Friday, May 5, 2017

Shed the colonial past

"It is the knowledge that all men have weaknesses and that many have vices that makes government necessary."
—James Monroe (American President, 1758-1831)
Word for the day
Minatory (adj)
Menacing; threatening.
Malice towards none
As per the latest Cleanliness rankings, MP emerges as the cleanest state in the country and the neighboring UP as the dirtiest.
First random thought this morning
Sometime I wonder whether we live in a democratic country or feudal village.
National media prominently shows, as a novelty, how the president of ruling party and vice president of principle opposition party eat food with poor people. Prime Minister visits temple, of course as a VVIP, but takes off his shoes himself. CM of a large state himself performs Kanya Pujan during Navratri. All events are reported as hallmark of the benevolence and humility of leaders.
A different view is to see how a minister gets out of his office. The driver brings the car 20minutes early, runs the AC to cool it. One person carries the briefcase and files. One person runs and holds the gate of lift so that minister does not have to wait. Some ministers like someone to hold their mobile phone too. This is true even for most of the Hawai Chappal wearing Delhi ministers.

Shed the colonial past

India became an independent political union 70years ago. However, it continues to remain far from becoming an economic and social union till date.
In past two decades, some notable efforts have been initiated to make India a strong economic union. The most pertinent being development of golden quadrilateral of national highways, development of dedicated freight corridors, a uniform goods and services tax, and more recently proposal to develop a national market for agriculture produce.
Many efforts have been made to promote cross state investments through tax concessions, e.g., tax holidays for setting up new industry in industrially backward areas, subsidies for new units in SEZ, Agro processing zones, Software Technology Parks, to reduce regional inequalities.
So far, these initiatives have brought some incremental changes in the direction and trajectory of economic growth. These measures are usually found inadequate in bringing any structural change in the economy, something we need desperately at this point in time of history. It remains to be seen whether GST will bridge the inequalities of widen these.
The economic model adopted post independence era, which was mostly an extension of the exploitive colonial model used by British Empire, has promoted inequalities, injustice and unsustainability. This is the economic paradigm we need to change by instituting fundamental reforms. Improving efficiency of the extant system is just not sufficient.
It is pertinent to take note some basic data points, before I extend my argument any further.
(a)   The four largest populated states, viz., UP, Bihar, MP and West Bengal are amongst the poorest ones. These four states account for almost 40% of total population of India. Whereas their contribution to India's total GDP is just ~20%. The annual revenue gap (the difference between the revenue earned and revenue expenditure) for these states is much higher than the national averages. Bihar earns just 31% of its revenue expenditure requirement; UP 51%; MP 46% and West Bengal 45%.
(b)   The four richest states in India, viz., Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu, Gujarat and Karnataka account for less than 25% the total population; whereas their contribution to national GDP is over 40%. Maharashtra (72%), Tamil Nadu (79%), and Gujarat (75%) are able to cover their revenue expenditure much better.
(c)    Five top states Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu, Gujarat, Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh account for close to 70% of total exports from India. Whereas the resource rich states like Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh, West Bengal, Odisha, Punjab etc. lagged much behind.
(d)   The economic inequalities are fully reflected in the social parameters like child mortality, literacy, women health, availability of drinking water and sanitation also.
The point is if we keep more than 50% of the population just at the sustenance level, how do we create enough demand to grow faster and higher! ....to continue next week
Read with the following

No comments:

Post a Comment