of by the investors. However, as a tine investor in Indian assets, I would in particular like to remember the following eight for next many years.

1.    The Indian government imposed a total socio-economic lockdown in the country in the wake of the outbreak of pandemic from 25^th March 2020. The restrictions were relaxed gradually from June onward.

In my view, it is almost impossible to assess the utility and true impact of lockdown exercise. We would never know, what could have been the situation if a total lockdown was not imposed in March. It could have been worse in terms of economic and health shocks; or perhaps the economic loss could have been less pronounced, sans total lock down.

This episode however has further strengthened my already strong view that the incumbent government is unpredictable. It can take decisions having far reaching repercussions rather quickly; without adequate planning; and without bothering about the immediate consequences in terms of human suffering. I shall continue to incorporate this feature in my investment strategy for midterm.

2.    During the lockdown, when the human activities and mobility were restricted to a great deal globally, the nature attempted to reclaim its space. The instances of peacock dancing on city streets, deer, sheep and even lions roaming freely on public roads, air quality improving to “serene” from “severe”; visibility improving to few hundred kilometers from few meters; children learning that the color of sky is “azure” and not “pigeon blue”. However, within 15 days of unlocking, the human reclaimed the entire territory from the nature.

Notwithstanding the enthusiasm behind sharing pictures of “pure nature” on social media, it is clear that we have moved too far on the path of self-destruction.

On the other hand, “work from home” and “digital meetings” have been adopted as fait accompli by many businesses. This because it brings immediate tangible benefits to both, the employer and the employee.

This leads me to conclude that any global agreement on climate will not succeed unless it has immediate and tangible economic payoff for the parties. The Paris accord, fails on this test, just like the Kyoto protocol. I shall therefore not be looking for investment opportunities in Paris accord, unless I see tangible economic gains for Indian businesses and consumers.

3.    On 20^th April 2020, something happened in global commodities market, which was unheard of. The WTI Crude Oil Future in New York crashed to a negative US$37.63 price. This event, though rare, has added a new dimension to the risk management process; option pricing methods; and trading strategies.

4.    The benchmark crypto currency “Bitcoin” has been vogue since 2009. Even though it was accepted as a medium of exchange in many jurisdictions, it never gained wider acceptance as legitimate asset like gold or store of value like currency. In 2020, most of the reputable global investors and strategists have accepted Bitcoin as futuristic “store of value”, just like gold and USD. This acceptance has come on the back of Bitcoin’s sharp outperformance vs precious metals and USD. I believe that this marks the beginning of a new era on global monetary system. Neutral digital currencies shall continue to gain prominence in global monetary system in future. May be this prominence would diminish the dominance popularity of gold and USD as global reserve currencies.

5.    The year saw a brilliant thaw between the traditional enemies the Arabs and the Israelis. Some strategic initiatives were taken by Israel, UAE and Saudi governments to reduce tension in the region. This also saw Arabs increasing distance from Pakistan. I see this as a good omen. It may result in sustainable reduction in terror support and funding globally. However, this has pushed Pakistan closer to China. The tension at Indian northern, western and eastern borders may sustain and even increase in short term. More frequent hostilities at borders  is something we would need to incorporate in our investment strategies.

6.    Reliance Industries, led by Mr. Mukesh Ambani managed to convince global business leaders like Facebook and Amazon, and investors like KKR, Carlyle, GIC, ADIA etc to invest in its digital and retail ventures. Global petroleum majors British Petroleum and Aramco have also committed large investments in fuel business of the company. If these investments are consummated successfully in next 2-3years, we shall see many large Indian businesses gaining attention of the global business leaders and investors. I shall be reevaluating some of the large, viable but heavily indebted businesses from this viewpoint.

7.    First protests against the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA and Shaheen Bagh) and now protests against the three acts to reform the farm sector in the country have further strengthened my belief that the mistrust between the ruling BJP and opposition parties has breached the red line. The political environment shall get further vicious, once the BJP tries to conquer the Forts of East (West Bengal and Odisha) next year. I shall not be expecting political consensus on any issue for next few years, for my investment strategy. Although with Congress weakening further, getting majority votes in Rajya Sabha may not be an issue for the government, nonetheless, the threat of reversal of contentious legislative changes shall always prevail, should a united opposition manage to dethrone BJP in 2024. (I agree that as of this morning this looks almost improbable).

