Tuesday, November 27, 2018

Leave nothing for later

Some food for thought
"A fool must now and then be right, by chance."
—William Cowper (English Poet, 1731-1800)
Word for the day
Tsuris (n)
Trouble; Woe
 
First thought this morning
On the 10th anniversary of the heinous Mumbai terror attack, the mood in Mumbai at least should have been somber. But it did not appear to be. Save for some customary official rituals and mostly sartorial tweets, Whatsapp forwards, and FM radio notes, nothing much was visible. Outside Mumbai, no one seemed concerned any bit.
A close observation of the Mumbai city behavior highlighted that the only thing that has changed in the city is the public entry procedures in large hotels. There are X-ray machines to scan the baggage of people entering the premises and a couple of security guards with automated weapons. It is mostly a small enhancement to the procedures followed since the terror strikes in 1993.
There is little change in the attitude of people towards the security of public areas, except that they appear little more tolerant to the scanning at the entry to hotels and malls.
There is little effort in training of security staff deputed at public places. Most of the "guards" are outsourced from placement agencies. They have little commitment to the place they are guarding or the outsourcing agency itself. They are inadequately trained. I managed to speak with 10 odd guards who are deputed to check the vehicles entering the premises. None of them has ever seen an explosive device. They open and shut the car bonnets and trunks mechanically without knowing what they are searching for. Women and minors are usually let go without proper search. Moreover, the guards are usually not fit to fight trained terrorists.
None of the establishment that were targeted during 26/11 have a professional "security audit" in place, to continuously assess the lapses in security procedures and upgrade in the system to equip for emerging security threats and challenges.
If the two police personnel, I managed to speak with, are to be believed, they have received just a few reports from people about the suspicious activities in their surroundings in past 10years. Worst, many of such reports have turned out to be mischievous.
We the people need to accept and imbibe that praying to god alone would not be sufficient. To protect our life and property, we would need to develop an attitude and adequate security apparatus.
Chart of the day
 

Leave nothing for later

The government of India has laid significant emphasis on the "ease of doing business" matrix in past few years. Consequently, the ranking of India on the World Bank's Ease of Doing Business Index has improved to 77 from 142 in 2015. This may in fact have resulted in material change in the perception of the global businesses towards India, as evident from the incrementally higher FDI flows in the country.
A closer study of the improvement in India's ranking suggests that the following three factors may be responsible for most of it:
(a)   Development of the telecom infrastructure, especially availability and speed of internet. This has helped significantly in reducing the time & effort taken for various procedures and services, and improving the transparency of the procedure itself. A lot of services are now provided online. ISRO and entrepreneurs/investors who invested hugely in developing telecom infrastructure in past 25years; and IT companies who developed enabling systems and software share the major credit for this.
(b)   Improved physical infrastructure, especially electricity and logistics. This is consequence of the massive investment in energy, roads, and ports/airports sector in past two decades, after these sectors were deregulated and freed from government monopolies. NDA -1 government led by AB Vajpayee should get major credit for this effort.
(c)    Statutory changes like GST and IBC have also contributed materially in the improvement in India's ranking. The incumbent government in particularly gets credit for these changes in the legal and regulatory framework, even though the past governments and a host of professionals who worked tirelessly to bring it to the implementation stage also need to be commended.
One thing that has not changed, or has arguably worsened, in this context is the transparency and predictability of the regulation. Some unconventional policy measures like demonetization; frequent changes GST framework, unnecessary tinkering in the direct taxes, e.g., taxation of LTCG, imposition of a variety of cess, indiscreet use of enforcement procedures, etc may have made the investors and businesses wary of the intent.
I would cite one small example that indicates lack of holistic thinking on part of the government in development and management of the regulatory framework for the business, making it subject to frequent and unpredictable changes.
It is widely accepted that e-commerce is the future of retail in the country. As per some estimates, the total ecommerce business in India may grow more than 2x in next four years to cross US$52bn form the present US$25bn.
Presently, more than 70% of the Indian ecommerce industry, at least in product retail, is dominated by the two US-controlled companies: Flipkart and Amazon.
The government had issued a draft National Policy on Ecommerce (see here) few months back. But reportedly, the plans to implement the policy have been shelved for now (see here).
The government has the global experience of more than two decades available to it. At national level also, it is more than a decade since we started buying online. The government has accepted that in future this sector is certainly going to grow exponentially. The litigations in the matters relating to taxation, pricing, quality control, customer services etc are piling with each passing day. Ad hoc solutions to all these issues will result in a messy regulatory framework, like in many other cases.
One issue in particular is bothering me in this. The last mile of the delivery chain in the entire ecommerce is totally uncontrolled.
A huge number of young boys have been employed to "deliver" the online shopping to the ultimate customer. There is absolutely no regulation for this entire workforce. Most of these delivery boys are contract workers, who in many cases are not even verified. They do not enjoy any job security, social security or any other benefit usually available to a worker in the organized sector. Many mafia type unregulated agencies have mushroomed, which control the supply of delivery boys.
Most of these delivery boys are under-paid, Some of these are also risk to the 'customer' to whom they are going to deliver.
Shockingly, the draft policy on ecommerce makes no mention of this segment of the ecommerce. The worst, the ministry of labor is not even mentioned as one of the implementing agency, in the draft policy document.
It appears that the regulatory framework for ecommerce delivery chain would evolve casually. Knee jerk reactions to each protest/strike by workers, accident, rape, murder, act of violence, etc. will add to the regulations, keeping it as unpredictable as anything else.


Trivia
India is popularly known as the diabetic capital of the world. It has the dubious distinction of having the largest population of diabetic people in the world. Many of the key politicians (including the union finance minister, union road minister, CMs of Delhi and Maharashtra and even BJP president) are known to be diabetic.
But only a few important metro stations in Delhi and Mumbai have provision for urinal. The famous 302kms long Lucknow-Agra expressway has no urinal.
How these diabetic leaders, could not think of the plight of millions of diabetic people whom they are supposed to lead and serve?
 

No comments:

Post a Comment