Vijay Kumar Gaba

 In his latest policy statement, US Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell commented “Inflation has risen, largely reflecting transitory factors.” The FOMC noted that “inflation has risen to 2 percent and is on track to moderately exceed 2 percent for some time” and said that “the Committee will aim to achieve inflation moderately above 2 percent for some time so that inflation averages 2 percent over time and longer‑term inflation expectations remain well anchored at 2 percent.” (see here)

These comments of Federal Reserve have triggered a fresh debate on probability of imminent “hyperinflation” and a global “commodity supercycle”.

As per a recent report of Bank of America Securities (BofA) after the third week of earnings. mentions of “inflation” have now quadrupled YoY; and after last week, mentions have jumped nearly 800% YoY!

BofA analyst also concludes from the corporates’ earnings commentary that “On an absolute basis, [inflation] mentions skyrocketed to near record highs from 2011, pointing to at the very least, “transitory” hyper-inflation ahead.”

As per the recent World Bank Commodity Outlook report (see here) “Energy prices are expected to average more than one-third higher in 2021 (a significant upward revision from the October report) followed by a smaller increase in 2022. Non-energy prices are forecast to increase 19 percent in 2021 (also revised upward from October), but a modest decline is expected in 2022 as metal price increases partially unwind. The outlook is heavily dependent on the path of the pandemic, with the potential for additional upside risks if the vaccine rollout gathers pace and strong growth in the United States generates significant global spillovers. However, on the downside, the global recovery could yet be derailed by renewed outbreaks in large economies.”

Not being an expert on commodities of economics, I draw the following from the discussion on “hyperinflation” and “Commodity supercycle”

1.    Presently, the consensus is revolving around “transitory hyperinflation”. There are some technical analysts who are forecasting a prolonged bull market in commodities (commodity supercycle) but it is far from consensus.

My views are clear on this account. I strongly refute any case for a “commodity supercycle”. (see “Commodities – trade “yes”; invest “no””)

2.    Inflation and Deflation are always transitory in nature. It is primarily the job of the central bankers to manage this transition in a way that these trends do not cause significant disruption to the economy. A high transitory inflation could be easily compared to a cyclone that destroys the weak structures and trees falling on its way.

The problem occurs when the central bankers persistently refuse to use the available monetary policy tools, arguing that “it is transitory” and “this shall pass too”. This tendency weakens the markets’ faith in central bankers and raise doubt about their relevance per se.

We have also seen RBI following the same tendency. In past three policy statements, the persistence of inflation has been recognized but action has been avoided. I am sure inflation may not last much beyond FY22, but in next few months it can destroy economics of many household, businesses and eventually lenders.

One thing I am really concerned about is the “transitory” food inflation. The weather in many parts of the world has been unusually dry in past many months. Notwithstanding the forecast of IMD, I have gathered from old farmers (who forecast monsoon based on some natural signs) that monsoon may be below normal at least in North and North West India.

The global food prices are already running at multiyear highs and look good for a further move north. The recent food buying spree of China may be another indication of things to come.

Crypto currency (e.g. Bitcoin) is proving to be the best asset class for the Covid-19 infected FY21. Most crypto currencies have yielded astronomical returns in a year that suffered the worst synchronized global recession since the great depression of 1930s. Against this, the traditional safe haven Gold, Swiss Franc (CHF), USD and US Treasuries have yielded insignificant return. USD Index (DXY) in fact has declined over 10% YTD FY21. Silver is the only traditional asset, besides equities, that has yielded strong return in past 11 months.

Regardless, the overwhelming consensus amongst global strategists appear to be favouring gold and silver as overweight in asset allocation of non-institutional investors. Most wealth managers and investment strategists are suggesting upto 15% allocation to gold (for example see here). Many globally popular and prominent traders, chartists and strategists have suggested a massive bull market in Silver in next couple of years (see here)

Meeting with a senior asset allocator last week was quite revealing in this context. The gentleman advocated 10% allocation to gold, besides 10% allocation to global equities (mostly US equities). He strongly advised to avoid crypto currencies; though he expects a rather lucrative trading opportunity in silver. On a little deeper probing, he offered the following rationale for his asset allocation strategy:

(a)   Given the status of quantitative easing (money printing) by major central banks, global hyperinflation is inevitable. It is only a matter of time when the prices of all real assets and commodities explode. In these circumstances gold will provide safety cushion to the portfolio.

(b)   Stagflationary situation in US could lead to sharp depreciation in USD value and chances of return to gold standard could enhance.

(c)    Gold-Silver ratio is breaking out on technical charts. From a 10yr high of 120, the ratio has already corrected to 60. Technically it is expected to test the 10yr low level of 30 in short term. This implies a sharp rise in silver prices.

(d)   Unwinding of monetary stimulus would also lead to unwinding of carry trade in USD and EUR. This may lead to reversal of flows away from emerging markets to developed markets. Therefore buying some developed market equity is desirable. It is also desirable from (i) diversification viewpoint and (ii) strategic viewpoint, i.e., to take stake in global businesses doing very well.

