Wednesday, February 15, 2017

Whats good for China, need necessarily not be good for us too

"I can't go back to yesterday - because I was a different person then."
Lewis Carroll (English, 1832-1898)
Word for the day
Ataraxia (n)
A state of freedom from emotional disturbance and anxiety; tranquility
Malice towards none
Dear Rahul Gandhi Ji,
I agree with your criticism of government for failing to deliver adequately on job creation front.
Will you please suggest two specific steps that the government should take to create adequate number of jobs for our youth.
Best Regards
First random thought this morning
A few weeks ago, I said "these days opposition parties should be very careful in what they ask from PM Modi. He may actually grant their wishes".
First PM was attacked for not focusing enough on Black Money. He obliged by abolishing 86% of currency in circulation.
Then people said, why is he silent on anonymous donations to political parties. He has obliged by restricting cash donations to Rs2000/per donor.
He was accused of letting Vijay Malaya slip out of country. He's produced documentary evidence of UPA government's benevolent stance on him, and strengthening the law for confiscation of fugitive's properties in India.
Congress and AAP strategists must now be scratching their heads, how to attack him without actually seeking any action.

Whats good for China, need necessarily not be good for us too

The economic survey presented a couple of days back presented some evidence about the trends in labor migration in the country. While most of us anecdotally knew these trends, it is good to see that the policy makers are also realizing, though might be still not in right perspective.
Firstly, the approach seems to be consider the migration inevitable and desirable for economic growth. Accepting the American model of growth, as adopted by China, as a role model, the Survey reads:
"12.1 On Chinese New Year, a staggering 277 million migrants1– about 25 percent of the workforce – board trains to return home. In China, high economic growth rates have been accompanied by mass migration from the rural hinterlands to urban hotspots, mainly along the coast.
12.2 Historically, migration of people for work and education has been a phenomenon that accompanies the structural transformation of economies, and has paved the way for the release of “surplus labour” from relatively low-productive agricultural activities to sectors enjoying higher productivity. The resulting remittance flows increase household spending in the receiving regions and further the economic development of less-developed regions."
The Survey finds that "India is increasingly on the move – and so are Indians. A new Cohort based Migration Metric3(CMM)—shows that annually inter-state labour mobility averaged 5-6 million people between 2001 and 2011, yielding an inter-state migrant population of about 60 million and an inter-district migration as high as 80 million. The first-ever estimates of internal work-related migration using railways data for the period 2011-2016 indicate an annual average flow of close to 9 million people between the states."
The data suggests that between 1991 and 2001 the growth rates of the workforce and migrants for economic reasons were nearly identical, at 2.4 per cent per annum. But as GDP growth started to soar over the next decade, the two began to diverge. The growth rate of migrants rose spectacularly to 4.5 per cent per annum, while the workforce growth rate actually fell. Thus, the migrants’ share of the workforce rose substantially.
More interestingly, in the 2000s the picture turned around completely: female migration for work not only grew far more rapidly than the female workforce, but increased at nearly twice the rate of male migration.
Unsurprisingly, relatively less developed states such as Bihar and Uttar Pradesh have high net outmigration. Relatively more developed states like Goa, Delhi, Maharashtra, Gujarat, Tamil Nadu, Kerala and Karnataka. take net in migration.
The largest recipient was the Delhi region, which accounted for more than half of migration in 2015-16, while Uttar Pradesh and Bihar taken together account for half of total out-migrants.
Surprisingly, flows from Gujarat to Tamil Nadu are about 7 lakhs annually.
...to continue

No comments:

Post a Comment