Do it yourself

Wednesday, July 9, 2014

Rose day, Chocolate day, Kiss day... Budget day

Thought for the day

”Never let your sense of morals get in the way of doing what's right.”

- Isaac Asimov (American, 1920-1992)

Word for the day

Previse (v)

To foresee; To forewarn

(Source: Dictionary.com)

Teaser for the day

By resolving to obstruct Parliament, Congress Party has only justified and legitimized all the misconduct of opposition parties in the Parliament during past 10years!

Rose day, Chocolate day, Kiss day... Budget day

I have never been in agreement with the convention of combining the announcement of government's socio-economic policies and programs with the announcement of annual budget speech. Especially, when this practice has often led to avoidable delay in implementation of critical programs and policy issues. There are many instances where some obvious mistakes in tax laws have to wait for next year's Finance Bill for necessary amendment, causing absolutely avoidable harassment to tax payers.

Moreover, more often than not budget speeches are used to make political statements and advance the political interests of the ruling party, usually at common man's expense.

I believe that the legislative work, including tax laws should be an ongoing business and not a discreet event. The annual budget should be just that - "a budget", where the government presents its accounts and seeks parliamentary approval for the expenditure it wishes to incur on various heads.

The spread of satellite televisions reach has also led to "commercialization" of the budget event, just like various "days" that have secretly entered our social calendars. TV channels usually build a hype around it and sell to investors as "make or break" event.

I would like to seek the counsel of wise men (businessmen, fund managers, investors, analysts, economists and policy makers) who are seen regularly participating in this mega event in past decade - what strategic investment or business decision they have taken or advised others to take based on a particular Finance Bill provision? And whether such legislative provision could have been made in regular course of parliamentary business other than Finance Bill?

To my ignorant mind, there is nothing that created or changed the business or investment opportunities in past one decade that could not have been done outside Finance Bill or Budget Speech.

Having recorded my dissent, now I would like play the sport and outline my expectations from the budget as sought by many readers.

Reading from yesterday's rail budget speech of rail minister and statement of the finance minister in Rajya Sabha on fiscal health of the country, three things are very clear:

(a) This government is laying much greater emphasis on capital markets for resource mobilization. Asset sale and equity dilution of PSE will be a focus. I would however like to first see a policy framework for protection of minority shareholders in PSE before making any investment decision.

(b) Revenue augmentation rather than expenditure curtailment may be the approach to fiscal discipline. Stricter tax compliance and higher taxes would be the order of the day.

...to be continued

Tuesday, July 8, 2014

Raise the bar

Thought for the day

”For rarely are sons similar to their fathers: most are worse, and a few are better than their fathers.”

- Homer (Greek, time uncertain, most believe between 7^th and 8^th century BC)

Word for the day

Blithesome (adj)

Lighthearted; merry; cheerful.

(Source: Dictionary.com)

Teaser for the day

Should poverty line be absolute or relative?

Would it be appropriate to say anyone earning less than 2% of the average income of top 10% Indian tax payers is poor?

Or you think notwithstanding the state of broader economy the poor should be happy and content with their 2000kcl?

Raise the bar

Traversing through remote hills and forests of Kumaun region of Uttrakhand during past 8days was quite revealing. For the first time, in my numerous visits to the region over past three decades, I experienced a colossal surge in expectations; and it is not the youth alone. Everyone is conspicuously carrying enormous expectations - not only from the government, but in general too. The common people there who are generally poor and live a sub-standard life on all parameters, seriously believe that their life needs to improve substantially.

Back home and listening to the media debates, it occurs to me that the tiny part of population which is vociferously (in some cases rather ludicrously) "demanding" concessions and seeking provisions for themselves in the Union budget might perhaps be completely cut from the broader realties of Indian economy.

