Do it yourself

I returned to my desk after a 10-day Diwali break. As I opened my overflowing mailbox, I realized a lot might have changed in the meantime. Nifty50 is flirting with its all-time level. INR has regained some of its lost ground. Precious metal prices have cooled after a sharp upmove. There is a conspicuous thaw in the Indo-US and Sino-US relations. Prime Minister Modi, who hardly missed an opportunity to represent India at various global forums, has missed the ASEAN summit after missing the UNGA annual session, arguably to avoid a one-on-one meeting with President Trump.

However, what caught my attention was a large number of notes, reports, messages alluding to the unsustainable $38trn US government debt, and how the US government and the US Federal Reserve are conspiring to dissipate this mountain of debt by manipulating the prices of gold and cryptocurrencies (especially Bitcoins). Most messages are arguing that 2026 could be a 1933 and/or 1971 redux, when USD was devalued 69% (1933) and Richard Nixon abruptly ended Bretton Wood and turned USD into a fiat currency to sidestep a debt crisis (1971).

Several analysts(?) suspect that the US strategy is to—

(i)    Create an environment of extreme uncertainty through trade war and geopolitical volatility and coax the eastern economies to accumulate gold at an elevated price.

(ii)   Keep the USD weaker, rebuild the US manufacturing base, incentivize exports, discourage imports to minimize trade deficit and strengthen the core of the US economy.

(iii)  Gain control over blockchain economics - suppress the value of cryptocurrencies and accumulate large reserves. Today the crypto market cap is appx US$4 trn. “Experts” are estimating it to cross US$100 trn in the next 10-12 years.

(iv)  Make UST yields unattractive and gradually substitute stablecoins to devalue public debt. Manipulate the crypto prices higher and offer accumulated crypto-coins to settle the mammoth debt.

(v)   Engineer a crash in prices of precious metals, inflicting severe pain on the eastern economies, which will be facing pressure anyways due to the US export competitiveness, and thus extend the USD supremacy for many more decades.

In my view, this analysis suffers from various shortcomings. It selectively chooses historical context 1933 and 1971 while ignoring demise of Roman, Mughal, British, Mauryan empires etc. Analysts seem to have assumed central banking and electoral democracy as sicut datum est or a fait accompli, in their analysis, whereas there is evidence that the autonomy of the central banks is being politically undermined; and the present form of electoral democracy is facing challenges in several countries.

The analysis also conveniently ignores that The US (and European & Japanese) debt problem is not new, but decades old. The US has been running unsustainable debt ever since the dotcom burst. It is only after the Lehman Bros. collapse that the debt has shifted from banks and household balance sheets to the government's balance sheet. Post Covid, the inflation moved from assets to grocery. It is now coming back to assets.

I would rather file these analyses into the “conspiracy theories” folder, than take it seriously and make it a basis for any change in my investment strategy.

In my view, notwithstanding how much people may dislike grocery inflation, they love asset inflation more than anything. Most of them would vote for a rise in the nominal value of their home, jewellery, and stocks, but only a few would vote for a slower pace of rise in the grocery prices. If you take asset inflation away, the political system might collapse.

In my view, under the present circumstances, the world should be worrying about the potential collapse of the post WW2 world order, while the new order still remains a work in progress. The chaotic transition might hurt the investors much more than what they would expect to gain from a 10-20% rise or fall in gold prices, a couple of percentage points change in US treasury yields, or Dollar (DXY) Index.

I found the views of Mr. Lawrence Wong, Prime Minister of Singapore, as expressed in his recent interview with the Financial Times, most pertinent in this context. (see here)