Friday, April 28, 2017

Taxing farmers may yield nothing

"Sheep, like people, are ungovernable when hungry."
—John Muir (American, 1838-1914)
Word for the day
Green-Collar (adj)
Noting or pertaining to workers, jobs, or businesses that are involved in protecting the environment or solving environmental problems.
Malice towards none
You speak one lie 100times, and people start believing it to be true.
This adage does not seem to be applying to AAP.
The more they lie, the more  people disbelieve them. So much so that many have started discounting their truths also.
First random thought this morning
Our government seems to be pushing the Make in India policy hard. Reportedly, it now wants all government procurements to be sourced locally. It also wants metro trains to have at least 75% local content. It sounds like a great idea.
The small problem is that many of our large trade partners like USA also seem to be copying our idea of localization, and many of us are not liking it.
An American investor who recently visited Patanjali facilities in Haridwar, got the impression that this desi enterprise certainly has tacit support of thegovernmen (States and Central). If global corporations like Coke, Pepsi, HUL, Nestle, P&G etc. get hit due to this, this pain will certainly reflect on likes of TCS, Infosys.


Taxing farmers may yield nothing

Tax on agriculture income is one of the favorite topic of market economists and strategists. Most of them believe that by taxing agriculture income, the government could materially improve its fiscal position.
In my view, taxing agriculture income would add only an insignificant amount to the government's kitty. Anyone betting big on taxation of agriculture income may perhaps need to spend 6months in any village of the country to understand what I am trying to suggest.
About 40% India's total population is directly dependent on farming. As per the latest available NSSO survey (70th Round, June 2013), the country has about 90.2 million agricultural households.
Among the major States, Rajasthan has highest percentage of agricultural households (78.4 percent) among its rural households followed by Uttar Pradesh (74.8 percent) and Madhya Pradesh (70.8 percent). Kerala has the least percentage share of agricultural households (27.3 percent) in its rural households preceded by other southern States like Tamil Nadu (34.7 percent) and Andhra Pradesh (41.5 percent).
Close to three fourth of these farmers belong to OBC, SC and ST category. Two third of these farmer household have crop cultivation as their primary source of income. 22% of these household survive on wages. While the others have livestock and agri related activities as their primary source of income. About 44percent of estimated agricultural households have MGNREG job card.
Average monthly income of the agricultural households, including net receipts from cultivation, farming of animals, nonfarm business and income from wages/salaries, during the agricultural year July 2012- June 2013 was estimated as Rs.6426/per household (Average 5people).
About 52 percent of the agricultural households in the country are estimated to be indebted. The average amount of outstanding loan per agricultural household was Rs.47000/- (approx.).
Among the major States, Andhra Pradesh had the highest share of indebted agricultural households in the country (92.9 percent) followed by Telangana (89.1 percent) and Tamil Nadu (82.5 percent). Assam (17.5 percent), Jharkhand (28.9 percent), and Chhattisgarh (37.2 percent) were the major States with lowest share of indebted agricultural households.
The average amount of outstanding loan was highest for Kerala (Rs.213600/-) followed by Andhra Pradesh (Rs.123400) and Punjab (Rs.119500). Assam (Rs.3400), Jharkhand (Rs.5700) and Chhattisgarh (Rs.10200) were the States with lowest amount of average outstanding loan.
About 83% (80% in 2003) of the total farming households in India are either landless or marginal (holding less than 1 hectare or 2.47 acres cultivable land). The average gross cropped area per agricultural household is period 0.937hectare (2.31 acre). The average value of production (which included value of harvested crop, pre-harvest sale and value of by-products) per agricultural household during the period was Rs.40580/-.
However, if we adjust this average income for the loss due to crop damage due to natural causes (at least once in three years), the average income per farmer household will be much lower.
It is most pertinent to note that this income does not account for the cost of self-labor and own seeds used.
As the following table shows, only 0.24% or appx 2,15,000 agriculture household are large farmers (owning more than 6hectare cultivable land). They collectively own approximately 5.8% of the total cultivable area.
Assuming that they earn more than average farmer household income of Rs41000/hectare per crop, and are able to take three crops every year, the average income for the large farmer household may not be more than Rs41000 X 3crops X 6hectare=Rs7,38,000. Dividing this income between two adult members of the house and adjusting for expenses like depreciation on equipments, interest on loans, and one bad year in five years, the government may not get virtually any tax.
 
 
 
I understand that there are numerous cases of false reporting of agriculture income to convert black money without any tax.
There are some large farmers, who hold large chunks of Benami Land, and may be earning much more than the averages mentioned above.
But these are anomalies. These need to be handled as such. Making a rule based on these exceptions may not yield much results.
As such, agriculture is a totally unviable business in India. With over 40% population engaged in an unviable and least productive business, an economy cannot be expected to grow faster on sustainable basis.
If we want Indian economy to grow faster on sustainable basis, supporting restructuring and reorganizing India's farm sector is a pre-requisite.
...to continue
Read with the following
 

No comments:

Post a Comment