Showing posts with label Market Cycle. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Market Cycle. Show all posts

Tuesday, February 15, 2022

A visit to the markets

 The markets have been in a punishing mood for the past couple of weeks. Especially after the “path breaking budget”, the markets seem to be adjusting to the RBI’s rather tepid growth forecast for 2HFY23. Obviously, the RBI does not share the enthusiasm of the government over public sector capex triggering a virtuous cycle of growth led by private sector investment.

The narrative of geopolitics (Russia-Ukraine conflict) and Fed tightening scaring the markets does not sound credible.

Russia and Ukraine have been at war for three decades, since the dismantling of the USSR. Eight year ago, in 2014 Russia annexed one of the larger provinces of Ukraine (Crimea) and markets have not cared much about that, just like it has learned to live with the perennial conflicts between Israel and Philistine; US and Iran, South Korea and North Korea, India and Pakistan; etc.

The US Federal Reserve started winding up its asset buying program (QE) last year and announced its intent to hike policy rates once QE ends in March 2022. There is no surprise for markets in this. There is overwhelming empirical evidence to suggest that Fed rate hikes that control inflation but do not hurt the growth have been usually benevolent for equity markets, especially emerging markets. The most hawkish forecasts are projecting the Fed policy rates to peak at much lower levels as compared to previous rate cycles. Building a disastrous outcome for markets like the 1980s or 2000 due to Fed rates may be inappropriate since in those cases rates peaked at 20% and 6% respectively, as against 3.5% worst forecast this time.


The argument of money debasement and hence rates peaking at lower level is actually favorable for equities, since it allows higher valuations to sustain for longer.



Another popular narrative on the street is that the ongoing correction may be a great opportunity to buy. Millions of experts on social media are saying with the benefit of hindsight that all such corrections in the past were great investment opportunities which people regretted later.

I see their point, but would like to understand where we stand in the current market cycle? If the current market is not complete yet, we may experience material pain in the coming months. In the past two market cycles (2006-2009 and 2016-2020), the market had given up most of its gain towards the end. In fact, the smallcap indices ended both the cycle with net losses. In the current cycle we are close to 10% off from highs recorded so far in the cycle. Both Nifty50 and Nifty Midcap are more than 100% higher from the starting point whereas Nifty Smallcap is 200% higher from the starting point. Never have the market cycles have ended like this.


We certainly have a long way to go in this market cycle. If the peak has already been recorded, we may see 25-50% correction in broader markets; else we may have some distance to move north. More on this tomorrow.

 



Wednesday, March 25, 2020

Change is only permanent thing



The past 5 weeks have been most horrific period for investors in financial since the five week period in September-October 2008. A colossal destruction of investors' wealth has already taken place.
There is an argument that this destruction is only a notional mark to market (MTM) loss if the investors' continue to hold the securities, as the prices will certainly recover as soon as the COVID-19 is contained; may be in 3-6 months. The proponents of this view are cautioning the investors that selling the securities at this point in time will convert the temporary MTM losses into permanent erosion in wealth.
Some readers have asked about my view on this argument. I have already expressed my views on this issue multiple times in past few months. Nonetheless, I do not mind a reiteration.
I believe that the market cycle in India that started from 2013 has definitely ended. Historically, the sectors and stocks that lead a particular market cycle, are not found to be leaders of the subsequent market cycle. Commodities in the early 1990s, financials in the mid-1990s, ITeS in the early 2000s, infrastructure in the late 2000s, and consumers in the past five years are some examples. Many star performers in these cycles (Andhra Cement, SAIL, VLS Finance, IFCI, IDBI, DSQ Software, Pentamedia, Suzlon, BHEL, Reliance Infra, JP Associates etc) did never recover their losses. Irrespective of the fact whether the investors sold these stocks during panic periods that marked the end of respective market cycles or held these stocks for many more years, their losses have been permanent in nature. In fact holding these stocks longer has only exacerbated the losses.
In my view, we would need to distinguish between the investors in mutual and investors who like to invest in securities directly.
Ideally, those investors who have invested in a mutual fund should not be worried, because the professional fund managers managing their money must recognize the need and time for change and adjust the fund portfolios accordingly. For example, most mutual funds today are not holding stocks of ADAG, JP Group, Suzlon, etc. Most of them would have sold the embattled Yes Bank, Vodafone, Zee Entertainment etc. also. By not redeeming these mutual funds during panic bottoms, investors may hope to recover their temporary MTM losses in due course.
However, this may not be true in the case of individual investors, who refuse or fail to effect necessary changes in their security holdings with the changing times. From my experience I know that many investors are still clinging on to the stars of previous cycles, which have become duds with almost no chance of recovery. For such investors, not selling during the times of panic may actually result in higher permanent losses.
It is also important to note that not selecting a good mutual fund manager may also result in MTM losses becoming permanent losses. A fund manager who is not dynamic and pragmatic enough to read the economic and market trends quickly may remain saddled with the non-performing assets for long, thus causing material permanent losses to the investors both in terms of erosion in portfolio value and opportunity cost.
Personally, I would therefore not buy or keep holding something just because it has fallen 50-60% from its recent highs. My portfolios of my mutual funds will definitely adjust as per the times, because I am confident about quality of my fund managers. My direct equity and debt holdings, I have already changed.

