Thursday, January 24, 2019

Sanitizing portfolio for higher cost of funds

Some food for thought
"We are put on this earth to have a good time. This makes other people feel good. And the cycle continues."
—Wolfman Jack (American Entertainer, 1938-1995)
Word for the day
Shirty (adj)
Bad-tempered; irritable; cranky
 
First thought this morning
Delhi Police has sought the approval of Delhi Government to file a charge sheet against some students of prestigious JNU. The allegation is that three years ago these students organized a protest within the university campus and shouted anti India and pro terrorist slogans, which as per the Police, tantamount to an act of sedition. On Tuesday, Delhi Police apparently selectively leaked a forensically certified video recording of the event to media, showing the students shouting slogans against the country, Indian Army, CRPF, and favoring a terrorist.
Media, politicians and their sympathizers have expectedly taken a partisan view on the issue.
Holding multiple studio trials, BJP and its sympathizers pronounced these people guilty of sedition and demanded strictest possible punishment for them.
Communists are backing the students strongly, palpably less for their commitment to democratic values and freedom of expression, and more out of their hatred for PM Modi and Sangh parivar.
Congressmen are taking a trademark ambivalent stand. Closer to elections they certainly do not want to take a firm stand against the move, simply for the fear that BJP may highlight numerous past instances when Congress Party misused Section 124A (Sedition) to silence its opponents. Supporting these students openly would be nothing less than stepping on a landmine given the charged sentiments.
Most other parties have either avoided taking a stand or have taken a safer "let the law take its own course" or "democracy is threatened" stand.
Asked by many readers to take a stand, I do not mind taking one. In my view, there are at least three dimensions to the issue.
Moral: From moral standpoint, aspiring to disintegrate the Nation is totally unwarranted and unacceptable, notwithstanding the severity of provocation. This should be condemned in no ambivalent words, and I do so.
Legal: In strict legal sense, I would like to go with the opinion of Justice (Retd) Markandey Katju. So far there is no evidence presented to show that the protests held in JNU and slogans shouted there could possibly have actually motivated an act against the State. Mere shouting slogan may not be enough to prove a charge u/s 124A of IPC.
Governance: From governance standpoint, I find the response of the state inappropriate. The State which is always willing to talk and exonerate Naxalites in Central India and militants in North East and J&K - the people who have actually taken up arms against the state, killed hundreds of security personnel, officials, innocent civilians - apparently did not make any attempt to meet these young students and ask what has agitated them so much that they decided to shout such slogans.
I find the Home Minister, the HRD Minister and JNU administration lacking in discharge of their governance responsibilities.
To sum up, in my view, the students may be guilty of moral turpitude; the ministers may be guilty of violating constitutional oath of commitment to act "without fear or favor, without ill will or affection"; and police may be guilty of acting under influence of their political masters.
 

Sanitizing portfolio for higher cost of funds

There is near consensus that in next 12months the global growth may be the weakest since the financial crisis a decade ago.
The monetary policy tightening by Fed and impact of trade related conflicts may be leading the slowdown in US. Euro Zone and UK are apparently deteriorating due to poor business and consumer sentiments caused by political developments. China slowdown is mix of slowing exports, financial stress, and sustainability measures. China shall take most of the emerging Asia down along with it. India may slow down as fiscal profligacy in run up to general elections constricts the government spending post elections. The poor commodity demand consequent to slower growth may check growth in most of Latin America, Australia and Africa.
The consensus is also emerging that weaker economic activity shall keep the inflationary expectations under check, forcing the central bankers to review their commitment to tightening the monetary policy. The popular discourse has mostly shifted from "hikes" to "cuts". ECB and BoJ, which were widely expected to join the US Fed in normalization of monetary policy by withdrawing stimulus and ending the zero rate policies, are now expected to stay put.
Under the circumstances, investors shall be well advised to note, inter alia, the following points, and adjust their investment strategy accordingly:
(a)   Debt has jumped even higher over the past ten years with various forms of quantitative easing across the globe. Non-financial debt has grown to over 200% of GDP and, with rates rising, could become more and more costly to repay, putting a strain on country health.

 
 
(b)   Stock valuations are their highest since dot com bubble. The US S&P500 CAPE ratio – the P/E ratio based on inflation adjusted earnings over the past ten years that it smoothens out the earnings over time, removing some quarterly noise and including an inflation component relevant to gold valuation, is elevated. The only time this ratio was higher was during the dot-com bubble and all other periods of elevated levels have preceded sharp market sell-offs.
India valuation premium to global peers as well as long term averages is also tracking much higher levels.
 
 
(c)    It is reasonable to expect the cost of funds to rise and stay higher in midterm. Complete tapering of QE by Fed, ECB and perhaps BoJ will results in lower demand for bonds. The fiscal discipline seen in the wake of global financial crisis is waning and fiscal deficits are rising, especially in US. Past 10year have seen minimal capacity building. Many large corporate have used cheaper debt and earnings to buy back their stock, to augment the stock price. Consequently, the cash to debt ratio has got distorted, with no improvement in productivity or earnings potential. Rising fiscal pressures may keep currencies under pressure.
(d)   If US is going to have higher rates for longer, a host of EMs will have their BoP become unmanageable. Trade deficit countries like India have been rather complacent about CAD, since the non trade flows were regular and easy to come by. If we have to make real hard efforts to get portfolio investment and FDI, the policy paradigm will have to shift dramatically.
(e)    In the meantime, many corporate who have borrowed in USD and acted smart to save the hedging cost, may learn what the Asian crisis was all about, all over again!
I shall look to sanitize my portfolio for—
  • Material USD debt without total hedge
  • High PE ratio, mostly due to TINA factor
  • Higher sensitivity to tax rates
  • Higher sensitivity to currency fluctuations
 

No comments:

Post a Comment