Tuesday, April 7, 2015

Bear herd is watching ya!

Thought for the day
"Every truth has two sides; it is as well to look at both, before we commit ourselves to either."
-          Aesop (Greek, 620-560BC)
Word for the day
Fallow (n)
Not in use; inactive:
(Source: Dictionary.com)
Malice towards none
Deeper and stronger the root of prejudice, least it is spoken about!
Bear herd is watching ya!
As per a report published in the Financial Times, in past few months the developing economies have suffered their biggest capital outflows since the 2008-09 financial crisis.
Brazil is faced with recession, decade high inflation, a fiscal crisis and water rationing. China is struggling to maintain 7% growth as property prices are collapsing and financial system is reeling under severe stress. The geo-political crisis in Russia at a time when energy prices are collapsing is driving citizens to desert Ruble and switch their savings into US dollars.
"Such snapshots of growing distress in the world’s largest emerging markets are echoed among many of their smaller counterparts. Several countries in Sub-Saharan Africa are beset by dwindling revenues and rising debts. Even the turbo-powered petroeconomies of the Gulf, hit by a halving in the price of oil over the past six months to $55 a barrel, are moving into a slower lane.
Though these expressions of distress derive from disparate sources, one big and insidious trend is working to forge a common destiny for almost all emerging markets .
The gush of global capital that flowed into their economies in the six years since the 2008-09 financial crisis is in most countries now either slowing to a trickle or reversing course to find a safer home back in developed economies."
India has been an exception to the trend, so far. The flow of capital to the country has not only sustained in past couple of years, it has actually accelerated in recent past 12 months. During FY15 the net foreign flows into Indian assets exceeded US$44bn. Consequently, the Indian Rupee has also materially outperformed its peers.
While it is worthwhile to examine the reasons behind the love for India, still more important is to assess the consequences if the love is lost, like in case of other emerging markets.
Hope driven by circumstantial factors
The divergence in foreign investor's India strategy vis a vis general emerging market strategy became conspicuous in summer of 2013 when an IMF economist Raghuram Rajan was appointed the governor of RBI.
The trend has strengthened since the new government assumed office at center in May 2014. Prime Minister Narendra Modi's outreach to global investors and appointment of couple of more prominent market economists to important posts has helped in boosting the confidence. Improvement in macroeconomic data driven by lower energy prices, fiscal tightening, and benign inflation expectations has further cemented the trend.
However, if we consider that most of the improvement in macroeconomic factors may have occurred due to circumstantial factors like cyclical trough in global demand leading to lower commodity prices; lower domestic consumption demand due to a variety of factors like lower social sector spending, poor employment level, decline in real wages, leading to benign inflation expectations, poor investment demand supporting comfortable liquidity and lower rate environment, etc.
The recent comments of RBI governor - implying that the infrastructure development model adopted by India during past decade may be faulty inasmuch as it pushed infrastructure building at the expense of financial stability - suggest that the fresh investment cycle may not start in a hurry. Not at least till the alternate source and model of infra development funding are firmly put in place. More on this in later pages.
There are little structural changes to show that Indian economy will escape the deflationary contagion should one engulf the global markets.
Bear herd must be watching keenly
I am sure the herd of bears that has been suffering for past couple of years, must be watching Indian markets keenly. They should pounce as soon as they smell the blood.
With little margin for error in monetary and fiscal policies, the Indian markets are more vulnerable to a bear attack then ever in past five years.
Continued poor show by corporate earnings, elevated level of stress in financial system, rise in consumer inflation beyond RBI's comfort zone on the back of crop damage due to recent unseasonal rains and a poor monsoon due to El Nino conditions developing in Pacific Ocean could be a setback to the investor's sentiments.
However, the most irksome sentiment dampener could come from rise in number of tax litigation with foreign tax payers.
A poor performance by BJP in Bihar elections, not unlikely, could queer the political pitch for Modi led NDA government.
Conspiracy theory
The most popular conspiracy theory doing rounds is that the foreign money flowing into India is nothing but domestic black money making a round trip. Even if this is the case, the mount may not be infinite.
