Wednesday, July 31, 2019

What's bothering Indian equities - 1



Some food for thought
"Honesty is a good thing, but it is not profitable to its possessor unless it is kept under control.
—Don Marquis (American Poet, 1878-1937)
Word for the day
Nisus (n)
An effort or striving toward a particular goal or attainment; impulse.
 
First thought this morning
The festival season has started in India with Shravan Mela. It will gather pace with Eid-ul-Adha (Bakr Id), Ganpati Festivals, followed by Navratri, Dussera, Diwali, Christmas, New Years of all the communities, and end with Holi.
This is the period when the entire country is in celebratory mood. Post monsoon crop brings prosperity and marriage season post harvest brings joy and ushers new hopes.
Unfortunately, over the years the religious practices and rituals for celebrating these festivals have degenerated to a large extent. Vanity and pretense have clouded the devotion and faith. To many, festivals bring stress and ailments instead of joy and bliss.
Millions of animals are sacrificed on Eid and waste is left to rot in the open, making it a major health hazard. Millions of PoP idols of Lord of Wisdom Ganesha and destroyer of all evil Mother Durga, laced with harmful chemicals are submerged in public water bodies, causing irreparable damage. Millions of tonnes of firecrackers are bursts on Diwali and New Year, making the already most polluted air in world a little more dangerous for the citizens.
The most unfortunate part is that the citizens who suffer most from the degeneration of these religious practices and rituals have turned this critical issue of protecting environment, for the sake of future generations, into an internecine communal debate.
A strong narrative has been built that since one community is allowed to pollute therefore all community must have the right to do so! A deluge of social media message is created to encourage citizens to defy Supreme Court orders and civil society's appeals and destroy the already fragile ecology of our cities and towns.
The elected governments are scared to intervene for the fear of losing popularity. The enforcement agencies refuse to follow court orders for the fear of stoking civil unrest. Citizens try their best to outdo other communities in destroying the ecology. Civil society makes some feeble protest, but since these are mostly (and strangely) targeted at majority community, these protests are rejected with utmost contempt and derision.
Something urgently needs to be done to reverse this trend of self destruction. No politician today seems to capable of doing it. We the citizen of India must take the initiative and pledge our contribution in terms of self restraint. We must denounce religious rituals and practices which could destroy both the religion and the followers. Its time to demonstrate the power of ONE.
Chart of the day

What's bothering Indian equities - 1
Indian equity are going through a sever correction since February 2018. For first 6months the correction was mostly limited to broader markets. However since September 2018, almost the entire market, with the exception of a handful of stocks, has seen significant price erosion.
In this context, it may be interesting to note the following:
1.    The current market cycle started from the presentation of Budget for FY17 on 29 February 2016 when Nifty made an intraday low of 6825. Since then Nifty has given a CAGR of 14.8%. Midcap and Small Cap Indices have returned a CAGR of 10.1% and 7.7% for the 41 months period since February 2016. India has outperformed most of the major global equity markets in this period.
In the previous major market cycle (June 2006 to March 2009), Nifty had not returned anything, while midcap and smallcap returned a negative yield of -4.2% and -12.7% respectively.
Some readers may be tempted to assume that there may be significant downside still left in the current market cycle. But in my view, a comparison with 2006-09 market cycle may not be totally appropriate given that period witnessed total freezing of global financial markets, which is not the case this time. Most global markets have either not seen a frenzied rally like previous cycle or have already corrected significantly.
2.    From March 2016 till yesterday, foreign investors have put in Rs125bn in Indian equities (primary and secondary market). The domestic institutions have invested Rs223bn in the same period.
This investment is positive but not significant in historical context, if we measure this as percentage of market capitalization.


Moreover, the much talked about FPI selling appears routine if seen in context of trends of past three years. Domestic money has not shown any signs of withdrawal so far.
 


3.    Nifty 50 has corrected ~8% from its recent high, whereas the broader markets have witnessed much deeper correction. Nifty Midcap and Nifty Small Cap have fallen ~24% and ~42% respectively from there last top.
 
4.    The period from February 2016 has witnessed some significant events like total and sudden demonetization of high denomination currency notes, implementation of nationwide GST, identification and large amount of NPAs for Indian banks and beginning of resolution process under new Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC).
The popular narrative is that the market correction has been caused primarily due the factors like to tax imposed on long term capital gains, additional tax imposed on super rich and certain class of foreign investors, solvency crisis in non banking finance companies, consumer demand slowdown, export slowdown due to global trade conflicts, lack of adequate policy response in terms of monetary & fiscal stimulus and public investment etc.
I am however not able to find convincing evidence about these issues having material impact on the markets. Even in the Month of July so far, net institutional investment in Indian equities is about Rs60bn positive.
I am inclined to believe that the market correction may have more to do with some fundamentals issue about the listed companies' performance and perhaps some structural regulatory issues like failure in breaking the promoter-operator nexus.....more on this tomorrow.
 

Tuesday, July 30, 2019

Enforce rule of law and ensure certainty of policy

Some food for thought
"Thank goodness I was never sent to school; it would have rubbed off some of the originality."
—Beatrix Potter (English Author, 1866-1943)
Word for the day
Fulgurant (adj)
Flashing like lightning.
 
