Ppt slides about accomplished PIOs
It is very common to receive the lists (or
graphics) depicting very successful persons of Indian origin (PIOs) on our
social media timelines; email inboxes and even front pages of newspapers. Some
of these lists contain names of people who are not necessarily of Indian
origin, but whose names resemble Indian names like Tulsi. In some cases we do
not even mind turning matriarchal, if the successful person has only a mother
of Indian origin, e.g., Kamala Harris.
Recently, two such persons are prominently in the
news – Rishi Sunak, who lost the race to the 10 Downing Street last month, and
Suella Braveman, the newly appointed Home Secretary in Liz Truss cabinet. Both
British politicians happen to be born to parents of Indian origin who migrated
from India many decades ago. Both were born and brought up in the UK; own a
passport issued in the name of the British Monarch; have never publicly shown
any allegiance to India. Suella Braveman recently lamented that Indians form
the largest group of VISA violators in the UK.
Many of the top global corporations, like
Google, Microsoft, Adobe, Twitter, IBM, Cognizant, Nokia, Bata, Chanel,
Starbucks, Micron etc. now have CEOs who were born and graduated from India.
Many of them pursued higher studies abroad and worked there for many years
before reaching the top. They all are global citizens, do not necessarily carry
an Indian passport and have shown no specific commitment to development and
growth of India.
I fear that most of these names may be under
pressure to prove their allegiance to the country, whose name appears on the
front page of their passports; or the companies which write their paychecks;
even if it means taking decisions that are prejudicial to the Indian economy.
They may hold tremendous respect for their motherland, alma mater, religion
and culture. But the economy of India and welfare of a common Indian may
not appear high in their list of priorities. In fact, people who are not of
Indian origin may do much more for India than PIOs.
In fact, the more PIOs reach the pole positions
in global corporations and politics, more worried we should be. Because, it not
only strengthens the global lobby of influential people who may not like to be
openly seen as biased towards India; it also reflects poorly on the weaknesses
of our entrepreneurial ecosystem that is unable to retain top talent.
Having understood this, I shall now avoid
investing in mutual funds and companies whose periodic presentations show the
list of accomplished PIOs as a strength of the Indian economy and markets.
Running foreign policy from press conferences
Recently, one of the most celebrated video
clips on social media in India has been the one where the external affair
minister (EAM) of India is answering the questions of western media about India’s
policy with regard to the Russia-Ukraine war, especially India’s decision to
buy crude oil from Russia despite NATO sanctions. The stern and articulate
response of the EAM won him millions of accolades. Many did not hesitate in
terming him the most competent minister of PM Modi’s cabinet; a symbol of
rising global power of India; and a worthy successor to PM Modi (whenever he
decides to retire). Even some foreign experts have termed him one of the best
diplomats in the world.
Inarguably, incumbent EAM is very articulate,
confident and clear in his views. He also seems to have a clear mandate from
the prime minister in the matters of foreign policy. But in recent times, there
have been more failures than successes in foreign policy.
NATO countries have tacitly imposed travel
sanctions (inordinate delays in VISA issuance) against India for supporting
Russia. Businesses and students are suffering from long delays in VISA
issuance. China is cementing its position in Ladakh. The US is giving arms and
money to Pakistan. We have not been able to get Pakistan black listed by FATF.
There is little progress on key issues like membership of UNSC and NSG. There
is little improvement in relationships with other neighbors. The UK home
secretary has spoken openly against India and the trade deal has been delayed.
The Canadian government is seen openly supporting anti India (Khalistan)
elements. Despite claims of 30-35% cheaper oil from Russia, the price of our
basket of oil is not much different from the benchmark Brent Crude. Belt Road
and CPEC are progressing steadily.
I would rather prefer that no one knows about our EAM
or see him on TV. Let him be an anonymous person and work behind curtains and
show results. The job of making fun of western media and giving blunt responses
to western diplomats is best left to the innocuous full timers like Tharoors
and Swamis.