Showing posts with label Tax cut. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Tax cut. Show all posts

Thursday, October 3, 2019

Sentiment watch

Last weekend I had an opportunity to address a gathering of stock market intermediaries. The interface provided some useful insights which I find pertinent to share with the readers.
All the participants deal with small and medium sized household investors and traders, commonly referred to as the Retail Investors. The common refrain was that the recent stock market rally has not benefitted the retail investors. Most of these investors are stuck with the struggling mid and small cap momentum stocks which are down anywhere between 25%-75% from their cost of acquisition and no hope of recovery.
To make the matter worst, many of their active clients are still looking to buy the fallen angels, the stocks where the equity value is negligible or even negative in some cases. Most popular stocks with this segment are stock of JPA group, ADAG Group, Jet Air, DHFL etc.
Tata Motors, SAIL, Nalco, Coal India and Yes Bank are some of the stocks which have perhaps disappointed the largest number of retail investors.
The investors' sentiment has improved marginally post the restructuring of corporate tax rates announced by the government. However, most of them remain skeptic about the sustainability of the current up move. There appears to be a widespread expectation that the budget for FY21 will contain provisions for restructuring of the personal income tax rates also.
The feedback about the business sentiments was scanty. Nonetheless, there appears to be some improvement in business sentiments. Most of the people would however like to wait for supplementary announcements like rate cuts, easier credit terms and government spending etc.
The two key concerns of the participants were:
1.    Will the promoter be encouraged by new tax provisions and set up new units as private entities, rather than investing in the growth of the existing listed entities?
2.    How the government will manage the fiscal deficit post the rate cuts, especially when the GST shortfall is also going to be much higher than anticipated? Will higher deficit constrain RBI in cutting the rates further? and Will the government investment in infrastructure be pushed back by couple of years due to revenue shortfall?
My take on these concerns is as follows:
Fresh capex
In my view, the first concern may not be valid for the businesses owned by Indian promoters and/or investors. For, many of the Indian businesses (e.g., in cement, power, chemicaal, steel, auto sectors) have either done material capex in recent past or are running at poor capacity utilization and do not need to do invest in fresh capacity in near term.
Insofar as the foreign companies are concerned, many of them like Maruti, Bosch, Siemens, Cummins, and Schneider etc have been investing outside the listed entity for past many years. This trend may continue or even accelerate. The consumer MNCs like Colgate, HUL etc do not need to do much capex in near future at least.
Fiscal deficit
The relationship between the investors and the fiscal deficit is akin to the proverbial Mother in Law and Daughter in Law relationship. No matter what, the investors can never be fully satisfied with the fiscal conditions.
We have seen much worse fiscal conditions in past 3 decades. The point that is often ignored in comparison with global economies is that so far the fiscal deficit in India is still funded by the savers, mostly from middle and lower middle class. In fact, in past 4years the reliance in small savings to fund the fiscal deficit has risen considerably.
Historically, the governments have been managing the fiscal burden through maintaining the interest rates on savings in negative territory (deposit rates being equal to or lower than consumer inflation). In recent times the real rates have become hugely positive and there is lot of leverage there to cut rates and fund the fiscal deficit easily with no critical impact on the overall fiscal conditions.
Moreover, we are likely to see an aggressive disinvestment program in next 12-18months that shall compensate for some of the revenue shortfall. 5G auction in FY21 should also be supportive. However, if the rates are not cut meaningfully (or inflation does not rise meaningfully) in next couple of years, FY22 onwards we may see pressure on the fiscal conditions.
The key monitorable here is the private savings rate that has been declining consistently in past one decade despite very high real rates in recent years. If tax cuts can result in higher corporate savings, it would be good sign for the economy.
Remember the gamble the government has taken is that private investment will accelerate to compensate for the poor growth in public investment. If this bet fails in next 2-3years, we shall have a serious problem at our hand.

Tuesday, September 24, 2019

Change in corporate tax structure - What does it mean for me

The sudden changes announced in corporate tax structure last week galvanized the Indian stock markets. It has turned the sentiments by 180 degrees from extreme pessimism to extreme optimism within a matter of few hours.
Not only the stock market participants, but all the corporates have also been positively surprised by this sudden announcement. The move has been welcomed by businessmen almost unanimously.
The decision to change the structure of corporate tax is not totally unexpected as this structure has been part of almost all versions of "New Direct Tax Code" that has been a work in progress for past one decade at least. However, the timing and method (through Ordinance) just 2months after announcement of full budget caught the markets by surprise.
Many readers have asked for my views on this decision to suddenly change the corporate tax structure, which I am happy to share as follows:
(a)   I believe this decision is very good.
It shall serve to enhance the competitiveness of Indian businesses (i) as exporter of goods and services and (ii) manufacturing location for global corporations which are either looking to diversify their manufacturing facilities away from traditional bases like China and Malaysia etc., or want their manufacturing closer to their target customers in South Asia.
The new structure being a simple one shall also lead to significantly less litigation and disputes.
Since the new structure does away with exemptions and incentives related to SEZ, Backward Area investment etc. it could lead to significantly more efficient industries. This combined with GST and improved logistic infrastructure, may enhance the efficiency of Indian industry materially.
(b)   In my view, this change in corporate structure is primarily aimed at attracting FDI in manufacturing and must be based on the expression of interest and/or feedback of global corporations.
It is basically a supply side measure and may not immediately result in higher consumer demand. If the stock market reaction and analysts forecast revisions are to be believed not many companies shall be passing on the benefit of lower tax to the consumers.
In my view, however the assumption of 1 to 1 gain in profit after tax (PAT) is totally unjustified. The gains, if any, will be shared between the consumers and shareholders. A 2-3% cut in tax liability therefore may not result in 2-3% higher PAT.
Therefore, the government may need to supplement these changes in the corporate tax structure with changes in personal income tax and GST to aid the consumer demand.
Insofar as investment demand from the domestic companies is concerned, the current capacity utilization level do not augur well for further capex. We may see some revival in investment demand only towards second half of next fiscal in my view.
(c)    To make the new corporate tax structure sustainable and credible, the government must almost immediately announce an aggressive disinvestment plan that involves privatization of a large number of public sector enterprises (PSEs). The practice of disinvestment through book entries (one PSE buying the other or buy back of shares) may not be sufficient to fill the fiscal gap that may be created by the new proposals.
(d)   The other countries vying for the business fleeing China, e.g., Indonesia, Vietnam and Thailand etc al. have also cut corporate tax rates to stay competitive. Therefore, only tax rate cut may not be sufficient motivation for the foreign businesses.
The government must follow this up with adequate non fiscal measures like easier land acquisition norms, necessary labor law changes and perhaps higher degree of INR convertibility.
These changes need to be considered and implemented promptly before the investment decisions are taken by the target global businesses.
I am sure the "surprise" has not been a pleasant one for many of the market participants. I know a lot of traders are caught on the short side.
The option writers in particular may have suffered "once in a decade" 6 or 8 sigma event that snatches away a large of profits made by the whole decade. If my memory serves me right, last time an event of this magnitude occurred in 2008. A lesser degree event occurred in 2016.
Besides, many investors who had decided to sit and wait on the sidelines have also been caught totally off guard. Most of them could be heard regretting the missed the "opportunity".