Showing posts with label India markets. Show all posts
Showing posts with label India markets. Show all posts

Friday, May 12, 2023

Some notable research snippets of the week

Indian IT: Precariously Placed (Jefferies Research)

An unexpected decline in revenues: During 4QFY23, aggregate revenues for Top-5 IT firms declined by 0.8% QoQcc - first QoQ decline in 11 quarters - the key disappointment. While revenues in 4Q were especially impacted by sequential decline in Communication and Tech verticals, growth across verticals moderated sequentially. In local currency terms, Americas and Europe both witnessed de-growth, indicating weakness in both regions. Aggregate growth for mid-sized firms was a bit better than large IT firms though they all disappointed in 4Q. TCS and Coforge disappointed the least while Infosys' reported the weakest results.

... derails margin recovery: Aggregate margins for our coverage universe contracted by 20bps QoQ and were 40bps below our expectation, mainly due to revenue miss. Employee cost (-120bps) weighed on margins due to muted growth, while Subcontracting costs (+50bps) and others overheads (+40bps) supported margins. Margin contraction was due to a 40bps compression in margins for large sized firms, partly offset by 100bps margin expansion for mid-sized firms. All large IT firms disappointed on margins, with TechM and Infosys being the weakest. LTIM drove aggregate margin expansion for mid-sized firms.

Intensifying pain in the sector: IT firms continued with cautious commentary on demand environment, highlighting a cut in discretionary IT spends. While bookings were supported by cost takeout and efficiency deals, revenue growth is being impacted by project deferrals, delayed ramp-ups and project cancellations. While Europe seems to be holding better than muted expectations, the worsening sentiment in America (~60% of aggregate revenues) was the key negative. Furthermore, IT firms have turned more cautious on the pricing environment.

Among verticals, IT firms highlighted weakness in Communication, Tech, BFSI, Retail and Mfg verticals.

Slower growth remains a risk: Aggregate headcount for IT firms declined by 8k in 4Q – the second straight quarter of decline - similar to the decline seen in 2020 during Covid. Declining headcount along with a pricing outlook suggests sharp moderation in FY24 - also evident from the FY24 revenue growth guidance given by Infosys/HCL Tech/LTIM. Additionally, IT firms expect a soft 1H, also evident from Wipro's guidance for 1QFY24 of -3 to -1% QoQcc.

A weak exit and a soft 1H implies a tougher ask for 2HFY24, which would necessitate large deal wins/ramp-ups - the absence of which could drive disappointments to consensus US$ revenue growth expectations of 7% in FY24. Our aggregate FY24 revenue growth is 110bps below consensus.

Stay Selective: A weak 4Q and heightened caution led to a 1-6% cut in FY24/25 consensus EPS estimates. The back-ended growth implies further risks to consensus estimates, which could drive further derating. Our FY24/25 EPS estimates are 1-11% below consensus and with the sector still trading at 8% premium to its 10-yr average and 13% premium to Nifty, we remain selective 

Three make-or-break crises impacting the US (ING Bank)

There is a thread running between the three crises being felt in the US right now. The inflation crisis was borne from the pandemic, a politically toxic one. The looming debt ceiling crisis stems from politicking that is more aggravated than ever. And the third crisis is a banking one, in part brought on by a Fed reacting to the inflation crisis. Where now?

Banking crisis development as measured by the Regional Bank Index and FRA / OIS – risky but tolerable

There are a number of indicators that we can track to help assess where we are and where we are likely to get to. Let’s start with the banking story, and the small and regional bank stress on deposits in particular. Here the US Regional Bank Index tracks sentiment. It was at 120 a couple of months back. It’s now at 80. In the rear view mirror the pandemic took it down to 60. Before that, the Great Financial Crisis saw it dip to 40. That’s the potential doom leap, from 80 to 40 ahead. The question is, will it?

So far the answer is probably not. We look here at the 3mth FRA / OIS spread for guidance. It essentially measures the premium that banks impliedly need to pay over risk free rates in forward space. Currently the 3mth FRA / OIS spread is at about 40bp. It spiked to 60bp when Silicon Valley Bank went down. Having journeyed back down to the low 20’s bp, the crescendo in the First Republic story saw it re-edge higher. As the Great Financial Crisis broke some 15 year ago the FRA/OIS spread quickly got up to 70bp, and then gapped to over 150bp.

We’re nowhere near that. The simple reference of neutrality would be the 20’s bp. We are practically double this right now. Troubling, but not discounting a collapse of the system or anything like that.