The debate over validity or otherwise of official poverty line also sounds hollow and unfractuous. Having lived with a family who earns less than Rs5000/month for a night, I can understand that Rs. 32 (per capita/day or Rs5000/month for a family of five) lets you survive, given health, education, and one meal for children are provided by the government; and you do not have to pay any taxes. Water is provided free by nature and electricity they have nothing to use for. The staple meal (rather obligingly) offered to me by the family was healthy and nutritious.

The basic needs of food, clothes and shelter apart, the life of our fellow countrymen, whom we prefer to call BPL, is far from dignified, which is their constitutional right. They lack basic civil amenities like sanitation and safe drinking water close to their homes. The healthcare available to them is really primitive and insufficient. The standard of education afforded to their children is far from satisfactory and abysmally inadequate for their children to break the vicious cycle of ignorance and poverty.

I am confident that the NDA government led by an erstwhile tea seller Narendra Modi is well aware of the ground realties. I therefore expect that the socio-economic policies of the government would be suited to uplift the bottom half of the population on priority basis. The middle class populism can wait for few more years.

To this end, I feel that the conventional paradigm of poverty alleviation needs to be radically redefined. I believe that the extant absolute measure of poverty in terms of minimum monthly per capita expenditure to obtain sufficient calories to survive is inappropriate, inequitable and in a way unconstitutional. Instead, the poverty line needs to be drawn on relative basis. In my estimates, defined as mere 2% of the average income of top 10% tax payers, will push over half the country below poverty line. This realistic assessment shall allow the government to redefine priorities and redraw the social welfare programs.

Over next three days I shall outline my views on the budget, which I sincerely believe is accorded undue importance by the community.

Friday, June 27, 2014

Entrepreneurship is not best always

Thought for the day

” God is not willing to do everything, and thus take away our free will and that share of glory which belongs to us.”

- Niccolo Machiavelli (Italian, 1469-1527)

Word for the day

Peckish (adj)

Somewhat hungry; Rather irritable.

(Source: Dictionary.com)

Teaser for the day

Where is Rahul Gandhi and his youth brigade?

Entrepreneurship is not best always

In past two decades, since 1995, India’s economy has grown at an average rate of 6.9%. However, the total employment in economy during this period has grown at just 0.3% CAGR.

In this period the number of self entrepreneurs has certainly increased in the country. This has coincided with the sharp fall in public sector employment. The aggregate private sector employment level has not been able to compensate for fewer opportunities available in public and unincorporated private sector. Consequently, the total number of employees on live payrolls has fallen sharply since early 2000’s.

The combination of two – lower employment opportunities and liberal business rules – has perhaps forced people towards entrepreneurship that keeps them underemployed for most of the time.

The number of self owned enterprise has swelled in past one decade. As per 67^th round of NSSO survey (June 2011), there were 58million unincorporated enterprises in India (excluding agriculture, construction and those registered under Factories Act).

Over 85% of these enterprises are run by the owner himself, without any hired worker. 44% of these were run from the residence of the owner. These enterprises employed 108mn people against just 39mn on the live payroll in organized sectors, including 11mn in private sector. (Source: RBI, NSSO)

There has been a definite shift in employment away from agriculture towards manufacturing, construction and service activities. The share of agriculture has declined continuously from 59.9 per cent in 1999-00 to 48.9 per cent in 2011-12 whereas the share of construction sector has consistently risen from 4.5 per cent in 1999-00 to 10.6 per cent in 2011-12.

This highlights the popular myth that MNREGA has led to reverse migration of labor to rural economy and had adversely affected the availability of labor for manufacturing and construction sector….to continue on Monday

Thursday, June 26, 2014

Capitalize on human capital

Thought for the day

”The new ruler must determine all the injuries that he will need to inflict. He must inflict them once and for all.”

- Niccolo Machiavelli (Italian, 1469-1527)

Word for the day

Garboil (n)

Confusion

(Source: Dictionary.com)

Teaser for the day

Should government consider scraping degree as eligibility condition for all government jobs (including IAS)?

Instead it may institute an exhaustive eligibility test followed by a 3-12 month orientation program for all new recruits.

