Showing posts with label Fiscal Deficit. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Fiscal Deficit. Show all posts

Friday, November 15, 2019

Hopes converging to reality

A recently published paper by the RBI (see here) highlights the perceptible change in the macroeconomic outlook of the professional forecasters, in recent months.
The latest round (September 2019) of the professional forecasters' survey (PFS) indicates that professional forecasters are growing increasingly skeptical about the macroeconomic conditions and growth in near term. I believe that in the next round of PFS (November 2019) we shall see further downward revision in the estimates as the data continues to deteriorate.
In my view, the professional forecasters play a critical role in policy formulation and the quality of policy response to critical economic conditions. The fact that in the latest episode the professional forecasters have been quite slow in recognizing, underlines the inadequate policy response so far. The positive take away is that the realization of the gravity of situation is finally happening and it may hopefully reflect in the policy response faster.
The key highlights of the September 2019 round of the PFS could be listed as follows:
1.    The forecast for GDP growth has been downgraded to 6.2% from 7.6% in May 2018. However, since the November forecast of many agencies and research houses is closer to 5% against 6% in September, it is reasonable to excpect that the November round of PFS will see further downward revision in GDP growth estimates.
2.    The forecasters have sharply downgraded the FY20 personal consumption expenditure growth forecast to 5.5% in September 2019 against 7.6% in July 2019. The subdued Diwali season sales may lead to further downward revision in this estimate.
3.    The investment climate is expected to remain poor in 2HFY20 also. The overall forecast for FY20 investment growth has been sharply downgraded to 6% against 9.2% in July 2019. It would not be reasonable to expect further downward revision in investment growth in the November 2019 PFS also.
4.    Surprisingly the forecasters do not expect material deterioration in the fiscal balance. Despite persistently lower GST collections, cut in corporate tax rates and lower than budgeted personal tax collection so far, the forecasters see only 20bps rise in center's fiscal deficit to 3.3% from 3.1% estimated a year ago. No deterioration is expected in the States' fiscal deficit.
 



Thursday, November 14, 2019

Two short stories



"Invest in India" - Caveat de Emptor
Nick Read, the chief executive officer of Vodafone Plc, sounded the alarm bell on the future of the beleaguered Indian JV of the company with AV Birla group. In an interaction with the press in London, Mr. Read said, "the company's future in India could be in doubt unless the government stopped hitting operators with higher taxes and charges." He warned, ”If you’re not a going concern, you’re moving into a liquidation scenario -- can’t get any clearer than that.”
It is pertinent to note in this context that Vodafone, which owns 45% of Vodafone Idea having a 30% share in India telecom market, wants a two-year delay on spectrum payments and lower license fees and taxes. It’s also calling for the spectrum payments demanded by the court to be spread over 10 years and is asking for a waiver on interest and penalties.
In my view it is a case of business decision gone wrong due to competitive intensity and policy adhocism. Here the all the 3 dominant market players, the policy makers and the regulators might have some part of the blame to share.
At the stake are - (i) capital of investors and lenders; (ii) credibility of the government which has been aggressively marketing India as an attractive investment destination; (iii) fiscal balance of the country as it may impact the future spectrum auctions, a key component of non tax revenue; (iv) the success of ambitious digital India plan as it may discourage further investment in the sector; and last but not the least (v) other entities of Av Birla group that might suffer serious collateral damage if Idea Vodafone goes into liquidation.
After fiascos in POSCO (land acquisition), Cairn Energy (retroactive tax claim), Daiichi (fraud), Vodafone (retroactive tax claim) etc., this will become another serious precedence for foreign investors and businesses considering investment in India. It is important to note that many foreign investors are already facing material losses from their investments in troubled entities like IL&FS, DHFL, Yes Bank, RBL, Zee, Suzlon, ADAG group entities, and a number of ecommerce ventures etc.
Trapped in means goal
I would like to revisit the the following blog post of Fayaz Shah, that I had quoted also.
"Many people confuse end goals with means goals. End goals define outcomes where you’re unwilling to compromise — they describe exactly what you want. Means goals, on the other hand, define one of many paths to reach your end goals.
Here’s a simple example:
Let’s say you want to see your favorite music group perform live in concert. That’s an end goal — it defines your outcome. You want to be there in person and enjoy that particular experience. It’s not a stepping stone to anything greater, and no substitute experience would produce the same result.
Now suppose a radio station is having a contest where the prize is two tickets to that concert, and you decide you want to win that contest. That’s a means goal. Winning the contest is not the final outcome you’re after. It’s only one of many ways that could lead to you sitting at that concert.
But if you don’t win those tickets and fail at your means goal, you may still be able to achieve your end goal. You just need to find another way to get to that concert.
Sometimes we get blocked on the path to our goals. But many times it’s just the means goals that trap us, and if we stay flexible, we can plot an alternative route to the same ends."
The fiscal policy and practices of the government appear trapped in the means goal.
Ideally the primary objective of a democratically elected government is to govern in a manner that ensures safety & security (financial, physical, social) of the citizen and provide an environment that is conducive for their overall growth and enrichment.
The policies like fiscal, monetary, human resource development, environment, resource management (energy, water, land, minerals etc) are all means to achieve the primary goals. No means shall become an obstruction in the achievement of the primary objectives.
For example, if the fiscal policy of the government becomes a hindrance in achieving the primary goal, the government must consider alternatives rather than staying trapped in this means goal to the detriment of the primary goal.
 