8.    India recorded its first recession in past four decades in 2020. Though many analysts are terming it a technical recession due to lockdown; I would like to wait and see the trajectory of recovery to conclude if a lasting damage has been caused to the growth prospects.

UK has allowed the administration of vaccine for SARS-CoV-2 virus (commonly known as Covid-19) developed by Pfizer. Russia and Chinese authorities have also confirmed approval of separate vaccines. In India also couple of developers has expressed confidence that an effective vaccine will soon be available for Indian population.

This is certainly a matter of relief for the distressed mankind living in fear since outbreak of the pandemic. However, for the investors in stock markets wider availability of vaccine could be a matter of slight concern.

So far the investors in equity have had a decent run in 2020, regardless of the severe correction in the early days of the pandemic. In my view, a large part of the price gains in equity stocks could be attributed to the accommodative monetary policy adopted by the central bankers world over.

In past 9 months, a significant part of the cheap and abundant money may have actually flown to the financial assets (mostly equities) as (i) the requirement of money in real businesses have been less; and (ii) the interest rates have persisted at lower levels making it un-remunerative for investors to keep money in short term debt or deposits.

The rising certainty about vaccine availability and subsequent normalization of the accommodative monetary policies may rock the stock market party in 2021. It may be pertinent to recall the impact of taper tantrums on stock markets in 2013, when Fed started to wind up the QE used for supporting and stimulating the economy in the aftermath of global financial crisis in 2008-09.

In a 2017 study, Anusha Chari and others (National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, see here), examined the impact of monetary policy surprises extracted around FOMC meetings on capital flows from the United States to a range of emerging markets. The study revealed “substantial heterogeneity in the monetary policy shock implications for flows versus asset prices, across asset classes, and during across the various policy periods.”, as per the study—

“The most robust finding is that the evolution in overall emerging market debt and equity positions between various policy sub-periods 14 Not reported but available from the authors. 33 appear to be largely driven by U.S. monetary policy induced valuation changes. In nearly every specification, the effect of monetary policy shocks on asset values is larger than that for physical capital flows.

Further, there is an order-of-magnitude difference between the effects of monetary policy on all types of emerging-market portfolio flows between pre-crisis conventional monetary policy period, the QE period and the subsequent tapering period. We detect some significant effects of monetary policy on flows and valuations during the period of unconventional monetary policy (QE). However, the effects are not consistent over all dependent variables. In contrast, during the period following the first mentioning of policy tapering, we uncover a consistent and large effect of monetary policy shocks on nearly all variables of interest.”

Normalization of global trade to pre pandemic levels may essentially obliterate the supply chain bottlenecks and ease commodity inflation. Remember, the pandemic has not caused any physical destruction, as is usually the case with a larger war. Therefore, normalization would not require any major reconstruction or rebuilding endeavor. The damage is mostly to the personal finances and small businesses. This will keep hurting the demand growth for few years and keep the need for additional capacity building low. The new capacities would all be built in healthcare and digital space, not much in the physical space.

In Indian context, in past six months, the yield curve has steepened the most in past two decades at least.

As per media reports, many private companies are able to raise 3month money at 3-3.3%, a rate lower than the policy reverse repo rate as well the corresponding bank fixed deposit rate. Obviously this is an anomalous situation and may not sustain for long.

There is little doubt in my mind that any further steepening of the curve could fuel Nifty to the realm of 15000 in no time. But I have serious doubts whether in a fast normalizing economy, as claimed by various government officials, economists and other experts, the short yields may continue to soften, or even sustain at the current level, especially when the inflation is seen bottoming at or above the RBI target rate.

Any sign of “withdrawal” might shock the brave traders, who are assuming unabated flow of cheap money. Beware!

 I remind myself of this narration almost every market cycle. I think, it is the time to reiterate once again.

Have you ever been to vegetable market after 9:30PM? The market at 9:30PM is very different from the market at 5:30PM.