Inflation crisis resolution as measure by market breakeven inflation rates – reasonably optimistic

The genesis of bank stresses in part reflects the switch in the stance of Fed policy to tightening on mounting inflation concern. Such concern has eased but has not gone away – latest core PCE readings still identify the US as a “5% inflation” economy.

But there is some good news coming from market inflation break-evens, as derived from the difference between conventional Treasury yields and real yields on inflation protected securities. These inflation break-evens not only have 2% handles right along the curve, but moreover are far closer to a big figure 2% than 3%.

In fact, the 2yr breakeven has just this week dipped below 2%. If that’s what gets delivered, the Fed’s hiking job is done and dusted, and indeed the ground is laid to rationalise future cuts. While interest rate cuts likely coincide with higher consumer delinquencies and corporate defaults, and there is a feedback loop to the stresses in the banking system, where pressure in the commercial real estate sector remains under immediate scrutiny. This would become further acute should these inflation expectations not be realised, making in more difficult for the Fed to execute those cushioning cuts.

Debt ceiling crisis as measure by US sovereign Credit Default Swaps – Concerning but fixable

And as we navigate this course, we face into a debt ceiling dilemma laced with political menace that is so intense as to risk a default. Just one missed interest rate payment would imply a default. Market concern on this front is quite elevated, with 5yr Credit Default Swaps now in the 75bp area. This is the highest since the Great Financial Crisis, and is at the widest spread over core eurozone, ever. While there is no cross default in Treasuries, where one defaulted bond pulls the rest into a defaulted state, there would still be a material tarnishing of the Treasury product even if just one interest payment were missed.

Many players would not want to take on the risk of having a defaulted bond on  their books, and the collateral value of Treasuries would come under scrutiny. One default should not take down the system if holders are immediately made whole through a swift resolution of the debt ceiling. But at this same time things could unravel quite quickly and uncontrollably. In essence the entire global financial system is at threat. Note though that while US CDS is indeed elevated, it’s also far from discounting an actual default, it’s just playing the (mild) probability of default.

India strategy: Improved macro, unchanged micro (Kotak Securities)

The market has lapped up the recent improvement in India’s macro—(1) peaking interest rates and (2) better external position (BoP). We hope that the improved macro percolates into better micro over the next few months. 4QFY23 results and management commentary underscored subdued domestic demand in consumption and weak global demand in the outsourcing (IT) sectors. We expect a gradual recovery in domestic consumption over the next 2-4 quarters. Valuations are at risk without a quick recovery.

Improving outlook on global inflation, but muted growth outlook: The global inflation outlook has improved in recent months, as a result of monetary tightening across major DMs, although core inflation has stayed high (see Exhibits 1-2). The progress on inflation has allowed the US Fed to pause its rate hike cycle, but bond markets are pricing in cuts after a brief pause.

We believe the growth outlook may weaken as DM central banks will likely keep rates at peak levels for an extended period of time. Economic conditions are still fairly strong in most DMs.

India’s macroeconomic outlook has improved: India’s macroeconomic outlook has improved with (1) peaking inflation and comfortable inflation trajectory and (2) an improving external sector outlook.

The country’s interest rates may have peaked in the current cycle, which may address concerns about the negative impact of higher interest rates on housing demand. The RBI had already paused its rate hike cycle at its April meeting on expectations of moderation in inflation.

Micro outlook remains muted: Domestic micro remains subdued, with 4QFY23 earnings slightly ahead of our muted expectations. The beat is largely because of lower-than-expected tax rate in the case of RIL. In fact, both consumer and IT companies reported weak results.

We note continued weakness across most consumption categories in 4QFY23), although lending remained robust. Outsourcing companies were impacted by a weak global demand environment.

We expect moderate earnings growth over FY2024-25 (see Exhibit 13), with low scope for earnings upgrades across sectors. We would not rule out earnings downgrades in the consumer discretionary space, as the underlying factors for the current spell of weak demand may sustain for another 2-3 quarters.

‘Rich’ valuations of ‘growth’ stocks may result in further de-rating: The Indian market is trading at reasonable valuations compared with recent history and bond yields after lackluster returns over the past 18-20 months. However, most ‘growth’ stocks, especially in the consumption, investment and outsourcing space, are trading at expensive valuations, despite increasing near-term demand issues and medium-term risks of disruption. Financials remain reasonably valued and appear attractive in the context of a likely healthy credit cycle over the next 1-2 years.

