Friday, July 24, 2020

Slipping back into deep abyss



Continuing from Tuesday Repayment of Debt. Also see How will this tiger ride end?
The overall poverty level in the world has seen material decline over past three decades as highly populated countries like China, India, and Bangladesh pulled millions of people out of abysmal poverty conditions; even though, this period has also seen sharp rise in economic inequalities also.
The pace of poverty reduction has reduced since global financial crisis, as the flow of development aid from developed economies to the poor countries saw a marked decline; commodities dominated economies suffered due to persistent deflationary pressures; EM currencies weakened; and abundantly available credit at near zero interest rates helped the large global corporations and investors to increase their wealth disproportionately.
The global economic shut down induced by the outbreak of deadly COVID-19 virus is threatening to reverse the process of poverty alleviation. Millions of people who had been barely out of poverty conditions are facing the prospects of slipping back into the deep abyss. The fiscally constraint governments, anemic economic activity and feeble businesses would find it tough to support these people.
The key question to examine therefore is, If the global growth continues to remain low, how the poor and developing economies will bridge the development gap with developed countries and come out of poverty? And if this gap widens, what would it mean for the world order?
As per the World Bank, "Poverty projections suggest that the social and economic impacts of the crisis are likely to be quite significant. Estimates based on growth projections from the June 2020 Global Economic Prospects report show that, when compared with pre-crisis forecasts, COVID-19 could push 71 million people into extreme poverty in 2020 under the baseline scenario and 100 million under the downside scenario. As a result, the global extreme poverty rate would increase from 8.23% in 2019 to 8.82% under the baseline scenario or 9.18% under the downside scenario, representing the first increase in global extreme poverty since 1998, effectively wiping out progress made since 2017."
The report further emphasizes, "The number of people living under the international poverty lines for lower and upper middle-income countries – $3.20/day and $5.50/day in 2011 PPP, respectively – is also projected to increase significantly, signaling that social and economic impacts will be widely felt." Besides, "A large share of the new extreme poor will be concentrated in countries that are already struggling with high poverty rates and numbers of poor. Almost half of the projected new poor will be in South Asia, and more than a third in Sub-Saharan Africa."
As per another report of World Bank (Global Waves of Debt - Causes and Consequences), "...wave of debt began in 2010 and debt has reached $55 trillion in 2018, making it the largest, broadest and fastest growing of the four. While debt financing can help meet urgent development needs such as basic infrastructure, much of the current debt wave is taking riskier forms. Low-income countries are increasingly borrowing from creditors outside the traditional Paris Club lenders, notably from China. Some of these lenders impose non-disclosure clauses and collateral requirements that obscure the scale and nature of debt loads. There are concerns that governments are not as effective as they need to be in investing the loans in physical and human capital. In fact, in many developing countries, public investment has been falling even as debt burdens rise.
The debt build-up also warrants close analysis because of slower growth during the current wave. In comparison with conditions prior to the 2007-2009 crisis, emerging and developing economies have been growing more slowly even though debt has been growing faster. Slower growth has meant weaker development outcomes and slower poverty reduction."
"The latest debt surge in emerging and developing economies has been striking: in just eight years, total debt climbed to an all-time high of roughly 170 percent of GDP. That marks a 54-percentage point of GDP increase since 2010—the fastest gain since at least 1970. The bulk of this debt increase was incurred by China (equivalent to more than $20 trillion). The rest of the increase was broad based—involving government as well as private debt—and observable in virtually every region of the world.
The study shows that simultaneous buildups in public and private debt have historically been associated with financial crises that resulted in particularly xviii prolonged declines in per capita income and investment. Emerging and developing economies already are more vulnerable on a variety of fronts than they were ahead of the last crisis: 75 percent of them now have budget deficits, their foreign currencydenominated corporate debt is significantly higher, and their current account deficits are four times as large as they were in 2007. Under these circumstances, a sudden rise in risk premiums could precipitate a financial crisis, as has happened many times in the past.
Clearly, it’s time for course corrections."
...to continue on Tuesday
 
Weekend readings

Thursday, July 23, 2020

Su karwa nu?