Capitalize on human capital

In a recently published working paper the Reserve Bank of India highlighted many interesting facts about the status of employment and its elasticity to the GDP growth. I find it pertinent to highlight some of the observations made in the said working paper.

In particular the change in occupation structure of the economy in past 15years is worth noting; because it helps setting up the agenda for future growth. It is important to note that one of the key promise of incumbent government is to make growth job oriented (hence inclusive) as opposed to jobless growth (therefore exclusive) growth achieved during past few years.

The working paper finds that aggregate employment elasticity (change in employment due to economic growth) of Indian growth has fallen considerably in post 1991 period. In this period for every 10 per cent change in real GDP, there had been about 1.8-2 per cent change in employment. The current statistic is even poor.

Moreover, elasticity varies considerably across sectors. While agriculture has witnessed negative elasticity, services including construction have generally been employment intensive. Manufacturing employment elasticity has hovered in the range 0.29-0.33.

Within manufacturing, the employment elasticity for organized manufacturing sector based on various estimates seems to be higher, in the range 0.42-0.57 for 2000s and it has risen over the previous two decades. Given the huge productivity and wage differentials between organised and unorganised sectors, greater employment generation in organised manufacturing is crucial as it has larger multiplier effects.

Subsequent to 2011, India has seen significant moderation in its GDP growth rates, particularly during 2012-13 and 2013-14. While employment numbers are not yet available for these years, Labour Bureau quarterly surveys as well as various private agencies’ information point towards moderation in employment generation. If these data sources are any hint, then one might see some changes in employment elasticity depending upon the relative pace of moderation in employment generation vis-à-vis growth.

The working paper suggests that going forward, it is the relative cost of capital vis-à-vis labour and the nature of investment demand that will determine to what extent growth would be job-creating.

Increased capital to labour ratio in the organised sector for a labour abundant country like India is a concern that has been well-highlighted. I have also been highlighting this rather frequently and to the annoyance of some of my government readers.

If India has to meet the demographic dividend challenge, focus should be on industries where employment elasticity is higher. On a rough basis, about 10 million people would need a job every year for the next 15 years. Finding productive jobs for such huge numbers is a big challenge, and clearly the answer lies in stepping up growth, and importantly, stepping up the employment intensity of growth….to continue tomorrow

Wednesday, June 25, 2014

Bitter pill alone is not enough

Thought for the day

” Hence it comes about that all armed Prophets have been victorious, and all unarmed Prophets have been destroyed.”

- Niccolo Machiavelli (Italian, 1469-1527)

Word for the day

Drake (n)

A valley with steeply sloping sides

(Source: Dictionary.com)

Teaser for the day

Narendra Modi to Shankracharya Swaroopanand Saraswati – “O’ lord thou are supreme amongst all wise, a truly elevated and enlightened soul, please enlighten me ‘what is Dharma’ and ‘who is God’?

Bitter pill alone is not enough

Two people who would certainly be delighted by the decisions to hike rail fares, and proposal to hike energy prices are former Prime Minister Dr. Manmohan Singh (MMS) and former Finance Minister P. Chidambaram (PC). Despite their best effort and intentions they could not do this due to pressure from party (read Ms. Sonia Gandhi) and supporting parties and allies (read SP, BSP, DMK, NCP and TMC).

I am sure incumbent Prime Minister Narendra Modi (NaMo) and Finance Minister Arun Jaitely (AJ) are completely conscious of the fact that not letting the short term political expediency overwhelm economic compulsions has decimated the national level influence of Sonia Gandhi, Mulayam Singh, Mayawati, Karunanidhi, Shard Pawar and Mamata Banerjee; even though these people would still like to believe that it was inefficient handling of economy by MMS and PC that led to their electoral rout.

Having said the obvious, I would like to flag this to the NaMo and AJ that the medicine that can completely cure a serious disease in early stages may be totally ineffective in the late stages of same disease even in materially high dosage. In such circumstances either surgery is a completely different line of treatment is warranted.

