Showing posts with label DXY. Show all posts
Showing posts with label DXY. Show all posts

Friday, March 5, 2021

Few random thoughts

 There are lots of events happening in global markets which cannot be full explained through conventional wisdom or empirical evidence. In my view, lot of these events are unintended consequences of policy actions, geopolitics and trade conflicts.

For example, there is a massive rally in the global commodity prices, despite poor demand and growth outlook for next few years at least. The recovery to pre Covid level may not entirely explain the rise in commodity prices much beyond the 2019 levels. Popularization of electric mobility etc. can explain gains in some commodities, but not in steel, coal, crude etc.

The forecasts of a commodity super cycle sound mostly unconvincing, given (i) worsening demographics of the world; (b) restricted mobility; (c) seriously impeded purchasing power of people; (d) already stretched limits and diminishing marginal utility of fiscal and monetary stimulus; (e) technology evolution focusing on reversal of trends in labor migration; and (f) diminishing chances of a full-fledged physical war amongst large countries; etc.

Material changes technologies related to construction, manufacturing and transportation etc. also leading to material changes in the demand matrix for various commodities like steel, cement, copper, coal etc.

The outrageous rise in economic inequalities globally also mean that investment rate in poor countries will continue to decline for next many years, as the economic power gets more and more concentrated in the hands of few rich nations.

I therefore feel that the price trends in the global markets are deeply influenced by the factors other than economics. Even though the defeat of Donald Trump in US presidential elections has taken the trade conflicts away from headlines and front pages; the trade war that started few years ago is far from over. Besides, geopolitics is also playing a large role in global markets.

In past two years, China has been making conscious efforts to reduce its holdings of US Treasuries and building large reserves of physical industrial commodities. The global investors appear selling Chinese assets (leading to massive tech rout in China) and buying other emerging markets, in line with the global enterprises’ China+1 policy.

The unintended consequences are that world is facing shortages of rare earths, semi-conductors, and shipping containers and struggling with the rising prices of commodities. China which had been exporting deflation to the world for the past 10years has suddenly become exporter of inflation to the world.

The markets focusing more on US yields and USD cross rates, might be missing the point that Chinese aggression on commodities can derail the entire AI led Tech revolution for at least 4-5yrs, if it continues to choke supply of rare earths and semi-conductors. This derailment of global trade and therefore growth is a bigger worry than inflation at this point in time.

It is pertinent to note in this context that today China is hosting its annual gathering of National People’s Congress, its biggest political meeting, to approve the plan to propel Chinese economy to the top of the world, ahead of US. At the center of the new plan will be Beijing’s push to develop new technologies and cut the nation’s reliance on geopolitical rivals such as the U.S. for components like microchips. As per some experts, that should mean allocating more resources to science and technology, with spending on research and development targeted at around 3.5% of GDP over the period

Another case in point is the sharp rise in the price of sugar in global markets. This rise has occurred despite the higher than expected production in India and over 10.6MT carry over stock. But for MSP of Rs31/kg mandated by the government, the glut should have resulted in domestic prices falling to much below the cost of production. Also, but for export limitations and logistic constraints, Indian supplies could bring down the global prices to much lower levels. Visualizing this as signs of impending global food inflation cycle may not be appropriate.

The semi-conductor shortages are hurting manufacturing of white goods, electronic items and automobile, etc. This could have meaningful second round impact on other sectors of economy. Thankfully, the border conflicts and political rhetoric have not impacted the Indo-China trade materially. But India gaining advantage at the expense of China due to China+1 policy could have some repercussions in the short to medium term. The capacity building in India needs to take place now. A delay of even one year could potentially render much of this capacity redundant as global enterprises find alternatives or reconcile with China.

The short point is that US bond yields and USD exchange rate, etc. are least of the worries for our markets and economy, presently. Laying too much focus on these may only distract us from bigger threats and even bigger opportunities.

Wednesday, June 17, 2020

Investors Beware - 2

The rise in equity indices in the wake of global pandemic and its long term socio-economic consequences is keeping most experts busy. The central bank bashing is the favorite theme of market participants, like anytime in past 33years, ever since Alan Greenspan took over the Chair of US Federal Chairman and assumed the role of the "champion of stock markets" after 1987 market crash. Since then the markets have been overwhelmingly depending on the central bankers to support any fall in stock prices.
Greenspan is criticized for both creating and causing the burst of dotcom bubble in 2000. It is popularly believed that the easy monetary policy unleashed by him during 1990s to support Clinton's deficit reduction program led to creation of massive dotcom bubble. It is also a popular belief that hiking rates many times by Greenspan in 2000 led to bursting of dotcom bubble. Both the popular beliefs are however contradicted by the empirical evidence. Greenspan was actually a monetarist who religiously followed the Taylor Rule of inflation targeting. In 2000 also, he started raising the rates only after the bubble had already burst. Till the party was on, he neither hiked rates nor tightened the margin requirements. He again supported the markets by a series of cuts post 9/11 incident and was widely blamed for rise in asset prices, especially gold and building of sub-prime crisis.
The detractors of present Fed Chairman are criticizing him for taking the economy for a tiger ride. They fear that the ride could end only in one way, i.e., the tiger jumps off the cliff taking the economy into the deep abyss with it.
(Strangely, back home RBI is being criticized for not emulating the central bankers like US Federal Reserve, European Central Bank and Bank of Japan etc.)
As an investor, I am carefully watching the global monetary policy actions and taking note of the following:
(a)   The printing of new money by Fed, ECB and BoJ may not be too much of a problem as yet, as presently the money velocity is at lowest in recorded history, and any new dollar printed does not augments the money supply in any measure. So one should be watching money velocity more closely rather than the amount of new dollar/EUR/JPY printed.
(b)   As per the Bank of International Settlement recent data, the current total international debt securities outstanding is over USD25trn. Out of this about 50% debt is denominated in USD terms, and about USD2trn of this USD denominated debt is maturing in next 12 months. Despite the unprecedented amount of load on the printing presses, there may not be sufficient USD available in the world to discharge these liabilities.
One should be watching this space closely to see how this debt is discharged or rolled over and at what price. Shortage of USD in international markets for discharging these liabilities could result in temporary spike in USD exchange rates. The borrowers who are not fully hedged against their USD liabilities could face serious solvency issues. Also the effort to develop an alternate reserve currency, preferably a neutral currency, shall also accelerate putting pressure on USD. This game of push & pill might lead to heightened volatility in currency market raising the cost of hedging. The impact on exporters' earnings needs to be observed closely.
(c)    More than USD11trn worth of bonds are presently yielding a negative return. This means the low rates are here to stay for longer; and the central bank shall continue to pump in cash in the system to grease the wheels of economy. The COVID-19 led deeper recession shall require even more new money to fill the larger fiscal gaps. For next couple of years this should not be too much of a worry for asset owners. But one needs to be prepared for the eventual collapse of the fragile mountain of debt.
....to continue tomorrow