Wednesday, March 19, 2014

Setting the context for post election market perspective

Thought for the day
Endorsing an idea doesn't mean you endorse any interpretation of it, or everything done in its name, under any circumstance.” -Unknown
Word for the day
Arraign (v)
To accuse or charge in general; criticize adversely; censure.
(Source: Dictionary.com)
Teaser for the day
My Mother India is the supreme deity. She is held on the highest pedestal of unquestionable extreme reverence & devotion by 1.3bn Indians and admired by many foreigners. She is above all respect, insult, criticism, attacks, insinuations, and malaise.
The one demeaned, smeared or insulted easily by mere pictorial depictions, refusal to sing her praise etc. is not my Mother. Is she yours’?

Setting the context for post election market perspective

2014 general elections in India are being seen as a watershed in the political history of India. There is near consensus, a rarity, amongst political analysts and commentators on this issue. The decisive change in the constitution of electorate in favor of under 25yrs voters; emergence of a larger than life personality (first in post Indira era) as key contender for the top post; and overwhelming disregard for established political ideologies in bargain for political power are the key contours defining the watershed.
With little ideological support to back, all political parties are scrambling to find issues. It has never occurred in my memory that less than one month for elections to begin, there is no clarity on “the key election issue”. As of now it is “undefined Gujarat model of governance” vs. “bickering over moral and legal accountability for 2002 riots” with Narendra Modi at center of debate.
Though occasionally parties try to obfuscate the public discourse with more pertinent issues like unemployment, inflation, and economic development; but these issues have so far mostly remained at the fringe in the election strategy. The issue of corruption that dominated the December assembly elections has been effectively sidelined by understandably united and concerted efforts of all parties to put “clouded” leaders back in fray.
It is in this context that we need to form post election market perspective for an appropriate investment strategy.
My thesis in this regard could be summarized as follows:
(a)   Expect no radical change in the economic policies and program post elections, irrespective of the constitution (BJP led NDA, Congress led UPA or any other alliance) and form of the government (majority or minority).
(b)   In past six months execution at policy level has improved dramatically. The incumbent Congress led UPA government has perhaps achieved more in past one year than it did in preceding nine years. I believe this trend is irreversible and will only accelerate post election, irrespective of the outcome of elections. Burdened by humongous expectations, a Narendra Modi led government will be obligated to perform much better in the short term.
(c)   A Narendra Modi led government is likely to face stronger resistance from left leaning sustainability activists. We might therefore even higher judicial intervention in policy matters relating to environment, compensation for displacement & rehabilitation, and allocation of natural resources. The issue of probity may dominate the allocation of resources and process if licensing, unfavorably and sometimes unreasonably impacting businesses and people popularly perceived closer to the new administration. A third front government would be actually best placed in these terms.
(d)   A continuation of effort seen in past 6months will be the best case scenario for markets in short term. A more “populist & Keynesian” (looser monetary & fiscal policy to stimulate economy) or fiscally tighter (higher taxes, lower government spending) could both be painful for markets in the short term.
…to continue tomorrow
Readers can send their views, comments, criticism to the author at vijaygaba.investrekk@gmail.com
Follow @VIJAYGABA
 

8 comments:

  1. What went wrong, how did it go wrong, how can I fix it and how can I improve on it? These four questions are staples when it comes to reflecting on and learning from any mistakes. Leadgeneration

    ReplyDelete
  2. It used to be you bought CPM (cost per thousand) in large-scale campaign Web site and hope that the good performance of these ads and get traffic to your website. web design san jose

    ReplyDelete
  3. People will be more willing to buy a product if they know exactly what they are getting. Many marketers love to use fancy prose, grand promises and technical jargon to bedazzle potential customers. Lead generation

    ReplyDelete
  4. In order to keep the premiums down, they'll just push more of the costs onto the Medicare Advantage recipients. Increased premiums and reduced benefits are what we're going to see coming in Medicare Advantage plan. supine leg lift

    ReplyDelete
  5. Audience engagement with Facebook is great for building reputation. Adding presentation secrets to the mix and creating curiosity makes success imminent. The more active and consistent you are the more visible you will become. welcome bot

    ReplyDelete
  6. Different social networks have different audiences and practices. Not every network is right for every business or industry. For example, how could a pharmaceutical company possibly engage in drug marketing on Twitter? The reality is that most businesses can take advantage of the networks out there in some way, but if there are limitations, you want your social media manager to be aware of them. social media

    ReplyDelete
  7. When you write Xu copy, you should take the time to understand what works and what does not. There are two mistakes almost every amateur search engine copywriting. small business SEO Melbourne

    ReplyDelete