Vijay Kumar Gaba

Besides hiking the policy repo rate, RBI also enforced correction in banking system liquidity to check the demand side pressures on inflation. The banking system liquidity that was running in excess of rupees eight trillion a year ago, has been completely neutralized.

Impact of monetary tightening

It is very difficult to assess the direct impact of the RBI’s monetary policy action and its consequences. Nonetheless, it is pertinent to note how various sub segments of the economy have moved in the past one year. This movement could have been caused by a variety of factors, RBI tightening being one of them.

Inflation

The Consumer Price Index Inflation (CPI) has eased from 7.04% (yoy) in May 2022 to 5.66% (yoy) in March 2023. After mostly staying above the RBI tolerance band of 4% to 6% for more than 15%, the latest inflation reading is within the band, though still closer to the upper bound. If we adjust it for high base effect, material easing in global commodity prices, and significant improvement in supply chains, in the past one year, the direct impact of RBI policy on demand side pressure may not be material. Besides, given the chances of a below par monsoon due to development of El Nino in the Pacific Ocean, the food inflation may spike again challenging the sustainability of the recent fall in CPI inflation.

Money supply and credit

In the past one-year broader money supply (M3) in India has grown at a higher pace than the trend seen in the past one decade; and currently stands at INR227.8trillion.

The commercial banks have not passed on the entire 250bps hike in the policy repo rate to the borrowers. On average lending rates have risen 130 to 150bps. It is pertinent to note that movement in lending rates in India is mostly not in tandem with the policy repo rates. Lenders were also slow in cutting the rates while RBI was in easing mode. Regardless, now since the RBI has already signaled a pause, the probability of material rise in lending rates from the current level is low; implying that the policy rates are more of a signaling tool rather than a driving force for the commercial rates. The commercial rates are more of a function of demand and supply.

In FY23, the overall bank credit grew from Rs118.9trillion to Rs136.8trn, registering a growth of 15%, highest since 2014. Though some moderation in credit growth has been seen in the past one quarter.

The fastest growing segments of the bank credit in the past one year have been personal loans (especially unsecured loans) and financing to NBFCs, (much of this could also be consumer financing related). This clearly suggests that higher rates may not have deterred the demand much.

Growth

There is little evidence to show that the tighter monetary policy of the RBI in the past one year may have directly impacted the economic growth materially. Nonetheless, the growth momentum has definitely slowed down and is not seen picking up from the present low levels in any significant manner over the next 12months. Though the RBI has forecasted FY24 real GDP to grow at 6.4%; most private forecasters estimate the growth to remain slightly below 6%. Declining global growth and poor weather conditions could be the two major factors in the lower trajectory of growth.

Yield curve

The benchmark 10yr bond yields in India are now at the same level as these were a year ago. The short to mid-term yields (30days to 5yr) have risen sharply in the past one year. In the past six month in particular, the overall yield curve has moved down noticeably, except in the 30days to 1yr timeframe where the yields are still higher. Apparently, the poor liquidity in the banking system has resulted in higher near term rates, without impacting the demand materially – more of a lose-lose situation.

To conclude, I would believe that the aggressive tightening by RBI in the past one year, was more of a reaction to the global trend, ostensibly to preempt the outflows and pressure on INR, rather than to stabilize prices and calibrate demand. Given that USDINR has weakened by over 7% in the past one year; and foreign investors have been net sellers in the past twelve months, it could be concluded that RBI would have been better pursuing an independent monetary policy commensurate with the assessment of local conditions and requirements.

I understand the “not for this, things could have been much worse” argument fully and will reply to that some other time.