At 5:30PM, the market is less crowded. The produce being sold is good and fresh. The customer has larger variety to choose from. The customer is also at a liberty to choose the best from the available stock. The vendors are patient and polite, and willing to negotiate the prices. As the day progresses, the crowd increases. The best of the stuff is already sold. Prices begin to come down slowly. The vendors now become little impatient and less polite and mostly in "take it or leave it" mode.

By 9:30PM, most of the stuff is already sold, and only inferior quality residue is left. The vendors are in a hurry to wind up the shops and go back home. The prices are slashed. There is big discount on buying large quantities. Vendors are aggressive and very persuasive. Customers now are mostly bargain hunters, usually the small & mid-sized restaurant, caterers and food stall owners. They buy the residue at bargain price, cook it using enticing spices and oils, and serve it to the people who prefer to eat out instead of cooking themselves, charging much higher prices.

The cycle is repeated every day, without fail, without much change. No one tries to break the cycle; implying, all participants are mostly satisfied.

A very similar cycle is repeated in the stock markets.

In early cycle, good companies are under-owned and available at reasonable prices. Market is less volatile. No one is in a hurry. Smart investors go out shopping and accumulate all the good stuff.

Mid cycle, with all top class stuff already cornered by smart investors, traders and investors compete with each other to buy the average stuff at non-negotiable prices. Tempers and volatility run high.

End cycle, the smartest operators go for bargain hunting; strike deals with the vendors (mostly promoters and large owners) to buy the sub-standard stuff at bargain prices. Build a mouth-watering spicy story around it. Package it in attractive colours and sell it to the late comers and lethargic, at fancy prices.

The cycle is repeated every day, without fail, without much change. No one tries to break the cycle; implying, all participants are mostly satisfied.

If my message box is reflecting the market trend near correctly, we are in the end cycle phase of the current market cycle. I daily get very persuasively written research reports and messages projecting great returns from stocks which no one would have touched six months ago, even at one third of the present price.

The stories are so persuasive and the packaging so attractive that I am tempted to feel "it's different this time." But in my heart I know for sure, it is not!

In past one month, the set of businesses commonly referred to as “cyclical” in stock market jargon has outperformed remarkably. This one month outperformance has resulted in this set of stocks outperforming the benchmark Nifty on past 12 month performance basis also. Though, on three performance basis these stocks continue to lag substantially.

If I go by the media reports and the messages and report in my inbox, there is still “huge” value left to be realized in these set of stocks. The arguments are varied and quite persuasive.

·         A former CIO of a fund recently tweeted that “Deeply negative rates with excess liquidity getting cleared at zero rates is like cocaine to asset markets. We are in midst of a blow off top rally and if RBI does not mop this liquidity then stock prices in India could rise beyond imagination.

·         Another prominent fund manager, reputed for his stock picking skills, argues that so far the liquidity has gone into financial assets. From here on liquidity may move to real economy and fuel demand for infrastructure building and capacity creation. Components of cost like power, labor and interest rates are favorable for Indian businesses hence profitability should improve. There is strong case for investing in cyclicals which will benefit from capacity building in infrastructure and manufacturing.

·         The global brokerage firm Goldman Sachs (GS), in a recent report, highlighted that global Copper prices are now at highest level in past seven years. GS forecasts that “the world’s most important industrial metal was in the first leg of a bull market that could carry prices to record highs.” The report further emphasizes that-

“Against a backdrop of low inventories and net zero carbon pledges from countries including China, Japan and South Korea, Mr Snowdon believes significantly higher copper prices will be needed to incentivise new supply and balance the market.

We believe it highly probable that by the second half of 2022, copper will test the existing record highs set in 2011 [$10,162],” he said. “Higher prices should ultimately help defer peak supply and ease market tightness, but this first requires a sustained rally through 2021-22.”

·         A report by Motilal Oswal Securities highlights that Indian steel spreads have risen ~25% in 3QFY21 and are at a three-year high. Brokerage expects the spreads to stay strong on the back of a domestic demand recovery and higher regional prices.

