Do it yourself

“Did you notice that no politician takes moral responsibility for any wrong these days!” In the past two months, many readers have asked about my expectations of the outcome of the ongoing general elections and the likely impact of it on the Indian economy and financial markets. I am glad to offer my opinion, with the rider that I am an independent observer of Indian politics and have no affiliation or inclination towards any particular political party or group thereof. Economic impact I believe that in India economic policies, and therefore financial markets, are politics agnostic. I do not see the outcome of general elections impacting the Indian economy in any significant manner. A study of the history of Indian politics would suggest that, unlike the Western democracies, only an abysmal minority of Indian voters are strongly committed to a political or socio-economic ideology. Contemporary issues, personalities, and election promises usually dominate the political discourse...

  Continuing from yesterday…( see here ) In the enterprise world, new ideas or innovations are usually valued much higher than the ability to execute such ideas. I believe for a successful enterprise both ideation as well as execution are equally important. The question of execution would not arise if there is no idea to execute. Similarly, an idea, howsoever innovative and brilliant it is, would remain just a thought or piece of paper unless it is executed well. Nonetheless, since the idea is the starting point of any enterprise, the innovator deserves to get a relatively higher valuation. Taking this further, in the realm of politics and governance, the two key components of good governance are: (i)     Conceiving, formulating, and instituting policies that would ensure inequitable, sustainable, and accelerated socio-economic development and growth. (ii)    Execution of instituted policies through a set of structured programs, efficient delivery m...

“Policy paralysis” of the preceding Dr Manmohan Singh led UPA government was one of the main planks of PM Modi’s election campaign in 2013-2014. The business community, middle classes, and poor, all were convinced that the UPA government suffers from a severe degree of inertia in policymaking and is therefore responsible for the poor growth of the Indian economy. It was alleged that large-scale and blatant corruption, nepotism (lack of meritocracy), and weak leadership are the primary reasons for the “policy paralysis” and poor execution. The campaign against the incumbent government was so effective that it swayed the big industrialists and SMEs which directly benefited from the government’s developmental efforts; the poor who benefited tremendously from the transformative social initiatives; and the middle classes who were protected from any potential collateral damage from the global financial crisis and events in its aftermath, against the government. In their disappointment wi...

 Three decades ago, on 24th of July, 1991, when Pallath Joseph Kurien, Minister of State for Industry in Government of India, tabled the New Industrial Policy (NIP) in the Lok Sabha, not many would have realized how big was the moment in the socio-economic history of Independent India. After six years of preparation and facing political challenges, the new policy, which sought to end the Nehruvian Socialism in the country, finally saw the light of the day. The process of economic reform was set in motion by Vishwanath Pratap Singh, the finance minister in the government of Rajiv Gandhi (1984-1987). It gained further impetus when Ajit Singh, the MIT educated, tech savvy industry minister of National Front’s government assumed the charge (1989-1990). The original draft of NIP was prepared by Amar Nath Verma (then Industry Secretary) and Mohan Rakesh (then Chief Economic Advisor to Industry Minister Ajit Singh) in 1990. The proposal to radically reform the industrial policy of Ind...

The undeniable fact is that FY21 could see most pervasive contraction in global economy in post war era. The economic impact of novel coronavirus led lockdown is deep and wide, engulfing most economies, most sectors and most people. The impact may not be evenly spread as services sector have suffered more due to restrictions on mobility; and consequently the developed economies with larger share of services in their economy have also suffered more. The economies based on commodity exports have also suffered extensive damage due to lower demand and logistic challenges. The economies based on agriculture may be the least impacted as demand and supply chain for food have been least impacted due to pandemic. If we consider the impact of pandemic from socio-economic distress view point, the poorest countries perhaps would end up suffering the most. Poor health infrastructure, cut in global development aid, sharp cut in remittances, fall in exports, etc have hit the poorest the most. T...