Friday, September 22, 2017

Enigma of inflation

"It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere."
—Voltaire (French 1694-1778)
Word for the day
Concatenation (n)
A series of interconnected or interdependent things or events.
Malice towards none
Do the TV channels daily broadcasting sponsored programs of quacks and suspicious preachers have any moral right to speak against superstitions and malpractices prevalent in the society? Also do the newspapers carrying prostitution advertisement under garb of friendship clubs, massage services etc., should be heard on the matter of women exploitation?
First random thought this morning
Is it a mere coincidence or the current administration (both at center and state level) is making serious attempts to correct a number of distortions in the Islamic practices especially relating to mexploitation of Muslim women, like Triple Talaq, NIkah Halala, Nikah Mutah, etc.?
Regardless of anything this is a welcome development and should be appreciated by all.
Making it clear that establishment will not seek to exploit the issue for electoral advantage, may minimize the resistance from Muslim male too.

Enigma of inflation

For a common man like me on the street, who is blissfully ignorant of the principles of economics and public finances, inflation is nothing but an enigma. The rising prices do hit him hard, but that also lead to rise in his nominal income and hence social stature. Higher nominal interest rate on his savings, higher notional value of his house & jewellery; and higher rental for the spare room on the top floor provides him some psychological comfort, at the least.
As I see it, for a common man, inflation is more of an income inequality issue than anything else. For example consider the following:
(a)   A farmer should gain maximum from the food inflation. Given that over 60% population is engaged in the farming and related activities, theoretically consistently high food inflation should result in transfer of wealth from non-farm sector to the farm sector. But this has not been the case in any of the high food inflation episodes in past seven decades. The gap between rural and non-rural income and wealth has been consistently widening.
(b)   The food inflation should also benefit the urban middle class. The expense on food for a typical Indian middle class family is not more than 40% and a typical middle class household saves 25% of his income. If food inflation is 10%, a 5% rise in nominal income should be sufficient to offset that.
Besides, they would need sufficient rise in nominal income and asset prices and interest rates to offset the erosion in real value of their savings. This perhaps has not happened in past many decades, implying that nominal rise in asset prices and interest rates has not been consistent with the general rise in price levels. The wealth is thus consistently getting transferred from savers to borrowers.
(c)    One could argue that transfer of wealth from farmer and urban middle classes to trader and indebted industrialist is a function of risk they take.
But if we consider the history of NPA cycles, and exploits by moneylenders this argument gets weaker. Large borrowers have been consistently transferring the risk to public sector banks, and hence the common public, through frequent defaults. The money lenders in informal sector have been fairly successful in exploiting the household and farmer borrowers, not allowing any benefit of inflation to them.
The equation in energy inflation (mostly imported or arising due to state inefficiency) and core inflation is different, but impact is mostly the same.
In my view, therefore inflation has been a medium of wealth transfer from common man to the rich. The current raging debate over rise in prices of food therefore has to be seem from this angle also.
I have been highlighting that at the current productivity level farming in India is mostly an unremunerative business. A multifold rise in either farm productivity or prices can only correct this situation.
I would seek readers' view on this problem, before I take up it in some detail.

No comments:

Post a Comment