Showing posts with label RBI Rates. Show all posts
Showing posts with label RBI Rates. Show all posts

Wednesday, September 4, 2019

Debating the slow down - 1

The dismal GDP growth data for 1QFY20 released last Friday has fueled a multitude of debates in the country. Most of these debates could be classified in three categories, viz.,
1.    Political Debate: Whether the incumbent NDA government led by PM Modi has failed in handling the economy properly?
The debate encompasses a variety of issues, e.g., (i) whether demonetization and GST have impacted the growth momentum so severely that it may take many years to recuperate from the side effects; (ii) whether the government is focusing on too much on political issues ignoring the evident socio-economic concerns; (iii) whether the Narendra Modi administration has adequate talent to manage a economy in serious crisis; and (iv) whether UPA government led by Dr Manmohan Singh managed the economy well or is it due to the vacuum created by that government that the current government is trying hard to fill?
The former Prime Minister Dr Manmohan Singh has actively joined the debate by suggesting that "Our economy has not recovered from the man made blunders of demonetisation & a hastily implemented GST. I urge the government to put aside vendetta politics & reach out to all sane voices to steer our economy out of this crisis".
2.    Economic Debate: The economic debate has many dimensions. Market economists, development economists, bankers, policy makers, market participants from financial markets, and business community are debating different dimensions of the Growth Conundrum.
Development economists are debating whether the current slowdown is (i) a demand side problem or a supply side problem; and (b) a structural or cyclical phenomenon.
Market economists are wondering whether the government has fiscal space to stimulate the economic growth through accelerating public investment & consumption and affording meaningful fiscal concessions to the consumers and businesses. "Need for aggressive Reforms" is a common jargon used in discussions but it continues to be vague as the specific suggestions are generally not made.
Bankers are debating whether rate cuts and other monetary stimulus can help achieving faster growth, especially when banking sector is still struggling with the asset quality issues and transmission of already effected monetary easing is not taking place adequately.
Financial market participants are discussing what does the GDP number means for credit growth, asset quality, auto & cement sales, flows, INRUSD, bond yields etc. They are also concerned with "avoidable" tinkering with tax rules especially in the current environment of global uncertainty.
Business Community is debating what concessions and relaxations the government could and should provide to help the struggling sectors like MSME, Real Estate, Automobile, etc. Incentives for exports, rationalization of excessive compliance norms, and "tax terrorism" also figures frequently in their discussions and debates.
3.    Social Debate: The social debate is overwhelmingly focused on failure of the government in creating adequate number of jobs in past 5yrs. Rising unemployment that is leading to many distortions like low savings, rising household debt, higher petty crime rate; poor consumption growth etc.
In next few days, I shall reflect on some of the key dimensions of the slow economic growth.

