Friday, August 30, 2019

The idiosyncrasies of our growth model plague SDGs



A prima facie look at the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and the programs and schemes announced/implemented so far by the government to achieve the SDGs (see here), and the performance of various state governments in achievement of these goals highlights some interesting points. For example, consider this—
(a)   The 58 centrally sponsored schemes assigned to meeting of SDGs are apparently classified into three categories (i) Core Schemes (ii) Core of Core Schemes and (iii) other schemes. Almost all the Core and Core of the Core schemes are old and in operation since prior to the India committing itself to the SGDs in 2015. Some of these schemes like Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan, Mid Day Meals and PMGSY are more than 20yr old. MNREGA classified as Core of the Core itself is more than 10yr old.
(b)   All government since the Vajpayee led NDA-1 government, have made related interventions through targeted programs at regular intervals. Many of these interventions have yielded commendable results.
(c)    Apparently, there are only a couple of core schemes that have been devised and implemented after committing to the SDGs in 2015. In that sense, our performance is limited to reclassifying and some further strengthening of the existing schemes. In that sense, the commitment to SDGs has failed in enforcing a fresh look at the entire growth paradigm that has been popularly believed and acknowledged to be inadequate and lacking in many critical aspects.
The idiosyncrasies of our growth model like adhocism, lack of cohesiveness, and incongruence continue to remain plague the planning process. In fact there are many instances of programs supposed to be devised to achieve SDGs, disregard the sustainability concerns. The best example of such a program is widening of roads connecting important pilgrimage centers in the state of Uttrakhand.
(d)   There is a huge gap in performance of various states insofar as meeting the development targets set under SDGs are concerned is concerned. Southern states, especially Kerala is far ahead of most other states. Eastern, North Eastern and Central States lag far behind. Western States have been performing well in recent years.


Thursday, August 29, 2019

Good intentions won't suffice. Execution needed too.

In the year 2015, the global leaders committed to an ambitious agenda of attaining the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) by the year 2030. SDGs aim to improve economic, environmental and social aspects of the wellbeing of various societies. SDGs include 17 goals, 169 targets and 306 national indicators.
Being the host to the second largest pool of population, India played a prominent role in the formulation of SDGs. Having committed to the SDGs, it is incumbent upon the government, both national and state, that the national development agenda is congruent with these Goals.
While a majority of goals focus on making perceptible impact on the quality of life of underprivileged, sustainable economic development is the key underlying theme. It is incumbent upon the signatories to the charter of SGDs to ensure "decent employment and economic growth", development of "industry, innovation and infrastructure", development of "sustainable cities and communities" and promoting "responsible consumption and production".
Most of the policies, programs and legislative changes made by our governments (center and state) could be seen the context of SDGs. Move towards Universal Basic Income, Food security, Ayushman Bharat and Jan Aushdhi, New Education Policy & Establishing Centers of Excellence, statutory and procedural changes for gender equality, Jal Shakti, Focus on renewable energy, Smart cities etc. are few examples of the intentions to make sincere efforts in attaining the SDGs.
While we have made decent progress on showing commitment to the attainment of SGDs, and devising a multitude of plans, execution looks seriously lacking.
As per the latest data available on NITI website, only three states (Kerala, Himachal Pradesh and Tamil Nadu) and two Union territories (Chandigarh and Puducherry) have made satisfactory progress on attaining SDGs. The most populated states of UP and Bihar are at the bottom of the league with dismal performance. Incidentally the track record of most BJP ruled states is not encouraging.



More on this tomorrow.