It is further noted that Despite domestic iron ore prices rising to a five-year high, spot steel spreads are at a multi-year high due to higher steel prices and subdued coking coal prices. While iron ore prices from NMDC have increased by 30% YTD in FY21, imported coking coal prices have declined by ~35% YTD, keeping total raw material cost in check. As a result, domestic steel spreads are strong at INR33,000/t for flats (HRC) and INR30,000/t for longs (rebar).

·         Nirmal Bang Institutional Equities notes that Automobile sales continued its growth momentum in November’20 amid rise in preference for personal mobility on the back of good festive demand, upcoming wedding season, soft base due to overlapping of Diwali in November this year and continued positive sentiments in rural & semi urban markets. Barring 3Ws, all the segments reported YoY volume growth.

·         Emkay Global highlighted in a recent report that Chemical prices are firming up. The report mentions that In Nov’20, prices for key products such as Phenol, Benzene, Acrylonitrile, Butadiene, Toluene and Styrene jumped over 20% MoM in international markets. Rising container freight costs (~2x) on dedicated Asian routes due to a capacity crunch have pushed prices higher for certain chemicals. Freight costs within Asia are also likely to see an uptick in Dec’20 as carriers are prioritizing long-haul routes over shorter ones as a result of better economics. PVC prices have increased 10% MoM and are likely to swell further next month.

On the other side of the spectrum are people like Peter Chiappinelli of GMO, who are convinced that this liquidity fueled rally is about to end anytime now. In the latest GMO Asset Allocation letter, Peter emphatically advised his clients as follows:

“Currently, we are advising all our clients to invest as differently as they can from the conventional 60% stock/40% bond mix, just as we were advising them in 1999. Back then, we were forecasting a decade-long negative return for U.S. large cap equities. And that is exactly what happened. Today, the warning is actually more dire. U.S. stock valuations are at ridiculous levels against a backdrop of a global pandemic and global recession, and CAPE levels are well above 2007 levels, within shouting distance of the foreboding highs reached in October 1929. But it gets worse. U.S. Treasury bonds – typically a reliable counterweight to risky equities in a market sell-off – are the most expensive they’ve been in U.S. history, and very unlikely to provide the hedge that investors have relied upon. We believe the chances of a lost decade for a traditional asset mix are dangerously high.”

My personal view is that it’s 9:30PM in the stock markets. I believe that in post pandemic era, many of the traditional businesses may even not survive. Besides, in Indian context, the present capacity utilization levels may not warrant any significant capacity addition in next couple of years at least. The so called “Atam Nirbhar” capacity building trade may mostly be limited to soft commodities (like chemicals); electronics and defense production. Unlike 2003-10 infra capacity additions, it may not trigger any life changing opportunity for many engineering and capital goods companies.

The logistic constraints and paranoid inventory building by some economies may cease in next six months as vaccine is made available to more and more people. The Central Banks, especially RBI, may look at containing liquidity in 2021, before it can actually cause an inflationary havoc. The hyperinflation which many analysts, economists and fund managers are secretly praying for since QE1 in 2009 may actually not happen at all. I am also convinced from my own research that stress in unsecured credit segment has increased materially in past few months and banks will have to bear the brunt of this. I shall therefore let this trading opportunity in financials, commodities and cyclicals passé.

“Generation gap” has perhaps been a subject of study, discussion and debate ever since beginning of civilization. The new generations have been adopting new ways and methods of living, and the older generations have been rejecting these ways and methods as degeneration. The human civilization has evolved, regardless of this persistent conflict between experience and experiment.

It could be matter of debate whether experience is good as a guide or driver. But in my view, there is no doubt that the innovation (experiment) of new ways and methods of living and doing things has been the primary driver of the human civilization so far.

With the advancement in science and technology, the life span of people has increased materially in post WWII era especially. This expansion in life span has material impact on the dimensions of “generation gap”. The gap which was historically visible mostly between grandfather and grandsons is now sometime visible even in siblings born 5-6yrs apart.

