Tuesday, September 24, 2019

Change in corporate tax structure - What does it mean for me

The sudden changes announced in corporate tax structure last week galvanized the Indian stock markets. It has turned the sentiments by 180 degrees from extreme pessimism to extreme optimism within a matter of few hours.
Not only the stock market participants, but all the corporates have also been positively surprised by this sudden announcement. The move has been welcomed by businessmen almost unanimously.
The decision to change the structure of corporate tax is not totally unexpected as this structure has been part of almost all versions of "New Direct Tax Code" that has been a work in progress for past one decade at least. However, the timing and method (through Ordinance) just 2months after announcement of full budget caught the markets by surprise.
Many readers have asked for my views on this decision to suddenly change the corporate tax structure, which I am happy to share as follows:
(a)   I believe this decision is very good.
It shall serve to enhance the competitiveness of Indian businesses (i) as exporter of goods and services and (ii) manufacturing location for global corporations which are either looking to diversify their manufacturing facilities away from traditional bases like China and Malaysia etc., or want their manufacturing closer to their target customers in South Asia.
The new structure being a simple one shall also lead to significantly less litigation and disputes.
Since the new structure does away with exemptions and incentives related to SEZ, Backward Area investment etc. it could lead to significantly more efficient industries. This combined with GST and improved logistic infrastructure, may enhance the efficiency of Indian industry materially.
(b)   In my view, this change in corporate structure is primarily aimed at attracting FDI in manufacturing and must be based on the expression of interest and/or feedback of global corporations.
It is basically a supply side measure and may not immediately result in higher consumer demand. If the stock market reaction and analysts forecast revisions are to be believed not many companies shall be passing on the benefit of lower tax to the consumers.
In my view, however the assumption of 1 to 1 gain in profit after tax (PAT) is totally unjustified. The gains, if any, will be shared between the consumers and shareholders. A 2-3% cut in tax liability therefore may not result in 2-3% higher PAT.
Therefore, the government may need to supplement these changes in the corporate tax structure with changes in personal income tax and GST to aid the consumer demand.
Insofar as investment demand from the domestic companies is concerned, the current capacity utilization level do not augur well for further capex. We may see some revival in investment demand only towards second half of next fiscal in my view.
(c)    To make the new corporate tax structure sustainable and credible, the government must almost immediately announce an aggressive disinvestment plan that involves privatization of a large number of public sector enterprises (PSEs). The practice of disinvestment through book entries (one PSE buying the other or buy back of shares) may not be sufficient to fill the fiscal gap that may be created by the new proposals.
(d)   The other countries vying for the business fleeing China, e.g., Indonesia, Vietnam and Thailand etc al. have also cut corporate tax rates to stay competitive. Therefore, only tax rate cut may not be sufficient motivation for the foreign businesses.
The government must follow this up with adequate non fiscal measures like easier land acquisition norms, necessary labor law changes and perhaps higher degree of INR convertibility.
These changes need to be considered and implemented promptly before the investment decisions are taken by the target global businesses.
I am sure the "surprise" has not been a pleasant one for many of the market participants. I know a lot of traders are caught on the short side.
The option writers in particular may have suffered "once in a decade" 6 or 8 sigma event that snatches away a large of profits made by the whole decade. If my memory serves me right, last time an event of this magnitude occurred in 2008. A lesser degree event occurred in 2016.
Besides, many investors who had decided to sit and wait on the sidelines have also been caught totally off guard. Most of them could be heard regretting the missed the "opportunity".

No comments:

Post a Comment