Tuesday, November 12, 2013

Food inflation conundrum II

Thought for the day
“If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts.”
-          Albert Einstein (German, 1879-1955)
Word of the day
Lam (v)
To beay; thrash
(Source: Dictionary.com)
Shri Nārada Uvāca
A large majority of Delhites indulge in a variety of corrupt acts in their daily routine –squatting on public land being the most popular act of corruption.
No political party has spoken about this so far.

Food inflation conundrum II

…continuing from yesterday
As we suggested yesterday, to bring down food inflation on a sustainable basis, it is critical to make agriculture a viable business.
In our view it would take a combination of administrative, legal, social, economic and financial sector reforms to achieve the objective.
In short the following three things need to happen, viz., (a) Substantial rise in productivity; (b) Substantial rise in price of agriculture produce; and/or (c) fall in price of agriculture land.
Rise in productivity
Our discussion with many farmers, agriculture scientists and rural activists across states in North India, suggests that a substantial rise in productivity is possible without cumbersome land, marketing and labor reforms or building expensive infrastructure.
Some aggressively promotion of collective farming, institutionalization of farm equipment rental business, creating more awareness about intensive farming and moving the farmers away from traditional cereal crops towards cash crops could enhance yields by 50-100% in most cases.
In our view, the Food Security Bill, if implemented in right earnest could transform Indian agriculture from a mere self sustenance activity into a truly commercial activity.
Financial inclusion is another tool that could enhance productivity by making affordable institutional credit to small and marginal farmers.
Substantial rise in prices of agriculture produce
A substantial rise (2 to 3x) in most agriculture produce could potentially bring back interest in agriculture sector and incentivize substantial investment leading to higher productivity and eventually lower food inflation.
This one time measure could help making taxation of this sector politically and finically feasible thus improving the fiscal balance of the country.
The negative could be substantial rise in food inflation in the short term leading to higher rates and thus lower industrial growth and lower overall household savings.
Substantial fall in land prices
Substantial fall in prices of agriculture land could also help in improving yields and therefore attract fresh investments in the sector.
Such a fall, however could have serious impact on the consumer discretionary spend, as a large part of the growth in discretionary spending has been contributed by the wealth effect created through higher land prices.
The best solution therefore would come only from a mix of the above three. Any solution on these lines would take 3-5years to implement and another 3-5years to have a meaningful impact on structure of food inflation.
Tomorrow we shall discuss a real life case study to illustrate our point.

No comments:

Post a Comment