Monday, December 22, 2014

2015: Global narrative is scary

Thought for the day
"You can't depend on your eyes when your imagination is out of focus."
-          Mark Twain (American, 1835-1910)
Word for the day
Larrikin (adj)
Disorderly; Rowdy.
(Source: Dictionary.com)
Teaser for the day
Should the Representation of the People Act, be amended to add the following ground for automatic disqualification of elected representatives:
"If he/she stands or speaks in the house without explicit permission of the presiding officer."

2015: Global narrative is scary

In past three months the global narrative has turned really scary. I am sure, Santa this year will have a really tough time, for the number of prayers are going to be much larger, louder and desperate.
I find myself thoroughly incapable in expressing the fear in my own words, as I do not feel it with the same intensity, sitting at a distance. I am therefore reproducing some popular sentiments.
China will be the focus of many, many boardroom discussions around the world next year. Unlike most previous years, the topic won’t be whether to double down on China—it will be whether to hold or even reduce exposure to a particular sector or the country overall. With China experiencing lower growth, greater competition, and more volatility, it won’t only be multinational companies having these conversations. (McKinsey & Co.)
A look at the long-term charts of the DXY Index shows just how massive the potential reversal of this trend is; and based on Raoul’s roadmap, the sheer size of the reversal gives us a strong hint of the degree of carnage that will be wrought upon a world in which the dollar carry trade has reached somewhere between $5 trillion and $9 trillion. (Mauldin economic)
Greece is back, front and centre — just as it was at the beginning of the euro crisis in 2010 and at the depths of the euro crisis in 2011. The only difference is that now, after several more years of depressionary policies have been foisted upon the people of that proud nation, the likelihood of an establishment victory (and thereby a continuance of the status quo) is far less than at either of those previous junctures. (Mauldin economic)
Do you want to know if the stock market is going to crash next year? Just keep an eye on junk bonds.  Prior to the horrific collapse of stocks in 2008, high yield debt collapsed first. And as you will see below, high yield debt is starting to crash again. The primary reason for this is the price of oil. The energy sector accounts for approximately 15 to 20 percent of the entire junk bond market, and those energy bonds are taking a tremendous beating right now. This panic in energy bonds is infecting the broader high yield debt market, and investors have been pulling money out at a frightening pace. And as I have written about previously, almost every single time junk bonds decline substantially, stocks end up following suit. (The Economics Collapse)
In the last two Absolute Return Letters I have argued why one should expect global GDP growth to be below average over the next decade or so, why interest rates should, as a consequence, remain low and why equity returns should also disappoint. (Absolute Return Partners)
In Europe, so far, Germany has been repatriating gold since 2012 from the US and France, The Netherlands has repatriated 122.5 tonnes a few weeks ago from the US, soon after Marine Le Pen, leader of the Front National party of France, penned an open letter to Christian Noyer, governor of the Bank of France, requesting that the country’s gold holdings be repatriated back to France; and now Belgium is making a move. Who’s next? And why are all these countries seemingly so nervous to get their gold ASAP on own soil? (Grant Williams)
In short, between Europe and Japan, thanks to the BOJ and ECB, there will be literally no bonds that will make their way from the primary to the secondary market! Which means only one thing: those looking for the marginal, and only, source of high quality collateral in 2015, will find it coming right out of 1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW in Washington. And that assumes, very generously, that that other famous institution located on Constitution Avenue Northwest doesn't come out of hibernation and resume soaking up collateral on its own if and when the S&P500 finally corrects from its unprecedented, and manipulated, bubble levels. (Goldman Sach via Zero Hedge)
Off-shore lending in US dollars has soared to $9 trillion and poses a growing risk to both emerging markets and the world's financial stability, the Bank for International Settlements has warned.
The Swiss-based global watchdog said dollar loans to Chinese banks and companies are rising at annual rate of 47pc. They have jumped to $1.1 trillion from almost nothing five years ago. Cross-border dollar credit has ballooned to $456bn in Brazil, and $381bn in Mexico. External debt has reached $715bn in Russia, mostly in dollars.
A chunk of China's borrowing is disguised as intra-firm financing. This replicates practices by German industrial companies in the 1920s, which hid their real level of exposure as the 1929 debt trauma was building up. (BIS via Telegraph)
Do you remember seeing old pictures of the Great Depression which depicted “lines?”  There were two types, bread lines and also lines to the front doors of banks. While we don’t see any bread lines today, trust me, there are bread lines in every single state and long ones at that. Nearly 50 million people in the U.S. survive on SNAP, EBT cards or whatever they are called in your state. Can you imagine the “confidence” it would instill if each day on your way to work you saw massive lines of people waiting for breakfast? Or, when you came home from work you turn on your television only to see long lines again, this time for supper? I can see it now, some reporter out on the street giving us the “good” unemployment, inflation or GDP news with a line of people in the background waiting for food. My point? False economic news would be harder to “sell” and even harder to “stomach” (pun intended). (Bill Holter in Miles Franklin Blog)
It was during this period at the end of the 1960s and the beginning of the 1970s that the Bretton Woods system of fixed exchange rates was breaking down, with key developments in 1971 and 1973. There was much academic debate over fixed versus flexible exchange rates. More economists appeared to support fixed rates, but the other side had the advantage of being led by Milton Friedman. As it turned out, however, flexible rates were not “chosen” but were what was left when fixed rates collapsed. My take away from that period most relevant today is that it is foolish to try to save a fixed exchange rate after it has come under severe attack. I’ve heard talk all day on the large amount of reserves held by Russia and whether they would be used to defend the collapsing Ruble. In my opinion, that would be a total waste of resources. The only cure for a Ruble down 50 percent is to let it go down even more, until the market recognizes the undershoot. (Bob McTeer)

No comments:

Post a Comment