Tuesday, March 15, 2016

Could it be different this time - 1

"I have never made but one prayer to God, a very short one: 'O Lord make my enemies ridiculous.' And God granted it."
—Voltaire (French, 1694-1778)
Word for the day
Commodious (adj)
Spacious and convenient; roomy: a commodious apartment.
Malice towards none
"Intellectual Bankruptcy".....huum!
Should government consider making it part of the proposed Bankruptcy Law?
First random thought this morning
The monkey of Brexit has been riding the back of global financial markets for some time now. No respite is seen from this lingering worry till June.
There have been strong arguments made, both in favor and against Brexit. The June referendum might settle the matter for now.
What I fail to decipher is how Britons would overcome the lure of free ECB money and free European market that may explode with rehabilitation of millions of refugees. My vote is "nay".

Could it be different this time - 1

To the question I raised last week (see here), I want to answer like this:
In my view, Indian economy and hence the Indian financial markets (equities, bonds, currency) are on the cusp of a major transformation. A successful crossover may lead to multi decade bull market in Indian assets; whereas a failure at this juncture will push us back by a decade at the least.
The markets are certainly sensing this opportunity. But the investors remain skeptical about the chances of success given their disappointing empirical experience.
The first generation reforms that began to take shape in mid 1980s when a non-career politician (Rajiv Gandhi) and his sundry friends took over the mantle to unshackle the Indian economy from the traditional feudal lordships. The outcome was rather disappointing. The traditional feudal lords, and the new uncontrolled "whatever it takes" class of entrepreneurs overwhelmed the good intentions of inexperienced leaders.
The economy ended a happening decade in an unprecedented fiscal crisis with domestic investors badly bruised by the first major scam in the Indian financial marked bruised . I call it Reliance-Harshad phase.
The fiscal crisis of early 1990s forced Indian government to initiate next phase of reforms, including opening Indian market to foreign investors . The reforms in this phase, in my view, were hurried, reluctant, and guided purely by short term goals. The adhocism in the policy making was too palpable. The conceptual framework for inclusion and holistic growth was conspicuous by its omission in the entire "reform" narrative. The consequence was rise in income inequalities, civil unrest, and social division. Though this phase provided a good platform to take off, the Indian economy did never really took off. Despite getting a humongous opportunity in Y2K, for lack of conceptual development framework we could not make India a knowledge base economy.
The two material positives of this phase were (a) emergence of a strong middle class and its acceptance as a political influence group; and (b) beginning of a move towards devolution of greater power to the federal states and local bodies. This was the age of Maruti, Satellite Television and beginning of the end of Congress as sole custodian of Indian democracy. I call it Maruti-SEBI (an epitome of adhocism in policy making) era.
With the nuclear blast at Pokharan in 1998, India embarked on a new phase of economic policy - driven by nationalism and self-reliance. The then NDA government embarked on a ambitious credit driven infrastructure building program to overcome the impact of sanctions and global slowdown. This was a classic mistake of advancement of investment demand; that too without making any concerted effort to augment future consumption demand that would justify the so called advanced investment. The subsequent UPA governments not only continued with the mistake but made it worse through lax governance standards. Indian financial system is still bleeding from the natural fallout of this mistake.....to continue tomorrow

No comments:

Post a Comment