Prior to 2009 elections, the scare
of communists and Mayawati coming to
power was so pervasive that nobody was willing to even reason why the
communists were bad and why it was not questionable for Dr. Manmohan Singh to
risk the government in the extremely tough global conditions, for civil nuclear
deal whose benefits, if at all, would be seen only beyond 2020.
In our view equal credit for MNREGA and RTI, two major
reforms done during UPA I should be
given to the communists, who ensured that the Congress Party stays focused on
the promise of inclusive growth and accountable administration.
We do not consider UPA II a coalition. TMC, NCP, DMK all
have same socio-economic agenda as the Congress.
Heading into a major election, especially when the outcome is as
uncertain as it could be, it is natural for investors to be jittery about the
politics & policy environment and its likely impact on the financial
markets.
We however find little evidence to suggest that elections, the
form of government or strength of a particular party in the parliament impacts
the market performance significantly. Though, usually it is common to see
higher volatility during or around elections. We believe that higher volatility
prior to next general election will certainly precipitate the market bottoming
process.
Insofar as the fear of third
front or fractured mandate is
concerned we believe the investors should be relieved by the prospects of a
true coalition coming to power. Because, post independence the best periods for
the Indian economy have been those when a “coalition” government was in power.
It is however important to note that by “coalition” we do not mean multi party
governments. In our view, coalition government means where people with
different and many a time completely diverging socio-economic policies jointly
participate in a government. They arrive at the common minimum agenda of
agreement and focus on executing the same, hence avoiding conflicts and
logjams.
The first cabinet of India post independence had R. K.
Shanmukham Shetty (Finance), Shyama Prasad Mukherjee (Industries) B. R.
Ambedkar (Law) and Jagjiwan Ram (Labor). These people did not subscribe to the
Nehruvian socio-economic agenda, but we still got a robust socio-economic
framework. The singular governments of Nehru (post BRA, RML, SPM - 1956 and
1961), Indira Gandhi (1971, 1980), Rajeev Gandhi (1984) are not really known
for good governance or socio-economic reforms.
Morarji Desai (1977 – FERA dilution, Gandhian socialism), V. P.
Singh (1989 – tax reforms, social justice), Chandershekhar (1990 –
disinvestment, fiscal reforms), PV Narsingh Rao (1991 - liberalization,
delicensing), Devegoda/IK Gujaral (1996 – dream budget), Vajpayee (1998, 1999 –
divestment, infra development) and Manmohan Singh (2004 – RTI, MNREGA) were all
coalition governments. These governments are all remembered for socio-economic
reforms causing fundamental changes in the economy. None of these governments
is remembered for non-governance, anti market policies or anti business stance.
(…to continue tomorrow)
(…to continue tomorrow)
Also read other posts in this series:
Thought for the day
“Disability is a matter of perception. If you can do just one thing well, you're needed by someone.”
- Martina Navratilova (1956 -)
Word of the day
Falcate (adj):
Curved like a scythe or sickle; hooked; falciform.
(Source: Dictionary.com)
Shri Nārada Uvāca
Uttrakhand disaster is a stern warning by the ‘Mother Nature’ to all those trying to mess with her.
No comments:
Post a Comment