Showing posts with label contract farming. Show all posts
Showing posts with label contract farming. Show all posts

Thursday, September 24, 2020

Farm Sector Reforms - 3

 

Continuing from yesterday (see Farm Sector Reforms – 2)

The second piece of legislation, namely, The Farmers (Empowerment and Protection) Agreement on Price Assurance and Farm Services Bill, 2020, primarily provides for the following four things:

1.    Forward Sale Agreement: A farmer may enter into a written forward agreement with a person to sell his produce at a predetermined price.

Any such agreement shall specify (a) the price (fixed, or benchmarked with a guaranteed minimum); (b) The time of delivery; (c) place and method of delivery; and (d) quality specification for the produce.

The ownership and risk of output due to vagaries of nature of otherwise, shall remain with the farmer till he offers a valid delivery to the buyer.

2.    Contract Farming: A farmer may enter into a written agreement with a person to provide farm services for predetermined fee. The service buyer shall specify the crop, quality, and other specifications, and may provide necessary inputs like fertilizers, seeds, technical knowhow etc. to the farmer. In this case, the risk of output may remain with the service buyer, depending upon the conditions specified in the agreement.

The new law prohibits implicit leasing or sale of agriculture land through such agreement. Also the rights of the share cropper (the farmers who till someone’s land in lieu of a share in the crop) also sought to be protected in the law.

3.    Stock of agriculture commodities: The buyer in either of the above cited two arrangements can stock the produce acquired under the agreement, regardless of any limits imposed by any state legislations or the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 on such stocking.

4.    Registration and Dispute Resolution: All such agreement will have to be registered with the appointed Registering Authority. All disputes in relation such agreements shall be settled as per the resolution mechanism prescribed in the Bill. In the two tier resolution mechanism, the first step would be conciliation (arbitration) at a panel constituted by SDM of the area. The second step would an Appeal to Appellate Authority (Collector). No civil court would have the jurisdiction over disputes relating to the trade specified under this law.

It is pertinent to note the following in this context:

·         The forward market for agriculture commodities in India is mostly informal, unorganized and unregulated. There are stocks exchanges and electronic trading platforms that offer future market in select agriculture commodities, but the farmers’ participation in these markets is miniscule. These markets are mostly used by traders and commercial consumers to either hedging or speculation purposes.

The new law permits forward contracts, but these contracts will be out of the purview of SEBI (regulator for derivative contracts in commodities). These agreements will be unregulated.

·         As discussed yesterday, the full implementation of the new regime may decimate the extant APMC mechanism. In that eventuality, the price discovery of agriculture produce will totally depend on the market forces. In absence of a deeper futures market in all commodities, the price discovery may not be efficient and create harmful volatility in food prices.

The apprehension is that the large corporates who would in a position to dominate the markets. They may entrench themselves deep in the agri ecosystem to dictate the cropping patterns as well prices. In this colonial form, the farmers would be forced to grow whatever these large players want and sell at the price mostly determined by them.

·         A large number of farm holdings in the country do not have clear ownership. In many cases the registered owners are either dead or have been excluded by the family members or encroachers. Besides, millions of farmers are share croppers.

In respect of land holdings that are being used by share croppers; or where the farmer actually tilling the land is not a clear title holder, entering into these agreements may not be possible.

·         As I wrote yesterday also, millions of marginal farmers (land holding of less than one acre) may not benefit much from these legislation. These farmer account for more than two third of the total farm holdings.

…to continue tomorrow