Thursday, October 3, 2019

Sentiment watch

Last weekend I had an opportunity to address a gathering of stock market intermediaries. The interface provided some useful insights which I find pertinent to share with the readers.
All the participants deal with small and medium sized household investors and traders, commonly referred to as the Retail Investors. The common refrain was that the recent stock market rally has not benefitted the retail investors. Most of these investors are stuck with the struggling mid and small cap momentum stocks which are down anywhere between 25%-75% from their cost of acquisition and no hope of recovery.
To make the matter worst, many of their active clients are still looking to buy the fallen angels, the stocks where the equity value is negligible or even negative in some cases. Most popular stocks with this segment are stock of JPA group, ADAG Group, Jet Air, DHFL etc.
Tata Motors, SAIL, Nalco, Coal India and Yes Bank are some of the stocks which have perhaps disappointed the largest number of retail investors.
The investors' sentiment has improved marginally post the restructuring of corporate tax rates announced by the government. However, most of them remain skeptic about the sustainability of the current up move. There appears to be a widespread expectation that the budget for FY21 will contain provisions for restructuring of the personal income tax rates also.
The feedback about the business sentiments was scanty. Nonetheless, there appears to be some improvement in business sentiments. Most of the people would however like to wait for supplementary announcements like rate cuts, easier credit terms and government spending etc.
The two key concerns of the participants were:
1.    Will the promoter be encouraged by new tax provisions and set up new units as private entities, rather than investing in the growth of the existing listed entities?
2.    How the government will manage the fiscal deficit post the rate cuts, especially when the GST shortfall is also going to be much higher than anticipated? Will higher deficit constrain RBI in cutting the rates further? and Will the government investment in infrastructure be pushed back by couple of years due to revenue shortfall?
My take on these concerns is as follows:
Fresh capex
In my view, the first concern may not be valid for the businesses owned by Indian promoters and/or investors. For, many of the Indian businesses (e.g., in cement, power, chemicaal, steel, auto sectors) have either done material capex in recent past or are running at poor capacity utilization and do not need to do invest in fresh capacity in near term.
Insofar as the foreign companies are concerned, many of them like Maruti, Bosch, Siemens, Cummins, and Schneider etc have been investing outside the listed entity for past many years. This trend may continue or even accelerate. The consumer MNCs like Colgate, HUL etc do not need to do much capex in near future at least.
Fiscal deficit
The relationship between the investors and the fiscal deficit is akin to the proverbial Mother in Law and Daughter in Law relationship. No matter what, the investors can never be fully satisfied with the fiscal conditions.
We have seen much worse fiscal conditions in past 3 decades. The point that is often ignored in comparison with global economies is that so far the fiscal deficit in India is still funded by the savers, mostly from middle and lower middle class. In fact, in past 4years the reliance in small savings to fund the fiscal deficit has risen considerably.
Historically, the governments have been managing the fiscal burden through maintaining the interest rates on savings in negative territory (deposit rates being equal to or lower than consumer inflation). In recent times the real rates have become hugely positive and there is lot of leverage there to cut rates and fund the fiscal deficit easily with no critical impact on the overall fiscal conditions.
Moreover, we are likely to see an aggressive disinvestment program in next 12-18months that shall compensate for some of the revenue shortfall. 5G auction in FY21 should also be supportive. However, if the rates are not cut meaningfully (or inflation does not rise meaningfully) in next couple of years, FY22 onwards we may see pressure on the fiscal conditions.
The key monitorable here is the private savings rate that has been declining consistently in past one decade despite very high real rates in recent years. If tax cuts can result in higher corporate savings, it would be good sign for the economy.
Remember the gamble the government has taken is that private investment will accelerate to compensate for the poor growth in public investment. If this bet fails in next 2-3years, we shall have a serious problem at our hand.