His arguments were quite convincing on first hearing. But on second thought these left me mor confused than ever. What I could not understand from his detailed presentation was:

(a)   If a hyperinflationary situation does materializes as popularly believed, won’t I have much serious problems to deal with. How 10% gold will solve these problems?

(b)   If USD and EUR get debased due to excessive money printing, INR will naturally appreciate against USD. Since gold is mostly priced in USD terms, won’t any appreciation in gold in USD terms will get neutralized by appreciation in INR vs USD.

(c)    What is the guarantee that gold does not suffer from the same malaise as USD? Is it totally improbable that the physical stock of gold has been leveraged many fold to issue paper gold?

(d)   Why can’t the targeted Gold-Silver ratio be achieved through fall in gold prices rather than rise in silver prices?

(e)    If USD and EUR do get debased, why would an alternative currency not emerge to maintain stability in global trade?

(f)    Since anticipated hyperinflation is mostly expected to be the outcome of a supply shock rather than a demand surge, a further dose of quantitative easing might be in order to encourage building of new capacities. If that is the case, then the whole premise of higher yields and hyperinflation might fail.

(g)    If USD and EUR debasement is a serious concern, then how does investing in global equities make sense?

(h)   A hyperinflationary condition may lead to material monetary tightening in India. Higher rates shall then warrant serious de-rating of equity valuations which are assuming prolonged period of lower rates and lower inflation. Even real estate may also suffer from poor demand due to higher rates in that case. We may need to worry more about INR debasement in that case rather than USD or EUR!

Many more such questions bothered me for couple of days, before I reminded me of the following basic learnings from the first chapter of my investment strategy book:

1.    India has 1.38bn people who need to eat & wear clothes, want decent healthcare, and aspire to have a decent shelter of their own. These needs and aspirations will continue to create many decent investment opportunity for me in India for next few decades at least.

2.    A tiny investor like me should never bother about diversifying the investment portfolio too much. A totally unproductive commodity like gold and mostly unknown animals like foreign equities are for large investors and traders with much stronger risk appetite. I should be happy with ordinary assets like high quality domestic equity (businesses which I can see and feel everyday); debt to my government and some large corporates; a house for myself; share in portfolio of good rental properties; and some liquid money in bank. Chasing few extra bps of returns is meaningless and fraught with risk which I can hardly afford. I cannot afford to risk even a single penny for earning few bragging rights.

3.    An information that has travelled seven seas to reach a commoner like me has no arbitrage value. If I know that USD hegemony is under threat; hyperinflation is on the anvil; silver is going to rise astronomically, then I must strongly believe that these happening will NOT shock the markets in any manner whatsoever.

 Many readers have found my thoughts on “hyperinflation” yesterday little abstract (see Hyperinflation - Highly improbable). They want me to elaborate further on why I think that “hyperinflation” is highly improbable in foreseeable future.

I do not mind sharing the bases of my views on this topic. However, before elaborating my views of “hyperinflation”, I would like to clarify that when I say “hyperinflation”, I do not mean the term in its literal sense, because in that sense it makes no sense in the present day conditions. In the current context, by hyperinflation, we should understand episodes of sustained high inflation over a period of many months.

To put this in further context, please note that “hyperinflation” is generally used to describe situations where the monthly inflation rate is greater than 50%. At this rate, an item that cost Rs1 on January 1 would cost Rs130 on January 1 of the following year. At least, in past few centuries, there is no instance of a global episode of hyperinflation. In the first half of 20^th century there were few localized episodes – the most famous being Germany (1922-23) and Hungary (1945-46).

In past 70yrs, Peru (1980s), Venezuela (2014-16), Yugoslavia (1989-1994), Armenia (1992-93), Turkmenistan (1992-93) and Zimbabwe (2004-08) have seen episodes of hyperinflation. It is conspicuous that all these episodes resulted from either geopolitical reasons (war or collapse of extant political order) or civil unrest within the country resulting in collapse of political and/or financial system. Most of the countries facing hyperinflation were either closed economies or were facing global trade restrictions or disruptions. Besides, all these economies were too small to impact global economy, trade and commerce in any significant measure whatsoever. It would therefore be totally unfounded to expect that hyperinflation could strike a major economy of the world like US, EU, Japan, China, or India in foreseeable future.

Insofar as the probability of the episodes of sustained high inflation occurring over a period of many months in a major economy is concerned, I believe that the chances of that are almost Nil in short to medium term (1-10yrs), unless a major war or civil war breaks out involving some major economies of the world, causing sustained disruption in the global supply chain. The bases of my belief, as stated below, are simple and mostly intuitive:

·         Unlike in 20^th century, the global trade and commerce is now mostly dematerialized. The material, money, and labor move digitally. The rebalancing of demand and supply equilibriums is much faster and efficient than before.

·         Demand elasticity for most products, including food and energy has increased significantly. Alternative products and sources of supply are available to mitigate the impact of any supply shock.