First thought this morning
Reportedly, Prime Minister Narendra Modi will feature in an episode of Man vs. Wild, to be aired on Discovery Channel on 12th August 2019. Enticing stills from the episode, with PM enjoying the wilderness of Uttrakhand with UK television presenter and adventurer Edward Michael Grylls, popularly known as Bear Grylls, are splashed all over the internet.
Distressed participants in financial markets, stressed businessmen and disenchanted commoners have naturally reacted negatively on the social media. The general feeling is that the prime minister himself should be focusing more on the economic slowdown and depressed markets rather than indulging in this almost contemptuous show of love for nature.
On the other hand there are many who believe that this rendezvous of prime minister is important from two viewpoints: (a) It encourages countrymen to see that PM is in full control; and (b) the real socio-economic conditions may not be as bad as the popular narrative on social media, pink papers and blue TV channels is indicating.
I would avoid taking a view this morning, but honestly I am not comfortable with the present socio-economic environment.
Chart of the day

 
Enforce rule of law and ensure certainty of policy
The first thing after assuming charge of office, the incumbent Chief Minister of Andhra Pradesh had ordered cancellation of many projects awarded by the preceding government (see here).
Andhra Pradesh Government has also decided to reopen power purchase agreements (PPAs) inked under the previous TDP government, that could potentially bring 5.2GW solar and wind energy projects with an estimated debt exposure of over INR21,000cr under stress (see here). The state seems to be moving ahead with this proposal despite strong request from central government (see here) and order of the High Court (see here).
Subsequently, the World Bank decided to "drop" funding of “Amaravati Sustainable Infrastructure and Institutional Development Project”, seriously affecting the future of the project which has already swallowed Rs 45,000 crore worth of public money with less than twenty per cent of the work completed. (See here) Following the World Bank, the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) has also decided to withdraw from funding the project. The decision to withdraw funding has been reportedly taken after the Central Government withdrew its request for funding of this project.
I understand from various sources that the Chief Minister Office has also ordered a hold on payments due to contractors for various projects under execution, pending investigation of any irregularity in awarding of contracts by the preceding government.
Reportedly, the newly sworn in Chief Minister of Karnataka has also expressed his intention to review the decisions taken by the preceding government.
These decisions to "review" or "cancel" contracts awarded by outgoing administrations are ostensibly "anti corruption" measures, giving the incumbent governments a high moral ground. We have therefore not seen much outcry against such appalling decisions. Media, central government, corporate, civil society, youth, and judiciary all seem to have accepted this as fait accompli.
The immediate impact of these decisions is -
(a)   Firms which have invested in capacity building to execute the contracts "under review" and/or part execution of the contracts face losses and uncertain future;
(b)   The lenders who have funded the firms for execution of these contracts face uncertainty about the realization of loans already disbursed and future demand of funds;
(c)    Political risk exacerbate to a new level. This "review" process sets dangerous precedence for all future government contracts. This might deter all firms to bid for government contracts, especially during the last couple years of the term of the government.
(d)   Investors will take a negative view of the government business leading to material erosion in the valuation of contractors executing government projects. We have already seen almost 40% erosion in the share price of NCC Limited, who got Rs61bn worth of order cancelled by the Andhra Government in past two months.
The worst impact of such actions is however immeasurable. The trust deficit between private enterprise and government has been a major impediment to the growth and development of the country. These actions would only further widen the deficit.
I understand that besides these latest instances of government reneging on its contractual obligations, there are numerous cases where the governments (central as well as state) are refusing to honor arbitration awards given in favor of contractors like HCC Limited and others.
This also reminds me about the concerns and promises made in the recently released Economic Survey 2019. For example, consider the following:
Chapter 05, Part 1 of Economic Survey 2019
"Arguably the single biggest constraint to ease of doing business in India is now the ability to enforce contracts and resolve disputes."
"The relationship between economic governance and the Rule of Law (Dandaniti) has been emphasized by Indian thinkers since ancient times. It is seen as the key to prosperity, and a bulwark against Matsyanyaya (i.e. law of the fish/jungle). It should be no surprise, therefore, that the Preamble to the Constitution of India defines that the first role of the State is ‘to secure for all its citizens: Justice, social, economic, and political’. In other words, it is well accepted that economic success and prosperity are closely linked to the ability to enforce contracts and resolve disputes."
"India continues to lag on the indicator for enforcing contracts, climbing only one rank from 164 to 163 in the latest report of EODB, 2018."
Chapter 06, Part 1 of Economic Survey 2019
"What is the effect of uncertainty/ambiguity in policy making on the investment climate in the economy?" "...such uncertainty can spook investors and spoil the investment climate in the economy. Such uncertainty in economic policy can be avoided. In contrast, a nation state that ensures predictability of policy action, provides forward guidance on policy action, maintains broad consistency in actual policy with the forward guidance, reduces ambiguity and arbitrariness in policy implementation creates economic policy certainty. Investors may enjoy the certainty provided by such an environment and flock to invest in this environment."
The government recognizes that the biggest impediment to the ease of doing business in India is State's inability to "enforce contracts and resolve disputes". And policy uncertainly and ambiguity could "spook investors and spoil investment climate".
Despite this realization we see absolutely no effort to guarantee at least the contracts where the government is a party. In fact as per several reports, the government itself is the largest litigant in the country.