In Indian context, the people who grew up in the socialist ear of 1970s had a very different mindset from the Maruti generation of 1980s. The star war generation of satellite television era of 1990s abandoned the 80s mindset; was soon rejected as outdated by the Google generation of 2000s. The people growing up in post global financial crisis era skeptical about the idea of globalization and free markets, but are free from the constrained mindset of thinking in local terms. They are at ease with creating global corporations and thinking in terms of billion dollars. The generation that will grow up in post COVID-19 era, may have a very different outlook towards life and work.

In this context it is interesting to note the results recent study conducted by Bank of America (BofA) Securities’ Global Research. The key highlights of the study could be listed as follows:

·         The Zillennials or ‘Gen Z’ (as BofA refers to the current generation) have never known a life without Google, 40% prefer hanging out with friends virtually than in real life, they will spend six years of their life on social media and they won’t use credit cards. They’re the ‘clicktivists’: flourishing in a decade of social rights movements, with 4 in 10 in our proprietary BofA seeing themselves as ‘citizens of the world'. The Gen Z revolution is starting, as the first generation born into an online world is now entering the workforce and compelling other generations to adapt to them, not vice versa. Thus, about to become most disruptive to economies, markets and social systems.

·         Gen Z’s economic power is the fastest-growing across all cohorts. This generation’s income will increase c.5x by 2030 to $33tn as they enter the workplace today, reaching 27% of global income and surpassing Millennials the year after. The growing consumer power of Zillennials will be even more powerful taking into account the ‘Great Wealth Transfer’ down the generations. The Baby Boomer and Silent generation US households alone are sitting on $78tn of wealth today.

·         Gen Z could be EM’s secret weapon. APAC income already accounts for over a third of Gen Z’s income and will exceed North American and European combined income by 2035. ‘Peak youth’ milestones are being reached across the developed markets – Europe is the first continent to have more over-65s than under-15s, a club North America will join in 2022. In contrast, India stands out as the Gen Z country, accounting for 20% of the global generation, with improved youth literacy rates, urbanisation, and rapid expansion of technological infrastructure. Mexico, the Philippines and Thailand are just a few of the EM countries that we think have what it takes to capitalize on the Gen Z revolution.

·         Gen Z is the online generation: nearly half are online ‘almost constantly’ and a quarter of them will spend 10+ hours a day on their phone. In our survey, over a quarter of Gen Z’s top payment choice was the phone, while credit cards weren’t even in their top 3. This generation is the least likely to pick experiences over goods, and values sustainable luxury – choosing quality over price as their top purchase factor.

·         Only half of US teens can drive, while our survey finds that less than half of Gen Z drink alcohol, and more than half have some kind of meat restriction. A third of them would trust a robot to make their financial decisions. Gen Z’s activist focus filters into their interactions with business, too – 80% factor ESG investing into their financial decisions, and they have also driven consumer-facing sustainability campaigns, such as single-use plastics. Harmful consumer sectors, such as fast fashion, may be the next focus.

SEBI relaxes cash segment margin norms for non F&O stocks

SEBI has increased the margining requirement for the non F&O stocks traded in cash segment, vide circular dated 20 March 2020. SEBI had also tightened the rule regarding market wide limits for individual stocks available for trading in F&O segment. The objective of increasing the margin requirements and tightening the exposure limits was to control the volatility, ensure market stability and orderly conduct of the market in view of the COVID-19 related concerns.

With effect from today, the enhanced margining norms for non F&O stocks traded in cash segment stands withdrawn. The restrictions on exposure to F&O stocks have also been relaxed. This implies that the market regulator now see lesser risk of market disruption due to COVID-19 related events and news.

The move has generally been received as positive for a rally in mid and small cap stocks. In past couple of weeks, many brokerages have published report favoring investment in mid and small cap stocks. For example, Edelweiss recently revised its outlook for small and mid cap stocks. A note from brokerage stated:

“The Q2FY21 earnings as well as the outlook beat expectations for most Small- & Mid-caps (SMIDs). Importantly, this led to 5–20% earnings upgrades for FY22 for nearly 63% of our coverage SMIDs; another 10% of SMIDs wallowed in 20%+ earnings upgrades. We like category leaders and—so far—this has helped our model portfolio outperform SMID indices by ~4% (over the past 12–15 months). We now include more recovery plays as sequential improvement plays through, having a bearing on stock performance.”