5/95 model may not be a way to go forward
The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) chief said on Thursday the country's push to build infrastructure should not come at the expense of financial stability, adding banks already had too much exposure to the sector.
Instead, Governor Raghuram Rajan said, India needed to find new sources of funding for infrastructure so that debt levels remained "moderate".
The comments, at a financial event organised by the RBI that was attended by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, come as the government says it wants $1 trillion invested in infrastructure in the five years to 2017, with half of the funding coming from private companies.
"The nation has enormous financing needs in infrastructure, and far too many of our banks already have too much exposure," Rajan said.
"Big corporate infrastructure players have also taken too much debt. The required national push to finance infrastructure should not override financial stability, which is key to national security."
Funding for infrastructure is expected to pose a challenge to India, whose banks, especially state-owned lenders, continue to struggle with non-performing loans.
The gross bad loans ratio at banks could rise as high as 5.7 percent by March 2016 from 4.5 percent last December, rating agency ICRA estimates. (Reuters)
This statement in my view, casts a shadow on the most popular model of infra development in India. The projects are often undertaken with 5:95 equity to debt ratio. It is popularly believed that some promoters even avoid putting 5% equity using scrupulous methods. In case project is successful, they make lot of money. However, if the project fails, the loss is absorbed by the lenders (mostly public sector banks) and tax payers.
The undercapitalized infra developers that have mushroomed in every nook and corner of the country would have no reason to exist if the intent is followed with honesty.
Another set of companies that should face extinction are the contractors who have been successful in obtaining construction contracts due to the political and administrative patronage enjoyed by them. Given that to keep his image and Kurta clean, PM Modi would want e-tendering to be introduced for most government and semi-government (PPP) contracts.
Another question on the sidelines would be "whether PSU banks are good investment sans patronized portfolio?"
I would like a study to be conducted for examining what was the growth rate for PSU banks in past decade if we take out (a) Discounting of oil bonds for OMCs, (b) financing to power sector against coal mines, (c) financing to Telcos against spectrum and (d) financing real estate developers under the garb of schemes such as 20/80 and (e) farm sector loans which the banks did want to give at the place.
Make in India - Is this the way to go forward
Last week the Union Cabinet approved revival of two shut urea plants in Uttar Pradesh and Bihar at an investment of up to Rs. 12,000 crore.
Currently India imports ~25% of its urea requirement. In last decade no new investment has been made in the sector in India. The reason is that urea production in the country is highly uncompetitive in global perspective. Currently, the landed cost of imported urea is US$30/tonne cheaper as compared to locally produced urea.
A similar situation exists in edible oil and a host of other sectors. If the things remain the same as they are, we might see a similar condition emerging in sugar sector also.
The points I am trying to make here are:
(a)   Whether it is good economics and/or politics to produce locally if you could import at much cheaper price.
(b)   Whether Make in India model is financially viable without dealing with the political model which focuses on short term expediency at the expense of long term sustainability.
Blood diamond
The prime minister claims that his government has turned coal mines into diamonds for the exchequer.
It is worthwhile to ask the following questions from his government:
(a)   Whether the government of the day had any other option but to go for transparent auctioning of natural resources after the Supreme Court decided on cancellation of spectrum and coal block allotments.
(b)   The Rs2,00,000 crore will accrue to the government over next 30yrs. The present value (NPV) of this money is much smaller.
(c)   Does the government has any viable plan to ensure that Coal India Limited does not go the MTNL, BSNL and Air India way post privatization of coal production for commercial sale.
In my view it does not have and CIL may be a much weaker company in two decades from now.
Trivia
The whole financial sector seems to praying for poor US economic data. It seems that a very poor data could only delay the "lift" (new jargon for rate hike).
I do not know what to wish.
I believe a stronger US economy could only save the world from slithering into a deflationary vicious cycle.
The reversal of US carry trade closer to "lift" may crush the spirits of market bulls for a month or so.

No comments:

Post a Comment