Showing posts with label BHEL. Show all posts
Showing posts with label BHEL. Show all posts

Friday, June 19, 2020

Investors Beware - 4

In past few days there has been heightened activity in stocks of the companies which are perceived to be beneficiaries of the "war" (trade or military) with China. My fellow small investors are lapping stocks making defence equipments, telecom equipments and missiles, as if there is going to be an attack on China tonight. The stock prices of many such stocks have risen by 10-25% this week. The stock price of a public sector power equipment manufacturer gained on the assumption that the government might ban Chinese competitors and the order book of this company may swell. Some pharma, chemical and agro chemical companies also witnessed action based on assumption of trade restrictions with China. The businesses dependent on imports from China witnessed selling pressure, while the businesses considered to be the alternative to the Chinese impost saw extra buying interest.
I would like to request my fellow investors to exercise some extra caution and restraint while jumping in buy the "beneficiaries" of the "war" with China. They must at least take note of the following points, before making any investment decision based on this impulse.
(a)   A war, small or prolonged, with China will have disastrous impact on both Indian and Chinese economy. By extension it will also impact the global economy. The war with China will not be limited to stones and iron rods, as the recent reported skirmishes have been. It will be fought on ground, in air, in the ocean and most importantly in the cyberspace. Pakistan for sure would like to engage Indian forces in the western and northern sectors to distract Indian forces in order to help its ally China. Moreover, given that China is finding itself cornered due the suspicions over its role in spread of COVID-19 across the world, and has been mustering allies who can support it on the global platforms, there are chances that the conflict may expand beyond Sino-India borders.
The point to note is that a war, even if it lasts less than a week, could have disastrous economic impact in terms of disruptions and costs (economic and human). Higher taxation, higher inflation and higher rates would be the most natural consequences. If the assumption is 'war" then the investors would be better off buying USD with all their money rather than buying mid and small cap companies which may or may not survive a 5 day war.
(b)   Accept it or not, as of today China is an integral part of India's economy. Millions of small businesses, traders, retailers, and footpath vendors depend overwhelmingly on the Chinese imports for their livelihood. Without a credible rehabilitation scheme for millions of these people dependent on trade with China, the "Boycott China" campaign in not going to be successful in any measure. If you want to fully assimilate what I am saying, take a round of you local market and see for yourself.
(c)    A large number of large businesses are dependent on the imports from China to carry out their manufacturing activities. They import critical raw materials, engineering products, plant & machinery and spare parts for their plant & machinery from China. Sourcing all these from alternative sources may either not be feasible or may be materially expensive.
(d)   A large number of large businesses have a big market for their final products in China. Finding alternative markets may be difficult for these businesses.
(e)    A significant number of global companies are looking to shift their operations from China. The governments of emerging markets like India are willing to go out of their way to attract these companies to their shores. Some of these companies may finally land up in India. This will be both threat and opportunity for Indian businesses. Some businesses may face enhanced competitive pressure from these global companies which relocate to India from China, while others may gain from becoming part of a larger global supply chain. Betting on who will gain and who will lose from this shift in global supply chain is a difficult task even for most of the sophisticated investors.
(f)    Chinese investors have invested, directly or indirectly, in a large number of Indian businesses. Many startups rely heavily on Chinese funds or technical support for their businesses. Many plants and infrastructure projects have been or are being built by Chinese companies. Their completion and maintenance could be severely impacted if the trade relations with China worsen due to war. The Indian promoters may lose heavily if this were to happen.
I am certainly not against the goals of self reliance and import substitution. But these things cannot be achieved over night and without tremendous pain. A long term strategy and willingness to bear the pain is what is needed to attain these goals. Rhetorical nationalism and mindless jingoism may lead to devastating consequences. In my view it will take 10-15years of meticulous planning, diplomacy and execution for us to meaningfully reduce "Made in China" from our day to day life. Doing a BTST (Buy Today Sell Tomorrow) trade on this theme can only bring losses. So at best it is avoidable.
Also note that the transition from a agro economy to industrial economy is a slow and excruciating process. Expecting quick results may lead to avoidable disappointment. Remember:
(a)   Most of the claimed "Demand" in India is still "Need". The "capacity to pay" that is quintessential to "Demand" is still low.
(b)   The "Democracy" is both the strength and weakness of India in economic context. Unlike China, it is not an easy order here to override sustainability concerns and regional aspirations for faster economic growth. Socio-political consideration would continue to take precedence over pure economic concerns.
(c)    The "Demography" is a still a raw strength. Without substantial investment in "gender equality" and "skill development" this resource cannot be exploited fully.
 
Image

Tuesday, June 16, 2020

Investors beware


The public sector capital goods bellwether company Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited (BHEL), reported its earnings for the fourth quarter and financial year ended on 31 March 2020. The numbers were poor and quite off the mark from what the equity research analysts had forecasted. For the quarter 4QFY20, the company reported total revenue of Rs50.5bn (vs Rs103.7 yoy); and for the full year FY20 the company reported revenue of Rs210.9bn (vs Rs304.41bn yoy). The revenue for the quarter was down ~51% yoy; and for the full year it was down ~29% yoy.
The research updates on BHEL by various brokerages raised three points in mind, which I find are critical for investors (especially the smaller one like me) to assimilate. I would like to share these points with the readers as follows:
(a)   In the notes to account, BHEL reported that in 9 days of lockdown (23rd March to 31 March) Rs40bn of revenue was lost. This is appx 39% of the 4QFY19 revenue and 13% of the full year FY19 revenue.
A large number of companies which have declared results so far have reported similar loss of revenue. (Please note I am talking about revenue here not profit). To me this sounds disproportionate for most of the companies.
I have spoken some senior chartered accountants to understand this phenomenon. Most of them informed that it is a regular practice amongst Indian corporates to manipulate the revenue of the month of March. In some cases the revenue of March month is shifted to next financial year (April); and in the other cases the revenue earned in April is accounted for in the month of March. In the last week of the year, some auto and FMCG companies dump inventory to their dealers to book revenue which is not actually earned. Conversely, in cases where the companies want to show lower revenue and/or profit, they book "sales returns" in the month of March and "resale" in the subsequent months.
In case of project oriented companies (real estate, project construction etc), which follows percentage of completion method the practice of manipulating the revenue for month of March could be even more widespread.
Please note that lower revenue booked in the Month of March by most companies is certainly not due to accounting issues, for they get full 3 months to complete the accounts for the financial year and month of March.
(b)   The consensus estimates of various equity analysts for BHEL 4QFY20 revenue was Rs87bn. It reported revenue of Rs50.5bn instead. There have been wide divergences in the analysts' estimates and actual reported number, even when adjusted for no recurring and exceptional items. In past five year, I have noticed, the one year forward Nifty EPS estimates consistently diverging 12-18% from the actual numbers.
This must raise serious questions about the efficacy and utility of the forecasting portion of the equity research function. There is enough evidence that the forecasting by research analysts has been off the mark; still a large number of non institutional investors place material reliance of such forecasts. SEBI must consider making it mandatory for the research analysts to adequately explain the divergence in their forecasts and the actual adjusted numbers; else the analysts may be restrained from making forecasts.
(c)    BHEL is a navratna company. For past one decade it's been racing fast downhill to join the junk yard with MTNL, Air India et al. Quarter after quarter its balance sheet is deteriorating; and revenue & profit growth is declining. No one in the government however appears concerned. Its hard to fathom, why BHEL was not privatized a decade ago, and why it is not being done even today!