Wednesday, February 19, 2014

Third fronts have mostly been good for economy

Thought for the day
“The schools would fail through their silence, the Church through its forgiveness, and the home through the denial and silence of the parents. The new generation has to hear what the older generation refuses to tell it.”
-          Simon Wiesenthal (Austrian, 1908-2005)
Word for the day
Elegy (n)
A sad or mournful musical composition; especially a funeral song.
(Source: Dictionary.com)
Teaser for the day
Once out of denial – the Congress Party will be most relieved. It is the only party that can do better than expectations.

Third fronts have mostly been good for economy

A government without Congress or BJP post 2014 is less likely in my view. However, for the argument sake even we take a hypothetical situation where non-aligned regional parties like JDU/RJD, TMC/CPM, BJD, DMK/AIDMK, SP/BSP, TRS/TDP, etc. get sufficient seats to form a government along with Congress joining or supporting from outside.
The moot question is should investors be worried about this probability?
I had expressed my opinion on this many times in past. I am happy to reiterate.
In my view the investors should rather be happy with the prospects of a larger number of regional parties with different socio-economic ideologies sharing power at center.
I find that post independence the best periods for the Indian economy have perhaps been those when a “coalition” government was in power.
By “coalition” I do not mean multi party governments. In my view, coalition government means where people with different and many a time completely diverging socio-economic policies jointly participate in a government. They arrive at the common minimum agenda of agreement and focus on executing the same, hence avoiding conflicts and logjams.
The first cabinet of India post independence had R. K. Shanmukham Shetty (Finance), Shyama Prasad Mukherjee (Industries) B. R. Ambedkar (Law) and Jagjiwan Ram (Labor). These people did not subscribe to the Nehruvian socio-economic agenda, but we still got a robust socio-economic framework. The singular governments of Nehru (post BRA, RML, SPM - 1956 and 1961), Indira Gandhi (1971, 1980), Rajeev Gandhi (1984) are not particularly known for good governance or socio-economic reforms.
Morarji Desai (1977, FM H. M. Patel, Bureaucrat – FERA dilution, Gandhian socialism, Mandal Commission), V. P. Singh (1989, FM Madhu Dandavate, Socialist  – tax reforms, social justice), Chandrasekhar (1990, FM Yashwant Sinha, Bureaucrat, fiscal commitment, government exiting non-strategic businesses) PV Narsingh Rao (1991, FM Manmohan Singh, Economist – economic liberalization, Industrial delicensing, LERMS, financial sector reforms), Devegoda/I. K. Gujaral (1996, FM P. Chidambaram, Lawyer turned politician – dream budget, tax reforms), Vajpayee (1998, 1999, FM Yashwant Sinha, Jaswant SIngh – divestment of government monopolies like roads, power, coal, NELP, NHDP, SEZ, nuclear program) and Manmohan Singh (2004, FM P. CHidambaram – RTI, MNREGA) were all coalition governments supported by socialists/communists.
These governments are all remembered for some structural socio-economic reforms causing fundamental positive changes in the economy.
None of these governments is particularly remembered for non-governance, anti market policies or anti business stance.
I will therefore be not too worried if our base case of Modi led NDA government does not materializes.

No comments:

Post a Comment