Do it yourself

Over the past few weeks, Indian financial markets have begun to show unmistakable signs of stress. While the benchmark indices such as the Nifty and Sensex have largely managed to hold their ground, the underlying market tone tells a very different story. A significant number of small- and mid-cap stocks have undergone sharp price corrections, exposing the fragility beneath what still appears, on the surface, to be a resilient market. This divergence between benchmark indices and broader market performance is often an early signal of rising investor discomfort. And this time, the discomfort has morphed into something closer to panic. The anatomy of the current panic The most pronounced damage has been in momentum-driven stocks, many of which were heavily owned by non-institutional investors. As liquidity dried up, these stocks witnessed not just steep price declines but also an absence of buyers, exacerbating the fall. This is a familiar pattern: assets that rise rapidly on optimism an...

Several readers have commented on my yesterday’s post (“USD, Gold, Crypto and a mountain of $38trn debt”). Some agree that the “debt manipulation” theory was far-fetched, others argued that I was underplaying the seriousness of America’s fiscal overhang. Both reactions are valid. My intent, however, was not to trivialize the US debt issue, but to put it in its proper context — and to focus attention on the much larger transitions now underway in the global financial order. I would like to elaborate to convey my point in the right perspective. The Debt Problem Is Real — but Not New The US federal debt now stands around $38 trillion, or roughly 120% of GDP. That sounds alarming, but the ratio has hovered near that level for over a decade. The composition, though, has changed dramatically. After the dotcom bust, debt piled up in corporate and household balance sheets. After Lehman, it migrated to banks. Post-Covid, it has firmly shifted to the sovereign. In essence, the debt hasn’t disapp...

Myth of free market A fundamental principle of economics is that “in a ‘free market’ current price of anything having an economic value is a function of demand and supply of such things at that particular point in time.” Of course, there could be multiple factors that may impact the demand and supply of a thing; but usually nothing impacts the “price” directly other than the forces of demand and supply. In a ‘controlled and/or manipulated market’ the prices of things are fixed by the controlling authorities (or forces); regardless of the demand and supply for such things. In such markets, usually demand and supply of things are controlled and/or manipulated; or demand and supply duly get adjusted to the fixed/manipulated prices. In the modern world, money is arguably the largest factor of production in the world. The price of money (interest rate) should ideally be a function of demand and supply of money. In case of excess supply, the interest rates should be lower and vice vers...

Ending the weeks of intense speculation, anticipation and debate last night, the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) of the US Federal Reserve started the latest monetary easing cycle with a 50bps fund rate cut. The Fed fund rate range now stands at 4.75-5.00% This is the first Fed rate cut since March 2020 and has come after a fourteen months policy pause. No panic in the boardroom Unlike the previous two rate cycles that started with a rather aggressive 50bps rate cut – first October 2008 post the Lehman collapse and second March 2020 post Covid-19 break out – this cut is apparently not a panic cut. The Fed chairman sounded confident about growth and employment level. He emphasized that the central bank is not in a hurry to ease policy, as he sees no likelihood of an elevated downturn in the economy. He mentioned, “There’s nothing in the SEP (Summary of Economic Projections) that suggests the committee is in a rush to get this done.” The Chairman categorically advised the ma...

The US Federal Reserve (Fed) Chairman Jerome Powell has provided the much-anticipated fuel to the US markets, which appeared running out of fuel after a shocking job revision. Speaking at the annual Jackson Hole symposium, he unambiguously hinted that “The time has come for policy to adjust” as “inflation has declined significantly. The labor market is no longer overheated, and conditions are now less tight than those that prevailed before the pandemic”. Though he qualified his remarks by adding, “the timing and pace of rate cuts will depend on incoming data, the evolving outlook and the balance of risks”. These comments read with the minutes of the last meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) provide adequate ground to believe that— (i)       The current rate cycle has peaked out; and the next policy move will be a rate cut. (ii)      The policymakers are confident the spike in inflation that occurred in the aftermath of Co...

(Note: I had last shared my investment outlook and strategy for the financial year FY25 in April 2024. Since then, there have been some changes in circumstances. The global financial system is more stable. Stock markets have done very well. The geopolitical conditions are more stable; and the price situation appears to be in control at both domestic and international levels. The domestic growth continues to surprise on the upside and the external balance is much more stable. The political overhang in the domestic market is over with the general elections. To accommodate these changes, I have made some changes in my outlook and strategy as outlined in April 2024.) In my view, the stock market outlook in India, in the short term, is a function of the following seven factors: (1)        Macroeconomic environment (2)        Global markets and flows (3)        Technical positionin...

  I have often seen that when we fail to find solutions to our problems with the help of science and economics, we tend to look towards the heavens and seek to find answers in philosophy. It is not uncommon for businesses, administrators, and policymakers to seek divine intervention when science and economics are not helping to resolve a problem. The global policymakers and administrators seem to have reached such a crossroads one more time, where the conventional practices, accumulated knowledge, and past experiences do not appear to be of much help. Their actions appear driven more by hope than conviction. The war in Ukraine; the economic slowdown in China; and the monetary policy dilemma in the US and India are some examples of problems where the administrators and policymakers seem to be hoping for divine intervention. I see the recent speech of the US Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell at the Jackson Hole symposium and the minutes of the last meeting of the monetary poli...

The present narrative in the global market is definitely not comforting. In the developed western economies, in particular, even the investors who took the classical moderate approach to asset allocation, e.g.,“100-age” (percent allocation to risk asset 100-investors’ age and the balance to fixed income) or “60:40” (60% risk assets and 40% fixed income for working people and vice versa for retirees) have witnessed material losses as both risk assets (equities, crypto, etc.) and fixed income (Bonds, REITS, etc.) have witnessed sharp correction. Reportedly, 60:40 Portfolio of US stocks and Bonds is down 21.6% in YTD2022, the worst performance since 1931. In India also, most balanced funds (funds that invest in a mix of equity and bonds) have yielded marginally positive or negative return YTD2022. From whatever is happening around the world; and whatever is being prophesied about the future, at least the following five things are reasonably clear to me– (i)    The econo...