India: Credit offtake remains robust in April’23

Credit offtake rose by 15.9% year on year (y-o-y) for the fortnight ending April 21, 2023. In absolute terms, credit offtake expanded by Rs.19 lakh crore to Rs.138.6 lakh as of April 21, 2023. The growth has continued to be driven by personal loans, NBFCs, and higher working capital requirements.

      Deposit witnessed a slower growth at 10.2% y-o-y compared to credit for the fortnight ended April 21, 2023. The short-term Weighted Average Call Rate (WACR) has reached 6.70% (as of April 28, 2023) from 3.63% as of April 29, 2022, due to a rise in policy rates and lower liquidity in the system.

      The Credit to Deposit (CD) Ratio as of April 21, 2023, rose sequentially to 75.7% from 75.0% in the previous fortnight due to incremental credit offtake at Rs 0.1 lakh crore compared to a fall in incremental deposit at Rs 1.4 lakh crore.

India Steel: Healthy spreads despite recent price cut (ICICI Securities)

Major steel companies have pruned their HRC list price by Rs2,000-3,000/te in order to restore the parity wrt imports. Traders were anticipating a price cut in May23’ over the last few weeks, resulting in domestic HRC price progressively reducing by Rs1,000/te in the month of Apr23’. HRC export price from India was down sharply by US$40/te last week, tracking China’s FOB price. Spot HRC spread, however, continues to remain healthy. Factoring in the latest price cut, it is still at Rs33,000/te (Q4FY23: 26,375/te). Hence, we expect profitability of steel companies to improve in Q2FY24.

In China, the focus is shifting from demand revival to possible production cuts in H2CY23 which might undermine global iron ore prices further, but may lead to lower exports. That said, in their respective Q1CY23 result commentaries, global players have indicated an improving demand environment with higher margins in Q2CY23. We maintain our positive outlook on ferrous space led by higher spot spreads; we would keep a close tab on exports from China.

India Chemical: Export witnessing revival, demand stability maintained (SMIFS)

Our chemical channel checks suggest that pickup of demand is gathering with most factories operating at 60-65% utilization up from 35% and expect it to gather pace because supply channel inventory is minimum & demand is witnessing uptick. Majority of commodity chemical prices are witnessing a rebound from the bottom on anticipation of strong demand in the coming months.

Despite global headwinds, India remains on a strong footing in chemicals led by increasing interest of global companies to source from India to de-risk their supply chain, increasing share of speciality chemicals in overall product mix and robust capex aligned by chemical companies to capture future growth. For Indian chemical companies, the coming quarter i.e Q4FY23 is witnessing improvement in margins sequentially owing to rebound in exports volumes and domestic demand firming up. The full recovery in margins should be visible in Q1FY24.

Pharma segment is witnessing rebound in demand & correction of major API prices seems to be over. Agrochemicals demand is steady owing to higher crop prices, though high channel inventory could impact sales in the near term. Shipping rates and container availability have reached pre covid levels. Currently, crude oil prices are trading in a narrow band which will provide stability in downstream chemical prices of basic chemicals which will aide margins in the coming quarters. Valuations of most chemical companies seems reasonable factoring in largely the pain gone by & seems ripe for bottom fishing opportunities for those investors who wish to play on the recovery cycle going ahead. The cautious approach in chemicals is the impact of the global slowdown amid lingering recession worries which remains a watchful factor.

India Building Materials: A stampede to paint the town? (Investec)

Building material proxies have sought to widen Total Addressable Market (TAM) citing variety of reasons. We highlight moat for each category is different and often beyond demand push vs. brand pull. Bundling, store economics and business to applicator to take centre stage going forward and only few winners to emerge. Our new trademark / ROC database highlights more entrants into attractive paints category and concur with house view on increasing competitive intensity here.

Chasing TAM – push or pull: BM names have sought to widen TAM by venturing into multiple categories and have cited rationale of a) growth optionality, b) channel synergies, c) connect with influencers, d) connect with applicators, e) better capital deployment (vs higher pay-outs) and e) incremental RoCE. Based on our checks with channel/ influencers, the mantra is simple, brand pull works where products are visible post installation (faucetware, paints, even tanks); if not, applicator/ store economics (bundling) dictate push. We cite companies with healthy B/S have resorted to cash burn or chase volumes at cost of quality, not the best proposition.

