Wednesday, May 7, 2014

Inflation will hurt more, 20yrs later

Thought for the day
“There are some ideas so wrong that only a very intelligent person could believe in them.”
—George Orwell (British, 1903-1950)
Word for the day
Coterie (n)
A group of people who associate closely.
(Source: Dictionary.com)
Teaser for the day
What if NDA gets 255 and all non-NDA parties get together and plead with Sonia Gandhi to become PM?

Inflation will hurt more, 20yrs later

In past few years both the major drivers of economic growth, viz., investment and consumption, have suffered in India.
High consumer inflation has materially eroded the purchasing power and savings of household consumers. Consequently, demand growth for both discretionary items as well as staples has declined to lowest levels in a decade. Persistently negative real rates for savers (interest on term deposit less consumer inflation) have made life of retired miserable.
It may be argued that this is an immaterial segment of the population given the young demography of India. But this argument, to my mind, is seriously flawed. During my recent visit to some smaller town in north and central India I discovered that the cost of living at these places has risen substantially in past one decade primarily due to (a) inflation and (b) change in consumption patterns. Spend on education, mobility, communication, health and discretionary consumption has risen substantially leading to structural erosion in savings and rise in household debt.
Rising household expenditure & debt and falling savings is an ominous trend to my mind. Middle age people (a substantial number) who will retire in next two decades will find it extremely difficult to survive without adequate savings. I see a structural rise in dependency ratio in couple of decades. Therefore tremendous pressure on political establishment for higher subsidies will likely continue.
Mr. Rahul Gandhi should understand that at this point in time he can bring 700mn people in the “middle class” category by giving them just Rs1000 pm. But keeping them there is going to cost much more for much longer.
Given the serious supply-demand mismatch, the pressure on prices, especially consumer and energy is more structural in nature. To bridge this supply-demand gap India needs huge investments. But persistently negative real rates have widened the chasm between demand (investment) and supply (savings) of capital. To minimize this gap (a) interest rates have to be kept high (for domestic savings) and (b) INR exchange rates have to be kept favorable to foreign investors.
Both of these higher rates and weaker currency put further pressure on prices as higher cost of capital and imported inputs makes the cost of production higher. Higher inflation also pressurizes wages, further adding to the cost of production.
India imports more than it exports and therefore runs a trade deficit with most of the trade partners. Weaker currency therefore harms the domestic economy more than it benefits the exporters.
The new government will have to urgently and strongly focus on inflation that is widely acknowledged. But “how” could be a matter of debate. Printing money (QE) and cutting rates to bridge capital gap may unleash inflation and weaken INR thus structurally weaken the economy, at least in the short term. Fiscal tightening (higher taxes, lower subsidies and higher cost for state controlled natural resources) could cause tremendous pain to already struggling industry but may lead to more intrinsic strength for the economy.

No comments:

Post a Comment