·         The discretionary demand dominates the consumption in most of the developed and large developing economies. The inflation for discretionary products, like electronic gadgets, personal care services, etc. is already high. A large part of global consumption (in value terms) may not be essential and could be scaled back with small effort, without having any substantial impact on human life or global order.

·         The productivity of essential goods, like food, energy, clothing etc has significantly increased in past five decades and there is enough inventory of essential goods in the world to mitigate the impact of any supply shock due to natural calamity etc.

·         The global trade and commerce is much larger, faster and easier as compared to five decade ago. An episode of higher inflation due to supply shock is not likely to last longer.

·         The global economy is significantly more integrated now as compared to first half of 20^th century. The impact of higher inflation in a major economy is more likely to spill to the global economy rather swiftly. Hence, it is highly unlikely that supply shocks in a major economy will remain unattended by global trade partners for longer periods.

·         Given the technology and advancement in the weapon systems, the chances of a prolonged war between major global powers are next to NIL.

·         The “tons of money” that we are bothering about is actually not physical money. Most of it is ‘bytes of money” or digital money. If need arises, this can be destroyed as easily as it is being created. In fact, I firmly believe that all the money created by central bankers of developed economies in past 12years shall be destroyed by the central bankers, as soon as it threatens to spark unwanted inflation.

·         There is enough spare capacity of productive infrastructure and housing, etc. in large economies to absorb excess liquidity of money. I believe that US$1trn of additional flows could be easily absorbed in Indian economy in one month, without stoking inflation of essential items.

Insofar as the reflation of depressed commodity prices (many like Zinc and Nickle have traded below cost of production for many months) is concerned, it is not something to worry about. If at all, it may actually be a cause for celebration as it would signal normalization of the global markets and may mark reversion of extraordinary monetary efforts made in past 12years. Terming this as “hyperinflation” and rushing to the “safe havens” like gold etc. to safeguard from it would actually be quixotic, in my view.

 It was particularly gloomy winter evening of 2008 in South Mumbai. The global financial markets had their knees frozen. One of the top global financial institutions, Lehman Brothers had collapsed a couple of months back. Another global financial giant Merrill Lynch lost its identity to Bank of America. Some peripheral European countries were on the brink of defaulting on their sovereign obligations. The bankers in the financial hub of India (South Mumbai) were staring at massive job losses. Numerous businesses were on the brink. Many large investors had also suffered huge losses in their portfolios. For younger investors and bankers in their 20s and 30s, the conditions were totally unprecedented. The fear, uncertainty, scale of value destruction was overwhelming as they had not experienced anything like that before. Most of the then had seen 5yrs of strong bull market in credit and capacity building in infrastructure, energy and housing. Suddenly, all the credit started to look bad and all the capacities worthless.

The US Federal Reserve (Fed) had launched its Quantitative Easing Program (QE1) a week ago. Many other central bankers, including European Central Bank (ECB) was expected to follow the Fed soon. The commitment of central bankers to do “whatever it takes” had calmed the markets only slightly.

In this setting, I had the opportunity of hearing one of the most famous global commodity traders and fund manager in person. The gentleman was in Mumbai at the invite of a local fund house which had launched a Natural Resource Fund just a few months back. This gentleman, in his idiosyncratic style and attire made a passionate pitch for investment in global commodities. He strongly argued that the massive new money printed under the QE program of central bankers will inevitably result in hyperinflationary conditions in the global economy leading to sharp rise in prices of commodities. Quoting from the classical monetary theory books, he presented some hyperbolic charts and diagrams reflecting his projections of commodity prices.

I had many questions for the debonair looking trader cum fund manager, but I chose not to ask any, since I was fully convinced that inflation is certainly not one of the threats to the global economy in foreseeable future. Any question to the expert therefore would have been plain sophistry.

In hindsight, I feel it was a right decision to go with my conviction instead of arguing with the expert and weakening my conviction. As we all know that despite multiple rounds of QE and vigorous efforts to create some inflation, the global economy has continued to struggle with deflationary forces in past 12years. Many commodities are even yet to see their respective 2007-08 prices.

In past couple of months, the hyperinflation has again started appearing in headlines. Numerous reports and articles have been written on how the global economy is fast racing towards hyperinflation. Many strategists have suggested trades for this - gold and silver being the most common. Many traders have taken positions. The Natural Resources Fund launched in 2008 is being marketed again aggressively.

Some wise and smart traders and fund managers are calling it “reflation” instead of “hyperinflation”, indicating that the price rise may be short trading opportunity and not a global trend.

Regardless, my view continues to remain the same as it was in 2008. I strongly feel that hyperinflation, as we know it from classical monetary theory, is a highly improbable event in the modern economic conditions. The present day trade and commerce dynamics, technology, and demand-supply matrices do not support any extraordinary inflationary flare up. And if the hyperinflation premise based on imminent demise of US Dollar, it may also be unfounded.