Friday, October 11, 2019

Fear dominating the greed

In past few months, a large number of prominent market experts have publically stated that the present phase of market correction is perhaps the worst they have seen in their life time. Many of them have recently indicated that the Indian equity prices may be close to their bottom and a recovery is imminent.
In view of these assertions by the prominent market personalities, I find it pertinent to examine, whether equity prices are close to hitting the rock (if not hit already).
For me, the most successful, though intuitive indicator of market bottoming is the dominance of "fear" over "greed". The phenomenon is usually reflected by a combination of the following three factors:
(a)   Sharp underperformance of broader markets as compared to the benchmark indices, for the current market cycle.
(b)   Materially negative market breadth for the current market cycle, indicating capitulation of large number of non institutional investors.
(c)    Sharp rise in market volatility.
Current market cycle
There is difference of opinion as to when the current market cycle actually started. The purist believe that the current market cycle started from end of August 2013, when the newly appointed RBI governor unleashed aggressive measures to stem the worsening CAD and the finance minister also announced a number of measures and Nifty bottomed at 5287 on 27 August 2013.
Whereas a number of market participants believe that the cycle that started in 2013 ended in mid February 2016, and a new cycle started with presentation of budget for FY17 on 29 February 2016 after a Nifty closing of 6825 on previous day.
Untitled.png

 
Both the groups have different parameters for the Nifty bottoming. The first group believes that the current market cycle shall end with Nifty breaching 10k mark in next 6-8months. Whereas the second group believes that the Nifty has already made a bottom on 19th September 2019 around 10700 level, even though a new cycle in Nifty may take some time to commence.
I am inclined towards the latter group and believe that the current market cycle is close to the bottom, though a sustainable up move may be 6-9 months away. In the interim lower levels for Nifty may not be completely ruled out.
Greed and Fear Index
Scenario 1: Present market cycle started in August 2013
If we presume the current market cycle started from August 2013, the greed and fear index is far from bottoming.
(a)   The market breadth is overwhelmingly positive for NIFTY500 as well broader markets.
(b)   The CAGR for mid and small cap indices is much better than the benchmark index.
Scenario 1: Present market cycle started in August 2013
If we take the current market cycle from February 2016, the greed and fear index is close to the bottom.
(a)   The overall market breadth has become negative while for Nifty500 it is a healthy 2:1, implying the capitulation for low quality stocks.
(b)   The CAGR for small cap (8%) is almost half of benchmark index (15%) and close to the bank deposit rate leaving no risk premium for the investors.

 
Both in 2013 and 2016, the cycle changes were accompanied by the heightened volatility. We are currently witnessing a similar phenomenon, which supports the hypothesis that the fear may have begun to dominate the greed.
Untitled.png
 
To conclude, in my view the Indian equity markets are close to completing the bottoming process for the current market cycle that started in February 2016. The next cycle may commence anytime in next 6-9 months, but it is more likely to start in 2H2020.