West Asia crisis
In June 2026, the US and Iran signed an
agreement to extend their ceasefire by 60 days. This gave both sides time to
negotiate a lasting solution to a long conflict. Most West Asian countries
seemed to support this process. But Israel, the most important player in the
region, kept its distance and did not fully sign on to the terms.
This week, Iran held the funeral of Ayatollah
Ali Khamenei, its Supreme Leader, who was killed in joint US-Israel air strikes
in February 2026. Leaders from several countries attended the long-delayed
funeral, and millions of Iranians came out on the streets of Tehran to mourn
him. His son, Mojtaba Khamenei, has since taken over as Iran's new Supreme
Leader.
Even as the funeral was underway, the fragile
ceasefire came apart. In the past two days, Iran attacked commercial ships
passing through the Strait of Hormuz. The US responded on 7 July with what it
called “powerful strikes,” hitting more than 80 targets inside Iran, and
reimposed the oil sanctions it had lifted as part of the ceasefire deal. Iran,
in turn, said it would deliver a “crushing response” and struck US bases in
Kuwait and Bahrain on 8 July. On the same day, speaking at the NATO summit in
Ankara, President Trump said he now considers the ceasefire “over” and a “waste
of time.” Oil prices jumped sharply on the news.
Looking at the mood of the Iranian people, the
stance of Iran's leadership on its right to enrich uranium and control the
Strait of Hormuz, and Israel's position on Iran's rights, it seems to me that
this conflict is far from over. This week's exchange of fire, coming barely
three weeks after the ceasefire was signed, confirms that hoping for a lasting
solution within the 60-day window was always more wishful thinking than
realistic expectation.
A more likely path over the next couple of
years could involve four things. First, Iran may push ahead with building a
nuclear deterrent against Israel and prepare to avenge the killing of its
former Supreme Leader. Second, GCC countries may continue to keep an equal
distance from Iran, Israel and the US, even as some of them, like Kuwait and
Bahrain, get drawn into the crossfire. Third, Israel may keep trying to weaken
Iran's ability to strike it. And fourth, the US may keep swinging between war
and peace, as it has done again this week.
Ethanol blending
The government's policy of blending ethanol with petrol has drawn sharp criticism from citizens. There have been complaints of vehicle damage and lower mileage due to blended fuel. Several environmental groups have also opposed the E20 policy, saying it uses too much water to produce ethanol.
The government has strongly defended the E20 policy, pointing to its environmental, agricultural and economic benefits. Automobile companies have also said that E20 fuel does not damage modern, compatible vehicles. A review of thousands of service records suggests there is no widespread evidence of engine damage, wear and tear, or corrosion caused by E20 fuel.
Even so, opposition parties and civil society groups have turned E20 into a popular campaign against the government. They allege that the blending policy mainly benefits the family of a minister who is in the ethanol production business.
This could well become a major election issue. It is not clear how the government will restore public trust in blended fuel and put this controversy to rest. If I were asked for a suggestion, I would say the government should make blended fuel optional rather than mandatory, and offer incentives such as a lower price for blended fuel or a subsidy on insurance premiums.
Infra construction quality
Poor quality of infrastructure, especially roads, along with allegations of large-scale corruption in awarding and executing key infrastructure projects, has become a common topic on social media.
While corruption cannot be ruled out, a more likely reason for the poor condition of newly built roads is rushed construction to meet deadlines, which are often set for political reasons. Poor design and inadequate safety audits are also major concerns for road quality in India.
Whatever the reason, the fact remains that India spends much more than the global average to build its highways, yet the quality of these highways remains poor in terms of design, durability and comfort.
It would help to open up infrastructure construction to global competition and make it mandatory for all projects above Rs 50 million to be awarded through global tenders.
It would also be worthwhile to set up a dedicated highway police force to ensure the safety and security of highway travelers and to quickly address complaints of damage and accidents.
No comments:
Post a Comment