Tuesday, August 20, 2019

Suggestions for stimulating the economy



Suggestions for stimulating the economy
The number of people cautioning about a deeper and longer economic slowdown in India is rising by the hour. Tata Motor's management has guided for double digit fall in automobile sales in FY20 (see here). Most auto companies have announced shut downs; some have also announced significant reduction in the employed workforce. SBI chairman is insisting on urgent need for some stimulus in almost each of his public presentations (see here). Most other senior banks and industrialists have also sounded the caution begul (see here)
The stock markets have corrected sharply in past one year; though the benchmark indices may not be reflecting the correction as yet. The wealth erosion for investors has been material. The market participants are clamoring hard for a stimulus package to bring the economy and market back on path of high growth.
Whereas, most businessmen and market participants have echoed the demand for stimulus, I have not seen many actionable solutions being suggested. Generally the solutions suggested are limited to lending rate cut, GST rate cut, and roll back of tax provision relating to surcharge and long term capital gains.
In my view, roll back of the tax provisions relating to long term capital gains and surcharge on high income non corporate entities may not add to the economic growth in any significant measure, though it might be a short term sentiment booster.
As per the available data, SBI has already cut MCLR by about 30bps post recent repo rate cut of 35bps. Current SBI MCLR (8.25%) is now ~100bps lower than the highest rate seen in early 2016. However, the current interest rate is still 300bps higher than the lowest rates we saw in 2003. Given the persistent low inflation, low money multiplier and global strong deflationary trends, there is scope for meaningful rate cut. To be effective immediately this rate cut must have some shock value. Small doses of 10-20bps cut in lending rate may take much longer to reflect in higher demand and therefore may not qualify as "stimulus".
A material cut in GST rates for automobile etc may stimulate demand. However, the impact may be somewhat neutralized as lower GST revenue shall constrict government's spending ability. In case the government chooses the path of fiscal expansion through additional market borrowing, the private investment may get crowded out. GST rate cut therefore may not be an easy option for the government to exercise.
I believe the government needs to take these conventional stimulating measures steps in adequate quantity. However, to enhance the impact of these measures, a number of additional measure aimed at boosting sentiments and stimulating higher trade volumes and activity level would be needed simultaneously.
The following are some of the illustrative measures that could be considered by the government for immediate implementation:
(a)   In most parts of the country, the Ready Reckoner or Circle Rates (minimum property rates considered for levying stamp duty) are much higher than the prevailing rates of property. The government must consider bringing this minimum threshold to 10% below the prevailing market rate to stimulate transactions in property market.
(b)   Capital gains of upto Rs25lacs on all constructed properties may be exempted from income tax for two years, i.e., AY21 and AY22.
(c)    Capital gains on sale of gold may be exempted, provided the entire sales proceed is invested in buying one or more constructed property (residential or commercial).
(d)   Concessional Housing advance by companies to their employees in next 2years may not be treated as perquisites during the term of the advance.
(e)    Trading in agri commodities may be exempted from cash transaction limits completely for 2yrs, i.e, till March 2021. Post that restrictions may be applied in graded manners over next 5yrs.
(f)    GST input credit for automobile purchase may be allowed for six months, i.e., October 2019 to March 2020.
(g)    Upto 50% discount may be offered on power tariffs to all green field industrial units that are approved before March 2020 and begin commercial operation before March 2022.
(h)   The payment time for all government contracts and supplies may be cut to 15days from the present 60-180days. All outstanding payments to contractors and suppliers may be released immediately. The arbitration and legal awards in favor of the contractors and suppliers may be honored immediately.
(i)    PSU banks may be adequately recapitalized immediately.
(j)    Long term corporate bonds (10yrs or more original maturity) may be treated at par with equity for capital gains taxation purposes. Periodic Interest on such bonds may be taxed @10% without any limit.
(k)   CSR spend in setting up rural schools and health centers may be made tax deductible at 125% of the amount spend. The operating and maintenance expenses on such schools and health centers may also be made tax deductible.
(l)    25% capital subsidy may be provided to agri produce processing units set up in the rural areas, provided the farmers who would supply agri produce for processing to such industrial unit form a cooperative society; and such cooperative society is allotted 25% equity in such unit free of cost. Gram Sabha land may be leased to such industrial units at nominal rent.
(m)  The government may make a solemn promise that the effective rate of direct taxation for any assessee shall not rise for next 3yrs

Wednesday, August 7, 2019

Keeping it simple



Some food for thought
"When my cats aren't happy, I'm not happy. Not because I care about their mood but because I know they're just sitting there thinking up ways to get even."
—Percy Bysshe Shelley (English Poet, 1792-1822)
Word for the day
Intellection
The action or process of understanding; the exercise of the intellect; reasoning.
 
First thought this morning
Home Minister Shri Amit Shah made an emphatic speech in the Parliament in support of government's decision to change the constitutional status of the state of Jammu & Kashmir. It sure is a historic and very brave step. The government, especially the prime minister and the home minister must be commended for this unconditionally.
I am sure with this determination, the government will be able to execute this decision as planned paving the way for overall development and growth the region.
The reply of the home minister to the debate in Rajya Sabha highlighted two things - (a) Article 370 and 35A of the constitution were temporary and transient provisions and have outlived their purpose; and (b) depriving the state of J&K from investment by outsiders has resulted in grave injustice to the state.
I mostly agree with him, and request the following:
(a)   Article 341 provided that after 15yr of implementation of the Constitution, he official language of the Union shall be Hindi in Devanagari script The form of numerals to be used for the official purposes of the Union shall be the international form of Indian numerals. We all know that this could not be achieved in spirit, even though In 1976, Official Language Rules were framed under the provisions of section 8(1) of the Official Languages Act, 1963. The government at least should ensure that the Supreme Court allows the cases to be filed and heard in Hindi.
(b)   There are number of other states that restrict or prohibit investment in property by people not domiciled in the respective states in pursuance of various provisions of Article 371. Many of these states are presently ruled by BJP, e.g., Himachal Pradesh, Uttrakhand, Arunachal Pradesh, Goa etc. It needs to be examined whether the people of these states are also being deprived because of these provisions.
(c)    Indians visiting the States of Nagaland, Mizoram and Arunchal Pradesh require to take permit from respective states. The government may consider reviewing these provisions also.
Chart of the day