TAM isn’t enough, need enablers to execute same: While cumulative TAM for BM categories (paints, construction chemicals, adhesives, consumer durables, bathware, ceramics, plumbing, wood+) is at $30b+ and headline growth rates/economics attractive, we find underlying enablers often lagging. For e.g., we cite ceramic plays who forayed into bathware ~7-8years back, and despite strong brand/distribution have achieved little (<Rs3b revenues p.a.).

We cite multiple reasons for disappointment in above case: a) Applicator: mason doesn’t fix a faucet, it’s a plumber (i.e., mason isn’t a plumber and DIY is still some time away), b) Ceramics is a dead product vs. faucet, a live product. Hence, after-sales is key, c) Channel’s willingness to cross-sell: Despite bathware potentially offering better margins and return ratios, selling bathware implies more hassle (vs. ceramics), given after-sales and number of parts.

Trademark/ROC checks: Based on our new proprietary database, we find several new players ready to foray into paints as a category, which is large attractive segment with incrementally high competitive intensity. We find Pidilite (brand: Haisha), Adani (into TiO2), Hyderabad Industries (HIL IN, NR), Wonder Cement as potential entrants, besides, known ones like Grasim.

Few winners: Several coverage plays have ventured into the paints category, and we expect only a few to thrive.

Wednesday, March 31, 2021

FY21 in retrospect


After FY09, the current financial year (FY21) has been the most eventful year in most respects – social, economic, financial, ecological, science, and geopolitical.

Socio-economic disaster: The spread of SARS-CoV-2 (Covid-19) virus that started sometime in last quarter of 2019 was declared a global pandemic in March 2020. The pandemic engulfed the entire world in no time, causing tremendous loss to human life and global economy. The mobility of people was restricted in most countries substantially. The economic activities were also curtailed only to the “essential” activities. Consequently, the global economy faced a technical global recession as most major economies recorded negative growth during 1HFY21.

The pandemic this had disastrous socio-economic consequences. Millions of jobs were lost and workers displaced; smaller businesses which could not bear the cost of lockdown faced closure or were further scaled down; loss of lives traumatized families; and millions of poor children who could not afford cost technology access were rendered out of schools. The inequalities rose sharply, further widening the social, economic and technology divide that has been hindering the global growth since the global financial crisis (GFC, 2008-09). It is estimated that millions of families across Latin America, Eastern Europe, Asia, Africa, and Indian subcontinent, that were brought out of poverty in past couple of decades face the specter of slipping back into the abyss.

Financial profligacy of gargantuan proportion: The pandemic and consequent economic lockdowns evoked unprecedented response from governments and central bankers across the world. The amount of fiscal and monetary stimulus created is unprecedented; even much higher than the quantitative easing done post GFC. This has certainly put question marks over sustainability of global debt (over $15trn still yielding negative return); ability of governments to support the poverty alleviation efforts.

Ecological awareness: One of the positive outcomes of the pandemic has been the rise in awareness about the ecological conservation. The partial lockdown of commercial activities demonstrated how the mother nature could heal itself within few weeks. The urban population which was moving away from the nature was reconnected with roots. This awareness may certainly accelerate the execution of global climate change action plans, saving the planet from imminent disaster.

Scientific advancement: The pandemic prompted a vaccine development program at unprecedented scale and speed. The scientists world over worked to develop an effective vaccine for the SARS-CoV-2 infection in no time. Never in the human history an effective antidote to a potent virus has been developed at such alarming speed. It is estimated that in next 3-5years the entire global population could be inoculated against this virus. The experience gained in development and administration of Covid-19 vaccine may be extremely useful in fast tracking the efforts for development of vaccines for other major infections like HIV and H1N1 etc. It shall also help in eradicating or controlling many deadly diseases in African continent, thus bringing the most endowed and most poor continent in the global economic mainstream.

Trade and Geopolitical tension: An intense trade war between the two major trade partners, viz., USA and China, had started couple of years ago. Besides, trade tensions were also rising between China-Japan, India and China and US and EU. The conspiracy theories behind origination of SARS-CoV-2 virus from Wuhan province of China, further deteriorated the trade conflicts into geopolitical tension. Some major economies and global corporations decided to reduce their dependence on imports from China; and use of Chinese technological firm’s services and equipment. India and China also had a material buildup at Northern borders. China intensified the efforts to build strategic block with allies like Iran, Sri Lanka, Pakistan, North Korea etc. These developments shall have a far reaching impact on the global economic and geopolitical situation. The full impact of this may be known in next decade or so only.