The decoupling of real economy and financial markets in past few months has certainly caught many market participants by surprise. There is no dearth of experts and masters of market who are claiming to have caught the March bottom and minted money. I have no doubts that they might have actually achieved what they claim. However, the publically available evidence suggests that most mutual funds have yielded negative return in YTD2021 and in past one year. The 5year return is worse than the average fixed deposit interest in this period.
The investors are thus caught in a quandary - whether they should use this bounce in the stock prices to redeem their investments or invest more money.
The problem in fact seems more acute with the investors who decided to play "safe than sorry" and redeemed their investments during March-April and are sitting on the fringes. Many of them are wondering whether it is a good time to invest back in equities; especially when the debt and money market returns have plunged sharply.
The questions I get these days vary - "su karwa nu?" (what to do?), "Kya lagta hai?" (how does it look?) "kuch karna hai kya?" (is there any investment/trading opportunity?), being the most common ones.
I do not believe in this entire FOMO (fear of missing out) theory of investment behavior. I believe that this is just a deceptive jargon to describe the unexplained part of the investor behavior.
In my view, it is perfectly normal and acceptable behavior for investors and traders if they do not find it desirable to venture into rough seas and prefer to wait in their cabin for the weather to clear out. It they are looking for assurance that the storm has passed and it's safe to sail now, this is a prudent behavior not fearsome.
My answer to the inquisitions of investors/traders who chose to retire to the safer confines of their respective cabins is as follows:
(a)   The economic storm triggered by outbreak of COVID-19 virus is far from over. The economic consequences of the disruptions caused by global lockdown will continue to unfold over many years to come. I do not expect Indian economy to regain sustainable 6%+ growth trajectory (normalized for FY21 extraordinary fall) in next 3years.
(b)   The asset prices, especially equities and precious metals, may continue to rise in short term, due to abundant liquidity; lower cost of funds & poor debt returns; lower capital requirements in routine businesses;
(c)    There is no sign of bubble as yet in the market, as even the 3-5yrs returns are abysmal. The valuations appear stretched due to extraordinary fall in earnings. The negative real interest rates may afford higher valuations to sustain in the short term (12-15months).
(d)   The market breadth has started to narrow again. In my view, this trend may accelerate in 2HFY21. I will not be surprised at all to see the benchmark indices scaling new highs in next 9-12 months, while the broader markets languish or correct materially from the current level. Too much diversified portfolios therefore may continue to underperform the benchmark indices.
My suggestion to the readers, who have asked these questions, is as follows:
Follow a rather simple investment style to achieve your investment goals. It is highly likely that most may find this path boringly long and apparently less rewarding, but in my view this is the only way sustainable returns could be obtained over a longer period of time.
I believe, taking contrarian views, anticipating short term performance (e.g., monthly sales, quarterly profits etc.) and reacting to that, or arbitrage on information/rumor of a corporate action are examples of circuitous roads or short cuts that usually lead us nowhere.
Taking straight road means investing in businesses that are likely to do well (sustainable revenue growth and profitability), generating strong cash flows; have sustainable gearing; timely adapt to the emerging technology and market trends, and most important have consistently enhanced shareholder value.
These businesses need necessarily not be in the “hot sectors” like commodities in early 1990’s, ITeS in late 1999s, or infrastructure and financials in 2004-07. These businesses may necessarily not be large enough to find place in benchmark indices.
I have discussed it many times in past. However, given that the market is in a prolonged period of high volatility and low returns, making investors jittery and indecisive, I deem it fit to reiterate. Of course there is nothing proprietary about these thoughts. Many people have often repeated it. Nonetheless, I feel, like religious rituals and chants, these also need to be practiced and chanted regularly.

Wednesday, July 22, 2020

The rise of "Retail Investor"

A multitude of data highlights that the participation of non institutional investors (and/or traders) in the Indian equity market has increased significantly in past few months. Many market observers have commented that it may in fact be a global phenomenon. Since, I do not have access to adequate authentic information about the global equity markets; I would restrict myself to Indian markets here.
  • As per the data available till last week, the share of non institutional volume on NSE has increased from 44.75% in February to 74.56% in July. In this period, the average daily market volume has increased from Rs51227cr to Rs59844; whereas the non institutional daily average volumes has almost doubled from Rs229bn to Rs446bn. This is unprecedented and surpasses both bubble markets (1999-2000 and 2007-2008).
     
  • Unlike the previous two episodes of bubble formation in markets, this rise in non institutional participation has coincided with sharp fall in the flows to mutual funds. Net flows into equity mutual funds tumbled 95% in June from the previous month, marking the third month of consecutive decline in the flows into equity mutual funds.
  • In this period the number of non institutional account with brokerages have increased materially. The largest discount brokerage in India recorded 23% rise in number of active clients in 1QFY21 period.
    My enqiry indicates that the reasons for this trends are as follows:
(a)   Dismal performance of asset managers (mutual funds as well as PMS). Most fund managers have disappointed the investors who were given high hopes through aggressive "Mutual Fund Sahi Hai" campaign. There have been many instances of impropriety and unethical practices, especially in case of PMS. This might have led the investors to take the things in their own hand.
(b)   The socio-economic lock down due to outbreak of COVID-19 has rendered many people jobless. Besides many businesses have been working at zero or sub optimal capacity reducing the working capital requirement materially. Many of the jobless individuals and idle businessmen with cash may have started trading in equities in order to generate some income.
(c)    Many young professionals who have been told to work from home, may have found spare time, which they are utilizing in trading in stocks.
The question is whether this trend is sustainable?
In my view, this trend is not sustainable. Much of this will reverse once the economy normalizes and people get to their routine work. Insofar as the conduct and performances of asset managers are concerned, the regulator might have a lot of work to do there, before the investors' confidence is restored.