Keeping it simple
It was summer of 2014. The citizen of the country had just elected a new government with overwhelming mandate. The general mood in Mumbai, the financial capital of the country, was ebullient. It reminded me of the following lines of famous Hindi poet Baba Nagarjuna:
"कई दिनों तक चूल्हा रोया, चक्की रही उदास
कई दिनों तक कानी कुतिया सोई उनके पास

कई दिनों तक लगी भीत पर छिपकलियों की गश्त

कई दिनों तक चूहों की भी हालत रही शिकस्त।


दाने आए घर के अंदर कई दिनों के बाद
धुआँ उठा आँगन से ऊपर कई दिनों के बाद

चमक उठी घर भर की आँखें कई दिनों के बाद

कौए ने खुजलाई पाँखें कई दिनों के बाद।"
In this hope filled environment, I happen to meet CEO and CIO of a large asset management company, managing funds of about rupees one trillion. The CEO asked me how do I see Indian equity markets and where would I be investing my money?
From their public statements I knew that both of them were very bullish about public sector banks (PSBs) and had huge overweight in most of their schemes. I plainly told the guys, "I have not yet decided yet where to put my money, but I am very sure where not to put my money, and that is the funds managed by your AMC".
Not expecting such a direct reply, both were stunned and immediately exclaimed "why?"
I explained my rather simple logic to them as follows:
"One of the reasons for businesses and markets not doing well is the hugely stressed corporate balance sheets. Till the time these balance sheets are deleveraged and destressed, the wheels of the economy could not be put into motion.
Destressing the corporate balance sheets may inter alia involve one or more of the following:
(i)    Writing off existing equity and         Infusion of further equity by existing equity owners;
(ii)   Conversion of debt into equity by lenders;
(iii)  Writing off debt in full or part;
(iv)   Sale of assets and repayment of lenders;
(v)    Nationalization of firms.
Historically PSBs have always played a major role in destressing exercise by taking over a large part of the stress through loan write off, loan conversion into equity and/or asset take over. So this time also there is a significant probability that PSBs will be made to swallow the bitter pill to put the wheels of economy in motion, i.e., take over most of the stress from corporate balance sheets so that corporate may begin to borrow again.
This essentially means that PSBs and some private corporate lenders cannot do well, if the economy and market has to do well."
Nifty PSU Bank rose further 10% from ~4000 to 4400 in the next following 8 months (January 2015), before correcting 55% to ~1900 level in subsequent 12months (February 2016).
Last week, I heard the same couple, and a few more, voicing serious concerns about the future of PSBs and advising major underweight on state lenders. I feel it is time to be overweight on PSBs, again for the simple logic.
Corporate balance sheets have been destressed materially in past 5years. We hear new cases of stressed emerging every day. But these are regular cases which are part and parcel of banking business. Whatever latest cases of stress we are aware of may not account for 2qtr equivalent of profits of banking sector.
PSBs have obviously consumed the bitter pill. The wheels of the economy shall put in motion as the government begins its massive infrastructure building drive, besides affording material cash in the hands of consumers. A material rate cut may just be the catalyst consumers are waiting to begin spending.
Recapitalized and cleaned up PSBs would be at front foot in financing the investment and consumption growth as the rivals (NBFC and MFs) have been cut to size. Any recovery from stressed assets acquired during cleanup process would just be a bonus.
Important to note that unlike the 1990s credit cycle, PSBs have materially strengthened their systems and processes, rationalized their costs, attained a fair degree of autonomy (freedom from undue political pressure), improved their business model and enhanced their understanding of business dynamics in the process of learning from latest debacle.

To me, the top 4-5 PSBs offer best trading opportunity for next 2years. But remember, there could be some pain before any big gain accrues. And for god sake, please do not drag me into technical jargon like capital dilution, significant watch list, NBFC stress, IBC delays etc. I am not interested in bothering about these small chips in the big picture.