The diseases of inflation and fiscal impropriety in case of Indian economy are, in my view, have advanced to a higher stage.

A small fiscal correction through subsidy rationalization and disinvestment in public sector enterprises (PSEs) though critically important may not be sufficient measures.

In my view, besides effectively and immediately containing their spillover effect on consumer inflation these measures must be adequately supplemented by necessary structural corrections. The “bitter pill” given alone may break the proverbial camel’s neck (in a potentially drought year) and kill the still fragile recovery in sentiments.

In particular, I feel, the following must be considered for almost immediate implementation:

(a) Dismantling of monopoly of public sector enterprise over sale and distribution of energy. Oil marketing, coal mining and sale, natural gas sales and distribution infrastructure businesses should be opened to free competition with adequate constitutional protection (unlike last time when oil marketing was opened to private entities without appropriate assurance as to sustainability of the model).

(b) The purchasing power of household consumer should be adequately protected and enhanced both through fiscal and monetary means, especially considering that implementation of GST will likely hit him most.

A line, clear and thick, should be drawn between compliant and non-compliant businessmen. Those who are in habit of defaulting should be severely punished. But consider adequately supporting the “good” enterprise to immediately kick start the investment cycle.

Tuesday, June 24, 2014

Committing on the front foot

Thought for the day

“A wise ruler ought never to keep faith when by doing so it would be against his interests.”

- Niccolo Machiavelli (Italian, 1469-1527)

Word for the day

Comely (adj)

Pleasing or agreeable to the sight; good-looking.

(Source: Dictionary.com)

Teaser for the day

What is more important--

(a) Know to drive or having driving license;

(b) Having PUC or keeping vehicle clean;

(c) Playing or watching sports on TV;

(d) Becoming a parent or having a child;

(e) Learning or passing exam?

Committing on the front foot

The cricket enthusiast would know that many good batsmen, who could have become great but did not just because they had the bad habit of committing to a stroke much before the ball pitched in front of them. Vinod Kambli is one such classic example.

As I suggested yesterday, many of the Modi government ministers are making the committing the same mistake.

Our health minister Dr Harsh Vardhan, in all his sincerity and with good intentions has suggested steep hike in cigarette prices to discourage smoking. The proposed hike as per his suggestion will result in additional tax revenue of Rs3800crores.

Now look at the internal contradictions and paradox in his suggestion.

(a) Is he conceptually clear about what he wants to do – augment revenue of the government or discourage people from smoking?

In case the objective is to discourage people from smoking, is the price hike best way to achieve this objective? Has any study been conducted by his ministry to find that in past few decades what had been the effect of cigarette price hikes on smoking habits of people? Have stopped, reduced smoking or shifted to cheaper (more harmful) variety of tobacco consumption?

There are enough examples of prohibition and higher taxes on liquor resulting in higher sale and consumption of spurious liquor. But I am yet to notice any trend indicating lower consumption due to higher taxes.

Would it not be better if BJP sets an example by enforcing strict “no smoking” rule for all its members, and then appeals to its voters not to smoke and then ask the nation to quit smoking, in that order.

If this suggestion is found ridicules, Dr. Harsh Vardhan’s suggestion is even more so, in my view.

Anyways, if this objective is achieved, then the substantially lower cigarette demand will have adverse revenue implications.

In case the objective is primarily to augment revenue, does the government have sound ethical and constitutional backing for this?

I would also like to know –

(a) What is the proportion of tax earned from production and sale of liquor, cigarette, chewing tobacco, pan masala and bidis etc. has been spent on running de-addiction centers and rehabilitation of addicted people? Why it should not be at least 50%?

(b) How many people have been fined in past one decade for smoking in public places? Why the fine be just Rs100 and not Rs10,000?

If my questions are found causing little discomfort, I would suggest that PM and his team should give top priority to building a conceptual policy framework for governance. Making emotional, populist and mostly undesirable speeches and comments will only strengthen the popular belief that BJP and Congress are sides of the same coin.