Indian markets

The initial reaction of Indian markets to the pandemic was that of panic. The prices of equities and bonds crashed precipitously. The panic however subsided soon as the government took some strong measures to control the spread and mitigate the damage due to economic slowdown. The FY21 journey of Indian markets could be summarized as follows:

Nifty rallied hard, catching the participants by surprise

Nifty is ending FY21 (all Nifty data till 29 March 2021) about 20% higher than its December 2019 closing level. Nifty rallied hard in October –December 2020 quarter as the unlock exercise started and earnings upgrade cycle kicked in. By November 2020 all Covid-19 related losses were erased.

The strong market rally in fact caught many participants by surprise as the divergences from the real economy became too evident. The rally was apparently supported by the fact that the large organized players have not only survived the lockdown well but gained material market share from the smaller unorganized players. Multiple stimulus packages announced by the government and consequent abundant liquidity also have helped the rally.

The rally however appears to have tired in 4QFY21, for lack of triggers.



India top performer FY21, but 2021 YTD underperforming

India with over 75% (Nifty TRI) gains is the second best market (after South Korea 78%) amongst all global major markets. It outperformed peers like Brazil (21%), China (25%), and Indonesia (40%); and developed markets like UK (21%), US (48%), France (37%) and Europe (36%), .

The momentum however has slowed down considerably in 4QFY21. In the current quarter, India (up 4%) is sharply underperforming US (8%), Japan (7%). Germany (8%). Even though it is still outperforming its emerging market peers like Brazil, China, Indonesia etc.



Consumption lags, cyclicals, IT & Pharma shine, smallcap outperform; FPIs’ big buyer

Metals, IT, Auto, Realty and Pharma have been the top performing sectors in FY21. Consumers have underperformed massively. Financials performed in line with the benchmark indices.

Broader markets (small and midcaps) and Alpha strategies sharply outperformed the benchmark indices. The market breadth has been mostly good (8 out of 12 months).

Net institutional flows were not great (less than $9trn) considering the abundance of liquidity and lower rates. FPIs though poured over $27bn in secondary equity market alone.

 




Gold disappointed; broader markets underperform on 3yr basis

Despite the huge rally in benchmark indices and broader markets, the household investors continue to be disappointed. One of their favorite asset class ‘gold” has underperformed majorly. Intuitively, gold ought to have done well in a crisis marred year. Gold ETFs have returned almost nothing in FY21 and are down over 10% in the current quarter.

Mid and small cap stocks have given superlative return in FY21. However, if we account for the massive underperformance of preceding two financial years, the performance of broader markets continues to remain below par.



Debt market jittery about large borrowing program

The government has managed the FY21 borrowing program well without any noticeable damage to bond markets or private credit. The bond market returns for FY21 have therefore been more than decent. However, in past 3months, rising global yields and huge Rs12trn borrowing for FY22 has kept the debt market on the tenterhook. A steeper yield curve due to abundant liquidity and RBI’s efforts has further queered the pitch for bond investors.

The Reserve Bank of India managed the markets well. It avoided direct monetisation of government borrowings and supported the government borrowing by all means available to it. At end of the day, RBI may close FY21 with a ballooned balance sheet equal to the size of 30% of GDP.



INR recovers from panic fall, stable around Rs73/USD

On announcement of lockdown, INR had a panic fall upto RS78/USD. It however recovered the entire lost ground within 5 months, and has been mostly stable around Rs73/USD in 2HFY21.


Macro conditions remain challenging due to quasi stagflation

India’s macro conditions remain challenging despite the complete recovery from recession. Pre pandemic, Indian economy was growing at the long term rate of ~6% (5yr rolling CAGR). Due to collapse of growth in FY21 (-8%), the trajectory has slipped to ~4%. Recovering back to even subpar ~6% trajectory may take upto 5 years (FY26). Considering that India’s demographic needs require consistent 8-9% growth, led by high job creating construction and manufacturing sectors, the growth challenges may not abate anytime soon.

To make the matter worse, the inflation has become sticky and persisting close to upper bound of RBI’s tolerance range. Though RBI has made it abundantly clear that Indian economy cannot tolerate rise in interest rates at this point in time, any further easing of policy rates is virtually ruled out.

Quasi stagflation (for lack of a better term), has therefore emerged as a major policy challenge in FY21.



 

Conclusion

To sum up, FY21 had been a challenging year. It has dented the core of global as well Indian economy. The markets have come out from it mostly unscathed. It would be interesting to see how FY22 unfolds. I will share my investment strategy for FY22 tomorrow.